goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Katpappy on December 09, 2010, 08:42:29 PM

Title: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: Katpappy on December 09, 2010, 08:42:29 PM
The worst bowl locales in CFB history
Found 1 day ago on Lost Lettermen: 
With bowl season just around the corner, we can’t help but envy some of the teams that are heading to picturesque destinations like Pasadena, Miami or Glendale. Then there are the teams that aren’t heading to those places. With 35 bowl games this season, not everyone is going to provide a trip to Disneyland and an escape from the winter. And while a trip to Boise, ID, might not seem ideal for Fresno State and Northern Illinois fans over this holiday season, there’s been worse. And to prove it, we ranked the Top 10 Worst Bowl Game Destinations Ever. 10. Dayton, OH: Aviation Bowl (1961) 9. Toronto, Canada: International Bowl (2007-10) 8. East Rutherford, NJ: Garden State Bowl (1978-81) 7. Cleveland, OH: Great Lakes Bowl (1947) 6. Boise, ID: Humanitarian Bowl (1997-Present) 5. New York, NY: Gotham Bowl (1961-62), Pinstripe Bowl (2010-Present) 4. College Park, MD: Presidential Cup Bowl (1950) 3. Washington, D.C.: Military Bowl (2008-Present) 2. Seattle, W...
 Original Story: http://www.lostlettermen.com/top-10-t...   :bait:
Title: Re: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: Katpappy on December 09, 2010, 08:49:53 PM
CAC'y team, CAC'y bowl... I guess we get just what we deserve.  :party: :woot: :driving:
Title: Re: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: MeatSauce on December 10, 2010, 09:37:22 AM
He's still pissed about the 76-0 Ball St. game
Title: Re: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: Clevey 2 Times on December 11, 2010, 10:58:18 AM
How in the hell is any bowl game in NYC worse than a game in Dayton, Ohio? That is a sad sad place. The '47 Great Lakes Bowl in Cleveland, Ohio - trust me its pretty much Dayton on a larger scale with a little more racism mixed in. Or a marginally better Detroit (by the way, just released figures show D-Town with 78,000 vacant homes...insane).  Although in '47 Cleveland was probably a swinging place...

A bowl in Ames, Iowa, now that would be some cac.
Title: Re: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: Katpappy on December 11, 2010, 08:43:29 PM
How in the hell is any bowl game in NYC worse than a game in Dayton, Ohio? That is a sad sad place. The '47 Great Lakes Bowl in Cleveland, Ohio - trust me its pretty much Dayton on a larger scale with a little more racism mixed in. Or a marginally better Detroit (by the way, just released figures show D-Town with 78,000 vacant homes...insane).  Although in '47 Cleveland was probably a swinging place...

A bowl in Ames, Iowa, now that would be some cac.
Just wondering, what your idea of a cacy bowl? :driving:
Title: Re: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: Clevey 2 Times on December 12, 2010, 12:27:02 PM
How in the hell is any bowl game in NYC worse than a game in Dayton, Ohio? That is a sad sad place. The '47 Great Lakes Bowl in Cleveland, Ohio - trust me its pretty much Dayton on a larger scale with a little more racism mixed in. Or a marginally better Detroit (by the way, just released figures show D-Town with 78,000 vacant homes...insane).  Although in '47 Cleveland was probably a swinging place...

A bowl in Ames, Iowa, now that would be some cac.
Just wondering, what your idea of a cacy bowl? :driving:

My first thought - any bowl that is not the national championship game.

My second thought - any bowl who's payout is less than 2 mil.

My final thought - since most bowls are irrelevant, it all depends on location, therefore NYC even in December would be nowhere near the worst. Off the top of my head, would not want to be bowling in Detroit, that may be the worst.
Title: Re: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: Katpappy on December 12, 2010, 07:10:19 PM
How in the hell is any bowl game in NYC worse than a game in Dayton, Ohio? That is a sad sad place. The '47 Great Lakes Bowl in Cleveland, Ohio - trust me its pretty much Dayton on a larger scale with a little more racism mixed in. Or a marginally better Detroit (by the way, just released figures show D-Town with 78,000 vacant homes...insane).  Although in '47 Cleveland was probably a swinging place...

A bowl in Ames, Iowa, now that would be some cac.
Just wondering, what your idea of a cacy bowl? :driving:

My first thought - any bowl that is not the national championship game.

My second thought - any bowl who's payout is less than 2 mil.

My final thought - since most bowls are irrelevant, it all depends on location, therefore NYC even in December would be nowhere near the worst. Off the top of my head, would not want to be bowling in Detroit, that may be the worst.

Agreed... also North Dakota, Montana or Wyoming are not cool.  Oh wait, very cool, as a matter of fact, Ice Frickin Cold!  :facepalm:

But if they have a pro baseball stadium, then maybe. :fatty:
Title: Re: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: FP TC etc. on December 12, 2010, 08:28:28 PM
I really like NYC. Even in the winter  :dunno:
Title: Re: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: theKSU on December 13, 2010, 01:43:53 PM
I really like NYC. Even in the winter  :dunno:

Does it get any better than NYC around Christmas/ New Years?  :ck:
Title: Re: TOP TEN WORST BOWL IN FOOTBALL HISTORY!
Post by: Katpappy on December 14, 2010, 09:42:09 PM
I really like NYC. Even in the winter  :dunno:

Does it get any better than NYC around Christmas/ New Years?  :ck:
What about Thursday afternoon around 2:30 PM?  Does that do it for you? :drink: