goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: reidrolled on October 07, 2010, 10:38:51 PM

Title: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: reidrolled on October 07, 2010, 10:38:51 PM
 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: KSUTOMMY on October 07, 2010, 10:40:13 PM
WOW... dont let Chase hear that talk, he might threaten to kick your ass.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Saulbadguy on October 07, 2010, 10:41:10 PM
Yeah, I imagine he'd be terrible at that, too.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: DQ12 on October 07, 2010, 10:42:58 PM
Man, reidrolled, great stuff.  Sorry Sober did lines off your old lady.

 :facepalm: :lol:
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: reidrolled on October 07, 2010, 10:43:11 PM
Ok_cat? We are waiting
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: JavaCat on October 07, 2010, 10:52:34 PM
:horrorsurprise:

He should go on that hike Dylan went on.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: CHONGS on October 07, 2010, 11:03:00 PM
carson was NOT the problem

not even in the top ten of our problems
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Tobias on October 07, 2010, 11:03:13 PM
:horrorsurprise:

He should go on that hike Dylan went on.

 :facepalm:
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: ew2x4 on October 07, 2010, 11:07:27 PM
carson was NOT the problem

not even in the top ten of our problems

This.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Skipper44 on October 07, 2010, 11:09:59 PM
I might put oline near the top of my list of probs.  I am very disheartened by this
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: OK_Cat on October 08, 2010, 12:00:36 AM
Ok_cat? We are waiting

I don't wish harm on Queso, you bumblefuck.  Once again, Carson was not the problem in this game.

Sorry about your old lady, dude.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: AzCat on October 08, 2010, 12:05:04 AM
carson was NOT the problem

not even in the top ten of our problems

True, he's twelfth just after every starting defensive player.   :users:
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: ednksu on October 08, 2010, 12:52:19 AM
carson was NOT the problem

not even in the top ten of our problems
:facepalm:
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: ToupeeFearsTheBeard on October 08, 2010, 12:54:39 AM
:horrorsurprise:

He should go on that hike Dylan went on.

too soon man... too soon...
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Paul Moscow on October 08, 2010, 01:06:37 AM
Please, Carson handicaps everything we do. Every pass he completes is a small miracle.

Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Brock Landers on October 08, 2010, 10:35:54 AM
Dear Carson,

Sorry about all the stuff I've said about about you this season.  As it turns out you still suck, but you suck way less than the defense and the o-line.

Warmest Regards,

Brock Landers
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: EllToPay on October 08, 2010, 10:40:37 AM
carson was NOT the problem

not even in the top ten of our problems

jfc.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: CatsNShocks on October 08, 2010, 02:02:07 PM
Carson is the reason the O is one-dimensional.
Carson is the reason the D has to play "perfect" football.
Carson is the reason the opposition can put "10 in the box".
Carson is the reason "bend but don't break" doesn't work.
Carson is the reason if the Cats are behind 2 scores, you can pack up and go home.
Carson is the reason that Cat fans are looking for only 2 more W's this year.
Carson is the reason the play-calling is so gawd-awful.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: hemmy on October 08, 2010, 02:11:15 PM
Carson is the reason the O is one-dimensional.
Carson is the reason the D has to play "perfect" football.
Carson is the reason the opposition can put "10 in the box".
Carson is the reason "bend but don't break" doesn't work.
Carson is the reason if the Cats are behind 2 scores, you can pack up and go home.
Carson is the reason that Cat fans are looking for only 2 more W's this year.
Carson is the reason the play-calling is so gawd-awful.

And boom. High five from team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: CHONGS on October 08, 2010, 02:31:14 PM
I love how Carson Coffman is somehow putting pressure on our defense to allow QBs to run untouched for 60 yards at a time. 

The defense is bad by itself. I hardly think CC made them give up 10 yards per play.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Saulbadguy on October 08, 2010, 02:36:24 PM
I love how Carson Coffman is somehow putting pressure on our defense to allow QBs to run untouched for 60 yards at a time. 

The defense is bad by itself. I hardly think CC made them give up 10 yards per play.
Well, he certainly does not help!!
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 08, 2010, 02:40:28 PM
Carson is the reason the D has to play "perfect" football.

Do you realize that NU only had 10 drives last night?  They scored on 8 of them.  Their best starting field position was their own 32 yard line.

That's horrible.  

That's beyond horrible.

The only things that kept them from scoring 100 were:

1. Our offense did not turn the ball over
2. There were no breakdowns in special teams.
3. Our offense gained yards and ate a lot of clock.

 

Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: EllToPay on October 08, 2010, 02:46:25 PM
I love how Carson Coffman is somehow putting pressure on our defense to allow QBs to run untouched for 60 yards at a time. 

The defense is bad by itself. I hardly think CC made them give up 10 yards per play.

The point is that there may be a more viable option at QB.

Hartman and E. Lamur are the two best options at safety. They both suck, yes. But they're the best options. There's a good chance Coffman isn't the best option at QB.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: CHONGS on October 08, 2010, 02:49:08 PM
I love how Carson Coffman is somehow putting pressure on our defense to allow QBs to run untouched for 60 yards at a time. 

The defense is bad by itself. I hardly think CC made them give up 10 yards per play.
Well, he certainly does not help!!
That's true and when I owe the mob $10K, losing that $1.25 to the vending machine doesn't help either.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: CatsNShocks on October 08, 2010, 03:52:57 PM
Carson is the reason the D has to play "perfect" football.

Do you realize that NU only had 10 drives last night?  They scored on 8 of them.  Their best starting field position was their own 32 yard line.

That's horrible.  

That's beyond horrible.

The only things that kept them from scoring 100 were:

1. Our offense did not turn the ball over
2. There were no breakdowns in special teams.
3. Our offense gained yards and ate a lot of clock.

 



I know typed this after the debacle last night, but this "perfect football" analogy is for the whole season.
Not only can the D not give up big plays (duh) but it cannot give up many points (more than probably 17) per game average or KSU doesn't win, because you know as well as I that CCQ cannot hoist a team on his shoulders and throw his way to a victory.
And don't gimme the BS about "the drive" vs. UCF...had he played well the entire game (or even average) he wouldn't have had to pull that drive out of his ass to win the game.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: OK_Cat on October 08, 2010, 04:24:39 PM
According to Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), Slamur is the best qb on the squad because he played mediocre against the 3rd team from nebraska.

gotcha! 

Team Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) - 1

Team CCQ - 0
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 08, 2010, 04:39:20 PM
Carson is the reason the D has to play "perfect" football.

Do you realize that NU only had 10 drives last night?  They scored on 8 of them.  Their best starting field position was their own 32 yard line.

That's horrible.  

That's beyond horrible.

The only things that kept them from scoring 100 were:

1. Our offense did not turn the ball over
2. There were no breakdowns in special teams.
3. Our offense gained yards and ate a lot of clock.

 



eff. i knew it was bad but didn't know it was that bad. 8/10 with their own 32 being the best field position? christ.  :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Ira Hayes on October 08, 2010, 11:10:49 PM
Carson is the reason the D has to play "perfect" football.

Do you realize that NU only had 10 drives last night?  They scored on 8 of them.  Their best starting field position was their own 32 yard line.

That's horrible.  

That's beyond horrible.

The only things that kept them from scoring 100 were:

1. Our offense did not turn the ball over
2. There were no breakdowns in special teams.
3. Our offense gained yards and ate a lot of clock.

 



I know typed this after the debacle last night, but this "perfect football" analogy is for the whole season.
Not only can the D not give up big plays (duh) but it cannot give up many points (more than probably 17) per game average or KSU doesn't win, because you know as well as I that CCQ cannot hoist a team on his shoulders and throw his way to a victory.
And don't gimme the BS about "the drive" vs. UCF...had he played well the entire game (or even average) he wouldn't have had to pull that drive out of his ass to win the game.

I didn't mention that our horrible defense also did not create a single turnover.

If the D could have ever stopped NU it would have given the offense a chance.  The three drives that we scored on were the only three drives that started beyond our 40 yard line (none started in NU territory.)  Both times we forced Nebraska to punt our offense came out and scored.  Our offense only had one three and out in 10 drives. 

Our drives went for:

0,17,23,25,27,30,39,48,54,56

That's not bad at all.  You can win football games with an offense like that if your defense is even moderately capable.

When your offense is driving the ball and not turning it over and putting the other team in poor field position every single time, it's not at all unreasonable to expect your defense to only allow 17 points.
Title: Re: Coffman should take up rock climbing.....
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 08, 2010, 11:25:53 PM
Carson is the reason the D has to play "perfect" football.

Do you realize that NU only had 10 drives last night?  They scored on 8 of them.  Their best starting field position was their own 32 yard line.

That's horrible.  

That's beyond horrible.

The only things that kept them from scoring 100 were:

1. Our offense did not turn the ball over
2. There were no breakdowns in special teams.
3. Our offense gained yards and ate a lot of clock.

 



I know typed this after the debacle last night, but this "perfect football" analogy is for the whole season.
Not only can the D not give up big plays (duh) but it cannot give up many points (more than probably 17) per game average or KSU doesn't win, because you know as well as I that CCQ cannot hoist a team on his shoulders and throw his way to a victory.
And don't gimme the BS about "the drive" vs. UCF...had he played well the entire game (or even average) he wouldn't have had to pull that drive out of his ass to win the game.

I didn't mention that our horrible defense also did not create a single turnover.

If the D could have ever stopped NU it would have given the offense a chance.  The three drives that we scored on were the only three drives that started beyond our 40 yard line (none started in NU territory.)  Both times we forced Nebraska to punt our offense came out and scored.  Our offense only had one three and out in 10 drives. 

Our drives went for:

0,17,23,25,27,30,39,48,54,56

That's not bad at all.  You can win football games with an offense like that if your defense is even moderately capable.

When your offense is driving the ball and not turning it over and putting the other team in poor field position every single time, it's not at all unreasonable to expect your defense to only allow 17 points.

the offensive playcalling throughout the entire year has been one half score some points and one half run the clock to limit the number of plays to help keep the defense off the field. if the d was better we'd throw it more and regardless of what people think, probably be somewhat decent at it.