goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 11:18:06 AM

Title: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 11:18:06 AM
Quote from:  posted in facebook thread about Frank post game video
Thats MsCougar There is more to Frank than meets the eye. As a parent of one of these players it was more about him and the AD than him and the players. Head Coaching can't always be like the lovely man who is the head coach of the football team. He is an enigma. He is the exception NOT THE RULE! Most Head Coaches in any sport LIE to YOUR FACE and your kids face. I and my son and I have had to learn that. But I will say this, I never had to talk to the AD E-V-E-R until oscar Weber and please remember that Frank Martin suspended my son. Yes hindsight is 20-20 but you may have another basketball head coach in 2 years. You never know. Here is what I do know the alumni at KSU is FANTASTIC and I know that my son is proud of his school and his team and will be an exceptional and loyal alumnus as well regardless of his treatment by Weber and the AD his Senior year. His character does not change because of his treatment by others. He has gotten a great education and has learned more than just academics and has made more than just friends!

 :surprised:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2013, 11:20:29 AM
JO was suspended, anyone else?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 11:20:34 AM
Well well well
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: kso_FAN on February 15, 2013, 11:20:51 AM
 :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 11:21:18 AM
JO was suspended, anyone else?

Pretty much everyone
Title: Re: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 11:21:45 AM
JO was suspended, anyone else?

Pretty much everyone

Except Will
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Bqqkie Pimp on February 15, 2013, 11:22:08 AM
But.... everybody was gonna transfer. But....Frank was a big meany and yelled at the boys.  But....  Frank had a turrible potty mouth and offended the blue-haired old ladies. 

Sincerely,
GPC Tucks


:popcorn:
Title: :sdeek:
Post by: puniraptor on February 15, 2013, 11:22:35 AM
Intrigue? Is it JOs mom?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 15, 2013, 11:23:03 AM
JO's mom, that's awesome!
Title: :sdeek:
Post by: puniraptor on February 15, 2013, 11:23:03 AM
I just knew oscar was a violent psychopath
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 11:24:10 AM
Is it JOs mom?

yeah
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 15, 2013, 11:25:17 AM
To be fair, she bitched about Frank yelling at the wrong players over a mistake last year at the tourney.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 11:25:35 AM
She really loves the crap out of Bill though!  :ksu:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: kso_FAN on February 15, 2013, 11:25:45 AM
JO was suspended "indefinitely" last January 19th. Missed the game at OSU on the 21st. Played 3 minutes vs Tech on the 25th.

“He’s a fine young man that needs to refocus on all the positive things that he’s done here for two years,” Martin said. “He just needs a moment away so he can regain the vision that he had when he came here. He’s like me and everyone else at that age, where he’s lost sense of what’s expected of him on a daily basis.”
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 11:27:36 AM
And KState! She LOVES us! Just not all the guys that are working for us!  :ksu:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 15, 2013, 11:31:03 AM
Microcosm, bruh
Title: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 11:33:02 AM
To be fair, she bitched about Frank yelling at the wrong players over a mistake last year at the tourney.

What on earth does this have to do with anything
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: SwiftCat on February 15, 2013, 11:33:15 AM
 :blush:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 11:34:38 AM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: kso_FAN on February 15, 2013, 11:36:00 AM
#BID with a massive win...

Yes hindsight is 20-20 but you may have another basketball head coach in 2 years.

You never know.
Title: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 11:36:09 AM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.

They are disgusting people
Title: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 15, 2013, 11:37:12 AM
To be fair, she bitched about Frank yelling at the wrong players over a mistake last year at the tourney.

What on earth does this have to do with anything
That she bitches about coaches a lot?! :dunno: Maybe just trying to #fanningbrag?! Either way, she's a lovely lady.
Title: Re: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 11:38:57 AM
To be fair, she bitched about Frank yelling at the wrong players over a mistake last year at the tourney.

What on earth does this have to do with anything
That she bitches about coaches a lot?! :dunno: Maybe just trying to #fanningbrag?! Either way, she's a lovely lady.

It was a #fanningbrag. Yeah, you were in Pittsburgh. We get it.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2013, 11:40:04 AM
I wonder what her beef with Weber was.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 11:40:27 AM
I am going to start calling Bill THE ENIGMA
Title: Re: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 15, 2013, 11:42:20 AM
To be fair, she bitched about Frank yelling at the wrong players over a mistake last year at the tourney.

What on earth does this have to do with anything
That she bitches about coaches a lot?! :dunno: Maybe just trying to #fanningbrag?! Either way, she's a lovely lady.

It was a #fanningbrag. Yeah, you were in Pittsburgh. We get it.
Deal with it, bro! :gocho:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 11:42:39 AM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2013, 11:42:49 AM
This isn't a win for anyone except those who said that they're all bad guys.  Like me.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: SwiftCat on February 15, 2013, 11:43:10 AM
#BID with a massive win...

Yes hindsight is 20-20 but you may have another basketball head coach in 2 years.

You never know.

I would welcome Frank back with open arms. Prodigal Son and whatnot.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: puniraptor on February 15, 2013, 11:46:01 AM
... more than just friends.

 :blush:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 11:46:15 AM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

and my guy dlew paints everyone into a corner  :thumbs:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 11:46:24 AM
This isn't a win for anyone except those who said that they're all bad guys.  Like me.

Look at you, winning. :thumbs:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 11:47:44 AM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 11:51:40 AM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!

Yeah, I'd be pretty upset if she got Bill fired.

Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 11:54:18 AM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!

Yeah, I'd be pretty upset if she got Bill fired.

2 years ago you wouldn't have been
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2013, 11:55:43 AM
This isn't a win for anyone except those who said that they're all bad guys.  Like me.

Look at you, winning. :thumbs:

Agree.  We're all losers.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 11:56:55 AM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!

Yeah, I'd be pretty upset if she got Bill fired.

2 years ago you wouldn't have been

no, I'd have loved her then.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 12:06:36 PM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!
so i wonder: is it the parent's involvement that we get upset about or the AD's response to the parent's involvement?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 12:08:03 PM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!
so i wonder: is it the parent's involvement that we get upset about or the AD's response to the parent's involvement?

are you really going to make me walk you all the way through this? i mean, you're the law student.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: SEK_EMAW on February 15, 2013, 12:11:16 PM
Quote from:  posted in facebook thread about Frank post game video
Thats MsCougar There is more to Frank than meets the eye. As a parent of one of these players it was more about him and the AD than him and the players. Head Coaching can't always be like the lovely man who is the head coach of the football team. He is an enigma. He is the exception NOT THE RULE! Most Head Coaches in any sport LIE to YOUR FACE and your kids face. I and my son and I have had to learn that. But I will say this, I never had to talk to the AD E-V-E-R until oscar Weber and please remember that Frank Martin suspended my son. Yes hindsight is 20-20 but you may have another basketball head coach in 2 years. You never know. Here is what I do know the alumni at KSU is FANTASTIC and I know that my son is proud of his school and his team and will be an exceptional and loyal alumnus as well regardless of his treatment by Weber and the AD his Senior year. His character does not change because of his treatment by others. He has gotten a great education and has learned more than just academics and has made more than just friends!

I'm confused....I never saw where this quote came from, but are guys inferring that this is JO's mom?  Sounds more like James Watson's mom to me.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 12:14:59 PM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!
so i wonder: is it the parent's involvement that we get upset about or the AD's response to the parent's involvement?

are you really going to make me walk you all the way through this? i mean, you're the law student.
no i get it.

you liked frank so BOO spradlings
you don't like oscar so bully for JO
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: puniraptor on February 15, 2013, 12:15:51 PM
I'm confused....I never saw where this quote came from, but are guys inferring that this is JO's mom?  Sounds more like James Watson's mom to me.

 a person who is currently a senior on the ksu bball team who had at one point been suspended by frank...
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 'taterblast on February 15, 2013, 12:16:10 PM
Beems sock
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Cire on February 15, 2013, 12:16:23 PM
what thread is this in?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2013, 12:16:31 PM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!
so i wonder: is it the parent's involvement that we get upset about or the AD's response to the parent's involvement?

are you really going to make me walk you all the way through this? i mean, you're the law student.
no i get it.

you liked frank so BOO spradlings
you don't like oscar so bully for JO

I don't like spradlings so boo spradlings
I like JO, so bully for JO

:dunno:

Also, bully? Seriously?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 12:18:59 PM
I'm confused....I never saw where this quote came from, but are guys inferring that this is JO's mom?  Sounds more like James Watson's mom to me.

redacted
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: AbeFroman on February 15, 2013, 12:23:57 PM
I'm confused....I never saw where this quote came from, but are guys inferring that this is JO's mom?  Sounds more like James Watson's mom to me.

redacted

little JO pics!

Also, I bet it's super awkward for JO that his mom calls herself that
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 12:27:40 PM
I removed it because of all the freakshows on here
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 12:28:01 PM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!
so i wonder: is it the parent's involvement that we get upset about or the AD's response to the parent's involvement?

are you really going to make me walk you all the way through this? i mean, you're the law student.
no i get it.

you liked frank so BOO spradlings
you don't like oscar so bully for JO

that's cute, but no and not even close.


spradlings can screw off because they were partly responsible (in my opinion) for frank being forced out (my opinion). most kstate people probably think frank up and willingly left, but i'm pretty sure that wasn't what happened. i did like frank though and i do wish he was still the coach though so yeah i guess the first part of your assumption was right.

where you miss badly is where you say i don't like oscar so bully for JO. i haven't said anything like that and no one in this thread has either. in reality i couldn't care less. why is that you ask? because i'm going to make the assumption that crap like jo and his mom happens all of the time in major college athletics. so i don't care. just don't care at all. total indifference to it.

now if their whining and moaning somehow actually affects the university in some way, shape or form like the spradlings did then i'll hop off the fence. like if their complaining helps to build a lazy river then i'll say "bully for jo" or if maybe their complaining causes the student union to burn down then i'll lump them in with the spradlings and tell them to go in the back. but again...as of right now i don't care. this is completely different from the gpc stance where they stuck up for will and are now trashing jo. sorry if not analytical enough to tell the difference. maybe that's year 2 or something. dunno.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: wetwillie on February 15, 2013, 12:28:41 PM
One thing is for certain, mscougar needs to post here.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: SEK_EMAW on February 15, 2013, 12:30:54 PM
I'm confused....I never saw where this quote came from, but are guys inferring that this is JO's mom?  Sounds more like James Watson's mom to me.

redacted
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 12:33:11 PM
One thing is for certain, mscougar needs to post here.

confirmed
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 15, 2013, 12:34:40 PM
You think he had to have a special crib because his legs were so long as a baby? These are the things we could find out if she was here.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 12:35:41 PM
One thing is for certain, mscougar needs to post here.

confirmed


we should use trim's ba miles to fly her to fatty fest and make her tell us more stories. then trim could roast her or whatever.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 12:36:57 PM
One thing is for certain, mscougar needs to post here.

confirmed


we should use trim's ba miles to fly her to fatty fest and make her tell us more stories. then trim could roast her or whatever.

I've heard worse ideas
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 12:37:39 PM
I'm guessing that no one who would let a player's parent influence their hiring and firing decisions will take a black woman as seriously as a white suburban aau basketball coach.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 12:38:08 PM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!
so i wonder: is it the parent's involvement that we get upset about or the AD's response to the parent's involvement?

are you really going to make me walk you all the way through this? i mean, you're the law student.
no i get it.

you liked frank so BOO spradlings
you don't like oscar so bully for JO

that's cute, but no and not even close.


spradlings can screw off because they were partly responsible (in my opinion) for frank being forced out (my opinion). most kstate people probably think frank up and willingly left, but i'm pretty sure that wasn't what happened. i did like frank though and i do wish he was still the coach though so yeah i guess the first part of your assumption was right.

where you miss badly is where you say i don't like oscar so bully for JO. i haven't said anything like that and no one in this thread has either. in reality i couldn't care less. why is that you ask? because i'm going to make the assumption that crap like jo and his mom happens all of the time in major college athletics. so i don't care. just don't care at all. total indifference to it.

now if their whining and moaning somehow actually affects the university in some way, shape or form like the spradlings did then i'll hop off the fence. like if their complaining helps to build a lazy river then i'll say "bully for jo" or if maybe their complaining causes the student union to burn down then i'll lump them in with the spradlings and tell them to go in the back. but again...as of right now i don't care. this is completely different from the gpc stance where they stuck up for will and are now trashing jo. sorry if not analytical enough to tell the difference. maybe that's year 2 or something. dunno.
Number 1: I don't appreciate the insulting tone you're taking with me.

Number 2: We're splitting hairs here imo, but you're right, no one is "sticking up" for JO here. 
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 15, 2013, 12:39:26 PM
Excuse me, Mrs., um,. Mrs. DOB, did baby DOB dunk on babies on his 'lil tykes hoop?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Pete on February 15, 2013, 12:40:30 PM
One thing is for certain, mscougar needs to post here.

Ms. Cougar?  Jesus, just send her Fanning's email and be done with it.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 15, 2013, 12:42:50 PM
One thing is for certain, mscougar needs to post here.

Ms. Cougar?  Jesus, just send her Fanning's email and be done with it.
:lol:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 12:44:01 PM
well i wonder what gpc has to say about this since they backed will and shannon really well. what? what's that you say? they are all talking crap on her and JO? oh wow. shocking. did not see that coming at all.
Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?

while i can't speak for everyone, i would say that for me personally it will depend if JO and his mother help cause a head coach that i want to be at kstate to get fired and the only coach i really want at kstate right now is bill. so i guess if jo and his mom get bill fired then yes i will bitch about it. stay tuned!
so i wonder: is it the parent's involvement that we get upset about or the AD's response to the parent's involvement?

are you really going to make me walk you all the way through this? i mean, you're the law student.
no i get it.

you liked frank so BOO spradlings
you don't like oscar so bully for JO

that's cute, but no and not even close.


spradlings can screw off because they were partly responsible (in my opinion) for frank being forced out (my opinion). most kstate people probably think frank up and willingly left, but i'm pretty sure that wasn't what happened. i did like frank though and i do wish he was still the coach though so yeah i guess the first part of your assumption was right.

where you miss badly is where you say i don't like oscar so bully for JO. i haven't said anything like that and no one in this thread has either. in reality i couldn't care less. why is that you ask? because i'm going to make the assumption that crap like jo and his mom happens all of the time in major college athletics. so i don't care. just don't care at all. total indifference to it.

now if their whining and moaning somehow actually affects the university in some way, shape or form like the spradlings did then i'll hop off the fence. like if their complaining helps to build a lazy river then i'll say "bully for jo" or if maybe their complaining causes the student union to burn down then i'll lump them in with the spradlings and tell them to go in the back. but again...as of right now i don't care. this is completely different from the gpc stance where they stuck up for will and are now trashing jo. sorry if not analytical enough to tell the difference. maybe that's year 2 or something. dunno.
Number 1: I don't appreciate the insulting tone you're taking with me.

Number 2: We're splitting hairs here imo, but you're right, no one is "sticking up" for JO here.


and i didn't appreciate you trying to dlew the thread and say that what we were doing was exactly the same thing as gpc but the opposite when we weren't. and no we're not splittling hairs. not even close.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: KanSt43 on February 15, 2013, 12:44:22 PM
That grammar was awful.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 12:45:55 PM
That grammar was awful.

nobody likes a grammar or spelling nazi
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: KanSt43 on February 15, 2013, 12:47:52 PM
That grammar was awful.

nobody likes a grammar or spelling sysboner

I prefer English, but whatever.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 15, 2013, 12:48:03 PM
LOL at all of this.

Oh man . . .  :lol:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2013, 12:50:09 PM
That grammar was awful.

nobody likes a grammar or spelling nazi

Nice edit, I liked the original
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 12:50:54 PM
That grammar was awful.

nobody likes a grammar or spelling nazi

Nice edit, I liked the original

It was too mean. I'm not a mean person.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2013, 12:54:59 PM
I think, if this is true, then there is one huge difference between JO's mom saying something and Will's dad saying something:

Will's dad getting Frank fired was about Will. Will didn't like him. JO's mom is not saying that JO liked Frank, she is saying that the whole team did. It seems weird to me that she would speak up about this now. What's her motivation? The Spradlings' motivation is very clear. They had reason to lie. If Ms. Cougar has a reason to lie, I have no idea what it is.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: kougar24 on February 15, 2013, 12:55:48 PM
One thing is for certain, mscougar needs to post here.

No relation, FYI.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 15, 2013, 12:56:25 PM
I think, if this is true, then there is one huge difference between JO's mom saying something and Will's dad saying something:

Will's dad getting Frank fired was about Will. Will didn't like him. JO's mom is not saying that JO liked Frank, she is saying that the whole team did. It seems weird to me that she would speak up about this now. What's her motivation? The Spradlings' motivation is very clear. They had reason to lie. If Ms. Cougar has a reason to lie, I have no idea what it is.

Also, she loves KSU. This cannot be understated.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2013, 12:56:51 PM
That grammar was awful.

nobody likes a grammar or spelling nazi

Nice edit, I liked the original

It was too mean. I'm not a mean person.

Now you are a liar though, most of us like SkinnyBenny
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: kso_FAN on February 15, 2013, 12:59:44 PM
Its entertaining for sure, but I don't really care for parent's going public (to reporters, social media, whatever) with their stuff that should be taken care of with the coach or AD. And Spradling's dad calling and feeding Kellis talking points is MUCH worse than this, but I still don't like either one.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: nicname on February 15, 2013, 01:02:32 PM
Def. not the same level, but this helicopter-parenting is getting out of hand.  just STFU parents.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Skipper44 on February 15, 2013, 01:05:44 PM
if this is JO's mom she has very good reason to be upset as the Frank to oscar change has been very detrimental to JO's pro bb future. 
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 01:08:24 PM
and i didn't appreciate you trying to dlew the thread and say that what we were doing was exactly the same thing as gpc but the opposite when we weren't. and no we're not splittling hairs. not even close.
i think we are splitting hairs.  you're right.  this isn't the inverse of the GPC response where they defend spradling and trash JO, but it's not that far off.  the reason people aren't rushing to JO's defense yet is because this just happened.  that's why originally asked the question:  "Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?"

and let me preface this by saying that I loved Frank and I hated the oscar hire just so we're all clear.  Also, i agree that the GPC response to the Sprads/JO complaining is ridiculous and inconsistent. 

i don't take issue with JO's mom complaining just like i don't really take issue with Spradling's parents complaining.  however, i could definitely understand how people could feel like sprads needed to shut up and play and how jo needs to do the same now.  But the players/parents don't determine how the AD responds.  Like some one alluded to earlier in this thread, parents probably complain about this crap all the time, and it's the AD's job to say "yeah, i understand.  don't worry we're looking out for your son and all of our student athletes, etc."  Currie used what is probably a common occurrence as leverage over a coach he hated. Don't we pretty much think that the "players are going to transfer" jazz was just a pretext for Currie hating Frank's guts anyways?  This is all on Currie. 

I don't think it's fair or consistent to crap on Sprads for being a pussy when he complains about a coach (which Currie just so happened to use as one of his reasons for firing Frank) and not consider JO a pussy when he complains about a coach (which Currie doesn't respond to). 
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: GCJayhawker on February 15, 2013, 01:11:15 PM
Not really sure what is going on in this thread.  At first thought JO was suspended, now not thinking that.  So confused, oh well
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2013, 01:12:27 PM
Not really sure what is going on in this thread.  At first thought JO was suspended, now not thinking that.  So confused, oh well

Great post.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 01:12:53 PM
Not really sure what is going on in this thread.  At first thought JO was suspended, now not thinking that.  So confused, oh well

Great post.

yeah, this gc guy is pretty adorable
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 01:13:54 PM
Not really sure what is going on in this thread.  At first thought JO was suspended, now not thinking that.  So confused, oh well

Great post.
yes.  terrific.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: GCJayhawker on February 15, 2013, 01:14:18 PM
Not really sure what is going on in this thread.  At first thought JO was suspended, now not thinking that.  So confused, oh well

Great post.

yeah, this gc guy is pretty adorable

 :cheers:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 15, 2013, 01:14:29 PM
Not really sure what is going on in this thread.  At first thought JO was suspended, now not thinking that.  So confused, oh well

He's more grounded than suspended.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: GCJayhawker on February 15, 2013, 01:15:45 PM
Not really sure what is going on in this thread.  At first thought JO was suspended, now not thinking that.  So confused, oh well

He's more grounded than suspended.

Thanks for clearing that up.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 01:24:59 PM
and i didn't appreciate you trying to dlew the thread and say that what we were doing was exactly the same thing as gpc but the opposite when we weren't. and no we're not splittling hairs. not even close.
i think we are splitting hairs.  you're right.  this isn't the inverse of the GPC response where they defend spradling and trash JO, but it's not that far off.  the reason people aren't rushing to JO's defense yet is because this just happened.  that's why originally asked the question:  "Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?"

and let me preface this by saying that I loved Frank and I hated the oscar hire just so we're all clear.  Also, i agree that the GPC response to the Sprads/JO complaining is ridiculous and inconsistent. 

i don't take issue with JO's mom complaining just like i don't really take issue with Spradling's parents complaining.  however, i could definitely understand how people could feel like sprads needed to shut up and play and how jo needs to do the same now.  But the players/parents don't determine how the AD responds.  Like some one alluded to earlier in this thread, parents probably complain about this crap all the time, and it's the AD's job to say "yeah, i understand.  don't worry we're looking out for your son and all of our student athletes, etc."  Currie used what is probably a common occurrence as leverage over a coach he hated. Don't we pretty much think that the "players are going to transfer" jazz was just a pretext for Currie hating Frank's guts anyways?  This is all on Currie. 

I don't think it's fair or consistent to crap on Sprads for being a pussy when he complains about a coach (which Currie just so happened to use as one of his reasons for firing Frank) and not consider JO a pussy when he complains about a coach (which Currie doesn't respond to).

i'm glad we agree that it's different. from where i'm standing, sprads and co helped destroy kstate basketball as i know it and jo is a kind of uncoordinated big man that has problems playing with his back to the basket but is still going to go make six figures playing basketball overseas in a few months after he graduates from college. not splitting hairs for me. to each their own though dlew, to each their own.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 01:29:42 PM
i'm glad we agree that it's different. from where i'm standing, sprads and co helped destroy kstate basketball as i know it and jo is a kind of uncoordinated big man that has problems playing with his back to the basket but is still going to go make six figures playing basketball overseas in a few months after he graduates from college. not splitting hairs for me. to each their own though dlew, to each their own.
ah yeah.  i guess the thing we disagree about the most is the level of sway the Sprads complaints had.  you seem to think that the Currie really took into account the complaints, where i really don't think Currie gave a crap about that.  i think it was all personal.  but hey, i could be totally wrong.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 15, 2013, 01:30:25 PM
That grammar was awful.

You gotta save this stuff for when we're trying to clown visiting fans and visiting tucks, imo.
















Also pull it out when you get in an argument with a Repub. in the Dunning-Kruger Dome or whatever.

Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 15, 2013, 01:32:07 PM
Nothing like a good ole dlew vs. daris showdown. Great goEMAW moment going on right now.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ChiComCat on February 15, 2013, 01:33:58 PM
Sprads complained about a coach with his father, through the media on a regular basis.  JO's mom posted a paragraph online.  There is a big difference in that.  Also, I don't care about JO's fam being upset about his minutes which is what this is.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 01:35:11 PM
Nothing like a good ole dlew vs. daris showdown. Great goEMAW moment going on right now.
i feel like the grandsonofdaxjones
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: KanSt43 on February 15, 2013, 01:36:28 PM
That grammar was awful.

You gotta save this stuff for when we're trying to clown visiting fans and visiting tucks, imo.
















Also pull it out when you get in an argument with a Repub. in the Dunning-Kruger Dome or whatever.

Fair enough.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2013, 01:36:40 PM
Nothing like a good ole dlew vs. daris showdown. Great goEMAW moment going on right now.
i feel like the grandsonofdaxjones

Yup, we're gonna need a name change. Not because I necessarily agree, but because that'd be hilarious.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: PIPE on February 15, 2013, 01:42:02 PM
Ok, kind of hard to follow her babel, but is she just mad 'cause JO's production is down, and his sucktatude is up? So maybe she is blaming Weber for JO's faults?

Should I just link the thread titled "JO" and have her check out my breakdown on page 6?

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=26283.125

Maybe Weber told her JO would be a major contributor this year, and then saw how bad he is or whatever, and now doesn't play him, so she is calling him a liar cause he isnt a major contributor?

Just a theory.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2013, 01:48:00 PM
Ok, kind of hard to follow her babel

This is hilarious
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 01:54:18 PM
i'm glad we agree that it's different. from where i'm standing, sprads and co helped destroy kstate basketball as i know it and jo is a kind of uncoordinated big man that has problems playing with his back to the basket but is still going to go make six figures playing basketball overseas in a few months after he graduates from college. not splitting hairs for me. to each their own though dlew, to each their own.
ah yeah.  i guess the thing we disagree about the most is the level of sway the Sprads complaints had.  you seem to think that the Currie really took into account the complaints, where i really don't think Currie gave a crap about that.  i think it was all personal.  but hey, i could be totally wrong.

we are actually apparently disagreeing on intent and whether it matters or not and not "level of sway." like if pete told sd to kill my dog and sd said oh i was already planning on doing that and then he did it and i found out about their convo, i'm pretty sure that i'd be fairly unhappy with both of them. maybe i'm just weird that way though dlew.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2013, 02:01:33 PM
I agree with dlew that consistency requires that if one thinks Will and dad should be called out, one should also think that JO and mom should be called out.  What happens after either of those pairs act is beyond their control.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 02:04:30 PM
Currie didn't use Shannon as a reason to fire Frank, but he used Shannon to build support for firing Frank after the fact. Source: the captain crap threads.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 02:07:47 PM
I agree with dlew that consistency requires that if one thinks Will and dad should be called out, one should also think that JO and mom should be called out.  What happens after either of those pairs act is beyond their control.

absurd. intent behind actions as well as consequences after actions should absolutely be taken into account when judging actions.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 02:07:58 PM
Didn't the Spadlings spread the rumor that JO told Willie Cauley to not come here because of Frank?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ChiComCat on February 15, 2013, 02:08:43 PM
I agree with dlew that consistency requires that if one thinks Will and dad should be called out, one should also think that JO and mom should be called out.  What happens after either of those pairs act is beyond their control.

absurd. intent behind actions as well as consequences after actions should absolutely be taken into account when judging actions.

I don't think their actions are the same.  I don't even think they are all that similar.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: pissclams on February 15, 2013, 02:09:40 PM
Its entertaining for sure, but I don't really care for parent's going public (to reporters, social media, whatever) with their stuff that should be taken care of with the coach or AD. And Spradling's dad calling and feeding Kellis talking points is MUCH worse than this, but I still don't like either one.

i think this post gets to the crux of the issue.  kids are going to kid, parents are going to parent, and coaches are going to coach.  there's nothing anyone can do to change that.  and you really can't place blame on any of them for doing what they do, it's just inherent in playing their role .  however, how each of these roles are managed is the job of the AD.  a competent AD is one who wouldn't let spradling's or JO's parents issues get to the point where they find themselves feeding media outlets their version of the world, or airing dirty laundry on message boards.  i mean, it's going to happen to some extent but not to the degree we've seen here.

just an imo.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2013, 02:12:22 PM
I agree with dlew that consistency requires that if one thinks Will and dad should be called out, one should also think that JO and mom should be called out.  What happens after either of those pairs act is beyond their control.

absurd. intent behind actions as well as consequences after actions should absolutely be taken into account when judging actions.

I don't know their intent beyond surmising that they're looking out for their kids.  Really skeptical that anyone here would know much more than that.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2013, 02:16:13 PM
I agree with dlew that consistency requires that if one thinks Will and dad should be called out, one should also think that JO and mom should be called out.  What happens after either of those pairs act is beyond their control.

absurd. intent behind actions as well as consequences after actions should absolutely be taken into account when judging actions.

I don't think their actions are the same.  I don't even think they are all that similar.

Action at issue:  Bitching to the AD about the coach.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Mr Bread on February 15, 2013, 02:19:00 PM
Its entertaining for sure, but I don't really care for parent's going public (to reporters, social media, whatever) with their stuff that should be taken care of with the coach or AD. And Spradling's dad calling and feeding Kellis talking points is MUCH worse than this, but I still don't like either one.

i think this post gets to the crux of the issue.  kids are going to kid, parents are going to parent, and coaches are going to coach.  there's nothing anyone can do to change that.  and you really can't place blame on any of them for doing what they do, it's just inherent in playing their role .  however, how each of these roles are managed is the job of the AD.  a competent AD is one who wouldn't let spradling's or JO's parents issues get to the point where they find themselves feeding media outlets their version of the world, or airing dirty laundry on message boards.  i mean, it's going to happen to some extent but not to the degree we've seen here.

just an imo.

You still don't get to decide who's on the stage.  It's killing you inside. 

ADJC----->boss of k-state stages and all those permitted thereon
clams---->zero stage juice/insides are dead as a result
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ChiComCat on February 15, 2013, 02:23:39 PM
I agree with dlew that consistency requires that if one thinks Will and dad should be called out, one should also think that JO and mom should be called out.  What happens after either of those pairs act is beyond their control.

absurd. intent behind actions as well as consequences after actions should absolutely be taken into account when judging actions.

I don't think their actions are the same.  I don't even think they are all that similar.

Action at issue:  Bitching to the AD about the coach.

In that case, they are similar.  Though for me, that is not why I don't like Will/Shannon.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: pissclams on February 15, 2013, 02:23:53 PM
i've got more juice than minute maid, u digg?    :confused:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 02:28:03 PM
I agree with dlew that consistency requires that if one thinks Will and dad should be called out, one should also think that JO and mom should be called out.  What happens after either of those pairs act is beyond their control.

absurd. intent behind actions as well as consequences after actions should absolutely be taken into account when judging actions.

I don't know their intent beyond surmising that they're looking out for their kids.  Really skeptical that anyone here would know much more than that.

team sprads was looking out for their kid and wanted a coach gone so that their kid would stay at kstate and not transfer. we know this because when frank left, will decided to stay. staying at kstate without frank was their first choice and transferring somewhere else if frank stayed was the second one. yes they wanted frank gone. team jo is looking out for their kid for a different reason. jo is graduating. intent can't be the same between the two groups. impossible.

also what happens after an action is pretty freaking important. like if i'm at the store and pete drives his car drunk into my house and then passes out, i'm kind of upset at pete. but if he drives his car drunk into my house and then passes out and some oil leaks and the car starts on fire and the house burns down with my entire family in it then i'm more than kind of upset.

spradspete got drunk on purpose and ran the car into my house on purpose and then burned it and got off free with no jail time or anything and jopete just got drunk and then parked the car in my driveway and walked away. who cares.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Mr Bread on February 15, 2013, 02:28:19 PM
i've got more juice than minute maid, u digg?    :confused:

A clams divided against himself cannot stand.  Just let it go and you'll probably feel even better than your normal very high level of feeling good.  Like if you kicked the ol' sodium intake down a few more percentage points.  Raging about ADJC is like a high sodium diet for your soul is what I'm saying here. 
Title: :sdeek:
Post by: JesusShuttlesworth on February 15, 2013, 02:35:23 PM
Maybe JO should continue listening to the former coach he loved so much.  Maybe if he listens real good, he will figure out why he's not playing more. 

"In life, you get what you deserve."
                          - Francisco J. Martin
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 02:45:07 PM
I agree with dlew that consistency requires that if one thinks Will and dad should be called out, one should also think that JO and mom should be called out.  What happens after either of those pairs act is beyond their control.

absurd. intent behind actions as well as consequences after actions should absolutely be taken into account when judging actions.

I don't know their intent beyond surmising that they're looking out for their kids.  Really skeptical that anyone here would know much more than that.

team sprads was looking out for their kid and wanted a coach gone so that their kid would stay at kstate and not transfer. we know this because when frank left, will decided to stay. staying at kstate without frank was their first choice and transferring somewhere else if frank stayed was the second one. yes they wanted frank gone. team jo is looking out for their kid for a different reason. jo is graduating. intent can't be the same between the two groups. impossible.

also what happens after an action is pretty freaking important. like if i'm at the store and pete drives his car drunk into my house and then passes out, i'm kind of upset at pete. but if he drives his car drunk into my house and then passes out and some oil leaks and the car starts on fire and the house burns down with my entire family in it then i'm more than kind of upset.

spradspete got drunk on purpose and ran the car into my house on purpose and then burned it and got off free with no jail time or anything and jopete just got drunk and then parked the car in my driveway and walked away. who cares.

dear god what a horrible post. i'm in too deep. aborting.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: jmlynch1 on February 15, 2013, 03:04:08 PM
Quote from: Dlew12 link=topic=26386.msg744971#msg744971 date= :billdance:

I don't think it's fair or consistent to crap on Sprads for being a pussy when he complains about a coach (which Currie just so happened to use as one of his reasons for firing Frank) and not consider JO a pussy when he complains about a coach (which Currie doesn't respond to).
i think another point here is that spradling chose to play for Frank, while JO pretty much got stuck with oscar
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Winters on February 15, 2013, 03:25:08 PM
JO'S mom is probably more liked on this board than JO  :sdeek:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: MakeItRain on February 15, 2013, 03:38:33 PM
WOW go away from the board for a couple of hours and I miss this huge story. I'm only on page 1 but as the conductor of the teamJO train and a confirmed hardcore Frankite, I'm gonna enjoy the hell of of pages 2-5 

:excited:  :ksu: :drool: :dance:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2013, 03:44:55 PM
WOW go away from the board for a couple of hours and I miss this huge story. I'm only on page 1 but as the conductor of the teamJO train and a confirmed hardcore Frankite, I'm gonna enjoy the hell of of pages 2-5 

:excited:  :ksu: :drool: :dance:

:dubious: More like the Ellie Goulding train (which is also a good train to be on)
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 15, 2013, 03:45:12 PM
WOW go away from the board for a couple of hours and I miss this huge story. I'm only on page 1 but as the conductor of the teamJO train and a confirmed hardcore Frankite, I'm gonna enjoy the hell of of pages 2-5 

:excited:  :ksu: :drool: :dance:

it doesn't get that great. i derailed it and then ruined it. much apologies.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: GoodForAnother on February 15, 2013, 03:47:06 PM
can we put  :sdeek: on this body  :dance:

I think that would appropriately describe my emotions
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: kougar24 on February 15, 2013, 04:00:25 PM
Didn't the Spadlings spread the rumor that JO told Willie Cauley to not come here because of Frank?

I don't know, but I'm 100% willing to accept that as fact.
Title: :sdeek:
Post by: felix rex on February 15, 2013, 04:04:58 PM
Didn't the Spadlings spread the rumor that JO told Willie Cauley to not come here because of Frank?

I don't know, but I'm 100% willing to accept that as fact.

Yep.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 04:06:35 PM
WOW go away from the board for a couple of hours and I miss this huge story. I'm only on page 1 but as the conductor of the teamJO train and a confirmed hardcore Frankite, I'm gonna enjoy the hell of of pages 2-5 

:excited:  :ksu: :drool: :dance:

it doesn't get that great. i derailed it and then ruined it. much apologies.
it was a joint effort.   :embarrassed:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: MakeItRain on February 15, 2013, 04:26:31 PM
WOW go away from the board for a couple of hours and I miss this huge story. I'm only on page 1 but as the conductor of the teamJO train and a confirmed hardcore Frankite, I'm gonna enjoy the hell of of pages 2-5 

:excited:  :ksu: :drool: :dance:

it doesn't get that great. i derailed it and then ruined it. much apologies.

You didn't.

I'm stunned that someone could honestly profess to not knowing the difference between a black woman from NYC making a Facebook post and a player and his dad from Johnson County using boosters, media, and an athletic department to trash a coach and the program because they didn't like the fact that the coach made the kid play point guard. Not only did the Spradlings take a scorched earth philosophy last spring but they continue to grind that axe nearly a full year later well after their problem was gone. Will had and has an active role in Spradling v. Martin, JO had no role in his mom's Facebook post.

I'm going to assume that any attempts to favorably compare the two situations is just a case of message boarding. Also dlew if I could directly address you for a second, personally for you to lump everyone critical of Will & Shannon into the "Will is a pussy" group is incredibly insulting. You obviously didn't do it directly to me here, but you have in the past and you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.





end rant, I wish the thread would have been more fun, now I'm going to start the Frank press conference thread with high hopes
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 04:33:37 PM
Also dlew if I could directly address you for a second, personally for you to lump everyone critical of Will & Shannon into the "Will is a pussy" group is incredibly insulting. You obviously didn't do it directly to me here, but you have in the past and you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.
Listen, Daris and I were both painting with broad strokes.  He opined about the GPC talking points and I opined about the gE talking points.  Take it easy.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Kat Kid on February 15, 2013, 04:45:09 PM
Also dlew if I could directly address you for a second, personally for you to lump everyone critical of Will & Shannon into the "Will is a pussy" group is incredibly insulting. You obviously didn't do it directly to me here, but you have in the past and you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.
Listen, Daris and I were both painting with broad strokes.  He opined about the GPC talking points and I opined about the gE talking points.  Take it easy.

I think he's calling you racist d-rew.  You should say something back and then we'd have a real fight on our hands.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: MakeItRain on February 15, 2013, 04:46:41 PM
Also dlew if I could directly address you for a second, personally for you to lump everyone critical of Will & Shannon into the "Will is a pussy" group is incredibly insulting. You obviously didn't do it directly to me here, but you have in the past and you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.
Listen, Daris and I were both painting with broad strokes.  He opined about the GPC talking points and I opined about the gE talking points.  Take it easy.

Did I say something mean? I'm just pointing out that you are fond of using this device when Will comes up and it pisses me off, seemed like a good time to bring it up especially when it was evoked in the context of Anthony Jordan Luis Henriquez Roberts.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 15, 2013, 04:52:35 PM
Also dlew if I could directly address you for a second, personally for you to lump everyone critical of Will & Shannon into the "Will is a pussy" group is incredibly insulting. You obviously didn't do it directly to me here, but you have in the past and you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.
Listen, Daris and I were both painting with broad strokes.  He opined about the GPC talking points and I opined about the gE talking points.  Take it easy.

Did I say something mean? I'm just pointing out that you are fond of using this device when Will comes up and it pisses me off, seemed like a good time to bring it up especially when it was evoked in the context of Anthony Jordan Luis Henriquez Roberts.
Well, i'm sorry for doing it in other threads but i don't think i'm sorry for doing it in this thread. 

i've always loved our guy jhr and i will continue to do so.  he's lucky to have a mom who is lookin' out for him.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 15, 2013, 05:05:51 PM
These situations are so dissimilar that I have a hard time understanding why they are being compared. Will is an average guard that likely doesn't have the athleticism to even play in one of the better leagues in Europe. So, he has not shot to make real money playing basketball. The reason the Spradlings acted out was because they dislike Frank, and they thought that Will was playing out of position. As has been stated before, Will had two more years left at KSU, so they knew if they could get rid of Frank, then Will would have a chance to play his desired position for a coach they liked more without having to sit out a year and move to a different state. Knowing that, the Spradlings launched an all-out smear campaign through every channel available to them including influential contacts, the radio, and local newspaper. JO coming into this year had a real shot to get an NBA contract with improved play this season. oscar Weber has refused to tweak the offense at all to cater toward JO's offensive skillset, which prevents him from showcasing his more marketable assets (defense and rebounding) to NBA scouts, because he has been nailed to the bench. In response to this, JO's mom posted a one paragraph lament about JO's situation on a social network, knowing that oscar's future at KSU doesn't have any impact on her son whatsoever. How am I supposed to see any type of correlation here? Because the parents of two college basketball players had a conversation with the AD?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: chum1 on February 15, 2013, 06:06:29 PM
None of the differences anyone has pointed out are really relevant to dlew's point (or a charitible reading of it).  The best anyone could say is that the two cases are different in degree.  But, ultimately, if you're (not) pissed at one player, you should (not) be pissed at the other.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on February 15, 2013, 06:44:46 PM
Good lord, you would swear we are fans of an effing Kansas 3A High School basketball team
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2013, 07:07:48 PM
WOW go away from the board for a couple of hours and I miss this huge story. I'm only on page 1 but as the conductor of the teamJO train and a confirmed hardcore Frankite, I'm gonna enjoy the hell of of pages 2-5 

:excited:  :ksu: :drool: :dance:

it doesn't get that great. i derailed it and then ruined it. much apologies.

You didn't.

I'm stunned that someone could honestly profess to not knowing the difference between a black woman from NYC making a Facebook post and a player and his dad from Johnson County using boosters, media, and an athletic department to trash a coach and the program because they didn't like the fact that the coach made the kid play point guard. Not only did the Spradlings take a scorched earth philosophy last spring but they continue to grind that axe nearly a full year later well after their problem was gone. Will had and has an active role in Spradling v. Martin, JO had no role in his mom's Facebook post.

I'm going to assume that any attempts to favorably compare the two situations is just a case of message boarding. Also dlew if I could directly address you for a second, personally for you to lump everyone critical of Will & Shannon into the "Will is a pussy" group is incredibly insulting. You obviously didn't do it directly to me here, but you have in the past and you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.





end rant, I wish the thread would have been more fun, now I'm going to start the Frank press conference thread with high hopes
Love the hit and run bitch move. 
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2013, 07:11:36 PM
WOW go away from the board for a couple of hours and I miss this huge story. I'm only on page 1 but as the conductor of the teamJO train and a confirmed hardcore Frankite, I'm gonna enjoy the hell of of pages 2-5 

:excited:  :ksu: :drool: :dance:

it doesn't get that great. i derailed it and then ruined it. much apologies.

You didn't.

I'm stunned that someone could honestly profess to not knowing the difference between a black woman from NYC making a Facebook post and a player and his dad from Johnson County using boosters, media, and an athletic department to trash a coach and the program because they didn't like the fact that the coach made the kid play point guard. Not only did the Spradlings take a scorched earth philosophy last spring but they continue to grind that axe nearly a full year later well after their problem was gone. Will had and has an active role in Spradling v. Martin, JO had no role in his mom's Facebook post.

I'm going to assume that any attempts to favorably compare the two situations is just a case of message boarding. Also dlew if I could directly address you for a second, personally for you to lump everyone critical of Will & Shannon into the "Will is a pussy" group is incredibly insulting. You obviously didn't do it directly to me here, but you have in the past and you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.





end rant, I wish the thread would have been more fun, now I'm going to start the Frank press conference thread with high hopes
Love the hit and run bitch move. 

MIR posted 20 minutes after this post in this very thread, dumbass. Your butthurt over him is weird.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2013, 07:12:36 PM
WOW go away from the board for a couple of hours and I miss this huge story. I'm only on page 1 but as the conductor of the teamJO train and a confirmed hardcore Frankite, I'm gonna enjoy the hell of of pages 2-5 

:excited:  :ksu: :drool: :dance:

it doesn't get that great. i derailed it and then ruined it. much apologies.

You didn't.

I'm stunned that someone could honestly profess to not knowing the difference between a black woman from NYC making a Facebook post and a player and his dad from Johnson County using boosters, media, and an athletic department to trash a coach and the program because they didn't like the fact that the coach made the kid play point guard. Not only did the Spradlings take a scorched earth philosophy last spring but they continue to grind that axe nearly a full year later well after their problem was gone. Will had and has an active role in Spradling v. Martin, JO had no role in his mom's Facebook post.

I'm going to assume that any attempts to favorably compare the two situations is just a case of message boarding. Also dlew if I could directly address you for a second, personally for you to lump everyone critical of Will & Shannon into the "Will is a pussy" group is incredibly insulting. You obviously didn't do it directly to me here, but you have in the past and you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.





end rant, I wish the thread would have been more fun, now I'm going to start the Frank press conference thread with high hopes
Love the hit and run bitch move. 

MIR posted 20 minutes after this post in this very thread, dumbass. Your butthurt over him is weird.
Wtf are you talking about my butthurt?  I don't take swipes at him in random ass threads dumbass.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: MakeItRain on February 15, 2013, 07:22:38 PM
You had the most prominent case of calling player a pussy on this board, your history is yours don't be mad at me about it.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2013, 07:22:49 PM
I'm not going to post them all, but these 2 are gold:

Quote from: ednksu
Our stats won't matter until they match what I think they will be at some point in time, and at that point in time, it's then that I will be right.
way to back your stats up
chirp gonna chirp

my stats are backing up the fact that your baseless thread sucks, i hope that helps.


There are couple of people in this thread and in general who are doing a really good job of drawing attention to their stupidity. Six pages :sdeek:
way to call your shots team pseudo, really childish.

We also changed coaches and rebounding is something that can be both coached and affected by the coach's philosophy.

The people you are talking to here won't listen to you. These dumbasses think if you just indiscriminately throw your hands at the rim every chance you get, you'll get lots of rebounds. All effort Rusty, nothing else.

You're so edgy MIR, I mean golly, you just can't flail around at the ball and rim and get rebounds?  Man, the insight!!
Dude he went to this camp this one time in middle school when someone who could rebound told him so.

And let's not forget the time you guys were going to fight IRL and you wouldn't tell MIR how to find you:

:facepalm:

So we got to this place we are now because some guys went to a road game, had a good time and needled some people in the process. Homophobia, threats, cyberstalking, etc. over a basketball game that ISU won. As I expressed yesterday, some of you are tying your happiness and well being a little to closely to basketball. There's nothing that happened over the weekend that happened that should make you feel good about calling someone a man of taste and distinction. If it weren't for all of the in person passive-aggressiveness I may have thought that some of these dudes would have fought if we won.

OKclone and topgun needs to find out in their next therapy session why they are so uncomfortable with human interaction in real life but turns into the incredible hulk on the internet and why they see no shame in this.
ironing

Yeah I've never done any of those things. If you're insinuating that I wouldn't tell you that you're a stupid ass to your face, trust me when I tell you that you're very wrong.  Don't answer we don't care, seriously.
so you threatening me asking for my seat location in the Bram was just have have a chat, after calling me a bitch?  GTFO. You're lying through your teeth at this point. 

Get with the real world, everyone does stupid crap, don't get offended when others call you out for doing the same thing.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2013, 07:35:30 PM
You had the most prominent case of calling player a pussy on this board, your history is yours don't be mad at me about it.
Dude I own that entirely as I have said before.  I made an ass out of myself that night and I was pissed beyond belief.  But ya know what, JP came out after that bad stretch of games and said he wasn't thinking of his team, that he was distracted by his career goals after K-State.  He came out and said he needed to recommit himself to his goals at K-State because he wasn't playing up to his standards.  He vindicated everything I was saying that night.  Now does he owe that to me?  Not really, but he owed it to the K-State community which we're apart of.  What pissed me off the most, he owed it to himself.   

That doesn't change the fact you have this weird obsession with me and my posting for no reason.  Its pretty clear that I don't value a lot of the banter here.  There are a few posters which make this board into the great place it can be.  The vast majority of people here, people like you, with your little clicks and groups make this a terrible place for most people.  I come here to read a fan frames, read Dax's facility posts, and CC's indery info.  Honestly I've enjoyed some of the convos we've had and some of the stuff you post.  But you get hung up on trying to prove yourself right, and if I may barrow, prove that you have "sharper tongue", even though you are speaking out both sides of your mouth (see your comments on volleyball). 

I've said before, lets just leave each other be, don't take random swipes at people.  But you don't do that, you've got this weird obsession with me for no reason.  You don't like my posting, don't follow it.  If you have something constructive say it.  But this random, childish, crap is just something a bore of a person does to make themselves feel better. 
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2013, 07:51:43 PM
You just randomly called out MIR for a "hit and run bitch move", so your 2nd and 3rd paragraphs should really be directed at yourself.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2013, 08:03:38 PM
You just randomly called out MIR for a "hit and run bitch move", so your 2nd and 3rd paragraphs should really be directed at yourself.
how do you square that with the fact he was taking veiled swipes at me.  The first example you post I wasn't responding to him and he came in with a childish hit.  The second example he called me a dumbass in another post you, i'm sure, accidentally left out.  The third example speaks directly to my horrid meltdown and MiR's repeated shots at me, culminating to him wanting to confront me in Bramlage.  I don't make it a habit to inject his name randomly into threads to make a shitty point.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ChiComCat on February 15, 2013, 08:11:09 PM
Is this the poster fighting-you-related thread?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 15, 2013, 08:14:09 PM
EVERYBODY SHUT UP!
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2013, 08:17:39 PM
EVERYBODY SHUT UP!
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.zaazu.com%2Fimg%2Fzip-zip-animated-animation-smiley-emoticon-000408-large.gif&hash=850cc5a04acdec758f197f2d1021c35c360b15d7)
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2013, 08:18:00 PM
You just randomly called out MIR for a "hit and run bitch move", so your 2nd and 3rd paragraphs should really be directed at yourself.
how do you square that with the fact he was taking veiled swipes at me.  The first example you post I wasn't responding to him and he came in with a childish hit.  The second example he called me a dumbass in another post you, i'm sure, accidentally left out.  The third example speaks directly to my horrid meltdown and MiR's repeated shots at me, culminating to him wanting to confront me in Bramlage.  I don't make it a habit to inject his name randomly into threads to make a shitty point.

Just seems funny that you're trying to tell MIR to leave you alone and stop reading your posts the same night your ran in a posted "Love a hit and run bitch move" after one of his posts. Do you not see the hypocrisy?
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2013, 08:22:57 PM
You just randomly called out MIR for a "hit and run bitch move", so your 2nd and 3rd paragraphs should really be directed at yourself.
how do you square that with the fact he was taking veiled swipes at me.  The first example you post I wasn't responding to him and he came in with a childish hit.  The second example he called me a dumbass in another post you, i'm sure, accidentally left out.  The third example speaks directly to my horrid meltdown and MiR's repeated shots at me, culminating to him wanting to confront me in Bramlage.  I don't make it a habit to inject his name randomly into threads to make a shitty point.

Just seems funny that you're trying to tell MIR to leave you alone and stop reading your posts the same night your ran in a posted "Love a hit and run bitch move" after one of his posts. Do you not see the hypocrisy?
Do you see in everyone one of your examples he went at me first? 
back to
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.zaazu.com%2Fimg%2Fzip-zip-animated-animation-smiley-emoticon-000408-large.gif&hash=850cc5a04acdec758f197f2d1021c35c360b15d7)
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 08:25:38 PM
EVERYBODY SHUT UP!

this only works when I do it
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2013, 08:30:01 PM
Question for #teamfrankites/#murderfacewill/#teamfrankleftbutthurt....how does a low value player like Will garner enough power to get relatively popular coach out of their job?  I could see if a Mike Beasley or  a Jake type of player pushed those buttons, but I don't see Will and his family being able to get that much pull.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: michigancat on February 15, 2013, 08:32:36 PM
You had the most prominent case of calling player a pussy on this board, your history is yours don't be mad at me about it.
Dude I own that entirely as I have said before.  I made an ass out of myself that night and I was pissed beyond belief.  But ya know what, JP came out after that bad stretch of games and said he wasn't thinking of his team, that he was distracted by his career goals after K-State.  He came out and said he needed to recommit himself to his goals at K-State because he wasn't playing up to his standards.  He vindicated everything I was saying that night.  Now does he owe that to me?  Not really, but he owed it to the K-State community which we're apart of.  What pissed me off the most, he owed it to himself.   


He did not call himself a pussy. He did not vindicate you. Just stop at "I made an ass of myself that night" and you sound like much less of an ass.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2013, 08:36:15 PM
You just randomly called out MIR for a "hit and run bitch move", so your 2nd and 3rd paragraphs should really be directed at yourself.
how do you square that with the fact he was taking veiled swipes at me.  The first example you post I wasn't responding to him and he came in with a childish hit.  The second example he called me a dumbass in another post you, i'm sure, accidentally left out.  The third example speaks directly to my horrid meltdown and MiR's repeated shots at me, culminating to him wanting to confront me in Bramlage.  I don't make it a habit to inject his name randomly into threads to make a shitty point.

Just seems funny that you're trying to tell MIR to leave you alone and stop reading your posts the same night your ran in a posted "Love a hit and run bitch move" after one of his posts. Do you not see the hypocrisy?
Do you see in everyone one of your examples he went at me first? 
back to
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.zaazu.com%2Fimg%2Fzip-zip-animated-animation-smiley-emoticon-000408-large.gif&hash=850cc5a04acdec758f197f2d1021c35c360b15d7)

1. In the first one, he didn't directly attack you. He said there's a lot of stupid in this thread. You, rightly, assumed he was talking about you and responded. In the second one, I have no idea what went on earlier in that thread, I just found that post. I'm not going to look it up. I don't care if he called you a dumbass earlier or not. And the third one was not an example of you attacking him, it was just funny that you called Pullen a pussy and then refuse to meet MIR in real life.
2. None of these examples matter because today, February 15th, you swept in and randomly attacked MIR. Then moments later said MIR should not randomly attack you.
3. You listened to fanning when he told everyone to shut up. That should tell you all you need to know about yourself.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ednksu on February 15, 2013, 08:42:06 PM
If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.

Love the hit and run bitch move.

1. In the first one, he didn't directly attack you. He said there's a lot of stupid in this thread. You, rightly, assumed he was talking about you and responded. In the second one, I have no idea what went on earlier in that thread, I just found that post. I'm not going to look it up. I don't care if he called you a dumbass earlier or not. And the third one was not an example of you attacking him, it was just funny that you called Pullen a pussy and then refuse to meet MIR in real life.
2. None of these examples matter because today, February 15th, you swept in and randomly attacked MIR. Then moments later said MIR should not randomly attack you.
3. You listened to fanning when he told everyone to shut up. That should tell you all you need to know about yourself.
The least you could do is read the posts. 

Also I'm not going to let message board bullshit enter my real world game day enjoyment.  If MiR wants to get at me in real life over message board nonsense, that is his problem.
Title: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2013, 08:56:13 PM
FWIW, Jakesie, MIR absolutely took a shot at edn in a thread that edn hadn't posted in yet. Weird battle to fight.

[...] you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 15, 2013, 08:56:46 PM
Man, that's awesome.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 15, 2013, 09:01:15 PM
EVERYBODY SHUT UP!

this only works when I do it
I know, but you were nowhere to be found. I thought I'd give it a shot.  :D
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Katpappy on February 15, 2013, 09:02:23 PM
That grammar was awful.

You gotta save this stuff for when we're trying to clown visiting fans and visiting tucks, imo.

Right on, Bro!  :cheers:
















Also pull it out when you get in an argument with a Repub. in the Dunning-Kruger Dome or whatever.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 15, 2013, 09:04:48 PM
I am just excited that we have finally started using the word "bully" on this board.  Long overdue IMO
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Mr Bread on February 15, 2013, 09:09:26 PM
I'm about to come off the top rope in this thread (elite pro wrestling reference).  One time clams posted something about something that I had posted and it made me feel bad and I was like "Geez, clams" in my head.  Who else wants some?  BBS royal rumble! :drool:     
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ChiComCat on February 15, 2013, 09:12:31 PM
I'm about to come off the top rope in this thread (elite pro wrestling reference).  One time clams posted something about something that I had posted and it made me feel bad and I was like "Geez, clams" in my head.  Who else wants some?  BBS royal rumble! :drool:     

I don't know what it was, but 'clams has mellowed in recent years.  A couple years back, he was PI'ing people off the board left and right.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: steve dave on February 15, 2013, 09:14:35 PM
I'm about to come off the top rope in this thread (elite pro wrestling reference).  One time clams posted something about something that I had posted and it made me feel bad and I was like "Geez, clams" in my head.  Who else wants some?  BBS royal rumble! :drool:   

I have a strategy to deal with every high level poster on this board (this is embarrassingly not a joke). I'm real life friends with most of them so it doesn't come to this a lot. But, each has their own ways to attack things. I go through my fake scenarios on how they will post and know how to respond really well to each making them feel like douches. This is mostly just a warning to all of you fuckers.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 15, 2013, 09:17:31 PM
I'm about to come off the top rope in this thread (elite pro wrestling reference).  One time clams posted something about something that I had posted and it made me feel bad and I was like "Geez, clams" in my head.  Who else wants some?  BBS royal rumble! :drool:   

I have a strategy to deal with every high level poster on this board (this is embarrassingly not a joke). I'm real life friends with most of them so it doesn't come to this a lot. But, each has their own ways to attack things. I go through my fake scenarios on how they will post and know how to respond really well to each making them feel like douches. This is mostly just a warning to all of you fuckers.
:ohno:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: star seed 7 on February 15, 2013, 09:18:48 PM
you don't have anything to worry about fanning.  (neither do i)
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Bloodfart on February 15, 2013, 09:26:50 PM
I'm about to come off the top rope in this thread (elite pro wrestling reference).  One time clams posted something about something that I had posted and it made me feel bad and I was like "Geez, clams" in my head.  Who else wants some?  BBS royal rumble! :drool:     

I don't know what it was, but 'clams has mellowed in recent years.  A couple years back, he was PI'ing people off the board left and right.

All the fucktards (me included) wore him down and now he's overwhelmed with the suckatude that slogs the gEBBS.  I have been waiting for the hammer of clams to come down on me for quite some time now.   :comeatme:







































The basketball board is a scary place.  :ohno:
Title: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2013, 09:26:53 PM
I'm about to come off the top rope in this thread (elite pro wrestling reference).  One time clams posted something about something that I had posted and it made me feel bad and I was like "Geez, clams" in my head.  Who else wants some?  BBS royal rumble! :drool:   
I want a piece of jakesie. Power lifting, schmower lifting.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Katpappy on February 15, 2013, 09:29:04 PM
Good lord, you would swear we are fans of an effing Kansas 3A High School basketball team
You got that right, Luke.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: wetwillie on February 15, 2013, 09:30:33 PM
Bread doesn't have the stomach for a goEMAW throw down with clams or SD, I'm certain of it.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Katpappy on February 15, 2013, 09:38:41 PM
You had the most prominent case of calling player a pussy on this board, your history is yours don't be mad at me about it.
Dude I own that entirely as I have said before.  I made an ass out of myself that night and I was pissed beyond belief.  But ya know what, JP came out after that bad stretch of games and said he wasn't thinking of his team, that he was distracted by his career goals after K-State.  He came out and said he needed to recommit himself to his goals at K-State because he wasn't playing up to his standards.  He vindicated everything I was saying that night.  Now does he owe that to me?  Not really, but he owed it to the K-State community which we're apart of.  What pissed me off the most, he owed it to himself.   

That doesn't change the fact you have this weird obsession with me and my posting for no reason.  Its pretty clear that I don't value a lot of the banter here.  There are a few posters which make this board into the great place it can be.  :blush: The vast majority of people here, people like you, with your little clicks and groups make this a terrible place for most people.  I come here to read a fan frames, read Dax's facility posts, and CC's indery info.  Honestly I've enjoyed some of the convos we've had and some of the stuff you post.  But you get hung up on trying to prove yourself right, and if I may barrow, prove that you have "sharper tongue", even though you are speaking out both sides of your mouth (see your comments on volleyball). 

I've said before, lets just leave each other be, don't take random swipes at people.  But you don't do that, you've got this weird obsession with me for no reason.  You don't like my posting, don't follow it.  If you have something constructive say it.  But this random, childish, crap is just something a bore of a person does to make themselves feel better.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 15, 2013, 09:42:29 PM
I unrelated news, but way cooler than what's going on in this thread. Is this a precursor to what Chings predicted would happen in chat the other day? Is this just the beginning? Is the asteroid really going to hit earth? Is NASA lying to us? Chings has me worried that the asteroid passing earth today didn't really happen and that we're all about to bite the big one  :ohno:


http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/meteorite-falls-in-russias-chelyabinsk-region-damage-and-casualties-unclear/2013/02/15/7041c0c8-7732-11e2-b102-948929030e64_story.html (http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/meteorite-falls-in-russias-chelyabinsk-region-damage-and-casualties-unclear/2013/02/15/7041c0c8-7732-11e2-b102-948929030e64_story.html)
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Mr Bread on February 15, 2013, 09:43:38 PM
Bread doesn't have the stomach for a goEMAW throw down with clams or SD, I'm certain of it.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Katpappy on February 15, 2013, 09:45:26 PM
I'm about to come off the top rope in this thread (elite pro wrestling reference).  One time clams posted something about something that I had posted and it made me feel bad and I was like "Geez, clams" in my head.  Who else wants some?  BBS royal rumble! :drool:   
Will this be a caged death match.  :excited:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Katpappy on February 15, 2013, 09:49:26 PM
Bread doesn't have the stomach for a goEMAW throw down with clams or SD, I'm certain of it.
Don't worry, he's a sock.  :D

[attachment deleted by admin]
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: star seed 7 on February 15, 2013, 09:50:18 PM
Clams is the last poster anyone should be afraid of, good grief.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Kat Kid on February 15, 2013, 10:35:14 PM
I wanted dlew and mir to fight and I get this crap?
Title: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: MakeItRain on February 15, 2013, 10:56:05 PM
FWIW, Jakesie, MIR absolutely took a shot at edn in a thread that edn hadn't posted in yet. Weird battle to fight.

[...] you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.

I didn't take a shot at anyone. Dlew used the hypothetical of calling Will a pussy. The two posters I named have called people pussies on this board, that's a fact. My point was that people who chose to use that word, almost always ironically BTW, shouldn't be lumped in with people who have a more effective way of making a point. As I said before, if you don't want to be characterized in that way you shouldn't call people pussies. Earlier in the week kougar said I can be unnecessarily mean at times, I can't get mad at that because I can be unnecessarily mean at times. This is all I have to say about this because I think it is amazingly stupid that it is detracting from JO's wonderful mother.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: MakeItRain on February 15, 2013, 10:58:39 PM
I wanted dlew and mir to fight and I get this crap?

Never. I love him.
Title: Re: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 8manpick on February 15, 2013, 11:11:54 PM
FWIW, Jakesie, MIR absolutely took a shot at edn in a thread that edn hadn't posted in yet. Weird battle to fight.

[...] you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.

I didn't take a shot at anyone. Dlew used the hypothetical of calling Will a pussy. The two posters I named have called people pussies on this board, that's a fact. My point was that people who chose to use that word, almost always ironically BTW, shouldn't be lumped in with people who have a more effective way of making a point. As I said before, if you don't want to be characterized in that way you shouldn't call people pussies. Earlier in the week kougar said I can be unnecessarily mean at times, I can't get mad at that because I can be unnecessarily mean at times. This is all I have to say about this because I think it is amazingly stupid that it is detracting from JO's wonderful mother.

Oh yeah I can definitely see how you didn't mean it as a shot but if anyone lumped me in with bw20 I would take it as shot, JMO.

#teamJOandMsCougar
Title: Re: Re: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ksupamplemousse on February 15, 2013, 11:13:56 PM
FWIW, Jakesie, MIR absolutely took a shot at edn in a thread that edn hadn't posted in yet. Weird battle to fight.

[...] you did essentially lump all of goEMAW into this group. If you are associating talking points from the MIcat and RDs of the board with those from the bigwillie and edns there really isn't a rational place to go from there.

I didn't take a shot at anyone. Dlew used the hypothetical of calling Will a pussy. The two posters I named have called people pussies on this board, that's a fact. My point was that people who chose to use that word, almost always ironically BTW, shouldn't be lumped in with people who have a more effective way of making a point. As I said before, if you don't want to be characterized in that way you shouldn't call people pussies. Earlier in the week kougar said I can be unnecessarily mean at times, I can't get mad at that because I can be unnecessarily mean at times. This is all I have to say about this because I think it is amazingly stupid that it is detracting from JO's wonderful mother.

Oh yeah I can definitely see how you didn't mean it as a shot but if anyone lumped me in with bw20 I would take it as shot, JMO.

#teamJOandMsCougar

 :drool:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: 0.42 on February 16, 2013, 12:11:02 AM
is this the warroom
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: bones129 on February 16, 2013, 12:15:03 AM
is this the warroom

Beginning to wonder.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: SwiftCat on February 16, 2013, 01:27:16 AM
What about that jtksu guy. He really boils my brains. Well actually, not so much anymore. I kinda like how he BBS's now.

 :D
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: GoodForAnother on February 16, 2013, 01:32:30 AM
is this the warroom

 :thumbs:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: DQ12 on February 16, 2013, 03:00:56 AM
I wanted dlew and mir to fight and I get this crap?

Never. I love him.
i really love MIR too.  i was looking for an oppy to say it earlier without it being totally weird and out of place, but i coudln't.  i bet i started and deleted 3 or 4 posts being like "hey just so everyone knows i really like MIR."  i'm glad i found an opportunity now.
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Skipper44 on February 16, 2013, 08:55:16 AM
What about that jtksu guy. He really boils my brains. Well actually, not so much anymore. I kinda like how he BBS's now.

 :D
have noticed this as well  :thumbs:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: PIPE on February 16, 2013, 09:05:53 AM
This thread got sidetracked......just a little :sdeek: :flush:
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: ChiComCat on February 16, 2013, 10:39:41 AM
MIR is a big teddy bear.  Really lovable
Title: Re: :sdeek:
Post by: Skipper44 on February 16, 2013, 11:26:05 AM
he only pi's because he cares?