goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: kso_FAN on February 16, 2016, 10:17:58 PM

Title: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on February 16, 2016, 10:17:58 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F02%2FTCU1-ADV.png&hash=c638fb3f0fec35df3cf053637e192d928ed6d721)

No moment of this game made me mad. Or happy.

Of course, I didn't watch a moment.

The ugly road streak is over and the NIT bubble is back.

Cats.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: TownieCat on February 16, 2016, 10:20:48 PM
The Flush making four 3s made me happy. That was about it tho.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: sys on February 16, 2016, 10:22:31 PM
just look at that 3% d.   :lick:
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on February 16, 2016, 10:24:06 PM

just look at that 3% d.   :lick:

#6!
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: sys on February 16, 2016, 10:28:01 PM
and #9 in overall d.  wow (legit, non-ironic wow).
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on February 16, 2016, 10:32:25 PM

and #9 in overall d.  wow (legit, non-ironic wow).

If we had an average shooting team we'd be legit talking about the tornament right now.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: sys on February 16, 2016, 10:37:25 PM
the really weird thing is they aren't good at most of the defensive components.  not great at 2% d, not good at dboarding, not good at blocks, not good at preventing 3 attempts, not good at not fouling.

very good at turnovers.  great at 3% d.  not horrible at any of the stuff they're not good at.  somehow it adds up to a top 10 defense.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on February 16, 2016, 10:40:48 PM
https://twitter.com/kellisrobinett/status/699811824032571393
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: Boondock Poonhound on February 16, 2016, 10:45:41 PM
58.8 FT% in 2nd half seemed like 30%. This is why we are losing close games.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: The Big Train on February 16, 2016, 10:55:08 PM
https://twitter.com/kellisrobinett/status/699811824032571393

jfc. The whole team is just a bunch of rough ridin' losers
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: Powercat Posse on February 16, 2016, 11:00:19 PM
7th time in 9 games that our TO% has been 25.0 or higher.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: renocat on February 17, 2016, 12:07:49 AM
I thought Claws did well.  Bigmeat is pitiful.  Westicles played shriveled.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 17, 2016, 12:47:59 AM
7th time in 9 games that our TO% has been 25.0 or higher.

Big problem, I don't think this team will solve it.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: rob mccolley on February 17, 2016, 05:30:13 AM
I've never met John Currie. Is this win enough to secure another five to ten years for Brooth?
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: chum1 on February 17, 2016, 06:20:50 AM
I've never met John Currie. Is this win enough to secure another five to ten years for Brooth?

I don't know if any coach is ever secure for 15-20 years.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: BostonPancake on February 17, 2016, 06:25:37 AM
https://twitter.com/kellisrobinett/status/699811824032571393

jfc. The whole team is just a bunch of rough ridin' losers

I'll let this slide.  I don't remember everything I did 400+ days ago either.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on February 17, 2016, 06:33:20 AM

7th time in 9 games that our TO% has been 25.0 or higher.

Big problem, I don't think this team will solve it.

It's legit to say losing Stokes has definitely hurt, especially in this area, and definitely without him there isn't a great solution. JMHO.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on February 17, 2016, 06:41:22 AM
Fan can you add B2W passes in the advanced metrics now?  Also maybe points per B2W pass.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: The Big Train on February 17, 2016, 06:53:30 AM

https://twitter.com/kellisrobinett/status/699811824032571393

jfc. The whole team is just a bunch of rough ridin' losers

I'll let this slide.  I don't remember everything I did 400+ days ago either.

This wasn't just anything, this was the lone big 12 road win, the only one of his career previous.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: catastrophe on February 17, 2016, 07:21:30 AM
Maybe he was just trolling OU.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: Shooter Jones on February 17, 2016, 09:57:33 AM
Fan can you add B2W passes in the advanced metrics now?  Also maybe points per B2W pass.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on February 17, 2016, 10:17:23 AM
Fan can you add B2W passes in the advanced metrics now?  Also maybe points per B2W pass.

?
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: sys on February 17, 2016, 10:37:29 AM
i believe it's a stat for the number of times hot horndogs realizes he can't trust his black teammates to get the ball to wade and takes care of the job himself.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: Shooter Jones on February 17, 2016, 10:43:29 AM
Fan can you add B2W passes in the advanced metrics now?  Also maybe points per B2W pass.

?

(https://media.giphy.com/media/FMenXZtWtfS1i/giphy.gif)

B2W=Buckets
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: pissclams on February 17, 2016, 11:43:25 AM
don't buy into the media's talking point that losing our true freshman point guard is what killed our season
stokes is a great prospect, for sure, but he doesn't solve this team's problems
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on February 17, 2016, 12:03:04 PM
don't buy into the media's talking point that losing our true freshman point guard is what killed our season
stokes is a great prospect, for sure, but he doesn't solve this team's problems

What season we were a bubble team at best.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: TownieCat on February 17, 2016, 12:07:53 PM
The Flush making four 3s made me happy. That was about it tho.

Just crunched some numbers and we are undefeated when Barry makes 4 or more 3s in a game. Seems like an obvious recipe for success.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on February 17, 2016, 01:40:33 PM
Fan can you add B2W passes in the advanced metrics now?  Also maybe points per B2W pass.

?

Black 2 White passes.  Like when Wesley feeds a cutting wade.  And then how many times the black to white pass resulted in points divided by number of black to white occurances.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: kso_FAN on February 17, 2016, 01:56:03 PM
Fan can you add B2W passes in the advanced metrics now?  Also maybe points per B2W pass.

?

Black 2 White passes.  Like when Wesley feeds a cutting wade.  And then how many times the black to white pass resulted in points divided by number of black to white occurances.

I only follow tempo free and race free stats. Sorry.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: sys on February 17, 2016, 02:07:34 PM
Black 2 White passes.  Like when Wesley feeds a cutting wade.  And then how many times the black to white pass resulted in points divided by number of black to white occurances.

damnit.  i thought it was budke to wade.  i got it completely backwards.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: wetwillie on February 17, 2016, 06:28:37 PM
Black 2 White passes.  Like when Wesley feeds a cutting wade.  And then how many times the black to white pass resulted in points divided by number of black to white occurances.

damnit.  i thought it was budke to wade.  i got it completely backwards.

That's W2W, and appears to be far less effective.
Title: Re: Not (fort) WORTHy of last place; TCU ADV
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 17, 2016, 10:28:47 PM
Kicking ass on the boards  :Woot: