0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: cfbandyman on January 12, 2017, 01:16:08 PMQuote from: The Big Train on January 12, 2017, 01:14:40 PMQuote from: CNS on January 12, 2017, 01:09:51 PMQuote from: The Big Train on January 12, 2017, 01:04:54 PMThat would be the dream if we knew where they would all be. Well, the exact thing I started posting about ITT is funding a process to locate them all. Kepler makes sense for finding new planets. How do you even start finding astroids and comets when you have no sun behind them?Gravitational anomaliesEffecting what? Are we just gonna measure every object in the Kuiper belt that we know of for the differences in their orbits we know nothing about? Every planets trillionth of a fraction orbit movement? Something that small doesn't have gravitational lensing either. It's not as easy as you think
Quote from: The Big Train on January 12, 2017, 01:14:40 PMQuote from: CNS on January 12, 2017, 01:09:51 PMQuote from: The Big Train on January 12, 2017, 01:04:54 PMThat would be the dream if we knew where they would all be. Well, the exact thing I started posting about ITT is funding a process to locate them all. Kepler makes sense for finding new planets. How do you even start finding astroids and comets when you have no sun behind them?Gravitational anomalies
Quote from: CNS on January 12, 2017, 01:09:51 PMQuote from: The Big Train on January 12, 2017, 01:04:54 PMThat would be the dream if we knew where they would all be. Well, the exact thing I started posting about ITT is funding a process to locate them all. Kepler makes sense for finding new planets. How do you even start finding astroids and comets when you have no sun behind them?
Quote from: The Big Train on January 12, 2017, 01:04:54 PMThat would be the dream if we knew where they would all be. Well, the exact thing I started posting about ITT is funding a process to locate them all.
That would be the dream if we knew where they would all be.