goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: bulldogbuster on August 14, 2013, 04:24:30 PM
-
Not sure if its speculative, a Fitz mirage or otherwise but they've updated the depth chart.
Nothing shocking, other than Evans not being listed, which I assume suggests he's still the dedicated nickle/flex DB.
http://kansasstate.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp
-
Ohh, Travis green is second on the depth chart at safety. DONT DOUBT EASTCAT :shakesfist:
-
is Devon Nash complete dog crap?
-
Winters showed me the depth chart last Tuesday. Yawn
-
Our defense looks like crap. I really hope there are a few DITR's on there.
-
No Gronk. :flush:
-
No Gronk. :flush:
Switch the offense to "Power I" at the top and he's the #1 FB.
-
No Gronk. :flush:
Switch the offense to "Power I" at the top and he's the #1 FB.
:pray: thank god.
-
All I keep reading is how we might be underrated and surprise people on D, but I squint and quint at that depth chart and just don't see it. We're average to not very good at LB, DT, DE, and corner. Safety is strong. Even if AB was back for another year, I'd still say this is a middle of the pack D.
-
All I keep reading is how we might be underrated and surprise people on D, but I squint and quint at that depth chart and just don't see it.
They'll surprise the people who think they will be good with how mediocre they are.
-
I like the name of the backup long snapper, "Dalton Converse". Outlaw name + athletic shoe name
-
Not sure if its speculative, a Fitz mirage or otherwise but they've updated the depth chart.
Nothing shocking, other than Evans not being listed, which I assume suggests he's still the dedicated nickle/flex DB.
http://kansasstate.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp
I'm pretty sure Snyder said Evans was going play both spots. IE he'll play outside in one of the regular corner spots in the base set and play in the nickel inside spot in the nickel package. David Garrett did the same thing the year before last.
-
I'm optimistic, but in a KC Chiefs 2003 kinda way. Score a crap load and pray for turnovers, cause that D is gonna get raped.
-
I just looked up the roster pictures of all our defensive starters and I think we are in trouble. They did not pass the eye test. In fact they failed the eye test and then they had to take the all essay retake version of the eye test and they failed that too so they were allowed to just correct their answers for half credit and finally got a D+.
-
I just looked up the roster pictures of all our defensive starters and I think we are in trouble. They did not pass the eye test. In fact they failed the eye test and then they had to take the all essay retake version of the eye test and they failed that too so they were allowed to just correct their answers for half credit and finally got a D+.
D+ is the grade instructors use when they don't want to see a kid ever again.
-
Not sure if its speculative, a Fitz mirage or otherwise but they've updated the depth chart.
Nothing shocking, other than Evans not being listed, which I assume suggests he's still the dedicated nickle/flex DB.
http://kansasstate.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp
laughable. Evans will always be on the field.
-
Not sure if its speculative, a Fitz mirage or otherwise but they've updated the depth chart.
Nothing shocking, other than Evans not being listed, which I assume suggests he's still the dedicated nickle/flex DB.
http://kansasstate.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp
laughable. Evans will always be on the field.
Like I said about Gronk earlier, switch to the other formation on defense and he is on there.
-
Not sure if its speculative, a Fitz mirage or otherwise but they've updated the depth chart.
Nothing shocking, other than Evans not being listed, which I assume suggests he's still the dedicated nickle/flex DB.
http://kansasstate.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp
laughable. Evans will always be on the field.
Like I said about Gronk earlier, switch to the other formation on defense and he is on there.
I did, but he will be on the field in a 4-3.
-
Not sure if its speculative, a Fitz mirage or otherwise but they've updated the depth chart.
Nothing shocking, other than Evans not being listed, which I assume suggests he's still the dedicated nickle/flex DB.
http://kansasstate.rivals.com/cdepthtext.asp
laughable. Evans will always be on the field.
Like I said about Gronk earlier, switch to the other formation on defense and he is on there.
I did, but he will be on the field in a 4-3.
Which is why I said always be on the field.
-
I'm optimistic, but in a KC Chiefs 2003 kinda way. Score a crap load and pray for turnovers, cause that D is gonna get raped.
This is how it will be this year. Bet the farm on it.
-
People that think our defense is going to be bad are mouthbreathing mongoloids. Mods, please add all these people and their posts to the mongoloid master thread. TIA
We're not plugging gaps with spring signed jucos, program guys are stepping into the starting roles. This is how its supposed to work, idiots.
-
All I see are champs.
-
People that think our defense is going to be bad are mouthbreathing mongoloids. Mods, please add all these people and their posts to the mongoloid master thread. TIA
We're not plugging gaps with spring signed jucos, program guys are stepping into the starting roles. This is how its supposed to work, idiots.
Thanks for being a voice of reason, FSD...
Also, who the eff believes any information that comes from GPC that is not the direct product of one of Fitz's minions transcribing a press conference. We all know damn well that no depth chart info has been released to anybody.
-
People that think our defense is going to be bad are mouthbreathing mongoloids. Mods, please add all these people and their posts to the mongoloid master thread. TIA
We're not plugging gaps with spring signed jucos, program guys are stepping into the starting roles. This is how its supposed to work, idiots.
Well you could have said it in a nicer way but thank you for this perspective. I hadn't really thought of it that way and I'm more optimistic now than I was.
-
All I see are champs.
:emawkid:
-
okay so we have a decent secondary imo dante, evans, 1y, and kippy should be better with more speed than last year not to mention adorbs cre moore probably starting by conference play
mediocre to semi decent lb's depending on the nickel set in biscuits, slaughter, and truman (i see moore breaking out this year) this is probably our weakest spot but if tre is back to 2012 form we might be able to hide it
and a serviceable dline with a crap load of upside with brown, hood, britz, chaq and roberts.
CONFIDENCE RISING FELLAS
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
-
why isn't "mongoloid" considered the most racist term in the English language?
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
Yes, on Opposite Day.
-
why isn't "mongoloid" considered the most racist term in the English language?
yeah, it's weird that it gets used around here so much
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
a good DL will hide the crap out of bad CBs
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
a good DL will hide the crap out of bad CBs
true but with how fast the game moves in this new hurry up quick out screen happy offenses you really need your lb's and corners to be fast and be able to contain. Its hard to get pressure these days with how fast the ball comes out. Hopefully Kip steps up like i think he can. I feel pretty good about our corners.
my biggest worry is if tre can move sideline to sideline with that knee
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
a good DL will hide the crap out of bad CBs
true but with how fast the game moves in this new hurry up quick out screen happy offenses you really need your lb's and corners to be fast and be able to contain. Its hard to get pressure these days with how fast the ball comes out. Hopefully Kip steps up like i think he can. I feel pretty good about our corners.
my biggest worry is if tre can move sideline to sideline with that knee
tre couldn't do that before the knee so I don't hold out a lot of hope
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
a good DL will hide the crap out of bad CBs
true but with how fast the game moves in this new hurry up quick out screen happy offenses you really need your lb's and corners to be fast and be able to contain. Its hard to get pressure these days with how fast the ball comes out. Hopefully Kip steps up like i think he can. I feel pretty good about our corners.
my biggest worry is if tre can move sideline to sideline with that knee
tre couldn't do that before the knee so I don't hold out a lot of hope
does he have arthur speed? of course not. but he showed he can move pretty good down in miami, i think a lot on here underrate his speed
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
a good DL will hide the crap out of bad CBs
true but with how fast the game moves in this new hurry up quick out screen happy offenses you really need your lb's and corners to be fast and be able to contain. Its hard to get pressure these days with how fast the ball comes out. Hopefully Kip steps up like i think he can. I feel pretty good about our corners.
my biggest worry is if tre can move sideline to sideline with that knee
tre couldn't do that before the knee so I don't hold out a lot of hope
does he have arthur speed? of course not. but he showed he can move pretty good down in miami, i think a lot on here underrate his speed
Have a lot of trouble thinking Dakorey Johnson will not be starting by confrence play. His length and speed should make him our best coverage linebacker, something you need in the BIG 12.
-
why isn't "mongoloid" considered the most racist term in the English language?
I propose we change all instances of "mongoloid" to "caucusoid".
-
why isn't "mongoloid" considered the most racist term in the English language?
I propose we change all instances of "mongoloid" to "caucusoid".
how does that help?
-
Hey, Dakorey Johnson is 2nd team LB.....that kid must be a huge stud cause hasn't he only been here for like a day or 2????? The must like his quickness when putting on his pants :dunno:
-
why isn't "mongoloid" considered the most racist term in the English language?
I propose we change all instances of "mongoloid" to "caucusoid".
how does that help?
hey look at the mong, just monging around
-
why isn't "mongoloid" considered the most racist term in the English language?
I propose we change all instances of "mongoloid" to "caucusoid".
how does that help?
hey look at the mong, just monging around
hey look at the racist, just racing around
-
sorry i guess we all now know what the "mo" is short for, "mocat"
-
why isn't "mongoloid" considered the most racist term in the English language?
I propose we change all instances of "mongoloid" to "caucusoid".
how does that help?
It spares the mongols.
-
Welp looks like another brown thread
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
You can not hide your linebackers. They are the most crucial part of a defense, DTs are close but your LBs are your defense.
Even with all the spread offenses, if you are weak where the ball is snapped everything else you try to do on defense will become FUBAR. You will still be exploited from the inside out.
Asking Evans to shed an OG a few times in a specific situation is fine, asking him to do it a lot, over the course of a game will be crippling.
-
why isn't "mongoloid" considered the most racist term in the English language?
I propose we change all instances of "mongoloid" to "caucusoid".
how does that help?
hey look at the mong, just monging around
hey look at the racist, just racing around
http://www.greghartwig.com/sounds/hill/WhitHate.wav
“What the hell kinda country is this where I can only hate a man if he’s white?” - Hank Hill
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
You can not hide your linebackers. They are the most crucial part of a defense, DTs are close but your LBs are your defense.
Even with all the spread offenses, if you are weak where the ball is snapped everything else you try to do on defense will become FUBAR. You will still be exploited from the inside out.
Asking Evans to shed an OG a few times in a specific situation is fine, asking him to do it a lot, over the course of a game will be crippling.
Agree, have to to be strong up the middle DT,MLB and S.
-
HFBIQ'ers: Which of our linebackers, if any, has the best chance to be a possible Tuggle replacement (QB blitzer specialist guy)?
TIA
-
HFBIQ'ers: Which of our linebackers, if any, has the best chance to be a possible Tuggle replacement (QB blitzer specialist guy)?
TIA
wouldn't be surprised to see Truman fill that role. won't be as good as Tuggle but he's quick and really strong for his size.
-
HFBIQ'ers: Which of our linebackers, if any, has the best chance to be a possible Tuggle replacement (QB blitzer specialist guy)?
TIA
wouldn't be surprised to see Truman fill that role. won't be as good as Tuggle but he's quick and really strong for his size.
Like, how strong?
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
a good DL will hide the crap out of bad CBs
true but with how fast the game moves in this new hurry up quick out screen happy offenses you really need your lb's and corners to be fast and be able to contain. Its hard to get pressure these days with how fast the ball comes out. Hopefully Kip steps up like i think he can. I feel pretty good about our corners.
my biggest worry is if tre can move sideline to sideline with that knee
tre couldn't do that before the knee so I don't hold out a lot of hope
Maybe it will be like Rookie of the Year and he'll be super fast now and his knee will make squeaky noises when he runs.
-
If there's one spot you'd be okay being weak at isn't LB it? As long as the ends and the corners play we'll do alright.
I am not okay with being weak anywhere, that's unacceptable. But considering we will most likely have 5 db's out there for conference play i guess if i had to choose yes, lb would be the one like I said above you can hide a bit.
You can not hide your linebackers. They are the most crucial part of a defense, DTs are close but your LBs are your defense.
Even with all the spread offenses, if you are weak where the ball is snapped everything else you try to do on defense will become FUBAR. You will still be exploited from the inside out.
Asking Evans to shed an OG a few times in a specific situation is fine, asking him to do it a lot, over the course of a game will be crippling.
Gary Barnett disagrees with you.
-
HFBIQ'ers: Which of our linebackers, if any, has the best chance to be a possible Tuggle replacement (QB blitzer specialist guy)?
TIA
Mike Moore
-
why isn't "mongoloid" considered the most racist term in the English language?
I propose we change all instances of "mongoloid" to "caucusoid".
That's fine, as long as no one uses negroid at any time. (Unless you are a negroid, then you can use it as much as you want.)
-
I like the name of the backup long snapper, "Dalton Converse". Outlaw name + athletic shoe name
Ehhh, he is no Jesse James Keds though, thats for sure
-
is Devon Nash complete dog crap?
Or did he go home to be with his son?
-
is Devon Nash complete dog crap?
Or did he go home to be with his son?
Not on the roster. :don'tcare:
-
is Devon Nash complete dog crap?
Or did he go home to be with his son?
Not on the roster. :don'tcare:
http://www.kstatesports.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/devon_nash_844617.html
-
is Devon Nash complete dog crap?
Or did he go home to be with his son?
Not on the roster. :don'tcare:
http://www.kstatesports.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/devon_nash_844617.html
I think I may have looked under "D." :embarrassed:
-
maybe a dumb question here, but why isn't Nick Ramirez on the depth chart? wasn't a a 4-star guy?
-
maybe a dumb question here, but why isn't Nick Ramirez on the depth chart? wasn't a a 4-star guy?
Either already identified as a RS candidate or on the scheme Dr's surprise list.
-
maybe a dumb question here, but why isn't Nick Ramirez on the depth chart? wasn't a a 4-star guy?
Pretty sure it was well known he was gray/redshirting
-
maybe a dumb question here, but why isn't Nick Ramirez on the depth chart? wasn't a a 4-star guy?
Pretty sure it was well known he was gray/redshirting
welp that confirms my dumb question statement.
-
maybe a dumb question here, but why isn't Nick Ramirez on the depth chart? wasn't a a 4-star guy?
Pretty sure it was well known he was gray/redshirting
Darn. I love when true freshmen start or play a lot. Because it's like whoa he's just a true freshmen and look what he's doing.
-
is Devon Nash complete dog crap?
Or did he go home to be with his son?
Not on the roster. :don'tcare:
http://www.kstatesports.com/sports/m-footbl/mtt/devon_nash_844617.html
I think I may have looked under "D." :embarrassed:
I lol'd.
-
maybe a dumb question here, but why isn't Nick Ramirez on the depth chart? wasn't a a 4-star guy?
Pretty sure it was well known he was gray/redshirting
Definitely not a grey since he is on the roster @ kstatesports.com. Grey's don't show up until a new roster comes out next spring.
-
maybe a dumb question here, but why isn't Nick Ramirez on the depth chart? wasn't a a 4-star guy?
Pretty sure it was well known he was gray/redshirting
Definitely not a grey since he is on the roster @ kstatesports.com. Grey's don't show up until a new roster comes out next spring.
Also, he signed a LOI, which greys don't do . Way too good to be a grey anyway. Is he injured or something? Can't imagine a dude like that would be automatically redshirted without a reason behind it.