Author Topic: Mainstream Economics Thread  (Read 43060 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #775 on: March 12, 2025, 01:01:41 PM »
I agree that there is a lot of nuance of the Canadian trade issues. However, I substantially discount what a senator from Wisconsin has to say on dairy and almost completely disregard the US Lumber Coalition's statements on lumber tariffs.

This journal article indicates that the dairy market in Canada has been liberalized a fair bit by USMCA and trade disputes have been settled pretty well under USMCA procedures.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225000053#

Personally, I think a 14.54% tariff on lumber from Canada is enough. The Department of Commerce agreed with that last August.

Overall, if there are trade issues with Canada or Mexico, why not wait until the 2026 review of USMCA to address them?

One - Thank you for openly admitting that this is far more complex than "Don Trump bad" which is the standard screed of #blueanon

As far as "why not wait" . . . you'll have to ask Don Trump

You also did not touch the claims by the lumber association.

I appreciate how claims by our legislators are to be dismissed . . . I'll keep that in mind going down the line on this blog.





« Last Edit: March 12, 2025, 01:07:50 PM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10317
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #776 on: March 12, 2025, 02:58:40 PM »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #777 on: March 12, 2025, 03:08:06 PM »
Sandstone (you won't answer) - Is it good for a country like the United States to have strategic manufacturing off shored?

Please also provide a list of countries where what you just posted didn't work, and provide a definition of "Import Substitution and Industrialization" in your own words
« Last Edit: March 12, 2025, 09:52:25 PM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37862
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #778 on: March 12, 2025, 04:08:21 PM »
Dax thinks we're the guy in the chair but really we are the guy who owns the hotel

Not for much longer.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #779 on: March 12, 2025, 05:20:17 PM »
#blueanongE: A life of fantasy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #780 on: March 12, 2025, 05:20:36 PM »

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10317
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #781 on: March 13, 2025, 03:11:38 PM »
Talking points from Regime Media.
Wrecking the economy for no reason to prove that the Biden economy was worse than everyone thought.

https://x.com/atrupar/status/1900278048584351954

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #782 on: March 13, 2025, 04:31:29 PM »
The primary crux still remains: #blueanon/#blueanongE's abject refusal to recognize $28 trillion dollars injected into the economy in 4 years. Of which $8 trillion was money the government didn't have in hand, and another trillion was supposed to be part of a reserve fund.

All to get tepid GDP growth, cooked book job "growth",  get the "we'll know a recession when we see it" junta to not call a recession a recession, and to struggle bus through 4 years of Shroom Yellen's transitory inflation.   :thumbsup:

Edit: Forgot to mention draining the SPR in order to buy votes.








Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 87864
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #783 on: March 13, 2025, 08:57:35 PM »
Woke journalists, smh

https://x.com/cgasparino/status/1900348325687144628?s=46


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32129
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #784 on: March 13, 2025, 10:07:36 PM »
Tariff Tantrum is fun, I'm going to start using that.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10317
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #785 on: March 14, 2025, 07:16:51 AM »
Why would any business that needs to try and make decisions based on things like tax policy, tariff policy, immigration policy, any sort of policy from the federal government be expanding right now? All the artificially created uncertainty is another pointless drag on the economy.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #786 on: March 14, 2025, 09:48:39 AM »
The greatest part about this whole thing is watching the meltdowns from both the drama queens in residence and those out in the social media space.

As if this the first time a potential shift in national economic policy hasn't caused business entities to put things on pause.

Insert Jen Psaki telling pipeline builders and suppliers that they can always find other work or other customers here . . . (one example)

Cue - #blueanongE trying to tell us about oil production during the Biden years, while also completely avoiding World at War: The Biden Years - driving up oil prices, thus making oil more profitable.  Democrats: Make Big Oil - Even Bigger via war and international disorder  (also avoiding Joe's war on LNG production and exporting)







Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20429
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #787 on: March 14, 2025, 10:40:25 AM »
The greatest part about this whole thing is watching the meltdowns from both the drama queens in residence and those out in the social media space.

As if this the first time a potential shift in national economic policy hasn't caused business entities to put things on pause.

Insert Jen Psaki telling pipeline builders and suppliers that they can always find other work or other customers here . . . (one example)

Cue - #blueanongE trying to tell us about oil production during the Biden years, while also completely avoiding World at War: The Biden Years - driving up oil prices, thus making oil more profitable.  Democrats: Make Big Oil - Even Bigger via war and international disorder  (also avoiding Joe's war on LNG production and exporting)








psaki said that when the economy was kicking butt dax

context matters, even if it is hard for you to understand

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #788 on: March 14, 2025, 01:55:59 PM »
The greatest part about this whole thing is watching the meltdowns from both the drama queens in residence and those out in the social media space.

As if this the first time a potential shift in national economic policy hasn't caused business entities to put things on pause.

Insert Jen Psaki telling pipeline builders and suppliers that they can always find other work or other customers here . . . (one example)

Cue - #blueanongE trying to tell us about oil production during the Biden years, while also completely avoiding World at War: The Biden Years - driving up oil prices, thus making oil more profitable.  Democrats: Make Big Oil - Even Bigger via war and international disorder  (also avoiding Joe's war on LNG production and exporting)








psaki said that when the economy was kicking butt dax

context matters, even if it is hard for you to understand

An economy living off of $28 Trillion Dollars in Federal spending.

To get tepid GDP growth, a recession that certain people refused to call a recession, and completely cooked "job growth" numbers, all time record Federal debt, and now all time record expenses related to that Federal debt.




Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16887
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #789 on: March 14, 2025, 02:00:23 PM »
all time record federal debt

not a defense of anyone, but isn't this kind of a funny point to make when federal debt has increased every year since the beginning of time

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20429
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #790 on: March 14, 2025, 02:04:45 PM »
Anyone know which presidents the debt increased the most under?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #791 on: March 14, 2025, 02:05:49 PM »
all time record federal debt

not a defense of anyone, but isn't this kind of a funny point to make when federal debt has increased every year since the beginning of time

A record pace

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20429
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #792 on: March 14, 2025, 02:06:58 PM »
A ‘Transgender Opera’ in Colombia
On April 28, 2022, the University of the Andes in Bogotá, Colombia, put on a performance of the opera “As One.” The show, which was written in the U.S. and debuted in 2014, features a transgender protagonist.

A program for the university’s production of the opera said the show had the support of the university, the Bogotá Philharmonic Orchestra and the “Small Grants Program of the Embassy of the United States in Colombia.”

The Department of State committed $25,000 to fund the project, and the website USAspending.gov also noted that there was $22,020 of “non-federal funding” for the project, making a total of $47,020 listed on the site. The federal funding for this project also came from the State Department, not USAID.

A ‘Transgender Comic Book’ in Peru
In 2021, the U.S. Embassy in Peru introduced a comic book called “The Power of Education,” which it used to promote education and exchange programs in the U.S.

The following year, the embassy commissioned a second volume.

“The Embassy asked us to introduce a gay student in #2 to show his personal struggle coming out to his parents, but that has zero to do with being transgender,” David Campiti, who owns the company that produced the comic book, told us in an email. “The comics were about scholarships and furthering education.”

The series ended up including three comic books, each one showing an aspect of cultural exchange and education. View them here, here and here.

The second one is what was highlighted by the Trump administration as a “transgender comic book.” But volume 2 of “The Power of Education” does not include a transgender character. Rather, as Campiti said, it featured a hero who was gay.

The writer of the comic, David Lawrence, said the same thing in a post on his Facebook page on Feb. 4, explaining why the embassy had requested an LGBTQ character. “The US embassy in Peru requested that as a small response to anti gay prejudice in the country,” he wrote.

We reached out to the embassy for comment and were referred to the State Department, which did not respond to us.

Like the first volume, the second one was used to promote education and exchange programs. And, incidentally, it won two awards in 2023, including comic of the year, from a Peruvian organization called Chronicles of Diversity.

The funding for this project didn’t come from USAID, either, but, again, from the State Department.

So, funding for three of the four projects highlighted by the White House came from the State Department for funding cultural activities on behalf of various embassies.


It's all anti trans bs

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20429
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #793 on: March 14, 2025, 02:08:45 PM »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #794 on: March 14, 2025, 02:10:13 PM »
Again, it's about how the money flows to . . . I've been over this at length on this blog.

That's why #blueanon political and thought leaders are acting like infants about this.


Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20429
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #795 on: March 14, 2025, 02:11:22 PM »
And a fascist.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 58088
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #796 on: March 14, 2025, 02:13:25 PM »
And a fascist.

A tsunami of tapouts

From someone who supports a movement that demands global censorship, misapplies the application of law against self perceived political enemies, wanted people arrested and their kids taken away if they didn't get the vax,  had thought leaders openly talking about re-education camps  . . . etc etc etc

Online bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10002
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #797 on: March 14, 2025, 02:38:32 PM »
And a fascist.

A tsunami of tapouts

From someone who supports a movement that demands global censorship, misapplies the application of law against self perceived political enemies, wanted people arrested and their kids taken away if they didn't get the vax,  had thought leaders openly talking about re-education camps  . . . etc etc etc

You may want to grab a newspaper if this is a redline for you

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1098
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #798 on: March 14, 2025, 04:32:22 PM »
Anyone know which presidents the debt increased the most under?

In terms of Debt to GDP ratio, Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1098
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #799 on: March 14, 2025, 04:35:32 PM »
all time record federal debt

not a defense of anyone, but isn't this kind of a funny point to make when federal debt has increased every year since the beginning of time

There were years under Clinton where it went down.