Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 23, 2017, 03:05:32 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on January 23, 2017, 03:06:30 PM
Post by: Institutional Control on January 23, 2017, 03:11:29 PM
Post by: Tobias on January 23, 2017, 03:11:51 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on January 23, 2017, 03:21:57 PM
I said first 100 days, he'll make it longer than that but he won't make it four years
Post by: star seed 7 on January 23, 2017, 03:23:46 PM
1/20/2029
Jade helm :surprised:
NO GESTOPO IN BASTROP :curse:
Post by: bubbles4ksu on January 23, 2017, 03:30:44 PM
Post by: Phil Titola on January 23, 2017, 03:42:02 PM
Post by: Tobias on January 23, 2017, 03:43:38 PM
Jade helm :surprised:
NO GESTOPO IN BASTROP :curse:
:peek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 23, 2017, 03:45:04 PM
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=38374.0
I said first 100 days, he'll make it longer than that but he won't make it four years
thanks. I kind of figured there had been discussion but didn't see this.
who do you guys think dislikes him the most? dems or pubs? maybe a tie?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 23, 2017, 03:52:21 PM
Post by: Kat Kid on January 23, 2017, 03:53:16 PM
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on January 23, 2017, 03:57:05 PM
Post by: AbeFroman on January 23, 2017, 04:15:53 PM
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 23, 2017, 04:22:56 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on January 23, 2017, 04:27:10 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on January 23, 2017, 04:33:32 PM
Trump is getting re-elected. Just plan for that.
I don't think he will even be the Republican nominee if he does compete the term. I also think the odds aren't great that he'll live a healthy eight years.
Post by: Kat Kid on January 23, 2017, 06:52:37 PM
Trump is getting re-elected. Just plan for that.
I don't think he will even be the Republican nominee if he does compete the term. I also think the odds aren't great that he'll live a healthy eight years.
Ronald Reagan had Alzheimer's in office and is still regarded as a near deity. If he is alive, he is going to be in office for 8 years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: MakeItRain on January 24, 2017, 03:12:48 AM
Trump is getting re-elected. Just plan for that.
I don't think he will even be the Republican nominee if he does compete the term. I also think the odds aren't great that he'll live a healthy eight years.
Ronald Reagan had Alzheimer's in office and is still regarded as a near deity. If he is alive, he is going to be in office for 8 years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The divided Republican party no longer has a unifying common enemy.
Post by: renocat on January 24, 2017, 07:57:50 AM
Post by: catastrophe on January 24, 2017, 08:16:54 AM
Trump is getting re-elected. Just plan for that.
I don't think he will even be the Republican nominee if he does compete the term. I also think the odds aren't great that he'll live a healthy eight years.
Ronald Reagan had Alzheimer's in office and is still regarded as a near deity. If he is alive, he is going to be in office for 8 years.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The divided Republican party no longer has a unifying common enemy.
Which is funny because democrats (and some republicans) today seem to be uniformly scared of Russia and Trump DNGAF.
Post by: catastrophe on January 24, 2017, 08:19:43 AM
This theory assumes the democrats put up someone who is even remotely competent and likeable, so I put the odds at about 50/50.
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 24, 2017, 12:30:36 PM
Post by: ben ji on January 24, 2017, 12:46:58 PM
1-20-21
Post by: chum1 on January 24, 2017, 08:44:06 PM
Amazing Associated Press sentence about the president. https://t.co/EEUv379I0E pic.twitter.com/A6a3WKN7WP
— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) January 24, 2017
Post by: Emo EMAW on January 24, 2017, 11:43:18 PM
True, trump is very fortunate to be inheriting a good economy
I think the economy is and has been crap. He's just inheriting good timing because it can't be shitty forever.
Post by: MakeItRain on January 25, 2017, 01:04:01 AM
If the economy is even remotely improved and the employment participation rate improves he will easily be re-elected.
Well the "participation rate" won't vastly improve but it will go back to not mattering like it didn't for the 236 years the country existed before the latest recovery. Participation rate is a made up metric for crap brained partisans to be passive aggressively unamerican. Easier to move the goal posts than acknowledge anything positive that happened in this country under the coon in chief.
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 25, 2017, 08:41:06 AM
If the economy is even remotely improved and the employment participation rate improves he will easily be re-elected.
Well the "participation rate" won't vastly improve but it will go back to not mattering like it didn't for the 236 years the country existed before the latest recovery. Participation rate is a made up metric for crap brained partisans to be passive aggressively unamerican. Easier to move the goal posts than acknowledge anything positive that happened in this country under the coon in chief.
You think 20-30 year olds not participating in the work force isn't a big deal?
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 25, 2017, 08:42:30 AM
Post by: Kat Kid on January 25, 2017, 08:52:45 AM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 25, 2017, 08:55:50 AM
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on January 25, 2017, 09:36:31 AM
Some people would just rather not work. It's not like those people are going to get the good jobs that a strong economy creates. Why would anyone offering a high-paying job consider the 20-something that hasn't ever had a job and lives with his parents?Because their mommy and Daddy told them they could be anything they want to be and they want to be the boss of those companies now. Isn't that how it works? "I want it so you have to give it to me?"
Post by: Phil Titola on January 25, 2017, 09:40:48 AM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 25, 2017, 10:58:25 AM
Demographics are working hard against the participation rate improving anywhere near the late 90's/2000 highs of close to 70%
Check out these stats, pretty interesting. While participation rate for younger workers decreased from 2004 to 2014, rates went up for older workers. Seems contrary to what most people believe.
https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm (https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm)
Post by: ednksu on January 25, 2017, 11:13:14 AM
Demographics are working hard against the participation rate improving anywhere near the late 90's/2000 highs of close to 70%
Check out these stats, pretty interesting. While participation rate for younger workers decreased from 2004 to 2014, rates went up for older workers. Seems contrary to what most people believe.
https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm (https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm)
I think you're looking at it from the wrong end. There is a lot of information out there that baby boomers aren't retiring early or at the "normal" time. That is skewing your data a bit. It's also a HUGE issue for academic jobs. At some point, through health, or they finally feel "secure" they'll start retiring in mass and we'll see that balance change drastically.
Post by: Cartierfor3 on January 25, 2017, 11:28:13 AM
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 25, 2017, 01:29:27 PM
Demographics are working hard against the participation rate improving anywhere near the late 90's/2000 highs of close to 70%
Check out these stats, pretty interesting. While participation rate for younger workers decreased from 2004 to 2014, rates went up for older workers. Seems contrary to what most people believe.
https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm (https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm)
I think you're looking at it from the wrong end. There is a lot of information out there that baby boomers aren't retiring early or at the "normal" time. That is skewing your data a bit. It's also a HUGE issue for academic jobs. At some point, through health, or they finally feel "secure" they'll start retiring in mass and we'll see that balance change drastically.
If there was really positive job growth, there should be plenty of jobs to go around, and the 16-24 demographic should be increasing in participation rate rather than dropping 10% from 2004 to 2014. Is grandpa really taking that many jobs away from them?
Post by: Phil Titola on January 25, 2017, 02:56:54 PM
Y
Maybe the problem here is the grasping of what the participation rate even means.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 25, 2017, 03:30:28 PM
Demographics are working hard against the participation rate improving anywhere near the late 90's/2000 highs of close to 70%
Check out these stats, pretty interesting. While participation rate for younger workers decreased from 2004 to 2014, rates went up for older workers. Seems contrary to what most people believe.
https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm (https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm)
I think you're looking at it from the wrong end. There is a lot of information out there that baby boomers aren't retiring early or at the "normal" time. That is skewing your data a bit. It's also a HUGE issue for academic jobs. At some point, through health, or they finally feel "secure" they'll start retiring in mass and we'll see that balance change drastically.
If there was really positive job growth, there should be plenty of jobs to go around, and the 16-24 demographic should be increasing in participation rate rather than dropping 10% from 2004 to 2014. Is grandpa really taking that many jobs away from them?
If someone were taking jobs from them, they'd be counted as unemployed, not non-participants. These people would just rather not work. The only thing that will drive them to the workforce will be their parents kicking them out or their parents dying.
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 25, 2017, 04:30:11 PM
Demographics are working hard against the participation rate improving anywhere near the late 90's/2000 highs of close to 70%
Check out these stats, pretty interesting. While participation rate for younger workers decreased from 2004 to 2014, rates went up for older workers. Seems contrary to what most people believe.
https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm (https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm)
I think you're looking at it from the wrong end. There is a lot of information out there that baby boomers aren't retiring early or at the "normal" time. That is skewing your data a bit. It's also a HUGE issue for academic jobs. At some point, through health, or they finally feel "secure" they'll start retiring in mass and we'll see that balance change drastically.
If there was really positive job growth, there should be plenty of jobs to go around, and the 16-24 demographic should be increasing in participation rate rather than dropping 10% from 2004 to 2014. Is grandpa really taking that many jobs away from them?
If someone were taking jobs from them, they'd be counted as unemployed, not non-participants. These people would just rather not work. The only thing that will drive them to the workforce will be their parents kicking them out or their parents dying.
Well, several years back there was much discussion about this. The "unemployed vs not in the work force" definition seemed to change. If you were collecting unemployment payments, you are considered unemployed, but once your unemployment benefits ran out and you were still unemployed, you were no longer considered in the work force. This is how we got tho 4.5% unemployment and the lowest participation rate in 40 years.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 25, 2017, 04:31:35 PM
Demographics are working hard against the participation rate improving anywhere near the late 90's/2000 highs of close to 70%
Check out these stats, pretty interesting. While participation rate for younger workers decreased from 2004 to 2014, rates went up for older workers. Seems contrary to what most people believe.
https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm (https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm)
I think you're looking at it from the wrong end. There is a lot of information out there that baby boomers aren't retiring early or at the "normal" time. That is skewing your data a bit. It's also a HUGE issue for academic jobs. At some point, through health, or they finally feel "secure" they'll start retiring in mass and we'll see that balance change drastically.
If there was really positive job growth, there should be plenty of jobs to go around, and the 16-24 demographic should be increasing in participation rate rather than dropping 10% from 2004 to 2014. Is grandpa really taking that many jobs away from them?
If someone were taking jobs from them, they'd be counted as unemployed, not non-participants. These people would just rather not work. The only thing that will drive them to the workforce will be their parents kicking them out or their parents dying.
Well, several years back there was much discussion about this. The "unemployed vs not in the work force" definition seemed to change. If you were collecting unemployment payments, you are considered unemployed, but once your unemployment benefits ran out and you were still unemployed, you were no longer considered in the work force. This is how we got tho 4.5% unemployment and the lowest participation rate in 40 years.
How long does it take your unemployment benefits to run out?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 25, 2017, 04:53:23 PM
Post by: star seed 7 on January 25, 2017, 05:00:24 PM
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 25, 2017, 05:03:21 PM
Not for coal miners
lots of unskilled labor jobs. get on a road crew
Post by: AbeFroman on January 25, 2017, 05:08:43 PM
Not sure if Mommybloggers count for or against the rate though.
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 25, 2017, 06:17:09 PM
Demographics are working hard against the participation rate improving anywhere near the late 90's/2000 highs of close to 70%
Check out these stats, pretty interesting. While participation rate for younger workers decreased from 2004 to 2014, rates went up for older workers. Seems contrary to what most people believe.
https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm (https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm)
I think you're looking at it from the wrong end. There is a lot of information out there that baby boomers aren't retiring early or at the "normal" time. That is skewing your data a bit. It's also a HUGE issue for academic jobs. At some point, through health, or they finally feel "secure" they'll start retiring in mass and we'll see that balance change drastically.
If there was really positive job growth, there should be plenty of jobs to go around, and the 16-24 demographic should be increasing in participation rate rather than dropping 10% from 2004 to 2014. Is grandpa really taking that many jobs away from them?
If someone were taking jobs from them, they'd be counted as unemployed, not non-participants. These people would just rather not work. The only thing that will drive them to the workforce will be their parents kicking them out or their parents dying.
Well, several years back there was much discussion about this. The "unemployed vs not in the work force" definition seemed to change. If you were collecting unemployment payments, you are considered unemployed, but once your unemployment benefits ran out and you were still unemployed, you were no longer considered in the work force. This is how we got tho 4.5% unemployment and the lowest participation rate in 40 years.
How long does it take your unemployment benefits to run out?
I think it was extended to 1 year.
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 25, 2017, 06:47:07 PM
Post by: waks on January 26, 2017, 06:24:44 AM
The only dramatic change that shows is the participation rate for 16 to 24 year olds. Could it be that more people in that age range are seeking higher education? A quick Google search indicates so.Demographics are working hard against the participation rate improving anywhere near the late 90's/2000 highs of close to 70%
Check out these stats, pretty interesting. While participation rate for younger workers decreased from 2004 to 2014, rates went up for older workers. Seems contrary to what most people believe.
https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm (https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_303.htm)
https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=98 (https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=98)
Post by: renocat on January 26, 2017, 06:42:23 AM
This is the lead headline on the CBS enews site. The crux of it is about removing a president because of mental illness. Now the appears to be mental illness. Dr. Rick is he? Or is he Wiley Don Fart?
Post by: Phil Titola on January 26, 2017, 08:52:17 AM
Post by: AbeFroman on January 26, 2017, 10:40:36 AM
Nobody can seriously look for work for a year and not find a job.
Yeah but you're forgetting how white trash Trumpsters have high and mighty opinions of themselves and think most jobs are beneath them.
Trump voters: willfully unemployed
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 30, 2017, 09:52:02 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on January 30, 2017, 10:17:35 PM
Post by: Tobias on January 30, 2017, 10:27:21 PM
Post by: AbeFroman on January 30, 2017, 10:40:45 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on January 30, 2017, 10:42:21 PM
after he does the heavy lifting, there's gotta be a long line of republicans ready to wedge this thing open
Exactly, he hasn't done a damn thing to garner loyalty either. Who has he helped in Washington other than his family, Bannon, and Kellyanne? Doing crap like messing with the joint chiefs is pushing everyone away. I checked several influential Republican twitter accounts over the weekend and there was radio silence about the EO and the restructuring of the NSC. All he had over these people was popularity, as that wanes the rats will flee the ship.
Post by: sys on January 30, 2017, 11:37:35 PM
Post by: Kat Kid on January 31, 2017, 07:57:23 AM
I originally said sometime in the first 100 days, he'll likely make out that far but no damn way he's making it 2 years. It is now obvious he's going to govern like he leads his life. He's a stupid, petty, vindictive, little child. It is far too easy to make enemies with him. Remember the revolving door with his campaign? Bannon and Kellyanne didn't get embedded until the summer. How long will it be until he starts to feud with Reince again. He won't quit, he will be impeached, someone currently in his circle will take him down. This will also end with either him getting divorced, his daughter getting divorced, or with her and him no longer speaking.
maybe on West Wing reboot or on that other shitty Sorkin show about tv news, but not in the America I know.
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2017, 07:58:36 AM
Post by: Kat Kid on January 31, 2017, 08:01:03 AM
You have to give a date to play the game
I said he serves 2 full terms. #math
Post by: star seed 7 on January 31, 2017, 08:01:49 AM
You have to give a date to play the game
I said he serves 2 full terms. #math
I meant mir, sorry
Post by: cfbandyman on January 31, 2017, 09:28:16 AM
after he does the heavy lifting, there's gotta be a long line of republicans ready to wedge this thing open
Exactly, he hasn't done a damn thing to garner loyalty either. Who has he helped in Washington other than his family, Bannon, and Kellyanne? Doing crap like messing with the joint chiefs is pushing everyone away. I checked several influential Republican twitter accounts over the weekend and there was radio silence about the EO and the restructuring of the NSC. All he had over these people was popularity, as that wanes the rats will flee the ship.
Third all of this talk. Especially once he doubles back and runs over those that got him there. Maher (who I'm not a huge fan of) is totally right about Trump in one word: Id. Trump is impulsive and if someone is garnering him the most attention, and is most useful to him at that moment, and if that starts to override people who helped get him there (or think they helped get him there) the scheming will happen. He lays a lot of people to waste. If there is one thing he is really good at, is protecting himself, he will not hesitate to let the bus hit someone else if it conveniences him.
As for a date, I'll go for July 17, 2018. It'll take time for the poison root to really take effect, but it'll happen sooner or later.
Post by: catastrophe on January 31, 2017, 09:34:19 AM
I originally said sometime in the first 100 days, he'll likely make out that far but no damn way he's making it 2 years. It is now obvious he's going to govern like he leads his life. He's a stupid, petty, vindictive, little child. It is far too easy to make enemies with him. Remember the revolving door with his campaign? Bannon and Kellyanne didn't get embedded until the summer. How long will it be until he starts to feud with Reince again. He won't quit, he will be impeached, someone currently in his circle will take him down. This will also end with either him getting divorced, his daughter getting divorced, or with her and him no longer speaking.
Based on US history, I still find impeachment and removal highly unlikely. FDR and Lincoln were about as crazy in their treatment of the existing political system (though admittedly you can get away with more as a wartime president), and believe it or not we've had more corrupt people take office.
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on January 31, 2017, 09:35:22 AM
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on January 31, 2017, 09:35:55 AM
I originally said sometime in the first 100 days, he'll likely make out that far but no damn way he's making it 2 years. It is now obvious he's going to govern like he leads his life. He's a stupid, petty, vindictive, little child. It is far too easy to make enemies with him. Remember the revolving door with his campaign? Bannon and Kellyanne didn't get embedded until the summer. How long will it be until he starts to feud with Reince again. He won't quit, he will be impeached, someone currently in his circle will take him down. This will also end with either him getting divorced, his daughter getting divorced, or with her and him no longer speaking.
Based on US history, I still find impeachment and removal highly unlikely. FDR and Lincoln were about as crazy in their treatment of the existing political system (though admittedly you can get away with more as a wartime president), and believe it or not we've had more corrupt people take office.
We've never had someone as mentally disabled, though.
Post by: ChiComCat on January 31, 2017, 09:40:24 AM
I originally said sometime in the first 100 days, he'll likely make out that far but no damn way he's making it 2 years. It is now obvious he's going to govern like he leads his life. He's a stupid, petty, vindictive, little child. It is far too easy to make enemies with him. Remember the revolving door with his campaign? Bannon and Kellyanne didn't get embedded until the summer. How long will it be until he starts to feud with Reince again. He won't quit, he will be impeached, someone currently in his circle will take him down. This will also end with either him getting divorced, his daughter getting divorced, or with her and him no longer speaking.
Based on US history, I still find impeachment and removal highly unlikely. FDR and Lincoln were about as crazy in their treatment of the existing political system (though admittedly you can get away with more as a wartime president), and believe it or not we've had more corrupt people take office.
I would put impeachment as more likely than any other president in my lifetime, but I think he steps down. He'll find a reason to say "I did what I came to do" and leave because he is tired of the job and scrutiny that comes with it.
I give him a few months past the midterms. He's out in April 2019.
Post by: wetwillie on January 31, 2017, 01:28:41 PM
Post by: chum1 on January 31, 2017, 02:20:13 PM
Post by: Panjandrum on January 31, 2017, 02:53:02 PM
I'll say impeachment hearings start sometime in Q2 2018 with him being ousted sometime before 2019. So, I don't know, 10/31/2018.
Post by: Mrs. Gooch on January 31, 2017, 02:55:05 PM
And he wasn't healthy to begin with. Fat, poor diet, no exercise.
He is the healthiest man to ever be elected president. Period.
Post by: sys on January 31, 2017, 03:02:38 PM
Post by: MakeItRain on February 01, 2017, 02:23:47 AM
You have to give a date to play the game
5/5/18 his last tweet as president will be a photo of him eating fajitas
Post by: cfbandyman on February 13, 2017, 11:44:38 PM
Post by: ednksu on February 13, 2017, 11:51:58 PM
I originally said sometime in the first 100 days, he'll likely make out that far but no damn way he's making it 2 years. It is now obvious he's going to govern like he leads his life. He's a stupid, petty, vindictive, little child. It is far too easy to make enemies with him. Remember the revolving door with his campaign? Bannon and Kellyanne didn't get embedded until the summer. How long will it be until he starts to feud with Reince again. He won't quit, he will be impeached, someone currently in his circle will take him down. This will also end with either him getting divorced, his daughter getting divorced, or with her and him no longer speaking.
Based on US history, I still find impeachment and removal highly unlikely. FDR and Lincoln were about as crazy in their treatment of the existing political system (though admittedly you can get away with more as a wartime president), and believe it or not we've had more corrupt people take office.
Man this is an amazing post. I love it when people who don't know what impeachment is comment about its historical context.
Post by: Tobias on February 14, 2017, 12:10:46 AM
Post by: star seed 7 on February 14, 2017, 12:14:00 AM
Heh.
Post by: The Big Train on February 14, 2017, 09:31:47 PM
Post by: Emo EMAW on February 17, 2017, 08:59:18 AM
Serve full term
Be removed / forced to resign
Quit on his own volition
Death
Post by: SdK on February 17, 2017, 11:49:01 AM
Post by: Trim on February 17, 2017, 12:39:36 PM
(https://www.reddit.com/r/nathanforyou/comments/50i9a0/season_4/)
Post by: catastrophe on February 17, 2017, 12:56:55 PM
I sort of think there are a lot of people depending on him to keep his job and they won't let him quit. In order of most to least likely to happen in the next 4 years:
Serve full term
Be removed / forced to resign
Quit on his own volition
Death
I'd swap the last two. There is zero chance of Trump quitting without impeachment being imminent.
Post by: ShellShock on February 17, 2017, 04:47:04 PM
Post by: The Big Train on February 17, 2017, 08:06:42 PM
I want to make sure that i'm in for Sunday, January 19th, 2025.
(http://goEMAW.com/forum/Smileys/goEMAW/LOL.gif)
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 17, 2017, 10:53:35 PM
I want to make sure that i'm in for Sunday, January 19th, 2025.
This. I'd put his attention span up against the mutants comprising the resistance any day of the week.
Post by: ShellShock on February 20, 2017, 09:35:39 AM
I want to make sure that i'm in for Sunday, January 19th, 2025.
This. I'd put his attention span up against the mutants comprising the resistance any day of the week.
...not sure if serious?
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on May 16, 2017, 11:47:14 AM
he can't be president of the united god damned states of America forever, so let's guess when his last day as president will be. I'm going with 3/13/2019.
man I don't know if he can make it that long. did I overestimate?
Post by: The Big Train on May 16, 2017, 12:48:04 PM
June 16, 2017
:peek:
Post by: ben ji on May 16, 2017, 07:23:39 PM
Initially I was going to say he is would resign for "Health" reasons around year 3 when its clear he will be challenged in the primary...Then I realize that Trumps loves campaigning more than anything in the world no one would be able to talk him out of it.
1-20-21
Update-
I don't see him resigning or going down without a fight. He will fight it to the bitter end and it could get ugly.
2-6-18.
Post by: Stevesie60 on May 16, 2017, 07:32:10 PM
Post by: Kat Kid on May 16, 2017, 07:35:03 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: Institutional Control on May 16, 2017, 07:42:26 PM
8 years folks.I'll be shocked if he doesn't make it 8.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: SdK on May 16, 2017, 07:59:29 PM
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on April 11, 2018, 10:44:18 PM
he can't be president of the united god damned states of America forever, so let's guess when his last day as president will be. I'm going with 3/13/2019.
:dunno:
Post by: 8manpick on April 11, 2018, 10:55:39 PM
That seems about right, I'll guess 2/14/19he can't be president of the united god damned states of America forever, so let's guess when his last day as president will be. I'm going with 3/13/2019.
:dunno:
Post by: Spracne on April 11, 2018, 10:57:52 PM
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Post by: Phil Titola on July 04, 2018, 09:35:08 AM
7/4/2019
One year left trumpers
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 04, 2018, 11:24:17 AM
Post by: catastrophe on July 04, 2018, 03:09:41 PM
I originally said sometime in the first 100 days, he'll likely make out that far but no damn way he's making it 2 years. It is now obvious he's going to govern like he leads his life. He's a stupid, petty, vindictive, little child. It is far too easy to make enemies with him. Remember the revolving door with his campaign? Bannon and Kellyanne didn't get embedded until the summer. How long will it be until he starts to feud with Reince again. He won't quit, he will be impeached, someone currently in his circle will take him down. This will also end with either him getting divorced, his daughter getting divorced, or with her and him no longer speaking.
Based on US history, I still find impeachment and removal highly unlikely. FDR and Lincoln were about as crazy in their treatment of the existing political system (though admittedly you can get away with more as a wartime president), and believe it or not we've had more corrupt people take office.
This post didn't age super well. We're getting into Warren Harding levels of corruption.
Post by: waks on July 04, 2018, 04:38:04 PM
Surely we're past Harding. He's already had several Tea-Pot Dome equivalents.I originally said sometime in the first 100 days, he'll likely make out that far but no damn way he's making it 2 years. It is now obvious he's going to govern like he leads his life. He's a stupid, petty, vindictive, little child. It is far too easy to make enemies with him. Remember the revolving door with his campaign? Bannon and Kellyanne didn't get embedded until the summer. How long will it be until he starts to feud with Reince again. He won't quit, he will be impeached, someone currently in his circle will take him down. This will also end with either him getting divorced, his daughter getting divorced, or with her and him no longer speaking.
Based on US history, I still find impeachment and removal highly unlikely. FDR and Lincoln were about as crazy in their treatment of the existing political system (though admittedly you can get away with more as a wartime president), and believe it or not we've had more corrupt people take office.
This post didn't age super well. We're getting into Warren Harding levels of corruption.
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 04, 2018, 04:40:25 PM
Post by: wetwillie on July 04, 2018, 04:43:17 PM
Post by: catastrophe on July 04, 2018, 09:56:38 PM
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 04, 2018, 10:44:23 PM
Post by: DaBigTrain on July 04, 2018, 10:46:25 PM
Oh man, you guys are in for a long no ass term. :frown:
:confused:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 04, 2018, 10:48:05 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 04, 2018, 10:50:31 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: DaBigTrain on July 04, 2018, 10:52:49 PM
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 04, 2018, 10:54:31 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: DaBigTrain on July 04, 2018, 10:57:50 PM
I rough ridin' knew it. Stop doing illegal drugs, dude. It’s not funny, it’s a legit crime.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What if I live in one of the 9 states it’s legal :dunno:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 04, 2018, 11:00:35 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: DaBigTrain on July 04, 2018, 11:02:08 PM
Dc cat being a illegal drug smuggler is not a surprise, I just hope everyone is hiding their family and kids from this gd monster tonight.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This site isn’t real, so I hope you don’t bring this level of aggression to those around you IRL tonight.
Post by: star seed 7 on January 08, 2021, 06:04:07 PM
Post by: catastrophe on January 08, 2021, 06:07:40 PM
I think Trump will last 4 years and will be challenged for the primary. I still think he will win but get defeated in the general by the democratic candidate.I think I nailed this (although the RNC circled its wagons pretty quickly to shut out Bill Weld). Biden is the living embodiment of remotely competent.
This theory assumes the democrats put up someone who is even remotely competent and likeable, so I put the odds at about 50/50.
Post by: wetwillie on January 08, 2021, 06:09:24 PM
Post by: Spracne on January 08, 2021, 06:11:52 PM
Post by: DaBigTrain on January 11, 2021, 02:11:46 PM
https://www.state.gov/biographies/donald-j-trump/
Post by: Cire on January 11, 2021, 02:50:07 PM
LOL
Post by: ChiComCat on January 11, 2021, 04:49:28 PM
Post by: cfbandyman on January 11, 2021, 05:48:56 PM
Post by: cfbandyman on January 11, 2021, 06:51:00 PM