goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: Sugar Dick on December 01, 2010, 10:11:01 PM

Title: uk v. dook
Post by: Sugar Dick on December 01, 2010, 10:11:01 PM
from phog.net
Quote
Selby = Irving
Taylor<= Smith - not as good a scorer but Asst to TO ratio probably better
Morningstar < Singler  - think could slow Singler down a little with good "D"
Mc Morris > Kelly - no contest
Mk Morris > Plumlee - close according to numbers but Mk much more offensive repitwa

Bench
T-Rob > Plumlee - no contest
Reed = Curry
EJ = Dawkins
Travis > Duke ?
Withey > Duke ?
Little > Duke ?

Looks pretty favorable for us!!!!!!!

 :lol:
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Stupid Fitz on December 01, 2010, 10:22:47 PM
Well, since he doesn't know anyone on the Duke bench, the named UK players have to be better right?
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: gatoveintisiete on December 01, 2010, 10:50:21 PM
dude is being a little conservative, Selby clearly better than Irving.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Sugar Dick on December 01, 2010, 10:55:16 PM
I liked the Mk.Morris repitwa part
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: broXcore on December 02, 2010, 07:33:08 AM
repitwa
:lol:
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: kitten_mittons on December 02, 2010, 07:42:20 AM
The "Reed=Curry" one is pretty good, also.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: mcmwcat on December 02, 2010, 07:45:33 AM
The "Reed=Curry" one is pretty good, also.

or EJ = Dawkins

Dawkins is 11ppg shooting 53% from 3
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: FHSU92 on December 02, 2010, 09:35:32 AM
Guys, I think he's talkin' street fight, otherwize why would he have bench comparos? 

Duke doesn't really use their bench much, so TRob would be going against both Plum's after McM fouls out.   Amazing the lbbiq over there. 
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: michigancat on December 02, 2010, 09:42:31 AM
KU will win the Big 12.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Dugout DickStone on December 02, 2010, 09:44:17 AM
KU will win the Big 12.

If Duke were in the Big 12, they would.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: pissclams on December 02, 2010, 10:31:26 AM
KU will win the Big 12.
i haven't seen them play any real competition so it's hard for me to know how good they are but i think you're probably right, esp when you consider conf schedules.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: yoga-like_abana on December 02, 2010, 10:47:39 AM
I can't disagree with anything he said, KU probably has one of there greatest teams of all time, anything less than an '08 type of season should be a disappointment to the hawk faithful.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on December 02, 2010, 10:59:56 AM
Yeah the hawks should not lose a game this year and if anyone is even with in 10 points of them it is a wasted and embarassing season IMH and HBBIQ Opinion.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: RTB on December 02, 2010, 11:07:37 AM
Probably UCONN Womens bball- Part 2.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: AbeFroman on December 02, 2010, 12:31:01 PM
Quote
Morningstar's defense slowing down Singler
:lol: x1000
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Scary Smart on December 02, 2010, 04:06:29 PM
From the front page of ESPN college basketball section.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi931.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fad152%2FScarySmart%2Fkuugly.jpg&hash=5b520e16d6df766ed4c687b7eb034b2e922bf38d)

Lot of mouthbreathers in this pic.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: cork_sniffer on December 02, 2010, 05:15:20 PM
that poster is pretty dumb, as are most posters at phog.net

selby might be as good as irving but we don't know yet.

taylor is faster, a better shooter and a comparable player other than that to smith

releford is the starting wing most likely as the season progresses and if needed mcmorris plays the 3 against singler.  in that case it's pretty even.

Robinson is stronger and more skilled than either plumlee and mk morris is the same vs kelly or mason plumlee

duke's bench features some young talent as does ku's. 

Pretty even matchup actually player to player but Duke is far more polished and tested at this point. 
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Sugar Dick on December 02, 2010, 05:48:03 PM
that poster is pretty dumb, as are most posters at phog.net

selby might be as good as irving but we don't know yet.

taylor is faster, a better shooter and a comparable player other than that to smith

releford is the starting wing most likely as the season progresses and if needed mcmorris plays the 3 against singler.  in that case it's pretty even.

Robinson is stronger and more skilled than either plumlee and mk morris is the same vs kelly or mason plumlee


duke's bench features some young talent as does ku's. 

Pretty even matchup actually
player to player but Duke is far more polished and tested at this point. 

OMG  :lol:
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: jtksu on December 02, 2010, 05:51:55 PM
Yep.  KU lost in the 2nd round, lost 3 guys to the NBA, added a guy yet to play in college, and are currently as good (or better) than the defending champs.  That makes sense to me.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: slimz on December 02, 2010, 06:23:41 PM
KU will win the Big 12.
i haven't seen them play any real competition so it's hard for me to know how good they are but i think you're probably right, esp when you consider conf schedules.

Agreed.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: yosh on December 02, 2010, 07:13:58 PM
Selby > Russell
Taylor< Pullen
Morningstar < McGruder
Mc Morris > Judge
Mk Morris < Kelly

OMG!!!   :ksu:    :excited:
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Cire on December 02, 2010, 07:17:18 PM
Keep in mind Robinson = Dwight Howard.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Sugar Dick on December 02, 2010, 10:05:11 PM
The only guy on ku that looks > than anyone is Morris22
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: jtksu on December 02, 2010, 10:07:40 PM
UCLA likely beats Duke by at least a dozen.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: hemmy on December 02, 2010, 10:25:17 PM
ku is full of uglies
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Immaculate1 on December 03, 2010, 08:51:07 AM
The thing that pisses me off the most about this post is the fact they are calling themselves UK. I know it is the university of kansas or whatever but when I hear/think uk I think kentucky. And IMO kansas doesn't have crap on kentucky in anything. So it is just disrespectful.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on December 03, 2010, 09:48:21 AM
that poster is pretty dumb, as are most posters at phog.net

selby might be as good as irving but we don't know yet.

taylor is faster, a better shooter and a comparable player other than that to smith

releford is the starting wing most likely as the season progresses and if needed mcmorris plays the 3 against singler.  in that case it's pretty even.

Robinson is stronger and more skilled than either plumlee and mk morris is the same vs kelly or mason plumlee

duke's bench features some young talent as does ku's. 

Pretty even matchup actually player to player but Duke is far more polished and tested at this point. 
  Uh, No.  Taylor might be better in transition but better shooter?  It's not even close.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: KSUTOMMY on December 03, 2010, 01:19:34 PM
dook is going to waste uk. JMO after seeing Irving go off on us.
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: cork_sniffer on December 03, 2010, 01:22:01 PM
Keep in mind Robinson = Dwight Howard.

nobody has ever said that.  he's got a dwight howard like frame perhaps but not that he plays like dwight howard. 
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: sonofdaxjones on December 03, 2010, 01:26:41 PM
I hope cork sniffer posts a lot.

That being said, how can anyone not turn away in horror when looking at that ku basketball team.    :barf:
Title: Re: uk v. dook
Post by: cork_sniffer on December 03, 2010, 02:22:21 PM
that poster is pretty dumb, as are most posters at phog.net

selby might be as good as irving but we don't know yet.

taylor is faster, a better shooter and a comparable player other than that to smith

releford is the starting wing most likely as the season progresses and if needed mcmorris plays the 3 against singler.  in that case it's pretty even.

Robinson is stronger and more skilled than either plumlee and mk morris is the same vs kelly or mason plumlee

duke's bench features some young talent as does ku's. 

Pretty even matchup actually player to player but Duke is far more polished and tested at this point. 
  Uh, No.  Taylor might be better in transition but better shooter?  It's not even close.

smith is a career 36% shooter from 3 and isn't a scorer or finisher inside the arc like taylor.  Taylor's 3 point percentage is about the same but he can also knock down midrange shots and finish better.