Author Topic: 8-4  (Read 15937 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #100 on: October 22, 2013, 09:15:10 PM »
i'd put the odds of us winning out at somewhere around 0%

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #101 on: October 22, 2013, 10:10:23 PM »

i'd put the odds of us winning out at somewhere around 0%

Obviously I agree that we will win out in conference, but it's absurd to think that bill will try to win a bowl game.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30954
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #102 on: October 22, 2013, 11:42:23 PM »
LALA looks decent, BTW.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67488
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #103 on: October 23, 2013, 12:14:10 AM »
Go Chiefs.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #104 on: October 23, 2013, 09:31:49 AM »
LALA looks decent, BTW.

5 of our 6 opponents haven't lost since we played them. And the 6th is UMass, who is absolute dog crap. Apparently after playing the Cats everyone else seems to be a step down in competition.

#team9and4

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #105 on: October 23, 2013, 10:58:24 AM »
LALA looks decent, BTW.

5 of our 6 opponents haven't lost since we played them. And the 6th is UMass, who is absolute dog crap. Apparently after playing the Cats everyone else seems to be a step down in competition.

#team9and4

We've played a pretty decent schedule, but UMass is on pace to have the worst offense in at least that last 12 years, and its not even close.

They currently sit at .103 points per possession, the worst I can find in the last dozen years is Buffalo with .145 ppp.

Another advanced stat is yards per point. Michigan currently leads the country at 10.5 yards per point. UMass is at 40.8 yards per point. The next worst team nationally is La Monroe at 24.1.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #106 on: October 23, 2013, 11:30:21 AM »
yards per point is an interesting stat

fun to think about

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #107 on: October 23, 2013, 11:46:17 AM »
yards per point is an interesting stat

fun to think about


Another advanced stat is yards per point. Michigan currently leads the country at 10.5 yards per point.

FWIW...Last year we led the country at 10.4 and this year we are 35th at 13.0.

Obviously this has as much to do with field position and non-offensive TDs as it does the offense.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #108 on: October 23, 2013, 11:47:53 AM »
man its fun to think about how we were the best ever for a little while  :thumbs:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40561
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #109 on: October 23, 2013, 12:13:38 PM »
i mean yards per point by itself does not tell you how good an offense is, but more how much does D/ST help the offense

Offline Functianalyst

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #110 on: October 23, 2013, 08:29:56 PM »
Unlike some of you who thought the world was ending after losing to UT, K-State to me as been as solid as anyone on defense and as bipolar as anyone on offense. They played as undisciplined of football have seen in Stillwater. I have to see what TTU does this weekend, but it is not out of the realm of possibility that the Cats win the remaining games.

 If OU wins handily then I agree K-State can go 8-4. But if TTU hands the Sooners their ass which I expect to happen, then the Big XII championship will be decided in Waco on November 16.

Offline #LIFE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #111 on: October 23, 2013, 08:33:29 PM »
Isn't the Tech-Baylor game at a neutral site this year?  :dunno:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32531
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #112 on: October 23, 2013, 08:36:43 PM »
I don't think tech is good enough to run train on anyone in the big12 other than KU.  I think they are better than OU but not as good as Baylor or Texas.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #113 on: October 24, 2013, 09:05:37 AM »
I don't think tech is good enough to run train on anyone in the big12 other than KU.  I think they are better than OU but not as good as Baylor or Texas.

The title will be decided on Dec. 7 in Waco. Doubtful that Texas has more than 1 B12 loss before then.

Offline Functianalyst

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #114 on: October 24, 2013, 09:46:21 AM »
Isn't the Tech-Baylor game at a neutral site this year?  :dunno:
That sounds right for some reason.  It just indicated Baylor will be the hometeam.  That will make it even better.  But again there is a lot of football left to be played.

Offline Functianalyst

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 190
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #115 on: October 24, 2013, 09:50:04 AM »
I don't think tech is good enough to run train on anyone in the big12 other than KU.  I think they are better than OU but not as good as Baylor or Texas.

The title will be decided on Dec. 7 in Waco. Doubtful that Texas has more than 1 B12 loss before then.
I question whether UT beats TCU this weekend, but doubt if they get passed WVU in Morgantown.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: 8-4
« Reply #116 on: November 06, 2013, 10:04:21 PM »
Saturday afternoon is likely (based on chirp) to make #8-4 look bright, and #dickweed look stupid
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #117 on: November 06, 2013, 11:57:41 PM »
I just realized FSD is Thunder_Cat!

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #118 on: November 07, 2013, 12:07:28 AM »
I can see us losing by multiple TDs to Tech

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #119 on: November 07, 2013, 12:08:28 AM »
I can see us losing by multiple TDs to Tech

weird, no one on #team9and4 sees that happening (I took a poll)
emaw

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #120 on: November 07, 2013, 07:42:23 AM »
I can see us losing by multiple TDs to Tech

weird, no one on #team9and4 sees that happening (I took a poll)

crunched some numbers and they match up, keep up the good work gfa

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: 8-4
« Reply #121 on: November 09, 2013, 09:25:32 PM »
Whoever started this thread is looking prophetic as eff

 :emawkid:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd