Author Topic: Thoughts  (Read 1604 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Acceleration Man

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 527
    • View Profile
Thoughts
« on: January 22, 2011, 03:29:51 PM »
Well... I'll say this. The seniors finally played like seniors tonight, and this was maybe the best overall defensive effort we've had all year. It was really the lack of options on offense (McGruder, where are you?) and the fact that we couldn't keep our mits off in the 2nd half. Maybe the fact that we are overall a young, inexperienced team could account for most of it.

It's frustrating, because we could've had this game and if we hope to get to the NCAA we're going to have to win a few of these from here on out, but it felt a lot more like a hard fought game than a stupid loss.

 :frown: but not  :curse:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline CatsFan_58

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 667
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2011, 03:46:00 PM »
Everybody on the team is stupid, and that is the problem. They couldn't score, so we let them do so by committing stupid fouls, sending them to the line.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2011, 03:48:13 PM »
Well... I'll say this. The seniors finally played like seniors tonight, and this was maybe the best overall defensive effort we've had all year. It was really the lack of options on offense (McGruder, where are you?) and the fact that we couldn't keep our mits off in the 2nd half. Maybe the fact that we are overall a young, inexperienced team could account for most of it.


How in the eff in one thread you say the issue was a lack of offensive options, but then in another thread say having Southwell, Spradling, and Peterson in the game at the same time isn't a problem?  Are you bi-polar?

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2011, 03:50:06 PM »
Yeah, one thought:

Our players just should've stuck with twitter.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2011, 04:03:39 PM by Pett »

Offline Acceleration Man

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 527
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2011, 04:03:06 PM »
Well... I'll say this. The seniors finally played like seniors tonight, and this was maybe the best overall defensive effort we've had all year. It was really the lack of options on offense (McGruder, where are you?) and the fact that we couldn't keep our mits off in the 2nd half. Maybe the fact that we are overall a young, inexperienced team could account for most of it.


How in the eff in one thread you say the issue was a lack of offensive options, but then in another thread say having Southwell, Spradling, and Peterson in the game at the same time isn't a problem?  Are you bi-polar?

Let me see if I can spell this out for you. Listen carefully. Pullen & Kelly stepped up today, but no one else did offensively. The normally somewhat-dependable other options were non-existent (Gruds and Samuels). The guys you're pining for (Irving & Russell) combined for 17 minutes and 2 points. You have no basis for an argument that more minutes for these guys was going to give us any different results. Let me say this again. Pullz and Kelly scored for us. No one else did. Not "your" guys and not "my" guys. The stats and gameplay show nothing to support your argument. Got it? GET IT!

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2011, 04:20:32 PM »
Well... I'll say this. The seniors finally played like seniors tonight, and this was maybe the best overall defensive effort we've had all year. It was really the lack of options on offense (McGruder, where are you?) and the fact that we couldn't keep our mits off in the 2nd half. Maybe the fact that we are overall a young, inexperienced team could account for most of it.


How in the eff in one thread you say the issue was a lack of offensive options, but then in another thread say having Southwell, Spradling, and Peterson in the game at the same time isn't a problem?  Are you bi-polar?

Let me see if I can spell this out for you. Listen carefully. Pullen & Kelly stepped up today, but no one else did offensively. The normally somewhat-dependable other options were non-existent (Gruds and Samuels). The guys you're pining for (Irving & Russell) combined for 17 minutes and 2 points. You have no basis for an argument that more minutes for these guys was going to give us any different results. Let me say this again. Pullz and Kelly scored for us. No one else did. Not "your" guys and not "my" guys. The stats and gameplay show nothing to support your argument. Got it? GET IT!

I'm not pining for Irving and Russell, I'm pining for Frank not to have three guards on the floor at the same time that have averaged a combined 11 PPG, along with a big averaging about 5.  Do you think that had an effect on the offense?

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2011, 04:22:17 PM »
Dillards. Blame them, I'm feeling better already.

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2011, 04:26:34 PM »
Dillards. Blame them, I'm feeling better already.

Will never shop there again

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2011, 04:28:34 PM »
Really, if Pulls/Kelly are not suspended we have at least 3 more wins, maybe 4. Granted, that's counting on both playing like they have post-Dillards.