Author Topic: 8-4  (Read 12750 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #50 on: October 15, 2013, 02:04:00 PM »
If our guy Daniel bosses it (like we know he will) I see no reason why we can't end up winning out and then winning our bowl game.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #51 on: October 15, 2013, 02:07:25 PM »


AND


Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #52 on: October 15, 2013, 02:14:37 PM »
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.
everyone is jealous

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #53 on: October 15, 2013, 02:15:20 PM »


AND


Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #54 on: October 15, 2013, 02:18:13 PM »
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

Denied. TCU has had the luxury of padding its schedule with puds like KU.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39171
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #55 on: October 15, 2013, 02:33:14 PM »
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #56 on: October 15, 2013, 02:36:50 PM »
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.

TCU at TT, TCU at OU and TCU played LSU. that right there is better than KSU schedule
everyone is jealous

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39171
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #57 on: October 15, 2013, 02:42:20 PM »
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.

TCU at TT, TCU at OU and TCU played LSU. that right there is better than KSU schedule

OK Tim. Keep your head in the sand. Baylor is better than each of those 3, and the bottom end of KU + SMU is much, much worse than the bottom end of UMass and ULL. But like I said, #30 is very close to #39 so as Baylor comes down to earth maybe the schedules will reverse. But certainly not now.  :don'tcare:

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #58 on: October 15, 2013, 02:46:11 PM »
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.

TCU at TT, TCU at OU and TCU played LSU. that right there is better than KSU schedule

OK Tim. Keep your head in the sand. Baylor is better than each of those 3, and the bottom end of KU + SMU is much, much worse than the bottom end of UMass and ULL. But like I said, #30 is very close to #39 so as Baylor comes down to earth maybe the schedules will reverse. But certainly not now.  :don'tcare:

Baylor is better than LSU??? lmao, do u really think ksu would stay within 10 of lsu?
everyone is jealous

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39171
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #59 on: October 15, 2013, 02:53:39 PM »
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I forgive you but you are not correct. Their schedules have averaged out to very similar (and I weigh all the FCS teams the same, even though NDSU is probably a much better team than SE Louisiana). #30 is very close #39, Tim.

TCU at TT, TCU at OU and TCU played LSU. that right there is better than KSU schedule

OK Tim. Keep your head in the sand. Baylor is better than each of those 3, and the bottom end of KU + SMU is much, much worse than the bottom end of UMass and ULL. But like I said, #30 is very close to #39 so as Baylor comes down to earth maybe the schedules will reverse. But certainly not now.  :don'tcare:

Baylor is better than LSU??? lmao, do u really think ksu would stay within 10 of lsu?

well, TCU did

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29146
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #60 on: October 15, 2013, 03:01:10 PM »
is this dumbass really questioning SNOWBRAG? :lol:

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21337
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #61 on: October 15, 2013, 03:03:16 PM »
show your algorithms, tim. I bet the acronym you chose is horrible also.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #62 on: October 15, 2013, 03:47:28 PM »


&

emaw

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #63 on: October 15, 2013, 03:54:10 PM »
I got 7-5, but I could see it. Hardest schedule in the Big 12 so far.

SNOWBRAG backs you up (almost).

Overall SOS:

20. West Virginia
30. Kansas State
39. TCU
42. Iowa State
53. Oklahoma
54. Kansas
77. Texas
106. Baylor
113. Texas Tech
114. Oklahoma State

I'm sorry but TCU has had a tougher schedule than ksu.

I'll defer to Mr. Sagarin who has K-State SOS at 14 and TCU's SOS at 21.  Thanks for playing.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/
bears are fast...

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #64 on: October 15, 2013, 05:24:37 PM »
We're going to finish 6-6.

Offline CyberToothCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 673
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #65 on: October 15, 2013, 05:49:14 PM »
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #66 on: October 15, 2013, 06:06:58 PM »
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable.

stopped reading after this.  welcome to #team9&4 CTC!
emaw

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #67 on: October 15, 2013, 06:21:44 PM »
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.
everyone is jealous

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #68 on: October 15, 2013, 06:35:42 PM »
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #69 on: October 15, 2013, 06:41:24 PM »
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.
everyone is jealous

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17148
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #70 on: October 15, 2013, 06:43:44 PM »
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

Oh my God, tim doesn't know what math is! :lol:

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #71 on: October 15, 2013, 06:50:03 PM »
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.

I'm really glad you're posting in this thread, tim
emaw

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #72 on: October 15, 2013, 07:05:23 PM »
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.

I'm sorry but this guy has to be someone's sock. I mean, there is just no way anyone can be as dumb as this guy. He spent nearly an entire page arguing about a Big 12 record that is not up for interpretation, and now this? Please ban, TIA.

Also, Team9-4 or burn this mother down!
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #73 on: October 15, 2013, 07:27:57 PM »
Individually, each one of those games looks winnable. But all together?  No, we will not win all six. I mean, just look at the math.

Odds of beating:
WVU 65%
ISU 75%
Tech 50%
TCU 65%
OU 50%
KU 80%

I created these percentages out of thin air. I assumed (and I don't necessarily think it's true) that we have at least a 50/50 chance in every game. I tried to be optimistic in the odds for the rest of the games.

Given these percentages, the likelihood that we win out is about 6%. SIX percent guys. It's not going to happen.

We can still win enough to make a bowl game. It's a long shot, but it is doable. The four games that I think are most winnable are WVU, ISU, TCU, KU. The odds we win all four is about 25%. Not a great chance, but it's possible.

50/50 chance...no crap. any team has a 50/50 chance in any game....either you win or you don't.

 :ROFL: at KU having a 50/50 chance in any of their remaining games.

sorta like saying "there's a 80% chance of rain." wrong, it's 50%, either it's going to rain or it's not.

I'm sorry but this guy has to be someone's sock. I mean, there is just no way anyone can be as dumb as this guy. He spent nearly an entire page arguing about a Big 12 record that is not up for interpretation, and now this? Please ban, TIA.

Also, Team9-4 or burn this mother down!

 :dunno:
everyone is jealous

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: 8-4
« Reply #74 on: October 15, 2013, 07:49:08 PM »
:slowclap: Well said, MB!