Author Topic: 3 for 13 . . .  (Read 3330 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59659
    • View Profile
3 for 13 . . .
« on: September 07, 2010, 11:55:04 AM »
UCLA on 3rd down conversions. 
:woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: (showing extreme excitement so daris and jt know that this was a positive post) :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline KSUTOMMY

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1575
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2010, 11:58:42 AM »


 :lynchmob:

 :kstatriot:

 :ksu:
We are K-State and we love to hire SHlTTY coaches.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47962
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2010, 12:01:57 PM »
Fire And Ice, baby, Fire and Ice


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2010, 12:04:49 PM »
Can we go back and see how many of those were dropped passes by UCLA receivers?  It was hard to tell from my vantage point but it seemed like there were quite a few drops. 
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47962
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2010, 12:05:46 PM »
Can we go back and see how many of those were dropped passes by UCLA receivers?  It was hard to tell from my vantage point but it seemed like there were quite a few drops. 

Your hands are going to be cold as ice when you go up against Fire and Ice.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38014
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2010, 01:15:06 PM »
Can we go back and see how many of those were dropped passes by UCLA receivers?  It was hard to tell from my vantage point but it seemed like there were quite a few drops. 

Dropped passes or not, the defense performed way better than expected. I am much more concerned with our run defense than I am the pass defense.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2010, 01:31:17 PM »
Can we go back and see how many of those were dropped passes by UCLA receivers?  It was hard to tell from my vantage point but it seemed like there were quite a few drops. 

Dropped passes or not, the defense performed way better than expected. I am much more concerned with our run defense than I am the pass defense.

This.  5.2 YPC.

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2010, 01:33:18 PM »
Can we go back and see how many of those were dropped passes by UCLA receivers?  It was hard to tell from my vantage point but it seemed like there were quite a few drops. 

Dropped passes or not, the defense performed way better than expected. I am much more concerned with our run defense than I am the pass defense.

This.  5.2 YPC.
Eh. Pistol offense. Overpursuit.
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2010, 01:44:27 PM »
daris and jt know that this was a positive post) [/size] :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot:[/move]

i'm not really sure that you are grasping what i'm trying to tell you. it has nothing to do with whatever jt is trying to say.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59659
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2010, 01:47:12 PM »
Okay . . . you guys are like 2 loud mouthed Siamese twins to me at this juncture, so it's hard to differentiate.



Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47962
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2010, 02:04:56 PM »
Can we go back and see how many of those were dropped passes by UCLA receivers?  It was hard to tell from my vantage point but it seemed like there were quite a few drops. 

Dropped passes or not, the defense performed way better than expected. I am much more concerned with our run defense than I am the pass defense.

i would agree that fire and ice was in effect during lasts saturday's game against UCLA.  fire and ice, round and round.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #11 on: September 07, 2010, 02:07:07 PM »
There were maybe 5 drops in the game, including 2 in UCLA's first possession. Gets Prince to 14-of-26 for maybe 160 yards and two picks. Not to say that 5 drops in what was essentially a 2-point game don't make a difference. We also had 2 first-half fumbles. The first ended a drive at midfield and the other gift wrapped a touchdown.

Also, if you're worried about a 5.2 ypc when we are facing a quarterback that can throw the ball more than 15 yards, just think if you were a UCLA fan that witnessed 5.8 ypc with a team that has CC as the quarterback.

More than a third of UCLA's total yards came on three plays, resulting in 9 (normally 10 points). More than half of their passing yards came on two plays for 6 (7) points.

I have no illusions that this defense won't give up big plays, but if they can contain most offenses I think we'll be in the majority of their games in the fourth quarter this year.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #12 on: September 07, 2010, 02:11:11 PM »
Okay . . . you guys are like 2 loud mouthed Siamese twins to me at this juncture, so it's hard to differentiate.




ok stormnut.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59659
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #13 on: September 07, 2010, 02:22:47 PM »
BITB . . .  "K-State has a gigantic problem at Quarterback."   

Better fire up those phone lines Siamese Twins.

   Phone Numbers:    
     Live Call-in Line:    913-381-0810
     Toll Free/800#:    877-692-4WHB (4942)


Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2010, 03:00:33 PM »
BITB . . .  "K-State has a gigantic problem at Quarterback."   

Better fire up those phone lines Siamese Twins.

   Phone Numbers:    
     Live Call-in Line:    913-381-0810
     Toll Free/800#:    877-692-4WHB (4942)



lol. wtf would i want to talk any more about  "kstates qb issues". i've spent the last week making fun of people who are doing it. bitb knows it's a tard issue that tards want to talk about and so he's talking about. lo fracking l dax. you are so deep into the tard forrest that you can't even see the tards through all of the tard trees. really your best post ever.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59659
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2010, 03:17:35 PM »
BITB . . .  "K-State has a gigantic problem at Quarterback."   

Better fire up those phone lines Siamese Twins.

   Phone Numbers:    
     Live Call-in Line:    913-381-0810
     Toll Free/800#:    877-692-4WHB (4942)



lol. wtf would i want to talk any more about  "kstates qb issues". i've spent the last week making fun of people who are doing it. bitb knows it's a tard issue that tards want to talk about and so he's talking about. lo fracking l dax. you are so deep into the tard forrest that you can't even see the tards through all of the tard trees. really your best post ever.

There's nothing more dumbass than your comments.   So tardboys Daris and jt come along and throw little tantrums about people talking about Carsy Coffman sucking and expect everybody to climb on their tardwagon and to quit talking about it.   LOL . . . pathetic.




Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53922
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2010, 03:32:06 PM »
I alwasy thought dax was a daris sock.  This is really throwing me off.   :runaway:

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2010, 04:20:41 PM »
BITB . . .  "K-State has a gigantic problem at Quarterback."   

Better fire up those phone lines Siamese Twins.

   Phone Numbers:    
     Live Call-in Line:    913-381-0810
     Toll Free/800#:    877-692-4WHB (4942)



lol. wtf would i want to talk any more about  "kstates qb issues". i've spent the last week making fun of people who are doing it. bitb knows it's a tard issue that tards want to talk about and so he's talking about. lo fracking l dax. you are so deep into the tard forrest that you can't even see the tards through all of the tard trees. really your best post ever.

There's nothing more dumbass than your comments.   So tardboys Daris and jt come along and throw little tantrums about people talking about Carsy Coffman sucking and expect everybody to climb on their tardwagon and to quit talking about it.   LOL . . . pathetic.





ksuqb talk and complaining about ksuqbs has been the number one tard talking point for the last twenty years. it barely beats out complaining about running down the play clock and having to use a timeout when cats are on offense, but if you want to make it #1 for another twenty years then f it. go for it man. btw, there was a guy at bsfs wearing purple zubazz this last weekend. i totally didn't even say anything to him about it. i'm nice that way sometimes. here, i'll even start you off...



what do you think dax?...3-9 this year with coffman and 9-3 if the staff can just find a better qb? maybe klein? thoughts? maybe call keitz about it?


Offline Andy

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 872
    • View Profile
Re: 3 for 13 . . .
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2010, 05:39:44 PM »
amazing how quick we turned this stat around in 2 years.