goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: renocat on January 26, 2016, 08:56:45 PM

Title: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: renocat on January 26, 2016, 08:56:45 PM
ABC news is reporting MG will seriously consider naming legal expert circumventing the law Obama to the Supreme Court.  Boy this stirs the spoon in the conspiracy stew.  Explains why Ojustist is supporting MG and shafting the Hollering Sugar Daddy.  This flushes the Hillary indictment IMO.
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: wetwillie on January 26, 2016, 08:59:59 PM
obama would be a fantastic justice.  Hope that happens.
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: star seed 7 on January 26, 2016, 09:05:53 PM
Would love for this to happen
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: cfbandyman on January 26, 2016, 11:03:17 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

I guess, I mean how many times do you actually hear/ have an interview with Supreme Court justices? Once/twice a year. Not a lot of bang for that buck.
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 11:05:16 PM
Quote from: cfbandyman on January 26, 2016, 11:03:17 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

I guess, I mean how many times do you actually hear/ have an interview with Supreme Court justices? Once/twice a year. Not a lot of bang for that buck.

True.   
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: ednksu on January 26, 2016, 11:15:49 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 11:05:16 PM
Quote from: cfbandyman on January 26, 2016, 11:03:17 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

I guess, I mean how many times do you actually hear/ have an interview with Supreme Court justices? Once/twice a year. Not a lot of bang for that buck.

True.

Clarence Thomas.

Quote from: renocat on January 26, 2016, 08:56:45 PM
ABC news is reporting MG will seriously consider naming legal expert circumventing the law Obama to the Supreme Court.  Boy this stirs the spoon in the conspiracy stew.  Explains why Ojustist is supporting MG and shafting the Hollering Sugar Daddy.  This flushes the Hillary indictment IMO.
LOL at thinking Obama gets anywhere close to a confirmation hearing.  Pub senators would jump from the rotunda to prevent a quorum.
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 11:20:50 PM
LOL @ edn, you know unlike Thomas, Barrack would be talking all the time, and since he'd be a former Pres, the interview requests and speech requests would be through the roof.

Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: bones129 on January 27, 2016, 12:02:33 AM
Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on January 26, 2016, 09:05:53 PM
Would love for this to happen

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: puniraptor on January 27, 2016, 02:26:25 AM
Doesn't have the resume.
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on January 27, 2016, 02:19:57 PM
He wouldn't do it unless he could be Chief Justice.  :bawl:
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: DQ12 on January 27, 2016, 02:28:20 PM
Quote from: cfbandyman on January 26, 2016, 11:03:17 PM
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on January 26, 2016, 10:59:16 PM
Would really enjoy all the stammering and stumbling around sans Teleprompter.

I guess, I mean how many times do you actually hear/ have an interview with Supreme Court justices? Once/twice a year. Not a lot of bang for that buck.
you'd presumably hear him speak relatively extemporaneously during oral arguments
Title: Re: Should Obama be named to the Supreme Court?
Post by: Dugout DickStone on January 28, 2016, 10:46:19 PM
He is going to make stupid money on speaking circuit, would never take job