goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Steffy08 on October 05, 2013, 06:14:53 PM
-
Play of the game. We go up two scores and we can run SAMs rest of game.
Seriously they should just do away with replay.
-
Agreed. Absolute absurdity. One of many tipping points. But totally in the hands of the crap refs.
-
Play of the game. We go up two scores and we can run SAMs rest of game.
Seriously they should just do away with replay.
nice to see that you haven't given up on being a little more Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) everyday.
-
Play of the game. We go up two scores and we can run SAMs rest of game.
Seriously they should just do away with replay.
nice to see that you haven't given up on being a little more Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) everyday.
Yep because they get it right so often
-
Agreed. Absolute absurdity. One of many tipping points. But totally in the hands of the crap refs.
A better team would've won anyway but we aren't good enough to overcome that
-
I still can't get over that call. I mean, it wasn't even close.
-
It was close, on the replay. At least to being irrefutable. The real mistake was made on the field.
-
He was down...no doubt about it. Do replay officials get paid? It's there one job and they can't do it correctly. I don't understand
-
It was a complete crap call on the field and in the replay booth especially. But Steffy, how would getting rid of replay changed the outcome on that?
-
It was a complete crap call on the field and in the replay booth especially. But Steffy, how would getting rid of replay changed the outcome on that?
It wouldn't; but I can live with mistakes made in real time.
-
It was a complete crap call on the field and in the replay booth especially. But Steffy, how would getting rid of replay changed the outcome on that?
It wouldn't; but I can live with mistakes made in real time.
Why is that? In this case, since the screw up was made both on the field and in the replay booth, we (ksu fans) have more of a right to complain about it than if there were no replay. However, since replay more often than not ensures the correct call was made, why is that a bad thing you would want to go away? Makes no sense either way.
-
It was a complete crap call on the field and in the replay booth especially. But Steffy, how would getting rid of replay changed the outcome on that?
It wouldn't; but I can live with mistakes made in real time.
Why is that? In this case, since the screw up was made both on the field and in the replay booth, we (ksu fans) have more of a right to complain about it than if there were no replay. However, since replay more often than not ensures the correct call was made, why is that a bad thing you would want to go away? Makes no sense either way.
Steffy is occasionally a complete rough ridin' idiot. Often a dumbass.
-
It was a complete crap call on the field and in the replay booth especially. But Steffy, how would getting rid of replay changed the outcome on that?
It wouldn't; but I can live with mistakes made in real time.
Why is that? In this case, since the screw up was made both on the field and in the replay booth, we (ksu fans) have more of a right to complain about it than if there were no replay. However, since replay more often than not ensures the correct call was made, why is that a bad thing you would want to go away? Makes no sense either way.
Good point; getting screwed on replay gives us more of a right to complain. Great argument for keeping it; I can't believe I had never considered that.
-
i'm getting tired of all the trolls
-
It was a complete crap call on the field and in the replay booth especially. But Steffy, how would getting rid of replay changed the outcome on that?
It wouldn't; but I can live with mistakes made in real time.
Why is that? In this case, since the screw up was made both on the field and in the replay booth, we (ksu fans) have more of a right to complain about it than if there were no replay. However, since replay more often than not ensures the correct call was made, why is that a bad thing you would want to go away? Makes no sense either way.
Good point; getting screwed on replay gives us more of a right to complain. Great argument for keeping it; I can't believe I had never considered that.
Yep. They never correct mistakes using it. Never happens. Definitely should just scrap it because your bad person is righteously sore over calls that aren't overturned. Get 'em Steffy. More mistakes are better, because they're the kind that are easier to live with and thus our assholes are less sore about it. Less bad person pain versus greater overall accuracy. No competition.
-
is steffy08 ally's mom :horrorsurprise:
-
It was a complete crap call on the field and in the replay booth especially. But Steffy, how would getting rid of replay changed the outcome on that?
It wouldn't; but I can live with mistakes made in real time.
Why is that? In this case, since the screw up was made both on the field and in the replay booth, we (ksu fans) have more of a right to complain about it than if there were no replay. However, since replay more often than not ensures the correct call was made, why is that a bad thing you would want to go away? Makes no sense either way.
Good point; getting screwed on replay gives us more of a right to complain. Great argument for keeping it; I can't believe I had never considered that.
I asked you two questions in my last post, and you answered neither of them. To address the "more of a right to complain" argument more fully, I am glad it was reviewed because that stoppage of play allowed them to show it multiple times on TV and the announcers to both agree that it should definitely have stayed KSU's ball. Everyone watching it on TV had no doubt we got screwed over. If there were no stoppage of play, people would have more easily forgotten about it and fewer replays shown. If there was bias involved, there is now much more of a case to prove that, and the Big 12 Supervisor of Football Officials may have to issue a statement addressing it. It won't change the outcome of this game, but anything to help eliminate future errors like that would be a good thing, no?
-
i'm getting tired of all the trolls
pfffft
-
I'm on team Steffy here. Replay is here to get a blown play on field right. If it can't, why have it?
-
I'm on team Steffy here. Replay is here to get a blown play on field right. If it can't, why have it?
-
I was proud of LHC Bill Snyder for not being like a giant baby like dumb dumb Rhodes in his post game. Crappy play, not poor officials, are the reason we lost.
-
I was proud of LHC Bill Snyder for not being like a giant baby like dumb dumb Rhodes in his post game.
Waters wasn't.
-
What do lose by playing Sams 1/3 of the season just like you played him? Go eff yourselves!!!!
-
Fanning, stop posting. Also, you have a drinking problem.
-
:ksu:
I was proud of LHC LHC Bill Snyder for not being like a giant baby like dumb dumb Rhodes in his post game. Crappy play, not poor officials, are the reason we lost.
It isn't an either/or. If we were better, or if we get that call, we win.
Will agree, though, that from the team's perspective you have to focus on poor play, becsuse that is all thàt you can control. Snyder very good about thát.
-
It was a complete crap call on the field and in the replay booth especially. But Steffy, how would getting rid of replay changed the outcome on that?
It wouldn't; but I can live with mistakes made in real time.
Why is that? In this case, since the screw up was made both on the field and in the replay booth, we (ksu fans) have more of a right to complain about it than if there were no replay. However, since replay more often than not ensures the correct call was made, why is that a bad thing you would want to go away? Makes no sense either way.
Good point; getting screwed on replay gives us more of a right to complain. Great argument for keeping it; I can't believe I had never considered that.
I asked you two questions in my last post, and you answered neither of them. To address the "more of a right to complain" argument more fully, I am glad it was reviewed because that stoppage of play allowed them to show it multiple times on TV and the announcers to both agree that it should definitely have stayed KSU's ball. Everyone watching it on TV had no doubt we got screwed over. If there were no stoppage of play, people would have more easily forgotten about it and fewer replays shown. If there was bias involved, there is now much more of a case to prove that, and the Big 12 Supervisor of Football Officials may have to issue a statement addressing it. It won't change the outcome of this game, but anything to help eliminate future errors like that would be a good thing, no?
I'm not even going to debate someone who is arguing for replay on the basis that everybody will know for sure who got the bad calls. I felt so much better when Rodney said we got screwed
-
The call was made by the OSU players, refs saw OSU player with ball and gave it to them on the field. This is exactly the kind of play replay is made for.
-
The call was made by the OSU players, refs saw OSU player with ball and gave it to them on the field. This is exactly the kind of play replay is made for.
our racist coach put Waters in after that too. FYBS!
-
It was a complete crap call on the field and in the replay booth especially. But Steffy, how would getting rid of replay changed the outcome on that?
It wouldn't; but I can live with mistakes made in real time.
Why is that? In this case, since the screw up was made both on the field and in the replay booth, we (ksu fans) have more of a right to complain about it than if there were no replay. However, since replay more often than not ensures the correct call was made, why is that a bad thing you would want to go away? Makes no sense either way.
Good point; getting screwed on replay gives us more of a right to complain. Great argument for keeping it; I can't believe I had never considered that.
I asked you two questions in my last post, and you answered neither of them. To address the "more of a right to complain" argument more fully, I am glad it was reviewed because that stoppage of play allowed them to show it multiple times on TV and the announcers to both agree that it should definitely have stayed KSU's ball. Everyone watching it on TV had no doubt we got screwed over. If there were no stoppage of play, people would have more easily forgotten about it and fewer replays shown. If there was bias involved, there is now much more of a case to prove that, and the Big 12 Supervisor of Football Officials may have to issue a statement addressing it. It won't change the outcome of this game, but anything to help eliminate future errors like that would be a good thing, no?
I'm not even going to debate someone who is arguing for replay on the basis that everybody will know for sure who got the bad calls. I felt so much better when Rodney said we got screwed
No, the argument for replay is that more often than not, it ensures the correct call was made on the field. You disagree with that? And you are the one who said "I can live with mistakes made in real time", but you won't explain how that is somehow "better" than a replay mistake.