Author Topic: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV  (Read 9392 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44995
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #50 on: February 25, 2017, 11:00:41 PM »
MIR, which "we" are you talking about.  gE main stream, GPC types, average K-State fans, etc?

gE, I guess, I don't really know anything else as it relates to how a K-State collective thinks.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #51 on: February 26, 2017, 02:32:35 AM »
15 FGs. 17 Turnovers. It's really over, isn't it. It's finally over.

Happy trails oscar.  I tried to give the benefit of doubt for so long....

But at last.... Good day. 

I just hope our top Frosh/Soph stay for 2017-18.   I think we can be special bin 2018-2019 season.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17191
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #52 on: February 26, 2017, 06:56:26 PM »
Am I crazy for thinking our roster for next year is decent for a coaching candidate to look at? Stokes, Brown and Xavier are something to be excited about? Please? Someone?

Offline PIPE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1146
  • Always a pessimist
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #53 on: February 26, 2017, 06:59:02 PM »
Am I crazy for thinking our roster for next year is decent for a coaching candidate to look at? Stokes, Brown and Xavier are something to be excited about? Please? Someone?

Welp that roster has lost 8/10, so I don't think it is that good
Awaiting the inevitable KITN

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4529
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #54 on: February 26, 2017, 07:23:59 PM »
Am I crazy for thinking our roster for next year is decent for a coaching candidate to look at? Stokes, Brown and Xavier are something to be excited about? Please? Someone?

It's not terrible. I think with the proper motivation and schemes they could pretty easily finish in the top half of the league. I think we've got one open scholly, probably at least one more defection in a coaching change. Juco post and point would most likely be top priority for the new guy. If he filled those spots well, then it could be a perfectly fine situation to step into.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #55 on: February 26, 2017, 07:29:10 PM »
Top properties to keep are Sneed, Wade, and Stokes. JMHO.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30610
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #56 on: February 26, 2017, 07:33:14 PM »
Whoever we want to keep will stay.  Ask Angel and Leti.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4529
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #57 on: February 26, 2017, 07:46:12 PM »
Top properties to keep are Sneed, Wade, and Stokes. JMHO.

Stokes can't continue to play point though. I'm all for him getting minutes over The Flush, but we've got have a different solution at lead guard.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #58 on: February 26, 2017, 07:52:51 PM »
Top properties to keep are Sneed, Wade, and Stokes. JMHO.

Stokes can't continue to play point though. I'm all for him getting minutes over The Flush, but we've got have a different solution at lead guard.

I agree, I'm just all for keeping a shooter.

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4529
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #59 on: February 26, 2017, 07:57:53 PM »
Top properties to keep are Sneed, Wade, and Stokes. JMHO.

Stokes can't continue to play point though. I'm all for him getting minutes over The Flush, but we've got have a different solution at lead guard.

I agree, I'm just all for keeping a shooter.

Yeah, i think he has a lot of value in that role.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42037
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #60 on: February 26, 2017, 08:31:13 PM »
Am I crazy for thinking our roster for next year is decent for a coaching candidate to look at? Stokes, Brown and Xavier are something to be excited about? Please? Someone?

I question any player that chose to play for this operation.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44995
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #61 on: February 26, 2017, 09:19:34 PM »
Whoever we want to keep will stay.  Ask Angel and Leti.

They didn't leave?

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53953
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #62 on: February 26, 2017, 10:08:13 PM »
Whoever we want to keep will stay.  Ask Angel and Leti.

They didn't leave?
Good grief mir

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44995
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #63 on: February 27, 2017, 02:09:37 AM »
 :dunno:
What am I missing

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17663
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #64 on: February 27, 2017, 10:15:29 AM »
I think the roster next year is certainly capable of making the NCAAs with the right coach.  We need to add bigs and a true PG to compete for anything bigger though.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53953
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #65 on: February 27, 2017, 11:29:29 AM »

Offline Art Vandelay

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • this guy...this guy fucks
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #66 on: February 27, 2017, 11:36:02 AM »
I think the roster next year is certainly capable of making the NCAAs with the right coach.  We need to add bigs and a true PG to compete for anything bigger though.

Well if you trust this staff that Diarra kid is supposed to be a stud. And hopefully that Love kid is legit.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #67 on: February 27, 2017, 12:19:04 PM »
Top properties to keep are Sneed, Wade, and Stokes. JMHO.
Can we keep Cartier too? Even if it's just to look adorable on the bench.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44995
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #68 on: February 27, 2017, 03:55:10 PM »
:dunno:
What am I missing
sarcasm

Still honestly not getting it. Weren't they both released?

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53953
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #69 on: February 27, 2017, 03:56:24 PM »
:dunno:
What am I missing
sarcasm

Still honestly not getting it. Weren't they both released?

yes. which is the point wetwillie was trying to make - there are no guarantees that current players will stay when a new coach is hired.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44995
    • View Profile
Re: We don't have much LONger to wait; KSU ADV
« Reply #70 on: February 27, 2017, 04:22:47 PM »
:dunno:
What am I missing
sarcasm

Still honestly not getting it. Weren't they both released?

yes. which is the point wetwillie was trying to make - there are no guarantees that current players will stay when a new coach is hired.

Got it, if that's what he meant it sailed 3 miles over my head.