goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: bshea85 on July 16, 2016, 06:49:29 PM

Title: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: bshea85 on July 16, 2016, 06:49:29 PM
Hear me out,

I've been reading a lot of trash talk on CSU on this site and how they're not deserving of a slot in a P5 conference.  If the rolls were reversed, would we deserve a spot in a P5 conference?   It's not like we ran the gamut for a number of years and were asked into a P5 conference (Let's not forget, we didn't even know how to spell W-I-N until Snyder came along.)  Comparatively, our schools are very similar, except we have the fortune of "sneaking" into a P5 conference unknowingly all the way back in 1913 when we joined the Missouri Valley Intercollegiate Athletic Association (MVIAA) --> Big Eight --> Big XII.  I think with the success and growth of the CSU campus and football program nowadays, I'd be proud to welcome them into the BigXII.  Hell, if the Big XII had broken up a couple of years ago, we would've been very welcome in the Mountain West.  Seriously, before TCU left that conference, the MWC was in serious talks for an automatic BCS bowl berth.

Road trips out to Colorado are always fun and I haven't been back there to watch football since CU left the conference (I'm still miffed at that).  If I can't get CU, I'll go and take their more Aggie relative, CSU, any day.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 16, 2016, 07:28:39 PM
Great post bshea.  Some other thoughts. 

Manhattan to KC = 120 miles
Fort Collins to Denver = 60 miles

Fact:  Denver has more alumni from CSU than CU.  Half of CU's students are rich kids from out of state that go back wherever they're from.  CSU's student body is made up of about 75% Coloradoans.

KC metro Population = 2.1 million
Denver metro Population = 2.7 million

Kansas Population = 2.9 million (2 P5 schools)
Colorado Population = 5.4 million (1 P5 school)

Kansas Population Growth last 5 years = 58,000
Colorado Population Growth last 5 years = 427,000

Kansas State University = 24,000 students
Colorado State University = 32,000 students

Our new $240 million football stadium will have a capacity of 41,000 and is easily expandable to the mid-50s. 
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: puniraptor on July 16, 2016, 07:47:08 PM
Time to measure endowments.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: chum1 on July 16, 2016, 07:47:43 PM
OF COURSE WE DON'T

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FXRTs7Mn.jpg&hash=d30cd0454e7939c748d01a46cdb78da24749c150)
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 16, 2016, 08:22:06 PM
Time to measure endowments.

We can also look at academic rankings.  I can see how my post might've been interpreted, but my intention was only to show that if Kansas can support two P5 programs, then Colorado certainly can as well.  I do think CSU and KSU being in the same athletic conference would be mutually beneficial.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: The Big Train on July 16, 2016, 09:05:19 PM
Is there a cliff notes edition of TT
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Bloodfart on July 16, 2016, 09:14:22 PM
What's the tv sitch in Colorado?  Can you bring anything to the the table network wise? 
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: KITNfury on July 16, 2016, 10:27:31 PM
Colorado is a very boring and ugly state.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 16, 2016, 10:47:09 PM
What's the tv sitch in Colorado?  Can you bring anything to the the table network wise?

Here are some quotes I pulled from the CSU message board awhile back.  I'm not sure I completely understand the first one, but maybe you do; "With cable or satellite subscriptions compared to other states something like 45%. pretty good but also a lot of potential to grow and create unrealized revenue."

and another:

"But what I understand is that the viewership of CSU games in the Denver market is much less important to the Big 12 than whether than can get the new Big 12 network (that they hope to establish) into the cable packages in the Denver area. If CSU helps the Big 12 accomplish that, that's all they care about. Doesn't matter, in the end, if viewers watch CSU games or Oklahoma games or whoever on the network. The key is that they will want the Big 12 network in what is currently the #17 and fastest growing media market in the country. "
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 16, 2016, 10:49:08 PM
Colorado is a very boring and ugly state.

True, but only the parts that border Kansas and Oklahoma.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 16, 2016, 10:56:52 PM
K-State: Over 40,000 Season Ticket Holders

CSU:  10,000 Season Ticket Holders

FY 2015 Cash Contributions to Athletics:

K-State:  $34 million in cash and cash equivalents (stocks). 

CSU:  $13 million (not sure if all cash or promise to give)






Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 16, 2016, 11:02:55 PM
K-State:  Over $200 million in new and renovated facilities over the last 4 years, only $80 million financed with bonds, the rest paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenue.    Specific to K-State's football facilities:   $170 million in improvements in the last 4 years and only $50 to $60 million financed with bonds, the remainder paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenues.   

CSU:   All $220 million dollars of the stadium was financed with bonds, to be offset by future donations and premium amenities sales.   

Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on July 16, 2016, 11:04:18 PM
So at the end of the day, specific to athletics.   From a financial perspective, particularly from a ticket sales and private contributions perspective.   K-State blows CSU out of the water.


Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: bones129 on July 16, 2016, 11:26:35 PM
So at the end of the day, specific to athletics.   From a financial perspective, particularly from a ticket sales and private contributions perspective.   K-State blows CSU out of the water.

 :kstategrad:
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Cartierfor3 on July 17, 2016, 12:17:59 AM
I can't imagine how bad it feels to not be a KSU CAT
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: bones129 on July 17, 2016, 12:45:23 AM
I can't imagine how bad it feels to not be a KSU CAT

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: HerrSonntag on July 17, 2016, 01:15:18 AM
10k season ticket holders?  Even their own fans don't want to watch them play football :-(
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: scottwildcat on July 17, 2016, 07:34:55 AM
but but but I though CSU had tons of students and alum that were all about that Rams pigskin life?
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on July 17, 2016, 09:21:18 AM
They are basically Pitt State
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: star seed 7 on July 17, 2016, 01:10:41 PM
Pitt state wins championships
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Bloodfart on July 17, 2016, 01:34:13 PM
ZAP!
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on July 17, 2016, 05:57:05 PM
Plus, we whipped their ass in their house with Wooley when they had Norris Cole.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Emo EMAW on July 18, 2016, 03:16:48 PM
but but but I though CSU had tons of students and alum that were all about that Rams pigskin life?

They can't put down the doobie and drive the 60 miles from Denver to Ft Collins for games.  :frown:
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: kcnut on July 19, 2016, 11:46:38 PM
Yes till the end of time. or until the pac ten wants us.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: schreds21 on July 28, 2016, 03:32:56 PM
but but but I though CSU had tons of students and alum that were all about that Rams pigskin life?

They can't put down the doobie and drive the 60 miles from Denver to Ft Collins for games.  :frown:
Can you blame them?  Who the hell wants to risk their lives on the gauntlet that is I25 just to watch some 2nd rate athletic event?
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: EMAWgasm on July 28, 2016, 03:52:25 PM

Our new $240 million football stadium will have a capacity of 41,000 and is easily expandable to the mid-50s.

Unfortunately this is incorrect.  It'll be a nice stadium though (because it was designed by KStaters  :gocho:).
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 28, 2016, 06:33:54 PM

Our new $240 million football stadium will have a capacity of 41,000 and is easily expandable to the mid-50s.

Unfortunately this is incorrect.  It'll be a nice stadium though (because it was designed by KStaters  :gocho:).

Actually it is and, yes, it will be a nice stadium that will be serving good beer on the "Pitkin Porch."  When we're conference mates in a couple years, you'll see.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 28, 2016, 06:35:54 PM
K-State: Over 40,000 Season Ticket Holders

CSU:  10,000 Season Ticket Holders

FY 2015 Cash Contributions to Athletics:

K-State:  $34 million in cash and cash equivalents (stocks). 

CSU:  $13 million (not sure if all cash or promise to give)

CSU doesn't inflate their season ticket holder numbers by including the students.  Nice try though.
Title: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: scottwildcat on July 28, 2016, 06:48:43 PM
Even if you subtract students that's still over 32,000 to 10,000.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: scottwildcat on July 28, 2016, 06:52:46 PM
Also CSU lets their students in for free. :lol: such crap athletics students wouldn't spend a dime to go to the games.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: MadCat on July 28, 2016, 08:58:57 PM
I look forward to drinking the good beers, RamSack.  :Cheers:
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: BostonPancake on July 28, 2016, 11:16:35 PM

Our new $240 million football stadium will have a capacity of 41,000 and is easily expandable to the mid-50s.

Can you elaborate on the ease of the expansion?  Is it like a table that pulls apart in the middle and you just slide in a section of stands that holds 5000 people?  Can a couple of groundskeepers or stadium personell convert it in about 30 minutes, of which 20 of those minutes are spent trying to find the extra expansion stands under the stairs or in the basement? 

Or, is it more like those fold out stands that they have in high school gyms, or just a tarp of 10,000 fans sitting in the stands that they can string up from the light standards?

Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 29, 2016, 08:36:42 AM
Also CSU lets their students in for free. :lol: such crap athletics students wouldn't spend a dime to go to the games.

This is not true either.  Each student pays an athletic fee regardless of whether they attend games or not.  This covers admission costs to home games for all sports.

The lone exception is neutral site games such as the KSU/CSU BB game at the Pepsi Center and the CU/CSU FB game at Mile High.  Students pay to attend those games.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 29, 2016, 08:44:53 AM

Our new $240 million football stadium will have a capacity of 41,000 and is easily expandable to the mid-50s.

Can you elaborate on the ease of the expansion?  Is it like a table that pulls apart in the middle and you just slide in a section of stands that holds 5000 people?  Can a couple of groundskeepers or stadium personell convert it in about 30 minutes, of which 20 of those minutes are spent trying to find the extra expansion stands under the stairs or in the basement? 

Or, is it more like those fold out stands that they have in high school gyms, or just a tarp of 10,000 fans sitting in the stands that they can string up from the light standards?

The plans for expansion have not been made public, but CSU officials have said the new stadium was designed to be easily expandable.  What I've been told by someone closer to the sources than I is that the south bowl will be completely closed off and that there is room to add another deck on the east side. 

There is a ton of room on the north side and the north bowl could be closed off if they put a curve in the road (like Florida did for their stadium), but I know they like how the stadium opens up to the heart of the campus.  So, I'm not sure of whether closing the north side off is on the table should expansion happen. 
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: bonercat on July 29, 2016, 08:46:11 AM
[youtube]https://youtu.be/wgE9Sap11FM[/youtube]

If they can get Bradlee Van Pelt back, I'd help roll the carpet out to them right now
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 29, 2016, 08:48:00 AM
I look forward to drinking the good beers, RamSack.  :Cheers:

I'm looking forward to tailgating with some K-State fans.  Like I said in another post, my roots are in Kansas.  Cool people are welcome to stop by and have a beer at my tailgate.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on July 29, 2016, 08:49:48 AM
[youtube]https://youtu.be/wgE9Sap11FM[/youtube]

If they can get Bradlee Van Pelt back, I'd help roll the carpet out to them right now

Nothing pisses off CU fans more than that!  They still talk about how classless BVP was and I love it!
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: EMAWgasm on July 29, 2016, 10:26:52 AM

Our new $240 million football stadium will have a capacity of 41,000 and is easily expandable to the mid-50s.

Unfortunately this is incorrect.  It'll be a nice stadium though (because it was designed by KStaters  :gocho:).

Actually it is and, yes, it will be a nice stadium that will be serving good beer on the "Pitkin Porch."  When we're conference mates in a couple years, you'll see.

Meh, ok you must know more than me then  :dunno:  We're topping out this Tuesday, maybe I'll see you at the ceremony  :thumbs:
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: Mike from Ft. Collins on August 06, 2016, 10:35:06 AM
K-State:  Over $200 million in new and renovated facilities over the last 4 years, only $80 million financed with bonds, the rest paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenue.    Specific to K-State's football facilities:   $170 million in improvements in the last 4 years and only $50 to $60 million financed with bonds, the remainder paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenues.   

CSU:   All $220 million dollars of the stadium was financed with bonds, to be offset by future donations and premium amenities sales.

CSU raised $86 million so far towards the new $220 million stadium.

http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2016/08/05/new-csu-stadium-solid-financial-ground-5-7-years/88297162/
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on August 06, 2016, 10:47:37 AM
K-State:  Over $200 million in new and renovated facilities over the last 4 years, only $80 million financed with bonds, the rest paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenue.    Specific to K-State's football facilities:   $170 million in improvements in the last 4 years and only $50 to $60 million financed with bonds, the remainder paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenues.   

CSU:   All $220 million dollars of the stadium was financed with bonds, to be offset by future donations and premium amenities sales.

CSU raised $86 million so far towards the new $220 million stadium.

http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2016/08/05/new-csu-stadium-solid-financial-ground-5-7-years/88297162/

That's great, but that money is just going to cover the debt payments for 5-7 years.   CSU athletics has nearly 3x the debt load of K-State athletics and about half the operating revenue.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: ednksu on August 06, 2016, 10:56:12 AM
K-State:  Over $200 million in new and renovated facilities over the last 4 years, only $80 million financed with bonds, the rest paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenue.    Specific to K-State's football facilities:   $170 million in improvements in the last 4 years and only $50 to $60 million financed with bonds, the remainder paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenues.   

CSU:   All $220 million dollars of the stadium was financed with bonds, to be offset by future donations and premium amenities sales.

CSU raised $86 million so far towards the new $220 million stadium.

http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2016/08/05/new-csu-stadium-solid-financial-ground-5-7-years/88297162/

That's great, but that money is just going to cover the debt payments for 5-7 years.   CSU athletics has nearly 3x the debt load of K-State athletics and about half the operating revenue.

Yeah but give credit where credit is due.  At least they didn't leverage the local Boys and Girls club and county parks and rec to build their facilities.
Title: Re: With all of this trash talk on CSU, Do we still deserve to be a P5 school?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on August 06, 2016, 10:57:04 AM
K-State:  Over $200 million in new and renovated facilities over the last 4 years, only $80 million financed with bonds, the rest paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenue.    Specific to K-State's football facilities:   $170 million in improvements in the last 4 years and only $50 to $60 million financed with bonds, the remainder paid for with cash contributions and athletic department revenues.   

CSU:   All $220 million dollars of the stadium was financed with bonds, to be offset by future donations and premium amenities sales.

CSU raised $86 million so far towards the new $220 million stadium.

http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2016/08/05/new-csu-stadium-solid-financial-ground-5-7-years/88297162/

That's great, but that money is just going to cover the debt payments for 5-7 years.   CSU athletics has nearly 3x the debt load of K-State athletics and about half the operating revenue.

Yeah but give credit where credit is due.  At least they didn't leverage the local Boys and Girls club and county parks and rec to build their facilities.


This is true.