uk v. dook

[Immaculate1]

The thing that pisses me off the most about this post is the fact they are calling themselves UK. I know it is the university of kansas or whatever but when I hear/think uk I think kentucky. And IMO kansas doesn't have crap on kentucky in anything. So it is just disrespectful.

[Poster formerly known as jthutch]

that poster is pretty dumb, as are most posters at phog.net

selby might be as good as irving but we don't know yet.

taylor is faster, a better shooter and a comparable player other than that to smith

releford is the starting wing most likely as the season progresses and if needed mcmorris plays the 3 against singler.  in that case it's pretty even.

Robinson is stronger and more skilled than either plumlee and mk morris is the same vs kelly or mason plumlee

duke's bench features some young talent as does ku's. 

Pretty even matchup actually player to player but Duke is far more polished and tested at this point. 

  Uh, No.  Taylor might be better in transition but better shooter?  It's not even close.

[KSUTOMMY]

dook is going to waste uk. JMO after seeing Irving go off on us.

[cork_sniffer]

Keep in mind Robinson = Dwight Howard.

nobody has ever said that.  he's got a dwight howard like frame perhaps but not that he plays like dwight howard. 

[sonofdaxjones]

I hope cork sniffer posts a lot.

That being said, how can anyone not turn away in horror when looking at that ku basketball team.   

[cork_sniffer]

that poster is pretty dumb, as are most posters at phog.net

selby might be as good as irving but we don't know yet.

taylor is faster, a better shooter and a comparable player other than that to smith

releford is the starting wing most likely as the season progresses and if needed mcmorris plays the 3 against singler.  in that case it's pretty even.

Robinson is stronger and more skilled than either plumlee and mk morris is the same vs kelly or mason plumlee

duke's bench features some young talent as does ku's. 

Pretty even matchup actually player to player but Duke is far more polished and tested at this point. 

  Uh, No.  Taylor might be better in transition but better shooter?  It's not even close.

smith is a career 36% shooter from 3 and isn't a scorer or finisher inside the arc like taylor.  Taylor's 3 point percentage is about the same but he can also knock down midrange shots and finish better.