@OU, @TECH, @OSU

[sys]

luck = variance 

unexplained variance.

Is there a difference?

null hypothesis would be that winning games is a matter of luck.  all teams would be expected to go .500.  deviation from .500 is variance.  the model attempts to explain that variance by apportioning variation to explanatory factors.  variance that can't be explained by the model is what's left over.

[Cire]

I think what this means is that good luck counts for crap on the road

[MakeItRain]

to signify what? I really don't know

some measure of the difference between the actual record and the predicted winning %.  not real sure of the details.

thank you. lol at Pomeroy calling this luck, that guy, so confident for a poor man's John Hollinger

[Trim]

I want to sew his goddam pockets shut.

That picture comes from this well-reasoned column: http://www.kstatecollegian.com/2014/02/19/time-for-doubting-oscar-weber-is-over/

[bones129]

I want to sew his goddam pockets shut.

That picture comes from this well-reasoned column: http://www.kstatecollegian.com/2014/02/19/time-for-doubting-oscar-weber-is-over/

Is his jacket actually unbuttoned, or is that image 'shopped?

[Trim]

I don't know.  There's a whole lot going on in that picture.

[deputy dawg]

I want to sew his goddam pockets shut.

That picture comes from this well-reasoned column: http://www.kstatecollegian.com/2014/02/19/time-for-doubting-oscar-weber-is-over/

Is his jacket actually unbuttoned, or is that image 'shopped?

What's with the white kid standing behind Coach Brooks and getting ready to lick his head?

[Stevesie60]

Te's tie!