Author Topic: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .  (Read 6736 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59715
    • View Profile
Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« on: February 09, 2011, 07:10:55 AM »
kent23

Post #38
MyFanPage
Add Buddy This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HCFM.



Posted on 2/8 11:33 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
kstate87

New walk-on to the team
Post #10
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seriously? Whats your reasoning?



Posted on 2/8 11:33 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
tlfksu

On the depth chart
Post #3068
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear God...



Posted on 2/8 11:34 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
TerryWGDDS

All-Big 12 performer
Post #8300
Wichita, KS
MyFanPage
Add Buddy That is ridiculous.** Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nm



Posted on 2/8 11:35 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
WestCoastCat

A solid starter
Post #4208
The PNW

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by kent23:
HCFM.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



JFC. Please tell me this is one of those lame fishing expeditions?



Posted on 2/8 11:36 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
WildcatTad

All-American performer
Post #11956
Overland Park, KS
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: That is ridiculous.** Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
yeah he just double his salary last year, added a 5 year contract, and now a couple of bozo's leave the team and CK lights up and he wants to fire the coach...that sounds like Currie.

I tihkn it's more likely that Currie is not goign to condone this behavior, the football program lost a corner..Byron Garvin if I remember correctly for the same thing...



Posted on 2/8 11:37 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
kst8rfan

Post #804
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Please elaborate ..... Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So it was Currie with the joint in the apartment....... Not Scarlet with the lead pipe in the study.. DAMN, I thought I had it.....



Posted on 2/8 11:37 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
kent23

Post #39
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currie didn't want to extend Frank's contract, but was forced to due to his success. There is no love lost between the two. They hate each other. The unraveling of the team makes Frank look bad. At some point, Currie might have support he needs to move Frank.



Posted on 2/8 11:39 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
AyoSaba

On full scholarship
Post #1708
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: That is ridiculous.** Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's one of the other (other) sites talking points, although they were also the ones that were sure Frank wouldn't get a contract extension last year, so they were calling for Curry's head last year, and even held up signs at games asking for Curry to be fired last year. They're goal is to be the first to state something, and have a meltdown before anything even happens so they can say they knew about it first. And honestly they remind me of certain hate groups that get together and try to outdo each other and in the process they make each other more mad and it turns into a vicious cycle where at the end they're marching and flying banners over stadiums asking for peoples heads. It's best just to ignore them, because all they want is to be validated. BTW this post will probably end up over there.



Posted on 2/8 11:40 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
rlccatfan

On the depth chart
Post #2562
KCMO
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's right. Blame it on anyone but the Guy that screwed up. Blame it on Currie, blame it on Frank, blame it on Wefald, blame it on Krause, hell blame it on Prince. But lets give Curtis a pass because we need an able body manning the post.



Posted on 2/8 11:40 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
Kaw Valley Cat

A solid starter
Post #5036
Grantville Kansas USA
MyFanPage
Add Buddy I'll play......... Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by kent23:
HCFM.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This is the second time, I have read this theory run up the flag pole.

Lets pretend,and take this bait...Very smart people float many stupid things to discredit individuals. 1. But the flaw in this little theory is it would much easier on ADJC and the university to just use HCFM's temper and demeanor to get rid of him rather than create a rumor about a current student athlete in the middle of the season. As it would be easy to disprove this "floated rumor" which could then lead to lose of career for ADJC. 2. If this deal is true, ADJC would not need to make it public to use it as ammuniation against HCFM.

So, IMO this theory fails from every angle.
This post was edited on 2/9 12:04 AM by Kaw Valley Cat



Posted on 2/8 11:49 PM | IP: Logged


 
 
brooksbunk

Almost on scholarship
Post #566
Manhattan
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i have heard the that the two do not like each other at all....



Posted on 2/8 11:53 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
bbs36

Almost on scholarship
Post #927
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Currie Conspiracy



Posted on 2/8 11:55 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
Kaw Valley Cat

A solid starter
Post #5037
Grantville Kansas USA
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by kent23:
Currie didn't want to extend Frank's contract, but was forced to due to his success. There is no love lost between the two. They hate each other. The unraveling of the team makes Frank look bad. At some point, Currie might have support he needs to move Frank.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This makes no sense at all, as this is messy and dirty. It presumes either ADJC created the rumor which is idoitic or the incident is true and ADJC leaked it. But is true he did not need to leak this in order to use it to accomplish what you speculate.

The theory fails at all levels + ADJC and UPKS are smart people. Smart people would not even try a JR HS stunt.



Posted on 2/8 11:58 PM | IP: Logged

 
 
mywillyispurple

Post #7847
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hahhahahahaha. Yep , Currie put a wig on, faked being Curtis Kelly's GF at Dillards and sold Kelly and Pullen 600 dollars worth of clothing for 100bucks. You are a complete fricking tard.



Posted on 2/9 12:05 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
kcat15

Almost on scholarship
Post #444
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by brooksbunk:
i have heard the that the two do not like each other at all....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



There is some tension. I've heard one of John's "people" openly mock Frank's mannerisms.

I've heard from someone that talks with the coaching staff that Frank feels some lack of support. On the other hand, Frank is somewhat paranoid about things like that.



Posted on 2/9 12:06 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
Kaw Valley Cat

A solid starter
Post #5041
Grantville Kansas USA
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by kcat15:




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by brooksbunk:
i have heard the that the two do not like each other at all....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




There is some tension. I've heard one of John's "people" openly mock Frank's mannerisms.

I've heard from someone that talks with the coaching staff that Frank feels some lack of support. On the other hand, Frank is somewhat paranoid about things like that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



While all the thing you say seem to be somewhat common knowlege, I would disagree that ADJC wants to get rid of HCFM just because of just they may not like each other. Just because you don't like a co-worker does not mean you can't work together or think they are bad at their job. ADJC is a very smart dude, I see nothing that tells me he is let personality diffences dictate a coaching decision. Now if things continue to go to hell, he is likely to hire someone that likes when it is his option.



Posted on 2/9 12:14 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
kent23

Post #41
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currie wouldn't create a rumor. Who orders drug tests on KSU athletes?



Posted on 2/9 12:15 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
Kaw Valley Cat

A solid starter
Post #5043
Grantville Kansas USA
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by kent23:
Currie wouldn't create a rumor. Who orders drug tests on KSU athletes?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



so now you agree you theory makes no sense?



Posted on 2/9 12:34 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
kent23

Post #42
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My original point in this thread was based upon the alleged info from other threads on this site. If Curtis has appealed a University decision, it means he has been accused of something. Supposition has led posters to believe he might have failed his third drug test. After everything that has happened to the team, it seems an unusual time for a drug test on Curtis Kelly. Unusual, unless you want to stir up more trouble for the team and its coach. Currie would like to get rid of Frank and get a coach in here that he can control.



Posted on 2/9 12:59 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
ccox

A solid starter
Post #4263
The Hoosier Hills
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Kaw Valley Cat:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by kent23:
Currie wouldn't create a rumor. Who orders drug tests on KSU athletes?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



so now you agree you theory makes no sense?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I don't have a dog in this fight, and while I DO think there is some tension between Currie and Frank (that was obvious to anyone willing to pay attention last year), I don't think Currie is trying to undermine anyone. That said, could you kindly point me to the post where kent23 said anything resembling the claim that currie created a rumor? Just because YOU (wrongly) claimed that it was one of ONLY two explanations for kent23's claim...(I see you have now edited your original post), doesn't mean you can put those words in HIS mouth.

This "Currie created a rumor" stuff was never HIS theory, it was YOUR version of his theory. The suggestion that he is now backtracking from YOUR theory is comical.



Posted on 2/9 1:00 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
kent23

Post #43
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for that great explanation! I appreciate your intellect.



Posted on 2/9 1:05 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
mywillyispurple

Post #7848
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't doubt that there's probably tension between the two from time to time, as is there's probably tension between Currie and Snyder, it's the nature of the beat. AD's are in fact the coaches boss, and boss/employees don't always get along or see eye to eye on things. But no i don't think Currie somehow fabricated some rumor about Kelly to inadvertently undercut Martin or make him look like he's losing complete control of his team. That is ludicrous to me. Also why would Currie be so obsessed about building Martin a 20 million dollar basketball facility, something Martin desperately wants if he hates him so much? This whole post is completely moronic if you ask me. And really just sad when you think about it.



Posted on 2/9 1:12 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
mywillyispurple

Post #7849
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
kent, i guess the biggest flaw in your whole conspiracy theory, is this, if this is supposedly the 3rd failed drug test for Curt this year alone, and ADJC has known about all of them,Why not pull this move on the first failure?



Posted on 2/9 1:19 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
Kaw Valley Cat

A solid starter
Post #5050
Grantville Kansas USA
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by ccox:




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by Kaw Valley Cat:




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by kent23:
Currie wouldn't create a rumor. Who orders drug tests on KSU athletes?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




so now you agree you theory makes no sense?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




I don't have a dog in this fight, and while I DO think there is some tension between Currie and Frank (that was obvious to anyone willing to pay attention last year), I don't think Currie is trying to undermine anyone. That said, could you kindly point me to the post where kent23 said anything resembling the claim that currie created a rumor? Just because YOU (wrongly) claimed that it was one of ONLY two explanations for kent23's claim...(I see you have now edited your original post), doesn't mean you can put those words in HIS mouth.

This "Currie created a rumor" stuff was never HIS theory, it was YOUR version of his theory. The suggestion that he is now backtracking from YOUR theory is comical.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I didn't edit out any content or change what I said. I never said that Kent23 said John Curry created the rumor.

As I said clearly, if you accept his premise that ADJC was using this to get rid of HCFM than logic dictates that he either ADJC created this rumor or leaked a factual event to undermine HCFM. With my point being that neither of those options makes sense to me.

Now if you come up with a third way ADJC got this information in the public eye just to undermine HCFM that please elaborate.



Posted on 2/9 1:23 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
ccox

A solid starter
Post #4264
The Hoosier Hills
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Kaw Valley Cat:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by ccox:




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by Kaw Valley Cat:




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by kent23:
Currie wouldn't create a rumor. Who orders drug tests on KSU athletes?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




so now you agree you theory makes no sense?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




I don't have a dog in this fight, and while I DO think there is some tension between Currie and Frank (that was obvious to anyone willing to pay attention last year), I don't think Currie is trying to undermine anyone. That said, could you kindly point me to the post where kent23 said anything resembling the claim that currie created a rumor? Just because YOU (wrongly) claimed that it was one of ONLY two explanations for kent23's claim...(I see you have now edited your original post), doesn't mean you can put those words in HIS mouth.

This "Currie created a rumor" stuff was never HIS theory, it was YOUR version of his theory. The suggestion that he is now backtracking from YOUR theory is comical.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I didn't edit out any content or change what I said. I never said that Kent23 said John Curry created the rumor.

As I said clearly, if you accept his premise that ADJC was using this to get rid of HCFM than logic dictates that he either ADJC created this rumor or leaked a factual event to undermine HCFM. With my point being that neither of those options makes sense to me.

Now if you come up with a third way ADJC got this information in the public eye just to undermine HCFM that please elaborate.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



LOL. Please read your post again. You know, the one where, after kent23 claimed currie wouldn't start a rumor, YOU claimed kent23 was "now agreeing his theory makes no sense." Problem was, that was YOUR theory.

Only in your mind are there only two possible implications for the general position kent23 took. And Currie starting the rumor, or leaking the results is not the exhaustive list, no matter if that is all the further your mind can see.

Indeed, as per your request, I will offer one of potentially many other possibilities that would be consistent with what kent23 claimed (again, I should say that I am NOT AT ALL sold on his theory). For example, perhaps ADJC simply has Frank's program on a shorter leash, and as part of that, is being more proactive/aggressive with drug testing, and has decided to handle positive tests firmly (it is simply not believable that other ADs actually test and enforce their policies to the letter, otherwise, there would be FAR more suspensions).

How's that?



Posted on 2/9 2:04 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
jimboberini

On the depth chart
Post #3158
high above ol mud creek waters
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by kcat15:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by brooksbunk:
i have heard the that the two do not like each other at all....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



There is some tension. I've heard one of John's "people" openly mock Frank's mannerisms.

I've heard from someone that talks with the coaching staff that Frank feels some lack of support. On the other hand, Frank is somewhat paranoid about things like that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



but isn;t that normal?



Posted on 2/9 4:00 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
Hannibal Smith

On full scholarship
Post #1687
Olathe, KS

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please tell me you're fishing.

And if you are fishing, I propose the staff implement a new 3-day automatic ban for fishing posts - even dprocket. It's not funny anymore how many people come on here just to stir the pot and get others worked up.



Posted on 2/9 6:46 AM | IP: Logged

 
 
node1966

Post #1146
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: This is about Currie trying to get rid of Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After reading some of the posts, CK isnt the only one enjoying that evil weed!!

 


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Stupid Fitz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6919
  • Go Cats
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2011, 07:30:35 AM »
Yeah, but what does Leland think. :dunno:

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42637
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2011, 07:36:37 AM »
And honestly they remind me of certain hate groups

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59715
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2011, 07:37:38 AM »
  I am constantly amazed at how (what's the words I'm looking for here) obtuse, or monolithic so many of our fans are in their thinking.

As ccox said, anyone that could read, or hear and that had half a brain understood last year that Currie and Frank weren't best pals.   AD's don't always give pay raises because they love the coach . . . it's also done to send signals to the coaching community.  

There are and have been issues between Frank and Currie since day one.   Some of it probably is Frank being a little paranoid and some of it is absolute reality.  

In the immortal words of Ron Prince and IMO we're possibly about to cross the Rubicon in the ADJC/HCFM paradigm.   Up until now we've had the dutiful AD who paid Frank, and busted his ass to get the BTF going again . . . and we've had Frank and "his ways" and the 2 were in "coexisting" mode.

K-State has been drug testing its athletes since the early 80's and no doubt it has gotten more sophisticated and more "surprise" as time has gone on.   Anything can happen, but I doubt that Currie was engaged in some sort of Lew Perkins/Mark Mangino witch hunt. But that doesn't mean he's on the opposite end of the spectrum patting Frank on the back and prepared to sweep everything under the rug, we already saw that wasn't the case in the Dillards incident.

I wonder if we can get BSAC to review the “for cause” section of Frank’s contract.



Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2011, 08:00:08 AM »
AD's don't always give pay raises because they love the coach . . . it's also done to send signals to the coaching community.  


Did you cut and paste this from the Phog???  GMAFB
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42637
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2011, 08:01:36 AM »
Yeah, but what does Leland think. :dunno:


Quote
Leland

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #14915
Land of the Magyars, Central Europe
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Look, unless Jessica Alba shows up at my door in a bikini...   Reply
and says "boink me, fat man", then there's nothing to get excited about as far as I'm concerned. Good night.

Leland

"Is UCLA even an option for Kevin McReynolds at this point? I doubt it." - Leland

Posted on 2/9 12:52 AM | IP: Logged

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42637
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2011, 08:03:32 AM »
Yeah. It's definitely a cesspool. It's kind of like an electronic frat party without girls.

 :horrorsurprise:

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55976
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2011, 08:04:26 AM »
I've got to hand it to Leland, quoting himself in his sig (and citing himself) is the balls.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59715
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2011, 08:06:49 AM »
AD's don't always give pay raises because they love the coach . . . it's also done to send signals to the coaching community.  


Did you cut and paste this from the Phog???  GMAFB

No and GMAFB, I've been saying stuff like that for years.   LOL'ers at you if don't think perceptions play into it, LOL'ers at you if you don't think smart coaches aren't going to ask why a school is all of sudden "so serious" if they come calling with wads of money after paying previous coaches chump change, LOL'ers at you if you don't think that smart coaches aren't going to ask how long a school plans to be "serious".  

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88688
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2011, 08:09:44 AM »
I've got to hand it to Leland, quoting himself in his sig (and citing himself) is the balls.

lol, yeah.  amazing bbs'ing. 

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42637
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2011, 08:12:32 AM »
I've got to hand it to Leland, quoting himself in his sig (and citing himself) is the balls.

lol, yeah.  amazing bbs'ing. 

Do I need to make sure it's clear who the "I" is in my sig if the unfortunate happens and I have to un-strikethrough?

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9491
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2011, 08:12:54 AM »
When did Ayosaba become such a bitch?

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55976
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2011, 08:30:39 AM »
I've got to hand it to Leland, quoting himself in his sig (and citing himself) is the balls.

lol, yeah.  amazing bbs'ing. 

Do I need to make sure it's clear who the "I" is in my sig if the unfortunate happens and I have to un-strikethrough?

I turn off sigs here.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47975
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2011, 08:33:22 AM »
When did Ayosaba become such a bitch?

was wondering the same thing


I've got to hand it to Leland, quoting himself in his sig (and citing himself) is the balls.

lol, yeah.  amazing bbs'ing. 

Do I need to make sure it's clear who the "I" is in my sig if the unfortunate happens and I have to un-strikethrough?

I turn off sigs here.

laughed about this too, trim's quoted himself in his sig for quite a while now.  "i hate currie" with the date.  however, he didn't cite himself.  leland will always have that over trim reaper.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42637
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2011, 08:35:36 AM »
I've got to hand it to Leland, quoting himself in his sig (and citing himself) is the balls.

lol, yeah.  amazing bbs'ing. 

Do I need to make sure it's clear who the "I" is in my sig if the unfortunate happens and I have to un-strikethrough?

I turn off sigs here.

laughed about this too, trim's quoted himself in his sig for quite a while now.  "i hate currie" with the date.  however, he didn't cite himself.  leland will always have that over trim reaper.
[/quote]

I'm ready to delete it entirely as soon as Currie makes it official.

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6338
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2011, 08:35:42 AM »
I love the crap out of goEMAW.com  :thumbsup:
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2011, 09:28:35 AM »
AD's don't always give pay raises because they love the coach . . . it's also done to send signals to the coaching community.  


Did you cut and paste this from the Phog???  GMAFB

No and GMAFB, I've been saying stuff like that for years.   LOL'ers at you if don't think perceptions play into it, LOL'ers at you if you don't think smart coaches aren't going to ask why a school is all of sudden "so serious" if they come calling with wads of money after paying previous coaches chump change, LOL'ers at you if you don't think that smart coaches aren't going to ask how long a school plans to be "serious".  

:facepalm:

Also, please take the paranoia down a notch, you're starting to scare the children.  You say a lot of stuff, every once in a while something sticks.  You don't need to vindicate yourself every time something does.  It's not that important, Nostradaxmous.

I should have clarified -->  This is not one of those times where something has stuck.  That has got be the most asinine logic for spending money I've ever heard.  Facilities, makes sense.  Giving some guy a windfall to show you're "serious" is beyond stupid.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2011, 11:46:36 AM by Fake Sugar Dick »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Stupid Fitz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6919
  • Go Cats
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2011, 09:43:27 AM »
What do you guys think it would take to get Leland to post over here?  MODS, would you be willing to waive his goEMAW subscription fee?

Offline ew2x4

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3918
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2011, 09:57:10 AM »
I hope Currie fires that worthless one hit wonder.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59715
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #19 on: February 09, 2011, 10:26:06 AM »
AD's don't always give pay raises because they love the coach . . . it's also done to send signals to the coaching community.  


Did you cut and paste this from the Phog???  GMAFB

No and GMAFB, I've been saying stuff like that for years.   LOL'ers at you if don't think perceptions play into it, LOL'ers at you if you don't think smart coaches aren't going to ask why a school is all of sudden "so serious" if they come calling with wads of money after paying previous coaches chump change, LOL'ers at you if you don't think that smart coaches aren't going to ask how long a school plans to be "serious".  



:facepalm:

Also, please take the paranoia down a notch, you're starting to scare the children.  You say a lot of stuff, every once in a while something sticks.  You don't need to vindicate yourself every time something does.  It's not that important, Nostradaxmous.
\
Great BBS’ing.   When you’ve been completely worked, move on to something else.

Great job FSD

Offline Fuktard

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1092
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #20 on: February 09, 2011, 10:37:52 AM »
If you've ever met Leland, you'd understand why everyone respects his opinion.  :Icouldn'tbemorefuckingsarcastic:


Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #21 on: February 09, 2011, 11:39:44 AM »
AD's don't always give pay raises because they love the coach . . . it's also done to send signals to the coaching community.  


Did you cut and paste this from the Phog???  GMAFB

No and GMAFB, I've been saying stuff like that for years.   LOL'ers at you if don't think perceptions play into it, LOL'ers at you if you don't think smart coaches aren't going to ask why a school is all of sudden "so serious" if they come calling with wads of money after paying previous coaches chump change, LOL'ers at you if you don't think that smart coaches aren't going to ask how long a school plans to be "serious".  



:facepalm:

Also, please take the paranoia down a notch, you're starting to scare the children.  You say a lot of stuff, every once in a while something sticks.  You don't need to vindicate yourself every time something does.  It's not that important, Nostradaxmous.
\
Great BBS’ing.   When you’ve been completely worked, move on to something else.

Great job FSD


That's right, I'm out to get you . . . better check your tail
 :facepalm: :facepalm:

goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59715
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #22 on: February 09, 2011, 11:43:14 AM »
:facepalm:

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #23 on: February 09, 2011, 11:47:22 AM »
AD's don't always give pay raises because they love the coach . . . it's also done to send signals to the coaching community.  


Did you cut and paste this from the Phog???  GMAFB

No and GMAFB, I've been saying stuff like that for years.   LOL'ers at you if don't think perceptions play into it, LOL'ers at you if you don't think smart coaches aren't going to ask why a school is all of sudden "so serious" if they come calling with wads of money after paying previous coaches chump change, LOL'ers at you if you don't think that smart coaches aren't going to ask how long a school plans to be "serious".  

:facepalm:

Also, please take the paranoia down a notch, you're starting to scare the children.  You say a lot of stuff, every once in a while something sticks.  You don't need to vindicate yourself every time something does.  It's not that important, Nostradaxmous.

I should have clarified -->  This is not one of those times where something has stuck.  That has got be the most asinine logic for spending money I've ever heard.  Facilities, makes sense.  Giving some guy a windfall to show the next you're "serious" is beyond stupid.

goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline KSUTOMMY

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1575
    • View Profile
Re: Dear Powertards who doubt us . . .
« Reply #24 on: February 09, 2011, 12:31:46 PM »
AD's don't always give pay raises because they love the coach . . . it's also done to send signals to the coaching community.  


Did you cut and paste this from the Phog???  GMAFB

No and GMAFB, I've been saying stuff like that for years.   LOL'ers at you if don't think perceptions play into it, LOL'ers at you if you don't think smart coaches aren't going to ask why a school is all of sudden "so serious" if they come calling with wads of money after paying previous coaches chump change, LOL'ers at you if you don't think that smart coaches aren't going to ask how long a school plans to be "serious".  

:facepalm:

Also, please take the paranoia down a notch, you're starting to scare the children.  You say a lot of stuff, every once in a while something sticks.  You don't need to vindicate yourself every time something does.  It's not that important, Nostradaxmous.

I should have clarified -->  This is not one of those times where something has stuck.  That has got be the most asinine logic for spending money I've ever heard.  Facilities, makes sense.  Giving some guy a windfall to show the next you're "serious" is beyond stupid.


To your corners, you two - TO YOUR GODDAMNED CORNERS...

Quote from: FUKTARD
If you've ever met Leland, you'd understand why everyone respects his opinion.  :Icouldn'tbemoreeffingsarcastic:

^^^ THIS is pretty damned funny ^^^
We are K-State and we love to hire SHlTTY coaches.