BCS: Michigan, OSU/OU/KSU, $tanford

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

The way I see it, of the 4 BCS at-large spots, the SEC definitely gets one, and Houston almost certainly gets the other (even if they lose to Tulsa, they'll probably finish top 16 and win their champioship, so the only way they don't get in is if they lose to Southern Miss in their championship).

So, that leaves two at-large spots up for grabs. Currently, those have to be held by Stanford/Oregon and Michigan.

So, we first need to open up one of those spots for OU/OSU/KSU, which means we need Michigan to lose Ohio State, or Oregon to lose to Oregon State. (Or, I guess, Houston loses to Southern Miss in champioship, but that's even less likely).

Then, we just need OSU to crush OU. If all that happens, the Cats are BCS bowling, right?

I wouldn't even be considering this, but for all the crazy upsets this past weekend.

Uhh, Michigan isn't even yet high enough for BCS selection.

But they will be tonight, won't they? And they certainly would be if they win out.

[Rage Against the McKee]

If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

[kstater]

If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

[sysdax]

We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.

[steve dave]

If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

LSU isn't losing to Georgia

[Stevesie60]

We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.

I thought this sock would be funnier. It would if you could exaggerate the negativity of dax and chum1 (sys is not the appropriate poster to attack, he's negative for different reasons), but you can't because they're already so far gone.

[sysdax]

We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.

I thought this sock would be funnier. It would if you could exaggerate the negativity of dax and chum1 (sys is not the appropriate poster to attack, he's negative for different reasons), but you can't because they're already so far gone.

Not supposed to be funny, just edgy and cool because I'm not satisfied with mediocrity and stuff.  Only losers are happy when we're 9-2 and BARELY winning games and not recruiting 5 star players.  Loser.

[Stevesie60]

We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.

I thought this sock would be funnier. It would if you could exaggerate the negativity of dax and chum1 (sys is not the appropriate poster to attack, he's negative for different reasons), but you can't because they're already so far gone.

Not supposed to be funny, just edgy and cool because I'm not satisfied with mediocrity and stuff.  Only losers are happy when we're 9-2 and BARELY winning games and not recruiting 5 star players.  Loser.

No, I get it. It's just not as funny as it could have been.

[Rage Against the McKee]

If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

There can only be 2 BCS bids per conference.

[michigancat]

is sysdax bookcat? because it seems like bookcat.

[kstater]

If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

There can only be 2 BCS bids per conference.

Not true in my scenario.

[kstater]

If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

LSU isn't losing to Georgia

Don't disagree.

[Skipper44]

If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

There can only be 2 BCS bids per conference.

Not true in my scenario.

Link?  I have not seen this anywhere?

[_33]

is sysdax bookcat? because it seems like bookcat.

Yes. Has to be.

[kstater]

If LSU plays Alabama for the championship, the Sugar Bowl will have to find 2 non-SEC schools. I like our chances in that scenario.

Yeah but if LSU beat Arkansas then loses to Georgia they could still get Georgia while LSU and Alabama play again.

There can only be 2 BCS bids per conference.

Not true in my scenario.

Link?  I have not seen this anywhere?

1 v 2 guaranteed.

SEC champ guaranteed.

[sysdax]

is sysdax bookcat? because it seems like bookcat.

Yes. Has to be.

pffft.  Bookcat is a rough ridin' tuck that thinks we're good and stuff.  I'm edgy and cool, unsatisfied with the medicority that KState football has become.  

[Rage Against the McKee]

  It is Bookcat.

[sys]

We better hope we end up in some crap bowl where we can play a crap team that will only beat us by 14.  A BCS opponent would beat us by 50.

I thought this sock would be funnier. It would if you could exaggerate the negativity of dax and chum1 (sys is not the appropriate poster to attack, he's negative for different reasons), but you can't because they're already so far gone.

take my name off this sock.  i was perfectly satisfied with mediocrity.