goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: HeinBallz on September 21, 2013, 09:00:37 PM

Title: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: HeinBallz on September 21, 2013, 09:00:37 PM
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball? 
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on September 21, 2013, 09:01:40 PM
ya eff that Jack guy
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: ksupamplemousse on September 21, 2013, 09:03:17 PM
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: PIPE on September 21, 2013, 09:04:06 PM
 Who is jack?

Maybe SAMs sucks worse at passing that waters does at running.   :sdeek:
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: HeinBallz on September 21, 2013, 09:14:19 PM
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: Bloodfart on September 21, 2013, 09:20:07 PM
eff this crap put in sams and let it rip. 
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: star seed 7 on September 21, 2013, 09:34:42 PM
This is easily the most frustrating thing about the situation.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: ksupamplemousse on September 21, 2013, 09:56:50 PM
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on September 21, 2013, 10:19:36 PM
I cannot believe Sams did not get to throw the ball this game. It is absolutely un - rough ridin'  believable
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: PandaXpanda on September 21, 2013, 10:20:40 PM
So weird.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: HeinBallz on September 21, 2013, 10:32:02 PM
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: hemmy on September 21, 2013, 10:32:45 PM
god he is rough ridin' worthless  :lol:
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: IPA4Me on September 21, 2013, 10:34:59 PM
Jane Waters. Little bitch didn't even get hit on the fumble.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: 1001 on September 21, 2013, 10:35:45 PM
The UT D knows how to negate SAMS.

You guys show LOW FOOTBALL IQ.


Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: HeinBallz on September 21, 2013, 10:35:55 PM
Hey guys!   Lets run the wildcat!!!!   But Lets put the best running QB we've ever had who never throws so the other team knows exactly what we're going to rough ridin' do! 


Nope that doesn't work!   Lets put the QB in the game that rough ridin' chokes and can't convert 3rd downs or anything in the red zone.


YEAHHHH!!!!!!
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: hemmy on September 21, 2013, 10:36:24 PM
The UT D knows how negate SAMS.

You guys how LOW FOOTBALL IQ.




Because Bill refuses to let him throw. Now go away and shut the eff up.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: IPA4Me on September 21, 2013, 10:37:31 PM
The UT D knows how negate SAMS.

You guys how LOW FOOTBALL IQ.
only because his senile coach sets him up to fail.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: HeinBallz on September 21, 2013, 10:39:17 PM
Jesus, the refs are giving us the game and we just keep sucking.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: Johnny Thunderbone on September 21, 2013, 10:42:25 PM
Jack Winters for Heinzman.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: ksupamplemousse on September 21, 2013, 10:44:14 PM
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.

Not a Jake Waters fan, you're reading comprehension could still use some work. I really underestimated Jake's ability to put the ball on the turf though...woof.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: HeinBallz on September 21, 2013, 10:54:20 PM

Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.

Not a Jake Waters fan, you're reading comprehension could still use some work. I really underestimated Jake's ability to put the ball on the turf though...woof.

eff you and your reading comprehension.  Waters creates turn overs.  He has more interceptions than Sams has pass attempts.  I don't need to read the end over your idiotic rebuttal where you agree Snyder is being a stubborn bitch if you can really make the argument that Sams "possibly" sucking at throwing "might" cause turnovers, so sticking with the human turnover, no third down converting, red zone choking rough ridin' pussy jake waters would be the better call.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: ksupamplemousse on September 22, 2013, 12:19:01 AM
I'll slow this down for you, because apparently I underestimated your stupidity. Jake bad. Sams good. Coach stubborn. Jake worse at holding ball than me thought. Stubborn coach may want to use head and redo thoughts.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: MakeItRain on September 22, 2013, 12:29:00 AM
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.

Not a Jake Waters fan, you're reading comprehension could still use some work. I really underestimated Jake's ability to put the ball on the turf though...woof.

 :D
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: Ira Hayes on September 22, 2013, 12:31:29 AM
Hey guys!   Lets run the wildcat!!!!   But Lets put the best running QB we've ever had who never throws so the other team knows exactly what we're going to rough ridin' do! 


Nope that doesn't work!   Lets put the QB in the game that rough ridin' chokes and can't convert 3rd downs or anything in the red zone.


YEAHHHH!!!!!!

This.

This is our offense.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: ksupamplemousse on September 22, 2013, 02:06:11 AM
Why can't we see Daniel Sams suck at throwing the ball?

Don't know if you're being serious, but if Sams is actually terrible at throwing the football, then it creates turnovers. Sucking at running the ball results in punts. One of these is less shitty than the other. BTW, I don't think Sams is terrible at throwing, I think Bill is being stubborn.

Sure... we can sit there and watch jack throw 2 TD's and 5 interceptions, but we can't trust the most athletic running QB in the history of KSU attempt a pass because it might cause a turnover?   GMAFB.

I think you missed the point of this post.

When jack runs the ball it causes turn overs. 


eff ALL OF YOU JAKE WATERS FANS.  eff EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU IN THE ASS.

Not a Jake Waters fan, you're reading comprehension could still use some work. I really underestimated Jake's ability to put the ball on the turf though...woof.

 :D

Damn, glass houses ya' know? Gets me every time.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: timhawk on September 22, 2013, 03:10:41 AM
I hope SAMs starts next game, throws 5-20 for 25 yards with 3 INT and can't wait to see you all throw him under the bus too....face it, Kstate is garbage this year.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: _33 on September 22, 2013, 08:26:06 AM
I hope SAMs starts next game, throws 5-20 for 25 yards with 3 INT and can't wait to see you all throw him under the bus too....face it, Kstate is garbage this year.

I also hope he starts but I don't hope for that other stuff.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: Bill Clarahan on September 22, 2013, 08:30:16 AM
Jack is a JUCO QB, nothing more
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: HeinBallz on September 22, 2013, 08:53:40 AM

I'll slow this down for you, because apparently I underestimated your stupidity. Jake bad. Sams good. Coach stubborn. Jake worse at holding ball than me thought. Stubborn coach may want to use head and redo thoughts.

Go back and read your first response.  That is not at all what you wrote.  If you often find yourself thinking people have poor reading comprehension - perhaps it's your writing ability. Common denominator and all. 
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: HeinBallz on September 22, 2013, 08:54:15 AM
And don't condescend you rough ridin' twit.
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: lopakman on September 22, 2013, 09:02:46 AM
I hope SAMs starts next game, throws 5-20 for 25 yards with 3 INT and can't wait to see you all throw him under the bus too....face it, Kstate is garbage this year.

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/1172642_10151752410763805_1227842700_o.jpg)
Title: Re: So... we've seen Jack suck at running the ball
Post by: HeinBallz on October 05, 2013, 04:40:23 PM
Hahaha!!!!    eff anyone that's ever said "maybe the coaches have a reason for not letting Sams throw."