goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: CHONGS on January 21, 2016, 10:50:42 AM

Title: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CHONGS on January 21, 2016, 10:50:42 AM
An update to:
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=35573.0

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FkI1fF56.png&hash=55bc10eef12e6064b5f61d03ce7ba6087a8bc2ae)

in 2015:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F1N85C7u.png&hash=30f523ea8700a9d7c5f7dafd5c43769bd43ff75e)

not doing as well anymore...
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CNS on January 21, 2016, 11:04:49 AM
@slobber

Now is the time to buy.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: Cartierfor3 on January 21, 2016, 11:12:01 AM
how does this compare with College football as a whole? Down across the board?
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: 'taterblast on January 21, 2016, 11:13:29 AM
is that saying La Tech was our most watched game other than the bowl?
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: slobber on January 21, 2016, 11:21:54 AM

@slobber

Now is the time to buy.
gE probably isn't worth $500 today. Smdh


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: Cartierfor3 on January 21, 2016, 11:22:53 AM
is that saying La Tech was our most watched game other than the bowl?

no because I only count 10 games on that thing. I'd guess that's the TCU game?
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: 'taterblast on January 21, 2016, 11:25:43 AM
is that saying La Tech was our most watched game other than the bowl?

no because I only count 10 games on that thing. I'd guess that's the TCU game?

yeah definitely the TCU game
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CHONGS on January 21, 2016, 12:02:34 PM
is that saying La Tech was our most watched game other than the bowl?

no because I only count 10 games on that thing. I'd guess that's the TCU game?

yeah definitely the TCU game
Yes, TCU game.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CHONGS on January 21, 2016, 12:03:31 PM
how does this compare with College football as a whole? Down across the board?
Not sure yet...but our numbers are down even relative to the rest of the Big 12.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CNS on January 21, 2016, 12:14:36 PM
Less ppl giving a eff about KSU.   'Grats Currie, Bill, etc.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: Panjandrum on January 21, 2016, 01:59:00 PM
Less ppl giving a eff about KSU.   'Grats Currie, Bill, etc.

We got pushed onto FS1 a lot this year due to not being very good.  That significantly impacts the number of people watching.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: MadCat on January 21, 2016, 02:08:30 PM
Would you say that OU's 11am kickoffs are negatively impacting their viewership?
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: yoga-like_abana on January 21, 2016, 02:15:54 PM
We weren't fun at all to watch last season.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: Blackcats on January 21, 2016, 02:17:59 PM
An update to:
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=35573.0

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FkI1fF56.png&hash=55bc10eef12e6064b5f61d03ce7ba6087a8bc2ae)

in 2015:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F1N85C7u.png&hash=30f523ea8700a9d7c5f7dafd5c43769bd43ff75e)

not doing as well anymore...

The numbers on the left don't match up. Doesn't seem as bad as the pretty colors make it look.

Plus 6 game losing streak. Our own fans don't want to watch a losing team.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CHONGS on January 21, 2016, 02:25:13 PM
2014 v 2015
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FObSp82k.png&hash=382ac9869d28a33b1e872b43d919f3cd8f4818cf)
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: ascentofstan on January 21, 2016, 02:36:40 PM
Can you do the entire Big 12 with the same Y-axis scale as 2014?
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CHONGS on January 21, 2016, 03:39:22 PM
Can you do the entire Big 12 with the same Y-axis scale as 2014?
might be messy that way, but this should be good

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FTVYN0E9.png&hash=c652624ac2dc59f4b414655db4dc4dbf19be4c9c)
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CHONGS on January 21, 2016, 03:45:48 PM
Out of the top 32....

2014:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F39sPYn4.png&hash=f7327f1dfbcc2ef79f6fc54f65794cd02e734d20)
2015:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FwZoZ2aC.png&hash=1213f99f6e39233ff39272f9194065386e00160c)

Cats sit at 61st.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: Blackcats on January 22, 2016, 09:22:58 AM
No Auburn.
FS1.
Lots of losing.

Liberty Bowl though.

Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: 'taterblast on January 22, 2016, 09:27:41 AM
i don't get why there are only 11 games shown. i assume the South Dakota game is excluded because it was on kstatehd.tv, what other game isn't in there?
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: Shooter Jones on January 22, 2016, 09:36:45 AM
i don't get why there are only 11 games shown. i assume the South Dakota game is excluded because it was on kstatehd.tv, what other game isn't in there?

I'm assuming La Tech/UTSA was a regional broadcast only?

(pretty sure it's LA Tech cause UTSA was on FS1, but who knows)
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CHONGS on January 22, 2016, 10:31:08 AM
i don't get why there are only 11 games shown. i assume the South Dakota game is excluded because it was on kstatehd.tv, what other game isn't in there?
La Tech
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: catastrophe on January 22, 2016, 12:47:15 PM
You'd have to crunch a lot of data to prove or disprove this, but for all but the uber blue chip programs, won't ratings always correlate with a team's record? Bad record > crappy tv slot > bad ratings.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: TheTruth on January 22, 2016, 01:26:55 PM
We were terribly boring to watch this past year. And I'm a K-State fan. Not sure why anyone else would have watched that crap show.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: catastrophe on January 22, 2016, 02:50:41 PM
I actually think we are normally much more boring to watch than we were this year.  This season had a lot of games go down to the wire (many with quite a bit of scoring too). We just happened to lose most of them, and it was a down year in the Big 12 so most people didn't care.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: Canary on January 22, 2016, 03:34:57 PM
Hell, I went to some games and didn't watch. Not that great a product this season.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: meow meow on January 22, 2016, 04:36:59 PM
I actually think we are normally much more boring to watch than we were this year.  This season had a lot of games go down to the wire (many with quite a bit of scoring too). We just happened to lose most of them, and it was a down year in the Big 12 so most people didn't care.

wtf?  this year with Hubener might surpass Grant Gregory level boredom.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: MakeItRain on January 22, 2016, 09:41:00 PM
How about seeing:
Nebraska
Indiana
Penn St.
Texas
together in that order?

I actually love these numbers, it seems like CFB ratings are nearly entirely merit based. Play good, interesting games; get good ratings. Simple enough.
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: 8manpick on January 23, 2016, 12:01:59 PM

How about seeing:
Nebraska
Indiana
Penn St.
Texas
together in that order?

I actually love these numbers, it seems like CFB ratings are nearly entirely merit based. Play good, interesting games; get good ratings. Simple enough.
Shocked that many people watch IU football. Although they were high scoring/fun to watch this year
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: CHONGS on January 23, 2016, 12:17:38 PM
How about seeing:
Nebraska
Indiana
Penn St.
Texas
together in that order?

I actually love these numbers, it seems like CFB ratings are nearly entirely merit based. Play good, interesting games; get good ratings. Simple enough.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FtxUyxKA.png&hash=f280635bd87c953dd89877e8bbe1d313ead9bb6b)
Title: Re: Viewers from 2015
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 23, 2016, 12:49:44 PM
Not to be a negative nelly, but this has got to be the worst goE thread in a long time. Those charts are terrible.