Author Topic: Frank...  (Read 9084 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline asava

  • goEMAW.com Cultural Ambassador and Fashion Consultant
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6709
  • It is inside you
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #50 on: December 04, 2010, 01:34:26 AM »
yes

you are going to sit there and tell me that after watching that game that wsu played as well as they could have? that they couldn't have given it a better go at it? our defense will account for some % drop, and some turnovers, but our defense doesn't entirely account for a team with the #3 fg % in the nation to drop that low. they played cacty. we just played less cacty. if they had put together any semblance of a game we would have been beat.

they havent seen a defense like ours.  did you see how that idiot big man kept reacting every time the team was physical against him?  when i said "best shot" i was referring to the stretch at the end of the game when they took the lead.  not their overall game.  

this makes more sense. enough to where i wouldn't have cared to reply if i had read it to originally be that.

Offline swish1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #51 on: December 04, 2010, 01:35:32 AM »
yes

you are going to sit there and tell me that after watching that game that wsu played as well as they could have? that they couldn't have given it a better go at it? our defense will account for some % drop, and some turnovers, but our defense doesn't entirely account for a team with the #3 fg % in the nation to drop that low. they played cacty. we just played less cacty. if they had put together any semblance of a game we would have been beat.

they havent seen a defense like ours.  did you see how that idiot big man kept reacting every time the team was physical against him?  when i said "best shot" i was referring to the stretch at the end of the game when they took the lead.  not their overall game.  

this makes more sense. enough to where i wouldn't have cared to reply if i had read it to originally be that.

fair enough.  in the future i will try to be more clear.

Offline slimz

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #52 on: December 04, 2010, 01:38:06 AM »
yes

you are going to sit there and tell me that after watching that game that wsu played as well as they could have? that they couldn't have given it a better go at it? our defense will account for some % drop, and some turnovers, but our defense doesn't entirely account for a team with the #3 fg % in the nation to drop that low. they played cacty. we just played less cacty. if they had put together any semblance of a game we would have been beat.

they havent seen a defense like ours.  did you see how that idiot big man kept reacting every time the team was physical against him?  when i said "best shot" i was referring to the stretch at the end of the game when they took the lead.  not their overall game.  

This.  We played terribly on the offensive end, but we stepped up and made plays when we had to make them.  They looked worse than Colorado, and a lot of that was because of the defensive pressure we put on them.  Very similar to last week when everyone was dropping 3's on Gonzaga and then the next night Duke was closing more quickly and we made a lot fewer.

Offline swish1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #53 on: December 04, 2010, 01:41:35 AM »
yes

you are going to sit there and tell me that after watching that game that wsu played as well as they could have? that they couldn't have given it a better go at it? our defense will account for some % drop, and some turnovers, but our defense doesn't entirely account for a team with the #3 fg % in the nation to drop that low. they played cacty. we just played less cacty. if they had put together any semblance of a game we would have been beat.

they havent seen a defense like ours.  did you see how that idiot big man kept reacting every time the team was physical against him?  when i said "best shot" i was referring to the stretch at the end of the game when they took the lead.  not their overall game.  

This.  We played terribly on the offensive end, but we stepped up and made plays when we had to make them.  They looked worse than Colorado, and a lot of that was because of the defensive pressure we put on them.  Very similar to last week when everyone was dropping 3's on Gonzaga and then the next night Duke was closing more quickly and we made a lot fewer.

exactly.  and their post players were clearly outmatched by ours.  like i said its games where we play like crap against decent teams on the road and still pull it out that make me feel good about the state of the program and this was one of those games...

Offline asava

  • goEMAW.com Cultural Ambassador and Fashion Consultant
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6709
  • It is inside you
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #54 on: December 04, 2010, 01:42:02 AM »
yes

you are going to sit there and tell me that after watching that game that wsu played as well as they could have? that they couldn't have given it a better go at it? our defense will account for some % drop, and some turnovers, but our defense doesn't entirely account for a team with the #3 fg % in the nation to drop that low. they played cacty. we just played less cacty. if they had put together any semblance of a game we would have been beat.

they havent seen a defense like ours.  did you see how that idiot big man kept reacting every time the team was physical against him?  when i said "best shot" i was referring to the stretch at the end of the game when they took the lead.  not their overall game.  

this makes more sense. enough to where i wouldn't have cared to reply if i had read it to originally be that.

fair enough.  in the future i will try to be more clear.

no worries. it could have been just as much my fault reading it as i did, as it could have been on your end.  :cheers:

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #55 on: December 04, 2010, 01:42:36 AM »
Memphis was like the 2nd worst FT shooting team in the nation in '08. 

Offline swish1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #56 on: December 04, 2010, 01:43:39 AM »
Memphis was like the 2nd worst FT shooting team in the nation in '08. 

i dont think anyone knew that

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #57 on: December 04, 2010, 01:48:27 AM »
I knew they were bad but I didn't know they were that bad.  Guess you watched them a bit more intently than I did, you rough ridin' squawk!

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55969
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #58 on: December 04, 2010, 05:27:38 AM »
If there were a way to physically poop on a thread I would do it right now.

Jesus christ, what a bunch of dipshits.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88615
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #59 on: December 04, 2010, 08:32:35 AM »
The most aggravating thing about the game for me was when Frank threw his own combo-breaker when we were rolling by making sure he got a bunch of losers some PT. 

Offline skycat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1143
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #60 on: December 04, 2010, 01:33:21 PM »
Memphis was like the 2nd worst FT shooting team in the nation in '08. 

I thought Memphis was worst in terms of FT misses. They missed 383 free throws. Which team missed more? (Of course, Memphis also ranked 1st in FT attempts and 5th in makes.)

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #61 on: December 04, 2010, 01:46:46 PM »
we lost to rough ridin' ole miss last year
emaw

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53930
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #62 on: December 04, 2010, 01:48:43 PM »
we lost to effing ole miss last year

Fond memories of San Juan pak.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #63 on: December 04, 2010, 02:01:12 PM »
I wasn't talking about total misses, just percentage.  Also, they were 2nd to worst with about 2 weeks to play in the season.  (Last stats I could find that didn't include postseason numbers.)

Offline skycat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1143
    • View Profile
Re: Frank...
« Reply #64 on: December 04, 2010, 03:48:55 PM »
I wasn't talking about total misses, just percentage.  Also, they were 2nd to worst with about 2 weeks to play in the season.  (Last stats I could find that didn't include postseason numbers.)

Memphis was 13th worst. Not sure why you'd want to exclude postseason play.