goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Dr Rick Daris on October 08, 2013, 12:53:24 PM

Title: hurt receivers question
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 08, 2013, 12:53:24 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 08, 2013, 12:54:58 PM
because now we're forced to come out and play like a bunch of rabid dogs. or day i say...................WILDCATS.
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: pissclams on October 08, 2013, 12:55:17 PM
dobermans
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: CNS on October 08, 2013, 12:56:26 PM
I wouldn't be mad if I saw some faces being eaten off Sat. 

Just throwing that out there.
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: puniraptor on October 08, 2013, 12:56:57 PM
d instant office sams better be allowed to return kicks and punts if this strategy is going to be effective
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: XocolateThundarr on October 08, 2013, 01:00:18 PM
NOTHING TO LOSE!
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: ArchE_Cat on October 08, 2013, 01:03:11 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Skipper44 on October 08, 2013, 01:04:27 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.
I agree but I wish TLBL had an ankle injury instead of a hamstring.

The part of this I hate the most is it appears the braintrust (Dimel, Miller & possibly SS) really made a mistake in evaluation how this team could function with the QBs at their disposal.  Also, I was really hoping the program was going to embrace the zig with the dual threat QB and power running game while the rest of the conference zags with the spread.
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 08, 2013, 01:16:22 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

but we are adding water(s). to the sideline that is.  ;)
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Catchacold on October 08, 2013, 01:31:48 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Trim on October 08, 2013, 01:39:21 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:

This is all about my water-boiling snag, isn't it?   :curse:
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: ArchE_Cat on October 08, 2013, 01:39:44 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

but we are adding water(s). to the sideline that is.  ;)

well played richard, well played  :gocho:
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Asteriskhead on October 08, 2013, 03:10:03 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:

This is all about my water-boiling snag, isn't it?   :curse:

the world doesn't revolve around you, trim. it revolves around #life.
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Trim on October 08, 2013, 03:15:16 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:

This is all about my water-boiling snag, isn't it?   :curse:

the world doesn't revolve around you, trim. it revolves around #life.

It weighed heavily on me.
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: unleashthemob on October 08, 2013, 03:33:47 PM
Kinda nullifies the return game with those two out...
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 08, 2013, 03:34:57 PM
I hope that TLBL is back so Sams has someone to throw his long bombs too w/o fear of being picked off
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on October 08, 2013, 10:16:01 PM
It was nice of TT86 to allow Torrell to borrow his devine gift of catch for one game.  Such a thoughtful group of youngsters we have.
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Gooch on October 09, 2013, 12:43:43 PM
It was nice of TT86 to allow Torrell to borrow his devine gift of catch for one game.  Such a thoughtful group of youngsters we have.
TT86 was just confirming how much he hated H2no
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: kso_FAN on October 09, 2013, 01:18:56 PM
Kellis Robinett ?@KellisRobinett 16m
LHC Bill Snyder: "We had 5 receivers on the field at one time last week and I'm not sure I knew all of them." http://www.kansas.com/2013/10/09/3048767/kansas-states-receiving-backups.html …
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: kso_FAN on October 09, 2013, 01:26:03 PM
Plus, we play our players.

“With Tramaine and Tyler out you lose a lot of speed, but the profession we are in, college football, it’s about the next guy up,” Sexton said.

Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Belvis Noland on October 09, 2013, 01:28:43 PM
I've noticed that Bill's become quite the comedian in his postgame interviews.  must carry over from his in-game coaching. 

Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: yoga-like_abana on October 09, 2013, 01:56:44 PM
Kellis Robinett ?@KellisRobinett 16m
LHC Bill Snyder: "We had 5 receivers on the field at one time last week and I'm not sure I knew all of them." http://www.kansas.com/2013/10/09/3048767/kansas-states-receiving-backups.html …
lol, that quote is gold
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Dugout DickStone on October 09, 2013, 01:59:59 PM
was tremaine's mono and lockett's leg the best thing to happen to the cats in the long run. basically forcing the staff to stop this sams as a back up or sams as a wr or other type of hokey pokey nonsense. no receivers for the dork juco to throw to now, so let's go ahead and play "instant offense" (new dsams nickname), so we can move the ball.

thoughts? ideas? preguntas? weigh in here folks.

usually if something is "instant" it only requires one to add water..... :dubious:

to make the product "instant" it is "dehydrated".  :party:

This is all about my water-boiling snag, isn't it?   :curse:

It was the first thing I thought of
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: MadCat on October 09, 2013, 02:09:10 PM
Kellis Robinett ?@KellisRobinett 16m
LHC Bill Snyder: "We had 5 receivers on the field at one time last week and I'm not sure I knew all of them." http://www.kansas.com/2013/10/09/3048767/kansas-states-receiving-backups.html …
dimentia
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: TheFormerKCCat on October 09, 2013, 02:14:54 PM
LHC Bill Snyder: "We had 5 receivers on the field at one time last week and I'm not sure I knew all of them."
lol, that quote is gold
Oh Billy! That young jokester!  :lol:
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Cartierfor3 on October 09, 2013, 02:21:16 PM
Kellis Robinett ?@KellisRobinett 16m
LHC Bill Snyder: "We had 5 receivers on the field at one time last week and I'm not sure I knew all of them." http://www.kansas.com/2013/10/09/3048767/kansas-states-receiving-backups.html …
dimentia

grow up
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: MadCat on October 09, 2013, 02:23:51 PM
 :frown:
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Skipper44 on October 09, 2013, 02:40:06 PM
:frown:
I lol'd and I don't think CF3 saw what you did there
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 09, 2013, 02:44:23 PM
Baylor is not ready for (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F1%2F1a%2FStephen_Curry_2.jpg&hash=ec36bb403bd830efaeb16eb60a09595712ed0dba)
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Mr_BONES on October 09, 2013, 03:07:53 PM
Have we confirmed they are out this week?  I've been looking around for that news.
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on October 09, 2013, 03:08:18 PM
Have we confirmed they are out this week?  I've been looking around for that news.

no confirmation for either
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: WildcatNkilt on October 09, 2013, 04:36:59 PM
Our hurt receivers make our return game  :Yuck:
Title: Re: hurt receivers question
Post by: EMAWmeister on October 09, 2013, 05:25:44 PM
Have we confirmed they are out this week?  I've been looking around for that news.

no confirmation for either

hmm...