Author Topic: petro  (Read 3357 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
petro
« on: February 16, 2010, 10:15:12 AM »
gottlieb @11
frank martin @noon

warm up the angry emails


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline RTB

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 172
  • Caaats!
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2010, 10:16:51 AM »
Have mine saved in the drafts with fill in the blank lines.
Frank Martin- "I used to teach math in HS but didn't scream as much because nobody was keeping score."

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7174
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2010, 11:46:09 AM »
Ooops. Missed almost all of Gottliebs. Now have to miss Franks for some lunch obligation.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline Pexikan

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 727
  • Junkyard Gato
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2010, 11:54:21 AM »
Heard Gottlieb, buncha KU BS, "is Sharron in a slump?" "last 5 minutes of last nights game KU played championship caliber defense" total cocksuckery. Doug pissed me off.

Offline ArchE_Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2010, 11:55:51 AM »
Doug says we're a 3 seed  :rolleyes:, say's we can't really justify a 2 :zzz:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88528
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2010, 11:59:40 AM »
OMG!  He talked about the local number 1 team in the country who just played last night!  He even went as far as to say that they are championship caliber during a short timeframe of their game!?  ARRRGGGGGHHHHH!  PILE ON! 

 :curse:

Offline Pexikan

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 727
  • Junkyard Gato
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2010, 12:04:07 PM »
Sorry SD, but calling us a #3 seed hurt my tard feelings.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2010, 12:06:07 PM »
Doug has earned nearly a lifetime free pass from me.  Love Doug!

*And I can see his rationale for saying that, but he needs to look at my Team 1 through Team 6 comparison.  I think that there is a pretty good group right now that can be 2/3 or even 4 seeds by the time this is done.

Offline ArchE_Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2010, 12:07:03 PM »
id don't know if doug was even paying attention to petro, sounding like he was changing clothes or something also doesn't want to explain to petro (idiot) that there are still games left to play

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2010, 12:36:59 PM »
*And I can see his rationale for saying that, but he needs to look at my Team 1 through Team 6 comparison.  I think that there is a pretty good group right now that can be 2/3 or even 4 seeds by the time this is done.

those were very confusing.  i would give them all two seeds.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2010, 12:47:37 PM »
*And I can see his rationale for saying that, but he needs to look at my Team 1 through Team 6 comparison.  I think that there is a pretty good group right now that can be 2/3 or even 4 seeds by the time this is done.

those were very confusing.  i would give them all two seeds.

Exactly.  At this point teams have to have to find a way to seperate themselves over the next couple of weeks either up or down with good wins/bad losses.  Then, if those 6-8 teams still remaind bunched, its going to be up to whatever criteria the committee weighs the most.  If its general like SOS or OOC record, we'll have an edge.  If its something more specific, like Top 10 wins or if they look at strength/weaknesses of divisions within conferences, then it won't look as good for us.  Right now there is a pretty decent pack competing for those 2 seeds.

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7174
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2010, 02:10:22 PM »
What did Frank say?
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #12 on: February 16, 2010, 02:53:11 PM »
OMG!  He talked about the local number 1 team in the country who just played last night!  He even went as far as to say that they are championship caliber during a short timeframe of their game!?  ARRRGGGGGHHHHH!  PILE ON! 

 :curse:




Bill Self can't coach!
 



:curse:




Offline Daddy Claxton

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 299
    • View Profile
Re: petro
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2010, 03:01:07 PM »
*And I can see his rationale for saying that, but he needs to look at my Team 1 through Team 6 comparison.  I think that there is a pretty good group right now that can be 2/3 or even 4 seeds by the time this is done.

those were very confusing.  i would give them all two seeds.

Exactly.  At this point teams have to have to find a way to seperate themselves over the next couple of weeks either up or down with good wins/bad losses.  Then, if those 6-8 teams still remaind bunched, its going to be up to whatever criteria the committee weighs the most.  If its general like SOS or OOC record, we'll have an edge.  If its something more specific, like Top 10 wins or if they look at strength/weaknesses of divisions within conferences, then it won't look as good for us.  Right now there is a pretty decent pack competing for those 2 seeds.

Won't the committee just look at how they can maximize revenues via TV and the pod system, and then work backwards to seed teams accordingly?

GetFipps

  • Guest
Re: petro
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2010, 03:07:35 PM »
HE IS crap.

GTFOOMF ESPN!!!!
RRAAAAAA!!!!