Author Topic: Unconstitutional  (Read 18558 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: Unconstitutional
« Reply #75 on: February 05, 2011, 05:23:19 AM »
Hey, look, the regime isn't ignoring courts over just healthcare

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-03/u-s-administration-in-contempt-over-gulf-drill-ban-judge-rules.html

Maybe that's because they, like chucklehead shoe-mer, don't believe the court is an official branch of government (unless it suits their interests).

Why don't they just call the courts racist and get it over with?

I have been thinking about this. Every generation gets a title. I was part of the Me Generation, which the symbol was a Mercedes icon, kind of reverse Hippie peace sign. We have had the Baby Boomers, Hippies, Generation-X, etc.

I am thinking this generation should be the Generation Race Card. Anytime anyone disagrees with you they are a racist, etc. I think it would be a fitting generation title.

So here we go.



Except the libs have been playing the false race card a lot longer than this generation.

Offline Jeffy

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1590
  • Hello Wilbur.
    • View Profile
Re: Unconstitutional
« Reply #76 on: February 08, 2011, 12:50:02 PM »

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Unconstitutional
« Reply #77 on: July 04, 2017, 10:36:34 AM »
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/03/federal-judges-order-epa-to-implement-obama-era-methane-regulation.html
I am getting concerned about activist judges appointed by the law trying to make decisions that are reserved for the executive branch.  First, the travel ban, and now a Federal panel of judges are saying that Trump has to implement EPA regulations on methane put into place by executive action by Obama, Inc.   Why can't executive orders be used to rescind them?  Apparently because squirrel lover judges want them.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2017, 12:43:30 AM by renocat »