goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: POWL on October 31, 2016, 09:56:34 AM

Title: Oklahoma State
Post by: POWL on October 31, 2016, 09:56:34 AM
might as well start this now...........they are better than us on paper on pretty much every stat, but it is at home.

this is a huge game.....we could sure use a non-offensive TD (or 2)

can someone make me feel better ?  :runaway:
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: pissclams on October 31, 2016, 10:05:46 AM
 pistol pete is going to have his pistols firing, i wonder if bullet and the spirit rider will make an appearance?  regardless, outside of iowa state, oklahoma state has the stupidest mascot and fans in the conference.  this doesn't include ku since they don't even register on the stupid scale since they're so bad.  that said, oklahoma state can suck it and mike gundy is orange and has a mullet and white trash joe bob and his goatee belongs there.  go cats.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Tobias on October 31, 2016, 10:06:46 AM
i have been spending a lot of time in the pit lately and from what I'm hearing they completely suck crap
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Prince McJunkins on October 31, 2016, 10:16:53 AM
This sets up as a letdown game for them after "upsetting" WV at home. They've had only two road games and were dogshit in both.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Bookcat on October 31, 2016, 10:18:36 AM
Cats win when Ertz runs the option like butter in the redzone.

and Kstate plays a bit of defense in the second half at home....

Kstate wins by 10.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: kso_FAN on October 31, 2016, 10:19:41 AM
We will have to play well.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F10%2F2016-KSU-vs-Oklahoma-State.png&hash=30eddbe3966cb70d22b433d045452b71d1e461b4)
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: MadCat on October 31, 2016, 10:23:57 AM
199 for Bill; trap game for them.  :ksu:
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 31, 2016, 10:28:36 AM
We're better than they are, it's a fact.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Gooch on October 31, 2016, 10:30:50 AM
We're better than they are, it's a fact.
@Trim? What does the measuring stick say?
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: scottwildcat on October 31, 2016, 10:32:27 AM
We aren't better than them, and we probably will lose by 4-7 points and it'll be gut wrenching.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 31, 2016, 10:34:32 AM
Anyone who is a fun of soccer obviously doesn't know jack crap about real sports.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: star seed 7 on October 31, 2016, 10:55:09 AM
When 'clams,' bias, and 'fsd agree on something you best not bet against them.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Katpappy on October 31, 2016, 10:57:56 AM
When 'clams,' bias, and 'fsd agree on something you best not bet against them.
:thumbs:
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Trim on October 31, 2016, 11:16:43 AM
We're better than they are, it's a fact.
@Trim? What does the measuring stick say?

We'll see!  It's an important day for osu.

I had them as measuring up in my preseason gut check, but I was wrong about texas so who knows!
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: kslim on October 31, 2016, 11:30:55 AM


i think we play a 60 minute game against the pokes and win 42-17
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Skipper44 on October 31, 2016, 11:41:02 AM
When 'clams,' bias, and 'fsd agree on something you best not bet against them.
ha, they are definitely 3 distinct points on the ge spectrum
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Skipper44 on October 31, 2016, 11:42:33 AM
We're better than they are, it's a fact.
@Trim? What does the measuring stick say?

We'll see!  It's an important day for osu.

I had them as measuring up in my preseason gut check, but I was wrong about texas so who knows!
this conference is the most muddled it has ever been, it's a like a ten team Nortard division
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: wetwillie on October 31, 2016, 11:48:41 AM
Every wrinkle in the playbook that can be used will be used this week. 
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Winters on October 31, 2016, 11:52:33 AM
I think it'll play out similar to the TECH game. Cats, win!
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Trim on October 31, 2016, 11:55:13 AM
this conference is the most muddled it has ever been, it's a like a ten team Nortard division

There's no muddle, at least not w/respect to us.  There's the trash below KSU, and the adequate above KSU.  TCU is the team that will be questioned until it tests itself against the measuring stick.

Quote
Oklahoma   5 - 0
Oklahoma State   4 - 1
Baylor   3 - 1   
West Virginia   3 - 1
Kansas State   3 - 2   
TCU      2 - 3
Texas    2 - 3
Texas Tech   2 - 3   
Iowa State   0 - 5
Kansas   0 - 5
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: MakeItRain on October 31, 2016, 12:25:29 PM
this conference is the most muddled it has ever been, it's a like a ten team Nortard division

There's no muddle, at least not w/respect to us.  There's the trash below KSU, and the adequate above KSU.  TCU is the team that will be questioned until it tests itself against the measuring stick.

Quote
Oklahoma   5 - 0
Oklahoma State   4 - 1
Baylor   3 - 1   
West Virginia   3 - 1
Kansas State   3 - 2   
TCU      2 - 3
Texas    2 - 3
Texas Tech   2 - 3   
Iowa State   0 - 5
Kansas   0 - 5

Yeah, there is muddle because those teams above us have yet to play each other, the only exception is OSU vs. WVU. They all got fat on those teams at the bottom. There are a whole bunch of losses still that will be had by those top four. I'm guessing OU wins the conference by two games.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Trim on October 31, 2016, 12:28:17 PM
this conference is the most muddled it has ever been, it's a like a ten team Nortard division

There's no muddle, at least not w/respect to us.  There's the trash below KSU, and the adequate above KSU.  TCU is the team that will be questioned until it tests itself against the measuring stick.

Quote
Oklahoma   5 - 0
Oklahoma State   4 - 1
Baylor   3 - 1   
West Virginia   3 - 1
Kansas State   3 - 2   
TCU      2 - 3
Texas    2 - 3
Texas Tech   2 - 3   
Iowa State   0 - 5
Kansas   0 - 5

Yeah, there is muddle because those teams above us have yet to play each other, the only exception is OSU vs. WVU. They all got fat on those teams at the bottom. There are a whole bunch of losses still that will be had by those top four. I'm guessing OU wins the conference by two games.

I'm indifferent to how good any of them are w/respect to each other or who wins the conference.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: POWL on October 31, 2016, 12:38:54 PM
i'd be curious to know what OSU isn't very good at, so I can watch for that weakness.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: kslim on October 31, 2016, 12:41:43 PM
i'd be curious to know what OSU isn't very good at, so I can watch for that weakness.
in the games i have watched they have a very suspect run defense, so we have that going for us

of course we will come out and throw it 30+ times just for good measure
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: catastrophe on October 31, 2016, 12:43:43 PM
OSU lost to Baylor who lost to Texas who lost to KSU. Cats roll.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Katpappy on October 31, 2016, 12:49:26 PM
i'd be curious to know what OSU isn't very good at, so I can watch for that weakness.
in the games i have watched they have a very suspect run defense, so we have that going for us

of course we will come out and throw it 30+ times just for good measure
Yea, and they may throw some Hubs action in for good measure.  But, of course, only if it's close and towards the end of the fourth quarter.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: CNS on October 31, 2016, 12:51:00 PM
We just need to tie for confy champy in a super convoluted way.  Seems like this weekend made that insanity somewhat possible. 
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: That_Guy on October 31, 2016, 01:47:47 PM
'Cats win Easy by 14-17 pts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 31, 2016, 01:50:07 PM
There's always a healthy amount of propagation that osu has good athletes. They don't. And their coach is the Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) spawn of a mike shanahan and joe dirt moonshine infused sexual encounter.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: NeverII on October 31, 2016, 02:12:48 PM
Common denominator in all of Oklahoma State's conference wins has been the opponent coughing the ball up at very inopportune times. They got three turnovers inside WVU's 10 last weekend (turned those into 17 points). Same thing against KU. Got 17 points on drives that covered 26 yards or fewer. Take care of the ball and we should be fine. I think winters said it earlier. Very similar to the Tech game. Probably fewer points. Somewhere in the 31-27 type range if I had to guess.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: ChiComCat on October 31, 2016, 02:25:03 PM
If we give them a shot late to take it from us, they are plenty capable unlike ISU, Tech, or Texas. 
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: star seed 7 on October 31, 2016, 02:31:03 PM
There's always a healthy amount of propagation that osu has good athletes. They don't. And their coach is the Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) spawn of a mike shanahan and joe dirt moonshine infused sexual encounter.

The OSU worship on gE has always been perplexing to me
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on October 31, 2016, 02:33:08 PM
It's because they recruit kids over us head-to-head and everyone thinks instantly that they're more athletic than what we have. #science
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: HerrSonntag on October 31, 2016, 02:38:35 PM
OSU doesn't get enough crap about being in a tight race with WVU for being the most hillbilly B12 school.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: kso_FAN on October 31, 2016, 02:39:21 PM
The TO point is a good one, +7 over 5 games is pretty ridiculous. Their only negative game was their loss to Baylor. Plus, this is one of Bill's best offenses ever at not turning the ball over.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on October 31, 2016, 02:45:49 PM
There's always a healthy amount of propagation that osu has good athletes. They don't. And their coach is the Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) spawn of a mike shanahan and joe dirt moonshine infused sexual encounter.

The OSU worship on gE has always been perplexing to me

They had a good team 5 years ago.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Gooch on October 31, 2016, 02:46:21 PM
OSU doesn't get enough crap about being in a tight race with WVU for being the most hillbilly B12 school.
#HicksWithSticks
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: wetwillie on October 31, 2016, 03:02:12 PM
I think this might be the first I'm hearing of OSU worship on gE
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: kslim on October 31, 2016, 03:05:35 PM
I think this might be the first I'm hearing of OSU worship on gE
you better fact check that
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Big Sam on October 31, 2016, 05:46:13 PM
Two things we know:
1) They will play a bit dirty, with the intent to hurt key players (in other words, Ertz will get knocked out for sure, at least).
2) They will do questionable recruiting things to edge KSU out for kids (this I can confirm).
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Pete on October 31, 2016, 06:09:27 PM
I think this might be the first I'm hearing of OSU worship on gE

We do covet their material possessions.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: wetwillie on October 31, 2016, 06:31:31 PM
I think this might be the first I'm hearing of OSU worship on gE

We do covet their material possessions.

Oh I thought our stuff was nicer than theirs. 
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: CNS on November 01, 2016, 07:52:46 AM
I wish we had Boone.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: schreds21 on November 01, 2016, 01:07:06 PM
I wish we had Boone.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
and Wood
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Bookcat on November 02, 2016, 10:50:23 AM
Kstate wins by 10-14. ... Probably a big special teams play or two.... and some amazing home cooking by the officials that makes Ostate's bench come unglued.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: doompaul on November 05, 2016, 07:02:03 AM
might as well start this now...........they are better than us on paper on pretty much every stat, but it is at home.

this is a huge game.....we could sure use a non-offensive TD (or 2)

can someone make me feel better ?  :runaway:

It doesn't matter, we are going to win. GET HYPE, NIGGERS!

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUa7YK17QP0[/youtube]
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: POWL on November 05, 2016, 08:33:18 AM
might as well start this now...........they are better than us on paper on pretty much every stat, but it is at home.

this is a huge game.....we could sure use a non-offensive TD (or 2)

can someone make me feel better ?  :runaway:

It doesn't matter, we are going to win. GET HYPE, NIGGERS!

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUa7YK17QP0[/youtube]
:sdeek: .........but, then   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: That_Guy on November 05, 2016, 09:25:48 AM
might as well start this now...........they are better than us on paper on pretty much every stat, but it is at home.

this is a huge game.....we could sure use a non-offensive TD (or 2)

can someone make me feel better ?  :runaway:

It doesn't matter, we are going to win. GET HYPE, NIGGERS!

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUa7YK17QP0[/youtube]

What in the rough ridin' world.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: MakeItRain on November 05, 2016, 10:41:00 AM
might as well start this now...........they are better than us on paper on pretty much every stat, but it is at home.

this is a huge game.....we could sure use a non-offensive TD (or 2)

can someone make me feel better ?  :runaway:

It doesn't matter, we are going to win. GET HYPE, NIGGERS!

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUa7YK17QP0[/youtube]

Nah bro, take it to castefootball or stormfront.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: _33 on November 05, 2016, 03:50:53 PM
Mike Gundys hair. What on earth?
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: CNS on November 05, 2016, 04:35:34 PM
We seem to be on the suck side of mediocre today.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: EMAWzifried on November 05, 2016, 04:39:12 PM
 :billdance:
I have full faith in the defense from here on out.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: bones129 on November 05, 2016, 06:01:04 PM
We used to win games like this.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: CNS on November 05, 2016, 06:01:33 PM
There goes 200 vs ku.

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: BostonPancake on November 05, 2016, 06:02:08 PM
eff you bill.  You gutless man.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: CHONGS on November 05, 2016, 06:03:32 PM
Once again we give up long (in terms of yards) scoring drives.  Can't overcome it.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: michigancat on November 05, 2016, 06:07:13 PM
Once again we give up long (in terms of yards) scoring drives.  Can't overcome it.

how many times does OSU have to run two receivers straight down the middle before we figure out how to stop it? I guess we'll never know.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: wetwillie on November 05, 2016, 06:11:40 PM
this one actually hurt.  I must still have some feels left.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Powercat Posse on November 05, 2016, 07:28:25 PM
20 carries 171 yds.
30 carries.

1 is Barnes Jones Silmon (8.55 per carry)
Other is just Ertz

Lol at Offensive play calling Stooges.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2016, 07:32:54 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwifXk_VQAE-CjE.png:large)
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: _33 on November 05, 2016, 07:34:14 PM
The worst part about today is that Brad Underwood coaches OSU bball.  I remembered that in like the 4th quarter and got really quiet and sad.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: kso_FAN on November 05, 2016, 07:39:37 PM
20 carries 171 yds.
30 carries.

1 is Barnes Jones Silmon (8.55 per carry)
Other is just Ertz

Lol at Offensive play calling Stooges.

The offense is improving, its the defense that is sliding backwards quickly. The offense and its young parts have the possibility of becoming very good over the next couple years, but I'm not sure we'll ever have the talent on defense to have enough for a Top 10 type team.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: everyone shut up on November 05, 2016, 07:42:10 PM
how many more 5 hearts do you think our defense needs to be top ten?
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: michigancat on November 05, 2016, 07:55:17 PM
20 carries 171 yds.
30 carries.

1 is Barnes Jones Silmon (8.55 per carry)
Other is just Ertz

Lol at Offensive play calling Stooges.

The offense is improving, its the defense that is sliding backwards quickly. The offense and its young parts have the possibility of becoming very good over the next couple years, but I'm not sure we'll ever have the talent on defense to have enough for a Top 10 type team.
Talent is not our problem IMO. I mean, yeah,  talent isn't top 10 caliber but it's 10 YPP bad either. They are good at tackling but constantly out of position against everyone in the big 12.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: MakeItRain on November 05, 2016, 08:31:09 PM
20 carries 171 yds.
30 carries.

1 is Barnes Jones Silmon (8.55 per carry)
Other is just Ertz

Lol at Offensive play calling Stooges.

Are you saying Ertz got too many carries today?
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: BBF$$Kat on November 05, 2016, 08:48:37 PM
20 carries 171 yds.
30 carries.

1 is Barnes Jones Silmon (8.55 per carry)
Other is just Ertz

Lol at Offensive play calling Stooges.
I would say Ertz got a few carries at the wrong time or more so I say in the wrong formation.... :dunno:...just my  :th_twocents:

Are you saying Ertz got too many carries today?
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: EMADUB on November 06, 2016, 12:04:15 AM
We aren't better than them, and we probably will lose by 4-7 points and it'll be gut wrenching.

When the cats punted the ball away after they pulled within 37-35, I remembered reading this post and thinking scottwildcat better not be some kind of prophet cause this will suck.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Powercat Posse on November 06, 2016, 12:59:49 AM
20 carries 171 yds.
30 carries.

1 is Barnes Jones Silmon (8.55 per carry)
Other is just Ertz

Lol at Offensive play calling Stooges.

The offense is improving, its the defense that is sliding backwards quickly. The offense and its young parts have the possibility of becoming very good over the next couple years, but I'm not sure we'll ever have the talent on defense to have enough for a Top 10 type team.

My issue is obviously that we should have given our RBs more carries.  Ertz isn't Klein or Bishop. 30 carries is a joke.
Barnes pretty much had a decent or really good run every time he touched the ball in 2nd half. We were up 2 in the 4th quarter....after Barnes got a 5 yd run, we ran back to back QB runs that got very little, and had to punt. You could see Ertz was tired and a little exhausted. 

I like all of our 4 tailbacks.  I like the trio of Pringles/Heath/Zuber. And I think the OL has come a ways since Stanford game.  Ertz is up and down, but putting 55% of our carries on him isn't a formula we want, especially with that 8.5 ave the RB trio had today.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: MakeItRain on November 06, 2016, 01:18:52 AM
20 carries 171 yds.
30 carries.

1 is Barnes Jones Silmon (8.55 per carry)
Other is just Ertz

Lol at Offensive play calling Stooges.

The offense is improving, its the defense that is sliding backwards quickly. The offense and its young parts have the possibility of becoming very good over the next couple years, but I'm not sure we'll ever have the talent on defense to have enough for a Top 10 type team.

My issue is obviously that we should have given our RBs more carries.  Ertz isn't Klein or Bishop. 30 carries is a joke.
Barnes pretty much had a decent or really good run every time he touched the ball in 2nd half. We were up 2 in the 4th quarter....after Barnes got a 5 yd run, we ran back to back QB runs that got very little, and had to punt. You could see Ertz was tired and a little exhausted. 

I like all of our 4 tailbacks.  I like the trio of Pringles/Heath/Zuber. And I think the OL has come a ways since Stanford game.  Ertz is up and down, but putting 55% of our carries on him isn't a formula we want, especially with that 8.5 ave the RB trio had today.

This dude is complaining about a player that had 30 carries for 150 yards and three touchdowns, hot take.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: stunted on November 06, 2016, 01:36:58 AM
8.55 > 5, and rushing TDs is misleading in Bill's offense, and Ertz has an injury history
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on November 06, 2016, 07:07:18 AM
Ertz got the exact right amount of carries for an offense that uses the passing game as a decoy for qb runs.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: scottwildcat on November 06, 2016, 07:31:12 AM
Anyone who is a fun of soccer obviously doesn't know jack crap about real sports.
lol what an idiot.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Trim on November 06, 2016, 11:08:18 AM
Quote
Running the ball is at the core of K-State’s identity, and this season Jesse Ertz is at the center of forming it.


For the first time since 2003, K-State has recorded at least 200 yards rushing in three-straight Big 12 games. Darren Sproles was the Wildcats’ workhorse then. Without an exclusive running back on this Wildcat team, Ertz has taken on the biggest load. And he’s carried it well.


Currently, Ertz leads K-State in rushing yards (630) and carries (111). A K-State quarterback hasn’t finished the season as the leader in both of those categories since Collin Klein in 2011.

Ertz is running so much b/c we have so many running backs.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: MakeItRain on November 06, 2016, 11:19:12 AM
Quote
Running the ball is at the core of K-State’s identity, and this season Jesse Ertz is at the center of forming it.


For the first time since 2003, K-State has recorded at least 200 yards rushing in three-straight Big 12 games. Darren Sproles was the Wildcats’ workhorse then. Without an exclusive running back on this Wildcat team, Ertz has taken on the biggest load. And he’s carried it well.


Currently, Ertz leads K-State in rushing yards (630) and carries (111). A K-State quarterback hasn’t finished the season as the leader in both of those categories since Collin Klein in 2011.

Ertz is running so much b/c we have so many running backs.

Yeah, we don't have an every down back, we don't have an every other or every third down back so in a run heavy offense he by default is going to get way more carries than the other guys splitting them five ways. Is that difficult to understand?
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Trim on November 06, 2016, 11:27:30 AM
Yeah, we don't have an every down back, we don't have an every other or every third down back so in a run heavy offense he by default is going to get way more carries than the other guys splitting them five ways. Is that difficult to understand?

No, the math part of it is very easy to understand.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: MakeItRain on November 06, 2016, 01:40:03 PM
I'm getting Oklahoma State banner ads :curse:
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: HerrSonntag on November 06, 2016, 08:06:26 PM
Remember that time in the 4th quarter when we went 3-and-out twice in a row running the same Ertz keeper play and not involving any of our running backs?  I 'member.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 07, 2016, 09:22:58 AM
2 picks one going for a td, a fumble recovery and blocking a punt and we still didn't win.... I mean sheesh
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: kso_FAN on November 07, 2016, 09:43:04 AM
2 picks one going for a td, a fumble recovery and blocking a punt and we still didn't win.... I mean sheesh

When your defense gives up nearly 10 yards per snap that's what happens.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: yoga-like_abana on November 07, 2016, 09:50:59 AM
fan why can't we cover the seam route/ continuously give up big pass plays up the middle, its depressing.. that tight end with two left feet even killed us
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: kso_FAN on November 07, 2016, 09:52:30 AM
fan why can't we cover the seam route/ continuously give up big pass plays up the middle, its depressing.. that tight end with two left feet even killed us

I'm not sure, but its a huge problem. I have no idea where our safeties were.
Title: Re: Oklahoma State
Post by: Powercat Posse on November 07, 2016, 03:34:20 PM
8.55 > 5, and rushing TDs is misleading in Bill's offense, and Ertz has an injury history


Exactly my point.

FAN mentioned us giving 10 yds per play on defense and how bad that is (and it is terrible).
Barnes ave 9.0 per carry, Jones 10.0 a carry.  Dimel got 10 yds on his only carry.

Ertz had been ave 13 carries in the 5 Big12 games. Ertz had success running the ball on Saturday , but He isn't built to carry it 30 times. Especially when we were running well all game with our RBs.

Our 2nd to last and 3rd to last drives, we only had the ball 8 plays total.  Instead of continuing to wear them down with our RBs, we let Ertz (who had 22 carries before these 2 drives), carry the ball 5 times. He got 9 yards.