goemaw.com

General Discussion => Essentially Flyertalk => Topic started by: theswo on January 31, 2010, 01:28:53 AM

Title: The old board ...
Post by: theswo on January 31, 2010, 01:28:53 AM
Is turning into gopo very quickly. Sad to see really
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Cire on January 31, 2010, 10:08:46 AM
awful.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 05, 2010, 07:21:29 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50115.msg706867#msg706867

 :users:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Cire on February 05, 2010, 07:39:09 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50113.0

this was pretty good.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: michigancat on February 05, 2010, 07:41:23 PM
Why is it sad?  It isn't a place.  The posters that made ksufans.com are now here doing what made ksufans.com great originally.

All that's changed is the ownership and archive location and censorship.  If anything, be happy about ksufans going to sh*t.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 05, 2010, 07:42:14 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50113.0

this was pretty good.

does FBWillie not now about this? or just not care...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 05, 2010, 08:37:03 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50113.0

this was pretty good.
:peek:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 06, 2010, 06:50:52 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50205.0;topicseen

 :users:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: theKSU on February 06, 2010, 07:37:27 PM
I like the old board.  It has a basketball scoreboard.   :users:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 06, 2010, 07:38:46 PM
I like the old board.  It has a basketball scoreboard.   :users:

Well, have fun over there
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: hemmy on February 06, 2010, 08:17:36 PM
Don't you guys feel kinda sad that ksufans is bound to a quick, fiery death?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: doom on February 06, 2010, 08:26:18 PM
Why is it sad?  It isn't a place.  The posters that made ksufans.com are now here doing what made ksufans.com great originally.

All that's changed is the ownership and archive location and censorship.  If anything, be happy about ksufans going to sh*t.

You sound angry and sad.   





:peek:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: slimz on February 06, 2010, 11:46:45 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg10.imageshack.us%2Fimg10%2F8638%2Fgrail.jpg&hash=0cc976882b0b9c4622a3e5ab804e71ca0618a97a)
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 07, 2010, 11:47:57 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg10.imageshack.us%2Fimg10%2F8638%2Fgrail.jpg&hash=0cc976882b0b9c4622a3e5ab804e71ca0618a97a)

snort
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: kazzu on February 07, 2010, 04:41:35 PM
Lurking at the old board once the elites left made me want to  :barf:

Now at goEMAW I'm all  :cool: again.
 :peek:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Pete on February 07, 2010, 05:10:43 PM
Lurking at the old board once the elites left made me want to  :barf:

Now at goEMAW I'm all  :cool: again.
 :peek:


It's like a warm blanket, bro... :kstatriot:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 07, 2010, 06:06:29 PM
ksufans ip banned me  :blank:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pike on February 07, 2010, 06:21:07 PM
Finally made my way over I didn't have internet for 2 weeks. Excellent monty python  post btw
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on February 07, 2010, 06:28:21 PM
ksufans ip banned me  :blank:

pfffffffffffffffft :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: michigancat on February 07, 2010, 06:30:49 PM
ksufans ip banned me  :blank:

me, too.  LOL
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Kat Kid on February 07, 2010, 06:32:47 PM
Yeah, getting the tom lite treatment over there.  Won't be long until that tard bans the ksu campus.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 07, 2010, 06:36:58 PM
Yeah, getting the tom lite treatment over there.  Won't be long until that tard bans the ksu campus.

If some people I know that were banned were IP banned at work they just did
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: chum1 on February 07, 2010, 07:10:43 PM
I think it's pretty cool that I can get banned when I don't visit that site at all and only infrequently post here.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 07, 2010, 07:24:10 PM
I think it's pretty cool that I can get banned when I don't visit that site at all and only infrequently post here.

i think you're one of the owners here or something. this whole thing is petty hard to follow though.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on February 07, 2010, 07:35:40 PM
Not banned yet :confused:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: I_have_purplewood on February 07, 2010, 09:59:48 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50113.0

this was pretty good.
:peek:

Did you see how I wanted to know where everyone went...... and no one threw me a line for days.... :runaway: (ftp://:runaway:)
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ArchE_Cat on February 07, 2010, 10:31:29 PM
Thinking of being a total dick just to get ip banned from the old board, you know go out with guns blazing type thing.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on February 07, 2010, 10:34:23 PM
Thinking of being a total dick just to get ip banned from the old board, you know go out with guns blazing type thing.

It's pretty fun.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Trim on February 07, 2010, 10:35:59 PM
Thinking of being a total dick just to get ip banned from the old board, you know go out with guns blazing type thing.

It's pretty fun.

Anyone doing wacky stuff should get a screenshot of said stuff and/or the result so us bastard stepchildren can see it.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ArchE_Cat on February 07, 2010, 10:37:03 PM
Thinking of being a total dick just to get ip banned from the old board, you know go out with guns blazing type thing.

It's pretty fun.

need to come up with something good, maybe drag keitzman into the whole thing.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ArchE_Cat on February 07, 2010, 10:48:12 PM
alright here it is. New sig pic at the old place will be a photo of keiztman with one of those cartoon talking bubble things stating, "Wanna get the band back together? Then visit goEMAW.com. Were everybody knows your name, and you get your coolers." Then I'll just randomly mention in several threads how the board now sucks.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pike on February 08, 2010, 01:49:25 AM
Make sure you spell 'where' right. And man that place does suck. The best poster there is like royalswild  :blindfold:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 08, 2010, 02:30:52 AM
Make sure you spell 'where' right. And man that place does suck. The best poster there is like royalswild  :blindfold:
that kid is fuckin stupid
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 08:23:18 AM
I realize that most of you now posting on this site have either had issues with Terry and how he and MJ have run KSUFans.com or you are here because you have heard there is a new site that is more true to the concept that KSUFans.com had from the beginning and you think it (KSUFans) has strayed.  Sites do change over time and I guess many of you didn't like the path it (KSUFans) was taking. 

I'm not here to argue nor convince anyone one way or the other.  I think this is a nice site and I like many of the posters who do post over here.  In fact I harbor no ill to the owners and I hope you feel that same way about me.  If I have pissed you off by adminning over there, well, I'm sorry, but I tried and will continue to try to moderate as best as I can.

One thing I'd like to mention is that you had the chance to make KSUFans.com be or retain what you want/wanted it to be.  In April, 2008, MJ decided he wanted to sell the site.  Saul tried to raise the $ 2,500 and I, myself, contributed $ 250 to that end.  Well, as most of you know, that fell way short and MJ was able to sell the site to Terry Pierce.  Say what you want, but not enough folks wished to donate to that cause and websites don't run for free.  So here we are.

Correct me, add to this post, flame me, ban me, or whatever.   I'll post over here if allowed and try to be classless, but in a good way.

:cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:   < ----- you 'classy' bastages still don't have my emoticon.   :curse:



Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2010, 08:28:21 AM
I realize that most of you now posting on this site have either had issues with Terry and how he and MJ have run KSUFans.com or you are here because you have heard there is a new site that is more true to the concept that KSUFans.com had from the beginning and you think it (KSUFans) has strayed.  Sites do change over time and I guess many of you didn't like the path it (KSUFans) was taking. 

I'm not here to argue nor convince anyone one way or the other.  I think this is a nice site and I like many of the posters who do post over here.  In fact I harbor no ill to the owners and I hope you feel that same way about me.  If I have pissed you off by adminning over there, well, I'm sorry, but I tried and will continue to try to moderate as best as I can.

One thing I'd like to mention is that you had the chance to make KSUFans.com be or retain what you want/wanted it to be.  In April, 2008, MJ decided he wanted to sell the site.  Saul tried to raise the $ 2,500 and I, myself, contributed $ 250 to that end.  Well, as most of you know, that fell way short and MJ was able to sell the site to Terry Pierce.  Say what you want, but not enough folks wished to donate to that cause and websites don't run for free.  So here we are.

Correct me, add to this post, flame me, ban me, or whatever.   I'll post over here if allowed and try to be classless, but in a good way.

:cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:   < ----- you 'classy' bastages still don't have my emoticon.   :curse:





No worries.  Everyone from Fans is welcome here, I hope it's vice versa as well.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2010, 08:31:06 AM
One thing I'd like to mention is that you had the chance to make KSUFans.com be or retain what you want/wanted it to be.  In April, 2008, MJ decided he wanted to sell the site.  Saul tried to raise the $ 2,500 and I, myself, contributed $ 250 to that end.  Well, as most of you know, that fell way short and MJ was able to sell the site to Terry Pierce.  Say what you want, but not enough folks wished to donate to that cause and websites don't run for free.  So here we are.

This is a great point.  Not a day goes by that I don't kick myself (and I know this goes for a lot of people here) for not buying the place when we had a chance to save it.  Thanks for rubbing it in our faces cyclist  :curse:

also, nobody dislikes you bro
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 08:35:32 AM

This is a great point.  Not a day goes by that I don't kick myself (and I know this goes for a lot of people here) for not buying the place when we had a chance to save it.  Thanks for rubbing it in our faces cyclist  :curse:

also, nobody dislikes you bro

SD,

Thanks and not trying to rub it in at all. 

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2010, 08:37:06 AM
SD,

Thanks and not trying to rub it in at all. 

I know
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 08:41:11 AM
I realize that most of you now posting on this site have either had issues with Terry and how he and MJ have run KSUFans.com or you are here because you have heard there is a new site that is more true to the concept that KSUFans.com had from the beginning and you think it (KSUFans) has strayed.  Sites do change over time and I guess many of you didn't like the path it (KSUFans) was taking. 

I'm not here to argue nor convince anyone one way or the other.  I think this is a nice site and I like many of the posters who do post over here.  In fact I harbor no ill to the owners and I hope you feel that same way about me.  If I have pissed you off by adminning over there, well, I'm sorry, but I tried and will continue to try to moderate as best as I can.

One thing I'd like to mention is that you had the chance to make KSUFans.com be or retain what you want/wanted it to be.  In April, 2008, MJ decided he wanted to sell the site.  Saul tried to raise the $ 2,500 and I, myself, contributed $ 250 to that end.  Well, as most of you know, that fell way short and MJ was able to sell the site to Terry Pierce.  Say what you want, but not enough folks wished to donate to that cause and websites don't run for free.  So here we are.

Correct me, add to this post, flame me, ban me, or whatever.   I'll post over here if allowed and try to be classless, but in a good way.

:cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:   < ----- you 'classy' bastages still don't have my emoticon.   :curse:





No worries.  Everyone from Fans is welcome here, I hope it's vice versa as well.

Well, as you guys know, several of you have been banned.  So, unfortunately, the feeling is not so mutual.  I really don't like that at all. 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: chum1 on February 08, 2010, 08:41:30 AM
Maybe this is just me, but my issue with ksufans was that it was getting really lame.  In my estimation, that probably had a lot more to do with increased popularity than with who owned the site.  (For, the average KSU message board poster is a lot more like the average GPC poster than the average goEMAW poster.)  By the time MJ went to sell, things were likely already past the point of no return.

I enjoyed making fun of all the other boards when ksufans started up.  I now get to enjoy that again.

I'd rather see cyclist on goEMAW full time, but that's totally his choice.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 08:46:57 AM
Maybe this is just me, but my issue with ksufans was that it was getting really lame.  In my estimation, that probably had a lot more to do with increased popularity than with who owned the site.  (For, the average KSU message board poster is a lot more like the average GPC poster than the average goEMAW poster.)  By the time MJ went to sell, things were likely already past the point of no return.

I enjoyed making fun of all the other boards when ksufans started up.  I now get to enjoy that again.

I'd rather see cyclist on goEMAW full time, but that's totally his choice.

I'd give you all a group hug, but then that would be (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ksufans.com%2Fforums%2FSmileys%2Fksufans%2Flame.gif&hash=92b8b9247282f10434314c3439cd5503f859776c)
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2010, 08:49:12 AM
I realize that most of you now posting on this site have either had issues with Terry and how he and MJ have run KSUFans.com or you are here because you have heard there is a new site that is more true to the concept that KSUFans.com had from the beginning and you think it (KSUFans) has strayed.  Sites do change over time and I guess many of you didn't like the path it (KSUFans) was taking.  

I'm not here to argue nor convince anyone one way or the other.  I think this is a nice site and I like many of the posters who do post over here.  In fact I harbor no ill to the owners and I hope you feel that same way about me.  If I have pissed you off by adminning over there, well, I'm sorry, but I tried and will continue to try to moderate as best as I can.

One thing I'd like to mention is that you had the chance to make KSUFans.com be or retain what you want/wanted it to be.  In April, 2008, MJ decided he wanted to sell the site.  Saul tried to raise the $ 2,500 and I, myself, contributed $ 250 to that end.  Well, as most of you know, that fell way short and MJ was able to sell the site to Terry Pierce.  Say what you want, but not enough folks wished to donate to that cause and websites don't run for free.  So here we are.

Correct me, add to this post, flame me, ban me, or whatever.   I'll post over here if allowed and try to be classless, but in a good way.

:cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:   < ----- you 'classy' bastages still don't have my emoticon.   :curse:





No worries.  Everyone from Fans is welcome here, I hope it's vice versa as well.

Well, as you guys know, several of you have been banned.  So, unfortunately, the feeling is not so mutual.  I really don't like that at all.  
I'm guessing that it wasn't you that pulled the trigger. :fatty:

FTR, i'm still bitter about the $2,500.  I thought that was a ridiculous number back then and I still don't think it is worth that much coin.  I thought it was a slap in the face to the community.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2010, 09:00:15 AM
FTR, i'm still bitter about the $2,500.  I thought that was a ridiculous number back then and I still don't think it is worth that much coin.  I thought it was a slap in the face to the community.

I would've contributed any amount had MJ ever demonstrated why the site was worth $2500 and what the costs would've been once the $2500 was ponied up.  Unfortunately, he never did.  Also unfortunately, I didn't personally know saul, sd, Pete, et al at that time who had the same thoughts as me and with whom we could've easily figured it out.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2010, 09:06:37 AM
Maybe this is just me, but my issue with ksufans was that it was getting really lame.  In my estimation, that probably had a lot more to do with increased popularity than with who owned the site.  (For, the average KSU message board poster is a lot more like the average GPC poster than the average goEMAW poster.)  By the time MJ went to sell, things were likely already past the point of no return.

I enjoyed making fun of all the other boards when ksufans started up.  I now get to enjoy that again.

I'd rather see cyclist on goEMAW full time, but that's totally his choice.

this is spot on...ksufans had gone over the ledge well before MJ tried to abscond the $2,500 from the board's users.   no reason to cry over spilt milk and not buying the site from MJ.   i'm sure this site will die an ugly death too, they all seem to over time, but we might as well enjoy it while it lasts.  at least it won't be handicapped by TP's mismanagment along its way.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 09:09:07 AM
I realize that most of you now posting on this site have either had issues with Terry and how he and MJ have run KSUFans.com or you are here because you have heard there is a new site that is more true to the concept that KSUFans.com had from the beginning and you think it (KSUFans) has strayed.  Sites do change over time and I guess many of you didn't like the path it (KSUFans) was taking.  

I'm not here to argue nor convince anyone one way or the other.  I think this is a nice site and I like many of the posters who do post over here.  In fact I harbor no ill to the owners and I hope you feel that same way about me.  If I have pissed you off by adminning over there, well, I'm sorry, but I tried and will continue to try to moderate as best as I can.

One thing I'd like to mention is that you had the chance to make KSUFans.com be or retain what you want/wanted it to be.  In April, 2008, MJ decided he wanted to sell the site.  Saul tried to raise the $ 2,500 and I, myself, contributed $ 250 to that end.  Well, as most of you know, that fell way short and MJ was able to sell the site to Terry Pierce.  Say what you want, but not enough folks wished to donate to that cause and websites don't run for free.  So here we are.

Correct me, add to this post, flame me, ban me, or whatever.   I'll post over here if allowed and try to be classless, but in a good way.

:cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:   < ----- you 'classy' bastages still don't have my emoticon.   :curse:





No worries.  Everyone from Fans is welcome here, I hope it's vice versa as well.

Well, as you guys know, several of you have been banned.  So, unfortunately, the feeling is not so mutual.  I really don't like that at all.  
I'm guessing that it wasn't you that pulled the trigger. :fatty:

FTR, i'm still bitter about the $2,500.  I thought that was a ridiculous number back then and I still don't think it is worth that much coin.  I thought it was a slap in the face to the community.

There are currently 100 some folks with Premium Membership.  At $5 a piece per month, that is $ 500 per month and it takes 5 months to pay the $ 2,500.  Of course there are other costs/expenses that have to be accounted for.  OTOH, I agree, $ 2,500 is too much if you are going to run it without charging for premium service.  Which is what you have on this site. 

I really hope that if or when the time comes to keep this site going, folks are willing to donate to the case.

And I didn't do the banning, but will admit that it wasn't done correctly (technical-wise, not moral-wise).   The ban list shows most of you who are banned as being banned on January 26th and January 29th.  Yet many of you could still post, etc.  I had to do one of those hard to do things, so I added the username triggers last night.    :facepalm:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2010, 09:13:03 AM
The ban list shows most of you who are banned as being banned on January 26th and January 29th.  Yet many of you could still post, etc.  I had to do one of those hard to do things, so I added the username triggers last night.    :facepalm:

PPFFFFTTTTTT  :lol:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2010, 09:14:09 AM
No problem, just don't ban my sock accounts. ^_^
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 09:20:30 AM
No problem, just don't ban my sock accounts. ^_^

I banned gbr.  Want it unbanned ?

 :confused:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2010, 09:22:53 AM
No problem, just don't ban my sock accounts. ^_^

I banned gbr.  Want it unbanned ?

 :confused:

Naw - I have another that i'm using.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: chum1 on February 08, 2010, 09:23:08 AM
And I didn't do the banning...I added the username triggers

You would have made a good Nazi gas chamber operator.  (j/k!)
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 09:28:49 AM
No problem, just don't ban my sock accounts. ^_^

I banned gbr.  Want it unbanned ?

 :confused:

Naw - I have another that i'm using.


:thumbsup:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 09:29:42 AM
And I didn't do the banning...I added the username triggers

You would have made a good Nazi gas chamber operator.  (j/k!)

I do have German ancestry...

 :runaway:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2010, 09:32:54 AM
And I didn't do the banning...I added the username triggers

You would have made a good Nazi gas chamber operator.  (j/k!)


I do have German ancestry...

 :runaway:
:ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 09:35:04 AM
And I didn't do the banning...I added the username triggers

You would have made a good Nazi gas chamber operator.  (j/k!)


I do have German ancestry...

 :runaway:
:ohno: :ohno: :ohno:

I apologize for that remark, Saul...

 :pray:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 08, 2010, 10:21:54 AM
What does it mean when the thread I put my first post in just got deleted? I thought that wasn't happening over here ... :confused: . So now my first post is a bunch of whining and complaining about why my first post was deleted. Thanks, guys.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2010, 10:25:10 AM
What does it mean when the thread I put my first post in just got deleted? I thought that wasn't happening over here ... :confused: . So now my first post is a bunch of whining and complaining about why my first post was deleted. Thanks, guys.  :rolleyes:
cupcake of doom? 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2010, 10:25:19 AM
What does it mean when the thread I put my first post in just got deleted? I thought that wasn't happening over here ... :confused: . So now my first post is a bunch of whining and complaining about why my first post was deleted. Thanks, guys.  :rolleyes:

I don't think anyone deleted your post.  Maybe the person who started the thread deleted their own thread :dunno:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2010, 10:35:54 AM
What does it mean when the thread I put my first post in just got deleted? I thought that wasn't happening over here ... :confused: . So now my first post is a bunch of whining and complaining about why my first post was deleted. Thanks, guys.  :rolleyes:

I deleted my own thread, it might have been in that one...sorry if that was the case.  I got all mushy over Cyclist's olive branch and deleted a snarky post I had put out there.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 08, 2010, 10:40:32 AM
What does it mean when the thread I put my first post in just got deleted? I thought that wasn't happening over here ... :confused: . So now my first post is a bunch of whining and complaining about why my first post was deleted. Thanks, guys.  :rolleyes:
cupcake of doom? 

2nd post. No one cares about those anyway. Does it help that I brought potato salad?

What does it mean when the thread I put my first post in just got deleted? I thought that wasn't happening over here ... :confused: . So now my first post is a bunch of whining and complaining about why my first post was deleted. Thanks, guys.  :rolleyes:

I deleted my own thread, it might have been in that one...sorry if that was the case.  I got all mushy over Cyclist's olive branch and deleted a snarky post I had put out there.

LOL... well, glad we got that clear'd up.  :cheers:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: OK_Cat on February 08, 2010, 11:47:12 AM
i've never been banned from anything in my life, kind of exciting. 

 :pbj:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 08, 2010, 11:53:08 AM
No problem, just don't ban my sock accounts. ^_^
thats a good one, are you RMC also?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2010, 11:55:12 AM
No problem, just don't ban my sock accounts. ^_^
thats a good one, are you RMC also?

Nope. But he's on here as well.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2010, 12:29:15 PM
kinda pissed i haven't been banned. Guess i didn't fit the criteria.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 08, 2010, 05:50:24 PM
Maybe this is just me, but my issue with ksufans was that it was getting really lame.  In my estimation, that probably had a lot more to do with increased popularity than with who owned the site.  (For, the average KSU message board poster is a lot more like the average GPC poster than the average goEMAW poster.)  By the time MJ went to sell, things were likely already past the point of no return.

I enjoyed making fun of all the other boards when ksufans started up.  I now get to enjoy that again.

I'd rather see cyclist on goEMAW full time, but that's totally his choice.
same here... i just came over here for the SD's, the Pete's, the FFF's, Clams, etc. Love their posting.  :love:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 05:56:38 PM
kinda pissed i haven't been banned. Guess i didn't fit the criteria.

I could ban you at your own request.   :dunno:

But that would be  :bs:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2010, 05:59:46 PM
That's funny, I wish I wasn't banned!  :embarrassed:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 06:07:52 PM
That's funny, I wish I wasn't banned!  :embarrassed:

Most of your socks aren't banned, though...

 :ump:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pike on February 08, 2010, 06:18:59 PM
I want to smoke a J with Fred Flintstone
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 08, 2010, 06:23:32 PM
I want to smoke a J with Fred Flintstone

Fred is actually smoking K2...   

:bigtoke:         :bigtoke:            :bigtoke:           :bigtoke:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: felix rex on February 08, 2010, 07:38:03 PM
Personally, I'm pissed that I never got a PM invite :curse:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 08, 2010, 07:39:22 PM
Personally, I'm pissed that I never got a PM invite :curse:

wow. i'm kind of pissed about that too. doesn't really matter though. this place apparently isn't going to be around in a month.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2010, 07:42:20 PM
Personally, I'm pissed that I never got a PM invite :curse:

wow. i'm kind of pissed about that too. doesn't really matter though. this place apparently isn't going to be around in a month.

I'm gonna miss the old girl.  goEMAW, we have gone through a lot together.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2010, 08:37:43 PM
Personally, I'm pissed that I never got a PM invite :curse:

wow. i'm kind of pissed about that too. doesn't really matter though. this place apparently isn't going to be around in a month.

I'm gonna miss the old girl.  goEMAW, we have gone through a lot together.

Why is the band still playing, don't they know that there aren't going to be enough life rafts? 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Winters on February 08, 2010, 08:51:32 PM
Personally, I'm pissed that I never got a PM invite :curse:

wow. i'm kind of pissed about that too. doesn't really matter though. this place apparently isn't going to be around in a month.
I got PM  :cool:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: TBL on February 08, 2010, 09:11:30 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Cire on February 08, 2010, 09:14:05 PM
lol

http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50228.0

:facepalm:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 08, 2010, 09:16:07 PM
lol

http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50228.0

:facepalm:

half of us have been banned and can't even read that. i'm sure it's gold though.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 08, 2010, 09:32:17 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: TBL on February 08, 2010, 10:05:31 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 08, 2010, 11:09:06 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pike on February 09, 2010, 12:03:02 AM
I want to smoke a J with Fred Flintstone

Fred is actually smoking K2...   

:bigtoke:         :bigtoke:            :bigtoke:           :bigtoke:

Which I hear has been banned already by the tards in Topeka...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: TBL on February 09, 2010, 09:09:16 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I saved it on pbucket and named it something else. Still up and running...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ksuwizard on February 09, 2010, 09:45:16 AM
I realize that most of you now posting on this site have either had issues with Terry and how he and MJ have run KSUFans.com or you are here because you have heard there is a new site that is more true to the concept that KSUFans.com had from the beginning and you think it (KSUFans) has strayed.  Sites do change over time and I guess many of you didn't like the path it (KSUFans) was taking.  

I'm not here to argue nor convince anyone one way or the other.  I think this is a nice site and I like many of the posters who do post over here.  In fact I harbor no ill to the owners and I hope you feel that same way about me.  If I have pissed you off by adminning over there, well, I'm sorry, but I tried and will continue to try to moderate as best as I can.

One thing I'd like to mention is that you had the chance to make KSUFans.com be or retain what you want/wanted it to be.  In April, 2008, MJ decided he wanted to sell the site.  Saul tried to raise the $ 2,500 and I, myself, contributed $ 250 to that end.  Well, as most of you know, that fell way short and MJ was able to sell the site to Terry Pierce.  Say what you want, but not enough folks wished to donate to that cause and websites don't run for free.  So here we are.

Correct me, add to this post, flame me, ban me, or whatever.   I'll post over here if allowed and try to be classless, but in a good way.

:cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:     :cyclist:   < ----- you 'classy' bastages still don't have my emoticon.   :curse:





No worries.  Everyone from Fans is welcome here, I hope it's vice versa as well.

Well, as you guys know, several of you have been banned.  So, unfortunately, the feeling is not so mutual.  I really don't like that at all.  
I'm guessing that it wasn't you that pulled the trigger. :fatty:

FTR, i'm still bitter about the $2,500.  I thought that was a ridiculous number back then and I still don't think it is worth that much coin.  I thought it was a slap in the face to the community.

There are currently 100 some folks with Premium Membership.  At $5 a piece per month, that is $ 500 per month and it takes 5 months to pay the $ 2,500.  Of course there are other costs/expenses that have to be accounted for.  OTOH, I agree, $ 2,500 is too much if you are going to run it without charging for premium service.  Which is what you have on this site.  

I really hope that if or when the time comes to keep this site going, folks are willing to donate to the case.

And I didn't do the banning, but will admit that it wasn't done correctly (technical-wise, not moral-wise).   The ban list shows most of you who are banned as being banned on January 26th and January 29th.  Yet many of you could still post, etc.  I had to do one of those hard to do things, so I added the username triggers last night.    :facepalm:


Since this thread currently went off topic of the price to run a forum, I thought I might bring it back.   How come no one has though of advertising or anything?  Or maybe a sponsorship with some other site to pay for hosting costs.  I used to be a huge gamer and we would have free forums sites all the time with ads or sponsorships to cover costs.  Maybe you all have though of using ads and no one wants to put links up on an EMAW site.  I dunno, just was thinking this since it's been a while since I have been to a board without advertisement.  
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 09, 2010, 09:59:42 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on February 09, 2010, 10:03:11 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

What about me :ohno: :runaway:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 09, 2010, 10:06:03 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I saved it on pbucket and named it something else. Still up and running...

I don't see anything wrong with you sig...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 09, 2010, 10:07:26 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

What about me :ohno: :runaway:

 :confused:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on February 09, 2010, 10:09:29 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

What about me :ohno: :runaway:

 :confused:

Am I gonna get banned? mjrod always hated me :frown:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 09, 2010, 10:54:56 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

What about me :ohno: :runaway:

 :confused:

Am I gonna get banned? mjrod always hated me :frown:

Just cuz MJ hates you, doesn't mean you get banned...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 09, 2010, 04:07:29 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Ira Hayes on February 09, 2010, 04:17:40 PM
i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.


It works now.  It was registered today by some dude in China.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pike on February 09, 2010, 04:32:45 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

What about me :ohno: :runaway:

 :confused:

Am I gonna get banned? mjrod always hated me :frown:

Just cuz MJ hates you, doesn't mean you get banned...

I want to smoke a J with that WILDCAT
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 09, 2010, 04:35:47 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: OK_Cat on February 09, 2010, 07:37:54 PM
Hey cyclist, why was I banned?

hurts my feelings, ya know.   :embarrassed:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 09, 2010, 08:28:59 PM
Hey cyclist, why was I banned?

hurts my feelings, ya know.   :embarrassed:

No clue.    :dunno:   Must have been starting the 'Powerorb' thread.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: doom on February 09, 2010, 09:23:18 PM
Hey cyclist, why was I banned?

hurts my feelings, ya know.   :embarrassed:

No clue.    :dunno:   Must have been starting the 'Powerorb' thread.

I know you have ties to that place, but it sucks now.  That is a crappy reason to ban.  mjrod crapped all over that place.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: TBL on February 09, 2010, 10:20:42 PM
The bastards! They changed my sig to a crappy bitmap of the court. Bastards!
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: TBL on February 09, 2010, 10:24:51 PM
In retaliation, I have changed my sig on both sites.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 10, 2010, 07:55:51 AM
The bastards! They changed my sig to a crappy bitmap of the court. Bastards!

I did that because the sig you did have had goEMAW.com on it.   The reason is that KSUFans does not knowingly provide links, etc. to other message board websites, including GPC, K-State Fans, EverymanaWildcat, this site, as well as TheMainBoard...   It is not a case of perceived competition. 

If you don't care for that policy, I'm sorry.  At least your current sig is allowed.   Thanks for changing it.

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 10, 2010, 08:13:23 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 10, 2010, 08:57:21 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 10, 2010, 10:57:57 AM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 10, 2010, 01:32:39 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.

Ok, how about your word as a Brother ?

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 10, 2010, 02:00:51 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.

Ok, how about your word as a Brother ?



I don't have any reason to lie about it.  Want to spit-shake on it as well?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Pete on February 10, 2010, 02:24:53 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.

Ok, how about your word as a Brother ?



I don't have any reason to lie about it.  Want to spit-shake on it as well?

Jeffy found this....

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:SzR1anK96mgJ:www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php%3Ftopic%3D49835+The+only+thing+left+is+the+fact+that+ku+person+will+be+managing+the+hosting.+I+don%27t+know+what+that+means+in+terms+of+how+the+site+will+operate+in+the+general+scheme+of+things.+I+have+tried+to+keep+an+open+forum+with+restrained+moderation+but+the+new+operators+may+not+have+that.+You+may+also+be+subject+to+other+things,+such+as+prying+into+your+private+PM%27s+and+so+forth.+I+am+hopeful+that+these+things+don%27t+happen,+but+I+will+have+no+control+over+that.+It%27s+obvious+that+you+want+the+site+to+be+more+responsive+and+to+enjoy+what+you+have,+but+change+invariably+means+just+that.+Just+know+that+with+change+things+may+not+be+what+you+hoped.&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Trim on February 10, 2010, 02:32:27 PM
http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:SzR1anK96mgJ:www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php%3Ftopic%3D49835+The+only+thing+left+is+the+fact+that+ku+person+will+be+managing+the+hosting.+I+don%27t+know+what+that+means+in+terms+of+how+the+site+will+operate+in+the+general+scheme+of+things.+I+have+tried+to+keep+an+open+forum+with+restrained+moderation+but+the+new+operators+may+not+have+that.+You+may+also+be+subject+to+other+things,+such+as+prying+into+your+private+PM%27s+and+so+forth.+I+am+hopeful+that+these+things+don%27t+happen,+but+I+will+have+no+control+over+that.+It%27s+obvious+that+you+want+the+site+to+be+more+responsive+and+to+enjoy+what+you+have,+but+change+invariably+means+just+that.+Just+know+that+with+change+things+may+not+be+what+you+hoped.&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

Is there a way to do that to get the other 2 pages and/or the printer-friendly version that would have the whole thread?  :combofan:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 10, 2010, 02:40:28 PM
http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:SzR1anK96mgJ:www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php%3Ftopic%3D49835+The+only+thing+left+is+the+fact+that+ku+person+will+be+managing+the+hosting.+I+don%27t+know+what+that+means+in+terms+of+how+the+site+will+operate+in+the+general+scheme+of+things.+I+have+tried+to+keep+an+open+forum+with+restrained+moderation+but+the+new+operators+may+not+have+that.+You+may+also+be+subject+to+other+things,+such+as+prying+into+your+private+PM%27s+and+so+forth.+I+am+hopeful+that+these+things+don%27t+happen,+but+I+will+have+no+control+over+that.+It%27s+obvious+that+you+want+the+site+to+be+more+responsive+and+to+enjoy+what+you+have,+but+change+invariably+means+just+that.+Just+know+that+with+change+things+may+not+be+what+you+hoped.&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

Is there a way to do that to get the other 2 pages and/or the printer-friendly version that would have the whole thread?  :combofan:
Don't think so.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 10, 2010, 02:54:22 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.

Ok, how about your word as a Brother ?



I don't have any reason to lie about it.  Want to spit-shake on it as well?

Don't need the spit-shake.  The grip is good enough for me.  Thanks.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 10, 2010, 03:03:13 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.

Ok, how about your word as a Brother ?



I don't have any reason to lie about it.  Want to spit-shake on it as well?

Don't need the spit-shake.  The grip is good enough for me.  Thanks.

Do you know where my hand has been?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 10, 2010, 03:06:17 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.

Ok, how about your word as a Brother ?



I don't have any reason to lie about it.  Want to spit-shake on it as well?

Don't need the spit-shake.  The grip is good enough for me.  Thanks.

Do you know where my hand has been?

Probably trying to modify one of your posts over at the other site to have a picture of a OOD basketball court mockup complete with goEMAW.com on the court...

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 10, 2010, 03:55:30 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.

Ok, how about your word as a Brother ?



I don't have any reason to lie about it.  Want to spit-shake on it as well?

Don't need the spit-shake.  The grip is good enough for me.  Thanks.

Do you know where my hand has been?

Probably trying to modify one of your posts over at the other site to have a picture of a OOD basketball court mockup complete with goEMAW.com on the court...



I didn't realize that pic had goEMAW on it.  I just like the doom center-court!
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on February 10, 2010, 05:30:24 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.

Ok, how about your word as a Brother ?



I don't have any reason to lie about it.  Want to spit-shake on it as well?

Don't need the spit-shake.  The grip is good enough for me.  Thanks.

Do you know where my hand has been?

Probably trying to modify one of your posts over at the other site to have a picture of a OOD basketball court mockup complete with goEMAW.com on the court...



I didn't realize that pic had goEMAW on it.  I just like the doom center-court!

quotin dis
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 10, 2010, 05:44:30 PM
What exactly is the "banning criteria" for that other site? Want to make sure I do it just right.

Apparently repeatedly changing my sig to a goEMAW sig doesn't qualify.

I used goEMAW's page header as my sig. Maybe that will work?

i doubt the website ksufanscopycat.com will work.

of course, I am no longer able to edit my sig at ksufans.

I'm trying to keep you from getting banned.   :facepalm:

Just goes to show you how far the site has fallen.... Threats of bannings... Thanks Terry "TomLight" Pierce!

Well there are no threats of bannings.  But if you really feel that way, why don't you just delete your account...

:confused:      :confused:       :confused:       :confused:

I personally received one from Terry not long after he took over, so I disagree with your statement.

Please PM me that.

Thanks !

The only PM I've still got is my invitation to goEMAW.  Sorry.

Ok, how about your word as a Brother ?



I don't have any reason to lie about it.  Want to spit-shake on it as well?

Don't need the spit-shake.  The grip is good enough for me.  Thanks.

Do you know where my hand has been?

Probably trying to modify one of your posts over at the other site to have a picture of a OOD basketball court mockup complete with goEMAW.com on the court...



I didn't realize that pic had goEMAW on it.  I just like the doom center-court!

Ya like this one ?:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi133.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fq45%2Fkougar24%2FKState%2Fdoom-court-logo.png&hash=c864e569fbd99bdcaca9fbce8dfa801d7992c8df)
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: PowercatPat on February 10, 2010, 06:04:23 PM
Hey cyclist, why was I banned?

hurts my feelings, ya know.   :embarrassed:

He explained why on the announcement board.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 10, 2010, 06:11:27 PM
Hey cyclist, why was I banned?

hurts my feelings, ya know.   :embarrassed:

He explained why on the announcement board.

I did ?  Thought it was in the next post or so...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: PowercatPat on February 10, 2010, 06:30:39 PM
Hey cyclist, why was I banned?

hurts my feelings, ya know.   :embarrassed:

He explained why on the announcement board.

I did ?  Thought it was in the next post or so...


No, TP showed why.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 10, 2010, 06:41:25 PM
Hey cyclist, why was I banned?

hurts my feelings, ya know.   :embarrassed:

He explained why on the announcement board.

I did ?  Thought it was in the next post or so...


No, TP showed why.

Now I see what you are talking about.  Actually, OK_Cat was banned on January 29, 2010.  I added the username trigger, February 7... and OK_Cat's post was on February 9 (on the 'The Truth Shall Set You Free' thread):

:lol:

Terry is coming off like a whiny bitch.  It's a rough ridin' messageboard, not an international billion dollar industry. 

Mediocre college fball player/washed out nfl player trying to pick fights on the internet.   :lol:



Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: OK_Cat on February 10, 2010, 08:18:19 PM
I was banned before posting that (on this site?  weird)

Terry just banned everybody who made the initial leap to goEMAW.com, it appears.  What a l-l-l-loser.  haha
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: TBL on February 10, 2010, 08:42:10 PM
I was banned before posting that (on this site?  weird)

Terry just banned everybody who made the initial leap to goEMAW.com, it appears.  What a l-l-l-loser.  haha

I wasn't banned..Can still post and everything. Did drop premi, though.... :dunno:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Winters on February 10, 2010, 08:42:55 PM
Only reason I don't plan on getting banned is so I can read all the retards posts..
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: D-FRED-BROWN on February 10, 2010, 08:43:14 PM
I was banned before posting that (on this site?  weird)

Terry just banned everybody who made the initial leap to goEMAW.com, it appears.  What a l-l-l-loser.  haha

Being a site administrator myself (not a ksu site), then I must say that if this is true, it is very unprofessional behavior on his part.  
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 11, 2010, 07:56:39 AM
I was banned before posting that (on this site?  weird)

Terry just banned everybody who made the initial leap to goEMAW.com, it appears.  What a l-l-l-loser.  haha

1.  Yes.  I really don't know why you were banned.

2.  No.  See TBL's post.

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 11, 2010, 07:58:47 AM
I was banned before posting that (on this site?  weird)

Terry just banned everybody who made the initial leap to goEMAW.com, it appears.  What a l-l-l-loser.  haha

Being a site administrator myself (not a ksu site), then I must say that if this is true, it is very unprofessional behavior on his part.  

Not disagreeing, but would like to know what you consider unprofessional about the above quoted statements ? 

Thanks...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pissclams on February 11, 2010, 08:16:36 AM
i just noticed I was banned, i didn't even do anything.  tears.  tears.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2010, 08:18:55 AM
i just noticed I was banned, i didn't even do anything.  tears.  tears.

Seems to be the theme
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 11, 2010, 09:04:57 AM
i just noticed I was banned, i didn't even do anything.  tears.  tears.

You've been Pierced!!
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: D-FRED-BROWN on February 11, 2010, 05:06:18 PM
I was banned before posting that (on this site?  weird)

Terry just banned everybody who made the initial leap to goEMAW.com, it appears.  What a l-l-l-loser.  haha

Being a site administrator myself (not a ksu site), then I must say that if this is true, it is very unprofessional behavior on his part.  

Not disagreeing, but would like to know what you consider unprofessional about the above quoted statements ? 

Thanks...

If the KSUFans.com admins are simply banning members because of their registration on other Kansas State message boards, then that's what I see as being unprofessional. 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on February 11, 2010, 05:28:14 PM
I was banned before posting that (on this site?  weird)

Terry just banned everybody who made the initial leap to goEMAW.com, it appears.  What a l-l-l-loser.  haha

Being a site administrator myself (not a ksu site), then I must say that if this is true, it is very unprofessional behavior on his part.  

Not disagreeing, but would like to know what you consider unprofessional about the above quoted statements ? 

Thanks...

If the KSUFans.com admins are simply banning members because of their registration on other Kansas State message boards, then that's what I see as being unprofessional. 

Fair enough anwser.

I can't speak for the Admin who did the banning, but I believe it was for those associated with the start up of this site and the perceived efforts to destroy KSUFans.

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 11, 2010, 05:32:45 PM
I was banned before posting that (on this site?  weird)

Terry just banned everybody who made the initial leap to goEMAW.com, it appears.  What a l-l-l-loser.  haha

Being a site administrator myself (not a ksu site), then I must say that if this is true, it is very unprofessional behavior on his part.  

Not disagreeing, but would like to know what you consider unprofessional about the above quoted statements ? 

Thanks...

If the KSUFans.com admins are simply banning members because of their registration on other Kansas State message boards, then that's what I see as being unprofessional. 

Fair enough anwser.

I can't speak for the Admin who did the banning, but I believe it was for those associated with the start up of this site and the perceived efforts to destroy KSUFans.


what about those that posted a post from the announcement board on this site?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2010, 05:34:58 PM
You know who I feel bad for in this whole thing?  Cyclist.  Great guy.  Just doing his damnedest to keep the peace.   :katpak: < for cyclist
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: sys on February 11, 2010, 07:45:01 PM
steve dave = mangino.  ksufans.com = kstate.  sys =  :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Jeffy on February 11, 2010, 10:51:52 PM
You know who I feel bad for in this whole thing?  Cyclist.  Great guy.  Just doing his damnedest to keep the peace.   :katpak: < for cyclist

Quite obvious that the stress got to him when he essentially melted down over the last couple days after a few of my posts/PMs.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ArchE_Cat on February 11, 2010, 11:06:26 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi46.tinypic.com%2F308bn9g.jpg&hash=8b724da29714ee5c2d280937a5273d1e2684fa7f)
 :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pike on February 11, 2010, 11:09:21 PM
i just noticed I was banned, i didn't even do anything.  tears.  tears.

Probably banned you for being an elite
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ArchE_Cat on February 12, 2010, 04:53:36 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.tinypic.com%2Frbhdvs.jpg&hash=c4144ba2b4cbf36cd2e38e3bc00f897fd3d8bb10)
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Annyong on February 12, 2010, 04:54:46 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.tinypic.com%2Frbhdvs.jpg&hash=c4144ba2b4cbf36cd2e38e3bc00f897fd3d8bb10)

Nice weather forecast tab. Cold and cloudy my friend.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 12, 2010, 05:01:14 PM
Guys, god damnit  :facepalm:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: felix rex on February 12, 2010, 05:09:34 PM
lol
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Cire on February 12, 2010, 05:20:11 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emoticonzone.com%2Fmsn-emotions%2Ffunny%2FFake+Sugar+Dick+%28WARNING%2C+NOT+THE+REAL+SUGAR+DICK%21%29.gif&hash=e15d0c6df23a16d6a98f73f93e5e319850b9be08)

:ksufans:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 12, 2010, 07:27:34 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.tinypic.com%2Frbhdvs.jpg&hash=c4144ba2b4cbf36cd2e38e3bc00f897fd3d8bb10)

i woulda lol'd if instead of Anderson guitars...it said black dicks...or something   :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: TBL on February 12, 2010, 09:52:09 PM
Holy rough ridin' crap. This just keeps getting better and better....    :lol:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: SuperG on February 13, 2010, 02:28:07 AM
I don't see the banning thing as unprofessional as much as it seems childish. Primarily because nothing about KSUfans is professional. Not sure it was ever supposed to be.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: yoman on February 13, 2010, 11:03:40 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50267.0  (http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50267.0)
we might as well just call it GPC jr at this point.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ArchE_Cat on February 25, 2010, 11:02:04 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.tinypic.com%2Ffut4k4.jpg&hash=d0176c945a3edee19e1a40378ddd12bb2b3b829c)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi49.tinypic.com%2F1zpr591.jpg&hash=79d171bc0f0def7a47eb1b9912328f4d31a163e0)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi49.tinypic.com%2F25tuqtv.jpg&hash=cc4da054f29c596b06de41959e46c543126c7a1d)
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Pete on February 25, 2010, 11:48:03 AM
Welp, Terry is going to sue the crap out of Drood now. HAHAHA
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Stupid Fitz on February 25, 2010, 12:16:27 PM
Welp, Terry is going to sue the crap out of Drood now. HAHAHA

I said this before and I'll say it again, who knew TP was such a crybaby pussy?   :dunno:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pissclams on February 25, 2010, 12:38:08 PM
Welp, Terry is going to sue the crap out of Drood now. HAHAHA

I said this before and I'll say it again, who knew TP was such a crybaby pussy?   :dunno:
i'll raise my hand.  i quit that board last summer because of his crybaby pussy ways.  on top of being a crybaby pussy, he's a complete dumbass when it comes to the innertubez.  great combo.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: OK_Cat on February 25, 2010, 12:41:13 PM
I'd give you proof, but I'm banned from there.  But I always "slammed" terry really good over there.  Like, a lot. 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pissclams on February 25, 2010, 12:42:17 PM
I'd give you proof, but I'm banned from there.  But I always "slammed" terry really good over there.  Like, a lot. 
clear your cookies, temp files, etc
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: OK_Cat on February 25, 2010, 12:44:07 PM
somebody post how to do that in sd's computer thread, tia
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 25, 2010, 12:46:39 PM
Welp, Terry is going to sue the crap out of Drood now. HAHAHA

I said this before and I'll say it again, who knew TP was such a crybaby pussy?   :dunno:
i'll raise my hand.  i quit that board last summer because of his crybaby pussy ways.  on top of being a crybaby pussy, he's a complete dumbass when it comes to the innertubez.  great combo.

but i thought you died?  :confused:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: chum1 on February 25, 2010, 03:54:27 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg46.imageshack.us%2Fimg46%2F2831%2F62636934.jpg&hash=baa075e335ad2ce13b07fa0447084be428eda22d)
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WildcatNkilt on February 25, 2010, 03:56:23 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg46.imageshack.us%2Fimg46%2F2831%2F62636934.jpg&hash=baa075e335ad2ce13b07fa0447084be428eda22d)

Ouch.  Big hit.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Johnny Wichita on February 25, 2010, 04:02:06 PM
Pretty much dead in the water. 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 25, 2010, 04:40:36 PM
....and that's why TP is pissed.  :cool:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Cire on February 26, 2010, 10:52:09 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50365.0

sad
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 26, 2010, 10:53:25 PM
Sorry steve dave, you are banned from using this forum!
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Pete on February 26, 2010, 10:54:44 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50365.0

sad

Why does Beams continue to post over there?  Seems beneath him, doesn't it?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 26, 2010, 11:03:07 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50365.0

sad

Why does Beams continue to post over there?  Seems beneath him, doesn't it?

It's recess where he's been playing pickup ball with the 5th graders for years and all of a sudden the 5th graders had to go back in for class and it's him against the 2nd grade all stars.  Let him have this.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Cire on February 26, 2010, 11:05:01 PM
 Poll
Question:    Does KU cheat
Yes    - 66 (82.5%)
Negatory    - 14 (17.5%)
   
Total Voters: 80

Pages: [1] 2    
« previous next »
     Reply  |  Notify  |  Mark unread  |  Send this topic  |  Print    
   Author    Topic: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)  (Read 867 times)
cireksu, DayneTB, WildCatzPhreak, pwrcat1, Lurker, bigshotattorneycat, Kellis and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
royalswild
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 1286


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« on: February 22, 2010, 08:05:21 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Yes.
   Report to moderator   Logged
PowercatPat
Senior Cub
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2518


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2010, 08:24:23 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Stupid thread.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Chad May Lover
Cub

Online Online

Posts: 280


View Profile Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2010, 08:30:05 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Yes especially Sharon.
   Report to moderator   Logged
royalswild
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 1286


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2010, 08:30:12 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: PowercatPat on February 22, 2010, 08:24:23 pm
Stupid thread.
If that makes you feel cool.
   Report to moderator   Logged
catsfan20032004
z
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 183


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2010, 08:46:31 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
I'm not 100% sure they cheat but I know there have been incidents of violence against women and children.
   Report to moderator   Logged
skeeter
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 65


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2010, 08:52:45 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
In Nascar... They say, "If you aint cheatin', you aint racing"
   Report to moderator   Logged
Bookcat
Scout Team Wildcat
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 6451


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2010, 08:31:30 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Aldrich and Collins stayed at Kansas to play for Bill Self one more year because he is a great guy. C'mon people.
   Report to moderator   Logged
jester66
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 1576


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2010, 08:58:24 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: Bookcat on February 23, 2010, 08:31:30 am
Aldrich and Collins stayed at Kansas to play for Bill Self one more year because he is a great guy. C'mon people.
This

Sherron Collins quote of "I don't need the money" shows how powerful the feelings are towards his head coach.  If I personally had children living in poverty and the opportunity to make their lives better, I would obviously choose to stay in school.  Jobs that pay in the millions are a dime a dozen, and with that ku degree, I'm sure Sherron has nearly limitless opportunities if he does not make it playing basketball.
   Report to moderator   Logged
dobbie4ksu
Administrator
Cub
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 901

K State cat 4 life!

dobbie66801
View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2010, 11:28:25 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
It's fair to say most this site thinks ku cheats, nothing to see here. We all know ku is crooked with the Chalmers/Adlrich parental situation. Come on ku fans the NCAA had to make a new recruiting rule thanks to your school
   Report to moderator   Logged
pwrcat1
Cub

Online Online

Posts: 2398


View Profile Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2010, 11:35:31 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Everybody cheats.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Bookcat
Scout Team Wildcat
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 6451


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2010, 11:53:36 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: pwrcat1 on February 23, 2010, 11:35:31 am
Everybody cheats.

to a degree I'm on board with this


The winning programs have the ability to operate in the gray area down to an art.
   Report to moderator   Logged
pwrcat1
Cub

Online Online

Posts: 2398


View Profile Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2010, 11:59:14 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: Bookcat on February 23, 2010, 11:53:36 am
Quote from: pwrcat1 on February 23, 2010, 11:35:31 am
Everybody cheats.

to a degree I'm on board with this


The winning programs have the ability to operate in the gray area down to an art.

Yup.  So raggin' on ku for getting the best talent at any cost comes off as jealousy than some stand for piety.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Guscat
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 337


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #12 on: February 23, 2010, 12:13:43 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Cheatin' bastards!
   Report to moderator   Logged
BMWJhawk
Argyle Square
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 49

Poster formerly known as Jayhawk34


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #13 on: February 23, 2010, 04:24:46 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
ku recruits itself... just look at a guy like Cole Aldrich.  He grew up going to ku basketball camps and following ku basketball.  You can't say the same for programs like K-State.  If anyone is cheating, it's a program like K-State, who has to do anything it can to get players to play in Manhattan, KS.
   Report to moderator   Logged
dobbie4ksu
Administrator
Cub
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 901

K State cat 4 life!

dobbie66801
View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #14 on: February 23, 2010, 04:26:04 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: BMWJhawk on February 23, 2010, 04:24:46 pm
ku recruits itself... just look at a guy like Cole Aldrich.  He grew up going to ku basketball camps and following ku basketball.  You can't say the same for programs like K-State.  If anyone is cheating, it's a program like K-State, who has to do anything it can to get players to play in Manhattan, KS.
Are you kidding me? Did you not read my post, they made a Ronnie Chalmers rule come on, if they make a rule about your school your a fracking cheater period!
   Report to moderator   Logged
BMWJhawk
Argyle Square
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 49

Poster formerly known as Jayhawk34


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #15 on: February 23, 2010, 04:28:59 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
That rule wasn't in effect when Ronnie Chalmers was at ku.  It's not cheating if it's not against the rules.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Chad May Lover
Cub

Online Online

Posts: 280


View Profile Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #16 on: February 23, 2010, 05:12:19 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: BMWJhawk on February 23, 2010, 04:24:46 pm
ku recruits itself... just look at a guy like Cole Aldrich.  He grew up going to ku basketball camps and following ku basketball.  You can't say the same for programs like K-State.  If anyone is cheating, it's a program like K-State, who has to do anything it can to get players to play in Manhattan, KS.

Honestly what does Lawrence have that Manhattan doesn't?
   Report to moderator   Logged
BMWJhawk
Argyle Square
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 49

Poster formerly known as Jayhawk34


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2010, 05:22:41 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: Chad May Lover on February 23, 2010, 05:12:19 pm
Quote from: BMWJhawk on February 23, 2010, 04:24:46 pm
ku recruits itself... just look at a guy like Cole Aldrich.  He grew up going to ku basketball camps and following ku basketball.  You can't say the same for programs like K-State.  If anyone is cheating, it's a program like K-State, who has to do anything it can to get players to play in Manhattan, KS.

Honestly what does Lawrence have that Manhattan doesn't?





Are you honestly trying to compare Manhattan and Lawrence?
   Report to moderator   Logged
Chad May Lover
Cub

Online Online

Posts: 280


View Profile Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2010, 05:27:19 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
I'm sorry besides the weed smoking liberals in that town what is the difference?
   Report to moderator   Logged
BMWJhawk
Argyle Square
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 49

Poster formerly known as Jayhawk34


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2010, 05:31:25 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
It's like comparing Colorado Springs to Boulder.  Two totally different towns.  Different culture, different city layout, different populations, different schools, different aesthetics, different locations, different restaurants, etc, etc. 
   Report to moderator   Logged
Chad May Lover
Cub

Online Online

Posts: 280


View Profile Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2010, 05:35:15 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
So Lawrence is not a small town in Kansas?
   Report to moderator   Logged
BMWJhawk
Argyle Square
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 49

Poster formerly known as Jayhawk34


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2010, 06:09:10 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: Chad May Lover on February 23, 2010, 05:35:15 pm
So Lawrence is not a small town in Kansas?



You have no argument.  Lawrence is different than every other city in Kansas, similar to Austin and Texas.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Chad May Lover
Cub

Online Online

Posts: 280


View Profile Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #22 on: February 23, 2010, 06:32:35 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
So you think Lawrence is inferior to every other city in Kansas.
   Report to moderator   Logged
kshox
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 11


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #23 on: February 23, 2010, 10:35:00 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: BMWJhawk on February 23, 2010, 06:09:10 pm
Quote from: Chad May Lover on February 23, 2010, 05:35:15 pm
So Lawrence is not a small town in Kansas?



You have no argument.  Lawrence is different than every other city in Kansas, similar to Austin and Texas.

And you wonder why we consider ku fans snobs. Manhattan is completely different than any other city in Kansas... shoot Osawatomie and Ogden are different than any other town in Kansas but that's not necessarily a good thing. If an athlete is choosing between KState and ku they're not going to base their decision on the town.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Dick Knewheizel
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 598


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #24 on: February 24, 2010, 09:34:02 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
I think it's fairly well documented that ku cheats.  Hence their probation and constant run-ins with local law enforcement.

FYI - Austin is a sh*t hole.  Furthermore, it's a city of over a million people and the state capitol of the second most populated state.  It also has a badass bar district as do most sh*thole towns (i.e. New Orleans, Memphis)and a legendary music scene.  Basically it is completely different than Lawrence in regards to the good things.  They do compare well regarding the bad things, i.e. homeless population, stinky liberals, ridiculous traffic, filthy.

They say that Wichita has all the benefits of a big city without all the problems.  Lawrence is the opposite, it has none of the benefits of a big city, with all the big city problems.  Lawrence is truly an island in KS, it's nothing but an oversized flea market full of indigents, ignorant, and ugly people.  I would say a good comparison city would be Springfield, MO.

I have yet to venture to a place that is very similar to Manhattan.  The closest I've seen is Oxford, MS.  Laid back culture, cool bar district, good eatin', town very focused on the university, well kept.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Bookcat
Scout Team Wildcat
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 6451


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #25 on: February 24, 2010, 09:48:06 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: BMWJhawk on February 23, 2010, 06:09:10 pm
Quote from: Chad May Lover on February 23, 2010, 05:35:15 pm
So Lawrence is not a small town in Kansas?



You have no argument.  Lawrence is different than every other city in Kansas, similar to Austin and Texas.

Texas is a state.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Chad May Lover
Cub

Online Online

Posts: 280


View Profile Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #26 on: February 24, 2010, 10:30:29 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: Dick Knewheizel on February 24, 2010, 09:34:02 am
I think it's fairly well documented that ku cheats.  Hence their probation and constant run-ins with local law enforcement.

FYI - Austin is a sh*t hole.  Furthermore, it's a city of over a million people and the state capitol of the second most populated state.  It also has a badass bar district as do most sh*thole towns (i.e. New Orleans, Memphis)and a legendary music scene.  Basically it is completely different than Lawrence in regards to the good things.  They do compare well regarding the bad things, i.e. homeless population, stinky liberals, ridiculous traffic, filthy.

They say that Wichita has all the benefits of a big city without all the problems.  Lawrence is the opposite, it has none of the benefits of a big city, with all the big city problems.  Lawrence is truly an island in KS, it's nothing but an oversized flea market full of indigents, ignorant, and ugly people.  I would say a good comparison city would be Springfield, MO.

I have yet to venture to a place that is very similar to Manhattan.  The closest I've seen is Oxford, MS.  Laid back culture, cool bar district, good eatin', town very focused on the university, well kept.


It's not a sh*thole Dick. Its a great city to live besides the traffic.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Dick Knewheizel
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 598


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #27 on: February 24, 2010, 11:21:26 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: Chad May Lover on February 24, 2010, 10:30:29 am
Quote from: Dick Knewheizel on February 24, 2010, 09:34:02 am
I think it's fairly well documented that ku cheats.  Hence their probation and constant run-ins with local law enforcement.

FYI - Austin is a sh*t hole.  Furthermore, it's a city of over a million people and the state capitol of the second most populated state.  It also has a badass bar district as do most sh*thole towns (i.e. New Orleans, Memphis)and a legendary music scene.  Basically it is completely different than Lawrence in regards to the good things.  They do compare well regarding the bad things, i.e. homeless population, stinky liberals, ridiculous traffic, filthy.

They say that Wichita has all the benefits of a big city without all the problems.  Lawrence is the opposite, it has none of the benefits of a big city, with all the big city problems.  Lawrence is truly an island in KS, it's nothing but an oversized flea market full of indigents, ignorant, and ugly people.  I would say a good comparison city would be Springfield, MO.

I have yet to venture to a place that is very similar to Manhattan.  The closest I've seen is Oxford, MS.  Laid back culture, cool bar district, good eatin', town very focused on the university, well kept.


It's not a sh*thole Dick. Its a great city to live besides the traffic.

I'm assuming you're talking about Austin.

If so, I'd agree with you if this was the 90's, however Austin has fallen off a cliff since then.  Went back for the first time in a while 2 years ago when we beat UT in football.  Extremely disappointing, absolutely one of the grossest places I've ever visited.  Couldn't wait to get back to Dallas (which ironically has drastically improved over the same time span).

The bar district was still top notch  Love

The walk to it  Yuck


   Report to moderator   Logged
Chad May Lover
Cub

Online Online

Posts: 280


View Profile Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #28 on: February 24, 2010, 04:02:58 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
I'm assuming you went to 6th street so yes I could see how you could say that. But I'm sure other cities have "that part" of the city. All in all it is a great city and it has some of the best restaurants.
   Report to moderator   Logged
CatsNShocks
Classless Cat
Cub
******
Offline Offline

Posts: 1939

There's a new sheriff in town.


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Does ku cheat Poll (just for fun dont freak out ku posters)
« Reply #29 on: Yesterday at 01:50:48 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Not sure which is gayer: City smack or Uni smack.
 Jerk off
   Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1] 2    
     Reply  |  Notify  |  Mark unread  |  Send this topic  |  Print    
« previous next »
 
Jump to: 

   Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC    Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Loading...


   
Big XII Basketball
Feb 25, 2010
No Games Scheduled Today
Big XII Basketball
Feb 26, 2010
No Games Scheduled Today
Big XII Basketball
Feb 27, 2010
Baylor
Oklahoma   0
0
12:30pm  CT
Iowa St.
Colorado   0
0
12:30pm  CT
Texas
Texas A&M   0
0
1:00pm  CT
Texas Tech
Nebraska   0
0
3:00pm  CT
Kansas
Oklahoma St.   0
0
3:00pm  CT
Missouri
Kansas St.   0
0
7:00pm  CT




KSUFANS is not associated or affiliated with nor endorsed by Kansas State University.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: HeinBallz on February 26, 2010, 11:06:16 PM
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=50113.0

this was pretty good.

does FBWillie not now about this? or just not care...

I found out about this place about a week after I posted that... then I changed my name.   Feel kind of like a dumb crap for not realizing sooner how powertardish that place had become.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: OK_Cat on February 26, 2010, 11:09:24 PM
How do we get bookcat to stay over there permanently?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on February 26, 2010, 11:10:47 PM
How do we get bookcat to stay over there permanently?

I really like bookcat.  I dog on him a lot but..I love the eff out of him
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ChiComCat on February 26, 2010, 11:20:54 PM
OK, so new orleans and austin are shitholes and wichita rocks?  WTF is wrong with that guy?  Also, is there some sort of half-ass ban where you can read crap and aren't allowed to post anymore?  I'm pretty sure I'm that now.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: theKSU on February 27, 2010, 01:39:23 PM
dobbie4ksu
Administrator
Cub
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 905

K State cat 4 life!
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 27, 2010, 01:53:30 PM
dobbie4ksu
Administrator
Cub
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 905

K State cat 4 life!

and... :dunno:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 04, 2010, 09:24:11 AM
dubnation
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 30


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Terrible coaching
« on: Yesterday at 11:04:22 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
We needed to come out of that zone we sucked in it and they just burried shot after shot. Then what is the play on offense get Denis the ball and get out of his way and if he pass give it back to him. Finally if we want to go far in the turnament our Coach has to take his had out of his ass and play Rodney and  Wally alot more. Luis and Chris enough said its the end of the year and our freshmen arent used to having consistent playing time. So we needed them today in the hardest place to win and they showed there talent but if they had played more before now no telling how much more they could have helped us today and in the tournament. With that I say thanks Coach for giving us a good season but in big games what are you doing besides Yelling Mad
   Report to moderator   Logged
delugeliveshere
Muzzled Poster
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 391


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Terrible coaching
« Reply #1 on: Yesterday at 11:08:01 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: dubnation on Yesterday at 11:04:22 pm
We needed to come out of that zone we sucked in it and they just burried shot after shot. Then what is the play on offense get Denis the ball and get out of his way and if he pass give it back to him. Finally if we want to go far in the turnament our Coach has to take his had out of his ass and play Rodney and  Wally alot more. Luis and Chris enough said its the end of the year and our freshmen arent used to having consistent playing time. So we needed them today in the hardest place to win and they showed there talent but if they had played more before now no telling how much more they could have helped us today and in the tournament. With that I say thanks Coach for giving us a good season but in big games what are you doing besides Yelling Mad

Boy.  You're kind of a fracking idiot.  The only thing that kept the game respectable was the zone.

Give it another 20 years of good basketball and you may start to catch on.  What are you, TP's brother?  Dumbass.
   Report to moderator   Logged
CatsNChiefs
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 2279


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Terrible coaching
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 11:12:30 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
I have to agree with our challenged friend.  You're being a tard.
   Report to moderator   Logged
royalswild
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 1303


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Terrible coaching
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 11:13:37 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: delugeliveshere on Yesterday at 11:08:01 pm
Quote from: dubnation on Yesterday at 11:04:22 pm
We needed to come out of that zone we sucked in it and they just burried shot after shot. Then what is the play on offense get Denis the ball and get out of his way and if he pass give it back to him. Finally if we want to go far in the turnament our Coach has to take his had out of his ass and play Rodney and  Wally alot more. Luis and Chris enough said its the end of the year and our freshmen arent used to having consistent playing time. So we needed them today in the hardest place to win and they showed there talent but if they had played more before now no telling how much more they could have helped us today and in the tournament. With that I say thanks Coach for giving us a good season but in big games what are you doing besides Yelling Mad

Boy.  You're kind of a fracking idiot.  The only thing that kept the game respectable was the zone.

Give it another 20 years of good basketball and you may start to catch on.  What are you, TP's brother?  Dumbass.
If you don't like how Terry is running things here then get the shazbot! off this message board troll.
   Report to moderator   Logged
delugeliveshere
Muzzled Poster
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 391


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Terrible coaching
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 11:16:49 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: royalswild on Yesterday at 11:13:37 pm
Quote from: delugeliveshere on Yesterday at 11:08:01 pm
Quote from: dubnation on Yesterday at 11:04:22 pm
We needed to come out of that zone we sucked in it and they just burried shot after shot. Then what is the play on offense get Denis the ball and get out of his way and if he pass give it back to him. Finally if we want to go far in the turnament our Coach has to take his had out of his ass and play Rodney and  Wally alot more. Luis and Chris enough said its the end of the year and our freshmen arent used to having consistent playing time. So we needed them today in the hardest place to win and they showed there talent but if they had played more before now no telling how much more they could have helped us today and in the tournament. With that I say thanks Coach for giving us a good season but in big games what are you doing besides Yelling Mad

Boy.  You're kind of a fracking idiot.  The only thing that kept the game respectable was the zone.

Give it another 20 years of good basketball and you may start to catch on.  What are you, TP's brother?  Dumbass.
If you don't like how Terry is running things here then get the shazbot! off this message board troll.

Nope.  That's the beauty about the interweb; you can chime in as you want.  Fact is, Terry Pierce is a fracking idiot.  Always ahas been and that was confirmed with the mass exodus around here.  The only ones left standing are the true d'bags of Riley C.
   Report to moderator   Logged
CatsNChiefs
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 2279


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Terrible coaching
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 11:18:52 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
So you have an affinity for "d'bags" apparently?
   Report to moderator   Logged
dubnation
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 30


View Profile Email Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Terrible coaching
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 11:36:03 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
you call me an idiot and you think the zone kept us in the game wow. I will not respond to dumb people that have no Bball IQ. if you tell me what the hell was the plan on offense I would like to hear it youcan win with defense but when you play a good team you have to have strategy also and you have to have the ability to change during the game when the things you worked on isn't working. we need to set more screens for the guards and do it with out them asking for it this is game 29 come on now. and finally why is he so stubborn and unwilling to discipline Denis he is out of control he does whatever he wants he never tell him to slow it down and be patient. you want an example end of 1st half why did he take a wild as runner with 15sec left on the clock we needed to run the clock down and run a play my bad we have no plays but get denis the ball and get out the way
   Report to moderator   Logged
delugeliveshere
Muzzled Poster
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 391


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Terrible coaching
« Reply #7 on: Today at 12:16:48 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: CatsNChiefs on Yesterday at 11:18:52 pm
So you have an affinity for "d'bags" apparently?

just you, bro.  just you.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Bosz56
Administrator
Cub
********
Offline Offline

Posts: 1245


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: Terrible coaching
« Reply #8 on: Today at 06:43:28 am »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: delugeliveshere on Yesterday at 11:16:49 pm
Quote from: royalswild on Yesterday at 11:13:37 pm
Quote from: delugeliveshere on Yesterday at 11:08:01 pm
Quote from: dubnation on Yesterday at 11:04:22 pm
We needed to come out of that zone we sucked in it and they just burried shot after shot. Then what is the play on offense get Denis the ball and get out of his way and if he pass give it back to him. Finally if we want to go far in the turnament our Coach has to take his had out of his ass and play Rodney and  Wally alot more. Luis and Chris enough said its the end of the year and our freshmen arent used to having consistent playing time. So we needed them today in the hardest place to win and they showed there talent but if they had played more before now no telling how much more they could have helped us today and in the tournament. With that I say thanks Coach for giving us a good season but in big games what are you doing besides Yelling Mad

Boy.  You're kind of a fracking idiot.  The only thing that kept the game respectable was the zone.

Give it another 20 years of good basketball and you may start to catch on.  What are you, TP's brother?  Dumbass.
If you don't like how Terry is running things here then get the shazbot! off this message board troll.

Nope.  That's the beauty about the interweb; you can chime in as you want.  Fact is, Terry Pierce is a fracking idiot.  Always ahas been and that was confirmed with the mass exodus around here.  The only ones left standing are the true d'bags of Riley C.
Board users TP is not to blame for people leaving. How about a massive email campaign filled with made up stories about me selling the site to theshiver.com as reason #1. What are you doing posting over here, when there is clearly another place to go post. Oh I get it, you are one of those loser types who follows "elite posters." Which by the way is a made up by people who probably look like pointdexters and have no friends. On a rival website you can't even think for yourself. Be an alpha...

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 04, 2010, 09:50:35 AM
When are he and MJ going to get their stories straight?   :facepalm:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: kso_FAN on March 04, 2010, 10:05:50 AM
I couldn't leave that one alone. 

But overall, sad there.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pissclams on March 04, 2010, 10:15:19 AM
"Give it another 20 years of good basketball and you may start to catch on.  What are you, TP's brother?  Dumbass."

 :lol:   :lol:   :lol:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ArchE_Cat on March 04, 2010, 11:04:42 AM
Quote from: Terry Pierce
Be an alpha...

 :lol:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: michigancat on March 04, 2010, 01:38:46 PM
wasn't dubnation Pullen's uncle or something?  Seems like he would only post after losses and complain about pullen not playing enough or something.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: PandaXpanda on March 04, 2010, 01:45:56 PM
Is Dobs a TP sock?  :dunno: :users:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: pissclams on March 04, 2010, 01:49:51 PM
wasn't dubnation Pullen's uncle or something?  Seems like he would only post after losses and complain about pullen not playing enough or something.
i thought he was some idiot from kstatefans.com
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 04, 2010, 02:06:28 PM
wasn't dubnation Pullen's uncle or something?  Seems like he would only post after losses and complain about pullen not playing enough or something.

If so, sorry Jake for flaming the hell out of your uncle
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: kso_FAN on March 04, 2010, 02:20:55 PM
wasn't dubnation Pullen's uncle or something?  Seems like he would only post after losses and complain about pullen not playing enough or something.

At least someone from Chicago that knew him.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: felix rex on March 04, 2010, 04:42:40 PM
wasn't dubnation Pullen's uncle or something?  Seems like he would only post after losses and complain about pullen not playing enough or something.

At least someone from Chicago that knew him.

Said he didn't know him, just followed him and Rose and other Chicago players. Weird, really.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 04, 2010, 05:03:24 PM
wasn't dubnation Pullen's uncle or something?  Seems like he would only post after losses and complain about pullen not playing enough or something.

At least someone from Chicago that knew him.

Said he didn't know him, just followed him and Rose and other Chicago players. Weird, really.

Weird stalkerish Chicago Fetish?? :dunno:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on March 05, 2010, 09:11:06 AM
That guy who thinks Dallas is better than Austin :facepalm:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: kso_FAN on March 05, 2010, 09:52:09 AM
wasn't dubnation Pullen's uncle or something?  Seems like he would only post after losses and complain about pullen not playing enough or something.

At least someone from Chicago that knew him.

Said he didn't know him, just followed him and Rose and other Chicago players. Weird, really.

Weird stalkerish Chicago Fetish?? :dunno:

And its clear he hates Frank.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 05, 2010, 09:53:46 AM
wasn't dubnation Pullen's uncle or something?  Seems like he would only post after losses and complain about pullen not playing enough or something.

At least someone from Chicago that knew him.

Said he didn't know him, just followed him and Rose and other Chicago players. Weird, really.

Weird stalkerish Chicago Fetish?? :dunno:

And its clear he hates Frank.

I bet he loves Deepdish pizza too.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: felix rex on March 05, 2010, 10:10:18 AM
wasn't dubnation Pullen's uncle or something?  Seems like he would only post after losses and complain about pullen not playing enough or something.

At least someone from Chicago that knew him.

Said he didn't know him, just followed him and Rose and other Chicago players. Weird, really.

Weird stalkerish Chicago Fetish?? :dunno:

And its clear he hates Frank.

Yeah. Every post is "Frank sucks. Pullen is our best player. Denis is out of control."
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Annyong on March 05, 2010, 10:51:05 AM
honestly, i dont know why you all still go back to read it.

obv its a trainwreck.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: felix rex on March 05, 2010, 02:00:01 PM
honestly, i dont know why you all still go back to read it.


archives
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 05, 2010, 02:14:58 PM
honestly, i dont know why you all still go back to read it.


archives

The only thing I miss.  Was actually the only reason we offered to buy it before starting fresh.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 05, 2010, 02:27:37 PM
honestly, i dont know why you all still go back to read it.


archives

The only thing I miss.  Was actually the only reason we offered to buy it before starting fresh.

if you ever need anything specific, i'll look it up as long as i haven't been banned yet...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Saulbadguy on March 05, 2010, 02:31:34 PM
honestly, i dont know why you all still go back to read it.


archives

The only thing I miss.  Was actually the only reason we offered to buy it before starting fresh.
Should just hire some Chinese to recreate them post by post in a sub-board or something.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: weird roberts foam finger on March 05, 2010, 04:34:58 PM
I bet he loves Deepdish pizza too.

What's wrong with deepdish?  :confused:

Any food that will stop my heart from beating has to be good, right?   :lick:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: nicname on March 05, 2010, 05:57:35 PM
I love the pinned threads all started by ksufans legends who no longer post there.  It is like the old mall in town after the new mall has been built.  Empty, dirty and kind of depression.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Paul Moscow on March 06, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
Dobbie digs deep and come back with this diamond,
 
Dobbie: They quote a bad loss back to a specific set I cannot remember what makes it a bad loss, like the RPI or something and per OSU's rpi and sos they are not considered a bad loss, no ranking have Kansas State with a bad loss at this time. It's ok we cannot all be perfect lol. I hate the loss but it wasn't a bad one 

CF 0304: Lunardi considers a good win to be over a team with a Top 50 RPI for which we've got "Good Wins" over Xavier, Texas A&M, at Baylor, vs. Dayton on a neutral court, at UNLV and over Missouri and Texas. He considers a "Bad Loss" to be a loss to a team ranked #101 or lower in the RPI for which we have none.

HERE WE GO DOBBIEEEE!!: "Thanks I couldn't remember for sure, so as of right now we have no bad losses.... As a fan side of it though, I think the OK State was bad cause we should have easily won it. Now this is also as a fan cause no true way shape or form is ku a bad loss, but we should have won that game in the bram. It just freaking pissed me off at the end. SO TECHNICALLY from a basketball prospecter we have no bad loses, but as a fan there are games we should have won!"




Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: dobbie4ksu on March 06, 2010, 06:28:59 PM
Dobbie digs deep and come back with this diamond,
 
Dobbie: They quote a bad loss back to a specific set I cannot remember what makes it a bad loss, like the RPI or something and per OSU's rpi and sos they are not considered a bad loss, no ranking have Kansas State with a bad loss at this time. It's ok we cannot all be perfect lol. I hate the loss but it wasn't a bad one 

CF 0304: Lunardi considers a good win to be over a team with a Top 50 RPI for which we've got "Good Wins" over Xavier, Texas A&M, at Baylor, vs. Dayton on a neutral court, at UNLV and over Missouri and Texas. He considers a "Bad Loss" to be a loss to a team ranked #101 or lower in the RPI for which we have none.

HERE WE GO DOBBIEEEE!!: "Thanks I couldn't remember for sure, so as of right now we have no bad losses.... As a fan side of it though, I think the OK State was bad cause we should have easily won it. Now this is also as a fan cause no true way shape or form is ku a bad loss, but we should have won that game in the bram. It just freaking pissed me off at the end. SO TECHNICALLY from a basketball prospecter we have no bad loses, but as a fan there are games we should have won!"

[/quoten
Yea just shattered my foot and was all on the morphine lol,  I read it now and it makes no sense to me what i was trying to say/. And just so it is said and this will be my last post here most likely I have no hate for most of you, the thing is we are two different boards KSUfans are getting media credemtials and we want to be getting all the info we can get for the fans and what not. you guys are the board that talks trash and likes to have fun. I think a lot of you were hard on TP and hope you all continue to lurk over there and jump into the convos if you have access the boards, no hard feelings fellows, but TP and I plan on making ksufans the best bbs it can be... good luck to all involved over here
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 06:37:42 PM
I would love to lurk but I'm banned.  Go unban me dobbie. 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: dobbie4ksu on March 06, 2010, 06:43:54 PM
nice try SD that cannot happen my friend
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 06:48:25 PM
nice try SD that cannot happen my friend

How come?  What have I done?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: dobbie4ksu on March 06, 2010, 06:59:50 PM
SD you were not civil at all, the crap attack about his mom... The site lies about us selling to a KU fan, which was not true killed our traffic, you single handedly attempted to kill ksufans like helsing to dracula my friend.  Tp and I have it under control though, thanks for the attempted daggar
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 07:11:49 PM
SD you were not civil at all, the crap attack about his mom... The site lies about us selling to a KU fan, which was not true killed our traffic, you single handedly attempted to kill ksufans like helsing to dracula my friend.  Tp and I have it under control though, thanks for the attempted daggar

What the eff are you talking about?  

I liked your interview with the players.  Keep up the good work.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ChiComCat on March 06, 2010, 07:47:35 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 07:54:24 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

 That wasn't a lie.  
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 08:28:54 PM
BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

Try it now ChiCat...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 06, 2010, 08:34:44 PM
BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

Try it now ChiCat...
What about me? All I did was post a post from the announcements board that we all know would have inevitably made its way on here.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 08:49:56 PM
BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

Try it now ChiCat...

What about me!?  :confused:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 06, 2010, 08:53:45 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 08:55:06 PM
BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

Try it now ChiCat...
What about me? All I did was post a post from the announcements board that we all know would have inevitably made its way on here.

Talk to Terry...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 08:55:28 PM
BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

Try it now ChiCat...

What about me!?  :confused:

Talk to Terry...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 08:57:21 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 06, 2010, 08:58:32 PM
BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

Try it now ChiCat...
What about me? All I did was post a post from the announcements board that we all know would have inevitably made its way on here.

Talk to Terry...
HAHAHAHAHA
seriously though cyclist I don't think it would do any good.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 08:58:37 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.
:lol:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 09:01:37 PM
BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

Try it now ChiCat...
What about me? All I did was post a post from the announcements board that we all know would have inevitably made its way on here.

Talk to Terry...
HAHAHAHAHA

PM him, olde fella...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 06, 2010, 09:03:50 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.

And whose fault is that?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 09:05:55 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.
:lol:


KSUFans.com will be hosted by a co-operative of ESPN affiliate sites.  Among those are OUinsider, Bucknuts, bulldawgjunction, insidetexas, insidetheu.com, gatorcountry.com and others including theshiver.com.

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 09:06:25 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.

And whose fault is that?

Obviously his. 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 06, 2010, 09:11:59 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.

And whose fault is that?

Obviously his. 

and he was, like head mod and/or host of that whole board, right?   :users:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 09:12:57 PM
Cyclist, listen....I like you.  You mean well.  You have never done anything to me (other than banning me when Terry wasn't smart enough to figure out how to set the ban triggers).  I will let you post here.  I will even let your pimp and direct link ksufans here.  All I ask is that you unban me from there so I can flame the eff out of people (not you).  We don't have enough sh1tty posters here yet to satiate my unquenchable thirst for destroying people on the internet.  Really not a lot to ask imo.  
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 09:16:43 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.

And whose fault is that?

Obviously his. 

and he was, like head mod and/or host of that whole board, right?   :users:

And your point ?

eff yes, he was the head mod, who is going through a divorce and doesn't have time to run the site.  So he misspoke.  Call him a fuckup.  Oh, you probably have many times before.

Why do I even try to reason with you guys ?

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 09:17:49 PM
Cyclist, listen....I like you.  You mean well.  You have never done anything to me (other than banning me when Terry wasn't smart enough to figure out how to set the ban triggers).  I will let you post here.  I will even let your pimp and direct link ksufans here.  All I ask is that you unban me from there so I can flame the eff out of people (not you).  We don't have enough sh1tty posters here yet to satiate by unquenchable thirst for destroying people on the internet.  Really not a lot to ask imo.  

I'm sorry, but I cannot. 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 09:18:33 PM
Cyclist, listen....I like you.  You mean well.  You have never done anything to me (other than banning me when Terry wasn't smart enough to figure out how to set the ban triggers).  I will let you post here.  I will even let your pimp and direct link ksufans here.  All I ask is that you unban me from there so I can flame the eff out of people (not you).  We don't have enough sh1tty posters here yet to satiate by unquenchable thirst for destroying people on the internet.  Really not a lot to ask imo.  

I'm sorry, but I cannot. 

ok, internet high five to you anyway
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 06, 2010, 09:21:48 PM
Cyclist, listen....I like you.  You mean well.  You have never done anything to me (other than banning me when Terry wasn't smart enough to figure out how to set the ban triggers).  I will let you post here.  I will even let your pimp and direct link ksufans here.  All I ask is that you unban me from there so I can flame the eff out of people (not you).  We don't have enough sh1tty posters here yet to satiate by unquenchable thirst for destroying people on the internet.  Really not a lot to ask imo.  

I'm sorry, but I cannot. 

ok, internet high five to you anyway

Thanks, SD.  At least we can be civil.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 09:22:57 PM
Cyclist, listen....I like you.  You mean well.  You have never done anything to me (other than banning me when Terry wasn't smart enough to figure out how to set the ban triggers).  I will let you post here.  I will even let your pimp and direct link ksufans here.  All I ask is that you unban me from there so I can flame the eff out of people (not you).  We don't have enough sh1tty posters here yet to satiate by unquenchable thirst for destroying people on the internet.  Really not a lot to ask imo.  

I'm sorry, but I cannot. 

ok, internet high five to you anyway

Thanks, SD.  At least we can be civil.

I've been civil this entire time.  You know that. 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 06, 2010, 10:02:54 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.

And whose fault is that?

Obviously his. 

and he was, like head mod and/or host of that whole board, right?   :users:

And your point ?

shazbot! yes, he was the head mod, who is going through a divorce and doesn't have time to run the site.  So he misspoke.  Call him a frackup.  Oh, you probably have many times before.

Why do I even try to reason with you guys ?



You won't find me being mean or rude to mj anyplace, except maybe calling him a Mexican but that was all in fun.  You are cool with me cylist
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on March 06, 2010, 10:25:52 PM
cyclist can i still use your avatar :cry:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: yoga-like_abana on March 06, 2010, 10:31:23 PM
wtf chicat u went from banned to mod?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 06, 2010, 10:35:36 PM
wtf chicat u went from banned to mod?

Congrats chicat, that's perfect usage of poster intimidation! 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ChiComCat on March 06, 2010, 10:54:23 PM
wtf chicat u went from banned to mod?

Congrats chicat, that's perfect usage of poster intimidation! 

It says Mod, doesnt seem to allow me to do Mod things.  More on this as I investigate my hopefully new found power...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: TBL on March 06, 2010, 10:55:32 PM
wtf chicat u went from banned to mod?

Congrats chicat, that's perfect usage of poster intimidation! 

It says Mod, doesnt seem to allow me to do Mod things.  More on this as I investigate my hopefully new found power...

Maybe it's a '60s kinda thing?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on March 06, 2010, 11:00:13 PM
wtf chicat u went from banned to mod?

Congrats chicat, that's perfect usage of poster intimidation! 

It says Mod, doesnt seem to allow me to do Mod things.  More on this as I investigate my hopefully new found power...

Maybe it's a '60s kinda thing?

More like England.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 07, 2010, 07:28:09 AM
wtf chicat u went from banned to mod?

Congrats chicat, that's perfect usage of poster intimidation! 

It says Mod, doesnt seem to allow me to do Mod things.  More on this as I investigate my hopefully new found power...

Good idea.  I would start by figuring out if you can unban me and the boys. 
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: ChiComCat on March 07, 2010, 07:44:15 AM
wtf chicat u went from banned to mod?

Congrats chicat, that's perfect usage of poster intimidation! 

It says Mod, doesnt seem to allow me to do Mod things.  More on this as I investigate my hopefully new found power...

Good idea.  I would start by figuring out if you can unban me and the boys. 

Doesn't look good SD, I don't seem to have any magic powers at all.  Curious too, because mine doesn't say Global Mod or Admin... I'm thinking cyclist or dobbie just put it on there because I was joking around about becoming a mod over there.  I think I can still poster intimidate though
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: steve dave on March 07, 2010, 07:49:59 AM
wtf chicat u went from banned to mod?

Congrats chicat, that's perfect usage of poster intimidation! 

It says Mod, doesnt seem to allow me to do Mod things.  More on this as I investigate my hopefully new found power...

Good idea.  I would start by figuring out if you can unban me and the boys. 

Doesn't look good SD, I don't seem to have any magic powers at all.  Curious too, because mine doesn't say Global Mod or Admin... I'm thinking cyclist or dobbie just put it on there because I was joking around about becoming a mod over there.  I think I can still poster intimidate though

Yeah, do that
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Trim on March 07, 2010, 02:38:26 PM
Yea just shattered my foot and was all on the morphine lol,  I read it now and it makes no sense to me what i was trying to say/. And just so it is said and this will be my last post here most likely I have no hate for most of you, the thing is we are two different boards KSUfans are getting media credemtials and we want to be getting all the info we can get for the fans and what not. you guys are the board that talks trash and likes to have fun. I think a lot of you were hard on TP and hope you all continue to lurk over there and jump into the convos if you have access the boards, no hard feelings fellows, but TP and I plan on making ksufans the best bbs it can be... good luck to all involved over here

SD you were not civil at all, the crap attack about his mom... The site lies about us selling to a KU fan, which was not true killed our traffic, you single handedly attempted to kill ksufans like helsing to dracula my friend.  Tp and I have it under control though, thanks for the attempted daggar

I gotta side with dobbie on this one.  This site and ksufans definitely seem to be 2 very distinct sites with different goals and business philosophies (very different business philosophies in the sense that goEMAW has none).  Also agree that TP and dobbie have things under control and continue to have a thriving premium business model that's completely unaffected by anything goEMAW and its band of rogues do.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 07, 2010, 02:54:16 PM
gatorcountry.com


 :love:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Pete on March 07, 2010, 03:44:44 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.

And whose fault is that?

Obviously his. 

and he was, like head mod and/or host of that whole board, right?   :users:

And your point ?

shazbot! yes, he was the head mod, who is going through a divorce and doesn't have time to run the site.  So he misspoke.  Call him a frackup.  Oh, you probably have many times before.

Why do I even try to reason with you guys ?



Seriously, THANK YOU  for posting this stuff Cyclist.  Not joking.  VERY HELPFUL against any would-be litigious knuckleheads bent on wasting their money on fruitless actions.

I owe you a beer.  You are a good dude.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: michigancat on March 07, 2010, 03:50:22 PM
gatorcountry.com


 :love:

I'm banned from there, too.  I think I talked a lot of crap during the Shipman recruitment.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 07, 2010, 06:46:42 PM
cyclist can i still use your avatar :cry:

Sure.  It's public domain...

Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 07, 2010, 06:50:47 PM
wtf chicat u went from banned to mod?

Congrats chicat, that's perfect usage of poster intimidation! 

It says Mod, doesnt seem to allow me to do Mod things.  More on this as I investigate my hopefully new found power...

Good idea.  I would start by figuring out if you can unban me and the boys. 

Doesn't look good SD, I don't seem to have any magic powers at all.  Curious too, because mine doesn't say Global Mod or Admin... I'm thinking cyclist or dobbie just put it on there because I was joking around about becoming a mod over there.  I think I can still poster intimidate though

QFMFT. 

I did the 'Mod' membergroup for fun; hope you are enjoying your new-found status.  I guess it wasn't allowing you to post so I redid it so it would.  It's like being a regular poster, but with a Mod in your title and blue as your color...
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 07, 2010, 06:53:06 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.

And whose fault is that?

Obviously his. 

and he was, like head mod and/or host of that whole board, right?   :users:

And your point ?

shazbot! yes, he was the head mod, who is going through a divorce and doesn't have time to run the site.  So he misspoke.  Call him a frackup.  Oh, you probably have many times before.

Why do I even try to reason with you guys ?



Seriously, THANK YOU  for posting this stuff Cyclist.  Not joking.  VERY HELPFUL against any would-be litigious knuckleheads bent on wasting their money on fruitless actions.

I owe you a beer.  You are a good dude.

Guess I'd better delete my account now.  Aiding and abbetting you guys in any litigation is not a good thing on my part...

 :ohno:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: The42Yardstick on March 07, 2010, 07:41:55 PM
cyclist can i still use your avatar :cry:

Sure.  It's public domain...



I just wanted your blessing :cheers:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: cyclist on March 07, 2010, 07:44:01 PM
cyclist can i still use your avatar :cry:

Sure.  It's public domain...



I just wanted your blessing :cheers:

:cyclist:        :cyclist:         :cyclist:           :cyclist:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: TBL on March 08, 2010, 09:33:31 PM
That lie didn't kill your traffic, everyone leaving did.  And SD didn't do the mom stuff, someone else said that.  BTW, why can't I post anymore?  I have been pretty civil through all of this!

MJ told everyone that the Shiver was the new host.   :dunno:

True, but he misspoke.
:lol:


KSUFans.com will be hosted by a co-operative of ESPN affiliate sites.  Among those are OUinsider, Bucknuts, bulldawgjunction, insidetexas, insidetheu.com, gatorcountry.com and others including theshiver.com.



Sorry, but "bucknuts" is a classic name and just makes me giggle.    :lol:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: WillieWatanabe on March 10, 2010, 01:05:26 PM
GP76
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 168


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: You can't have it both ways Pat!
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 05:07:05 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: Guscat on Yesterday at 04:18:22 pm
Quote from: Louises West on February 09, 2010, 02:18:54 pm
how can you argue?  manhattan blows.

Nah.  Most males in Lawrence, maybe, and I'm sure you would know.

I thought this crap was over when SD left this site.
   Report to moderator   Logged
Snaggle Tooth
Cub

Offline Offline

Posts: 19


View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: You can't have it both ways Pat!
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 05:15:45 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote
I thought this crap was over when SD left this site.

What happened to SD, Dax and several of the other regulars on this site?
   Report to moderator   Logged
ChicagoCat
Mod
Cub
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1758



View Profile Personal Message (Offline)
   
   
Re: You can't have it both ways Pat!
« Reply #10 on: Yesterday at 06:36:00 pm »
   Reply with quoteQuote
Quote from: GP76 on Yesterday at 05:07:05 pm
Quote from: Guscat on Yesterday at 04:18:22 pm
Quote from: Louises West on February 09, 2010, 02:18:54 pm
how can you argue?  manhattan blows.

Nah.  Most males in Lawrence, maybe, and I'm sure you would know.

I thought this crap was over when SD left this site.

Nope, it just got less funny
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: stunz on March 11, 2010, 05:45:16 AM
sd, can u get on through www.hidemyass.com?
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: theKSU on March 14, 2010, 06:08:43 PM
KSUFans56
 
Thinking that too many KSU Message board sites is a bad idea...

 :users:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Paul Moscow on April 06, 2010, 10:50:46 AM
There hasn't been a single post on the other site since this morning. 3.5 hours and counting since anyone said anything.

:heartratemonitorflatline:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: SuperG on April 08, 2010, 06:58:30 PM
Nearly five posts today so far... and there is a pep rally set for Monday!  :excited:
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Havs on July 28, 2010, 04:19:39 AM
Looks like KSUFans.com is gone.
Title: Re: The old board ...
Post by: Trim on July 28, 2010, 07:23:04 AM
Looks like KSUFans.com is gone.

It always goes down around 4 in the morning.

Why were you checking on ksufans.com at 4 in the morning?