Messages

1

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: political hobbyist thread

« on: July 08, 2025, 05:06:09 PM »

The current Dems are undoubtedly the worst politicians the US has seen in....how long? How is it possible that they continually push for the worst possible candidate that will almost assuredly keep the base home on election day? They are losing to a regime that is trampling on the constitution day by day with an old man that is hawking crap daily from the oval office to enrich himself. They aren't even hiding it like they used to. This shouldn't be that hard.

To be fair, Republicans also have also been pushing the worst possible candidate. It just so happens that he resonates with a surprisingly large base to my continual surprise.

I agree its weird and disappointing that they don't just put 100% of their focus on preserving the constitution and restoring checks and balances.  Democrats just need to agree to get behind a moderate Republican... kind of like they did with Joe Biden.

2

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Master Epstein Thread

« on: July 08, 2025, 04:50:55 PM »

I agree on the last part, but I think generally you have two plausible scenarios: (1) there is (or was) a client list involving someone that Trump wants to protect from criminal charges (including himself), or (2) Bondi lied about there being one as part of a disinformation campaign.

Either one is inexcusable.

3

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: TexAgs politics board gems thread

« on: July 08, 2025, 04:18:03 PM »

All it takes is some outside Jew lawyer to tell another FBI Jew lawyer to make it all disappear. But as you point out, that could be happening under Trump's watch too. Especially after he stepped in defensively today to basically say "nothing to see here, waste of time".
1 edit

$10 says the edit was to add the second "Jew" before the FBI lawyer.

4

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Master Epstein Thread

« on: July 08, 2025, 04:16:06 PM »

It would be weird if this was all running cover for Trump.  You'd think that the previous administration would have been pretty eager to get that out there prior to last November.

I'm guessing it's mostly about running cover for others.

What's the difference?

5

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: TexAgs politics board gems thread

« on: July 08, 2025, 10:56:54 AM »

Size should be XXXL

6

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency

« on: July 08, 2025, 10:54:56 AM »

#blueanon has literally attempted to leak everything under the sun - knowing that easily manipulated #blueanon masses will believe anything no matter how positively insane it is . . . sources say, people close to the situation say, experts say . . . is absolute fent laced crack for #blueanon

But . . . in the case of Trump on the Epstein list, they sat on it for years. 

So, safe to assume we can put you in the camp of: the list should be released? Do we finally have some COMMON GROUND?

7

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Political Facebook Posts/Tweets From People

« on: July 08, 2025, 10:07:29 AM »

Man, if you gave me 10 years I’m not sure I could craft a more perfect example for this thread

8

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency

« on: July 07, 2025, 04:38:44 PM »

Only the dumbest of the dumb (so pretty much the whole of #blueanon/#blueanongE) don't understand that if Trump was on the Epstein "client list" that list would have been on the streets years ago.

Elon said Trump was on the list. Seems like that could easily be disproven by releasing the list, which only Republicans are able to do right now.

9

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: MEGA MAGA

« on: July 07, 2025, 01:22:38 PM »

Who could have predicted that electing a convicted felon could lead to criminal coverups

10

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / MEGA MAGA

« on: July 06, 2025, 08:27:33 PM »

The other wild part is that this is an actual thoughts and prayers moment. Sure you could increase preparedness and work harder to address climate change, but freak weather events are just going to happen. It’s not like gun violence where you could knock out a bunch of deaths with super simple measures.

It is the epitome of politicizing a tragedy.

11

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: MEGA MAGA

« on: July 05, 2025, 10:33:11 PM »

Maybe if scientists rebranded global warming as “fake manmade weather,” we’d finally have a coalition to start fixing crap.

12

Essentially Flyertalk / Re: chum1's dumb job stories

« on: July 03, 2025, 01:19:18 PM »

I’ve said it a million times: the opportunity for income in this country is practically uncapped if you have determination, a reasonable amount of intelligence, and zero shame.

13

Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Shows that have you by the balls, or vag...

« on: July 02, 2025, 09:56:27 PM »

I think Seasons 2-3 have been pretty much as enjoyable as Season 1, so I really don’t get people that love 1 but dislike 2 or 3.

I don’t think it has to do with Seasons 2/3 jumping the shark. The entire premise is insane when you consider the logistics that would have to be involved to conduct those games involving hundreds of people in total secrecy for 10+ years or however long it was.

Season 1 used an absurd premise to provide social commentary. The following seasons added nothing to the social commentary while having an even more absurd premise. It's still a fun show if you like watching grown people kill themselves playing children's games, though.

I thought the voting segments in Season 2 hit just as hard on social commentary. Not trying to Pit, but it immediately made me reflect on people voting for Trump despite every indication it was going to work out poorly for them.

14

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency

« on: July 02, 2025, 07:11:14 PM »

https://www.reddit.com/r/law/s/BrgatmPTFU

This is sickening.  Trump, miller, and Noem should have serious consequences for this.

Needless cruelty to score loyalty points.

15

Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Shows that have you by the balls, or vag...

« on: July 02, 2025, 06:38:52 PM »

I think Seasons 2-3 have been pretty much as enjoyable as Season 1, so I really don’t get people that love 1 but dislike 2 or 3.

I don’t think it has to do with Seasons 2/3 jumping the shark. The entire premise is insane when you consider the logistics that would have to be involved to conduct those games involving hundreds of people in total secrecy for 10+ years or however long it was.

16

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Thread for Democratic Socialists/AOC watch with 24/7 AOC updates

« on: June 27, 2025, 10:17:31 AM »

cross post

https://x.com/esjesjesj/status/1938341002621669521

That is amazing.

17

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Thread for Democratic Socialists/AOC watch with 24/7 AOC updates

« on: June 26, 2025, 04:59:53 PM »

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/26/trump-golden-share-us-steel-nippon-merger.html?link_source=ta_bluesky_link&taid=685d8abdea31db0001a83f5e&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_content=main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=bluesky

Is this socialism?

US Steel is owned and controlled by a foreign company (who agreed to the golden share thing) so I don't think so.  You could maybe even argue that the U.S. refusing to allow the business deal would have been a greater act of socialism.

18

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Political Facebook Posts/Tweets From People

« on: June 25, 2025, 04:52:49 PM »

Dax I am not your lawyer but I don’t think your defense should be that both you and MJT had the same original thought

19

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Possible WW3 thread

« on: June 23, 2025, 03:40:46 PM »

It would be funny if Iran took out the $400M airplane bribe sitting in a hangar in Qatar.

NGL I like this solution

It's way more valuable to our enemies as a wide open bribe. Destroying it would only bother one person in the entire world.

20

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Let's talk about Elon Musk

« on: June 22, 2025, 07:29:00 PM »

https://x.com/ditzkoff/status/1936495664814244008?s=46


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And this was prompted because grok said catturd2 (of the dax cat turds) is misinformation

I’m legit interested to see whether Musk is willing to compromise the functionality of grok simply to make his own misinformation spreading less embarrassing

21

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Possible WW3 thread

« on: June 22, 2025, 01:26:21 PM »

Incel talking points are slow for Dax today

I'm betting on "you guys are just mad because it's trump"

My money is on “you guys are forgetting that Obama also said Iran was bad.

22

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency

« on: June 20, 2025, 03:54:16 PM »

then claiming republicans freed the slaves with a picture of lincoln who whipped the ass of the south and made them cry.

an incredible logical pretzel to tangled in

I’m legitimately curious how many confederate flag waiving MAGAs repeat this talking point. I’m sure there are many because on average they’re not very bright.

23

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency

« on: June 19, 2025, 07:32:19 PM »

Is Columbus Day still a thing?

24

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Possible WW3 thread

« on: June 18, 2025, 02:03:07 PM »

I mean the Bible for real doesn’t say anything about protecting Israel does it? I actually think God historically got pissed off when people started taking credit/responsibility for fighting Israel’s wars.

25

The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Possible WW3 thread

« on: June 18, 2025, 10:26:02 AM »

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/18/iran-threatens-irreparable-damage-if-us-enters-israel-conflict.html

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday threatened the U.S. with "irreparable damage" if Washington follows through with a military strike against the Middle Eastern country.

"Any American military entry will undoubtedly be met with irreparable damage," Khamenei said, according to NBC News reporting. He added that America's potential involvement in Iran "will 100% backfire" and that "the damage they suffer will be far worse than anything Iran may face. If they enter militarily, they will face harm that they cannot recover from."

What kinds of irreparable damage (if we rule out imaginary) could this dude possibly mean?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Probably more pee tapes.