goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: catzacker on October 22, 2012, 07:48:18 PM
-
So, halftime last year, KSU's sitting with 94 yards of total offense, though only down by 8 thanks to a pick 6 and baby lockett. Tech ends ups with 580yds of total offense (KSU 339). Tech's scoring defense ranked 117 last year (KSU's scoring offense ranked 34). Tech turned it over 3 times and had 2 FG's blocked.
This year, KSU's scoring D is 14th, Tech's is 34th. KSU and Tech are tied nationally for scoring offense @ 5.
Concerns? Thoughts? I am concerned because Tech seems patient enough on offense to dink and dunk down the field and we're more than willing to give them that and Tech's defense (even as crappy as they were last year) had some success early shutting down our run game.
-
If this season has taught me anything it's that last year's results are a great predictor of this year's.
-
Concerns?
Yes. But not based on your post.
-
If this season has taught me anything it's that last year's results are a great predictor of this year's.
i put in this year's stats too, dick.
-
Concerns?
Yes. But not based on your post.
Thanks for the feedback Jakesie60. Please elaborate on your concerns in this thread.
-
They are definitely the best team left on the schedule IMO. Glad we get them at home. Our D is more improved than theirs.
-
Their coach is gross looking.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
-
we are gonna sack their qb all doe long
-
We are going to buttfuck their faces.
-
Our o-line is far better this year....like way way way better. and if those losers try sitting back in zone coverage like they did against WVU, Collin's gonna penetrate them all game long. :gocho:...and they also gave up 53 points against toadaggies. not worried
-
we are gonna sack their qb all doe long
:lol:
-
Their coach is gross looking.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
after last year's game tubbs basically called snyder a simple-minded Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) and his football team a bunch of JV'ers.
"They don't do anything special," he said. "They took advantage of their opportunities and we didn't take advantage of ours. We had too many missed opportunities."
-
Here's an easy way to decide if our defense is better. Last season we had Skippy Chris Cosh, this season we have Steak House Hayes. Any questions. :billdance:
-
No one team on the entire planet can stop our offense.
-
We weren't nearly as polished last year. That was our second road game. Our defense was much worse against the pass. Tech is improved, but we're much more improved.
-
Tubberville doesn't make many adjustments after the season starts, let alone at half time. As the season wears on people figure out TT's scheme and start beating them. Snyder should have lots of TT game tape to dissect.
-
Tech does some nice things and has a solid defense. But I think turnovers and special teams could really hurt them in Manhattan. Unless the Cats suddenly decide to turn the ball over, I think we'll be fine.
-
i am as worried as a person could possibly be
-
Texas Tech sucks and the only team that they have played that is even close to our level kicked the crap out of them in their house. Not worried.
-
He is spinning it. At no time last year was he even remotely close to spinning it.
-
Tech does some nice things and has a solid defense. But I think turnovers and special teams could really hurt them in Manhattan. Unless the Cats suddenly decide to turn the ball over, I think we'll be fine.
1 key turnover could be the difference in this game, imo. i think they score at least 28 24 points.
edit: changed point prediction
-
Toads scored 53. 53 with their QB in rehab. Please.
-
another concern for me is that we've played worse at home the last 2 years than on the road. it seems like every big 12 team we've played at home the last 2 years has scored a TD on their opening drive.
edit: only baylor, ou, and ku have scored on their opening drives at BSFS
-
Tech does some nice things and has a solid defense. But I think turnovers and special teams could really hurt them in Manhattan. Unless the Cats suddenly decide to turn the ball over, I think we'll be fine.
1 key turnover could be the difference in this game, imo. i think they score at least 28 24 points.
edit: changed point prediction
So as long as we don't score 20 points less than our average we should be fine, IYO?
-
Their coach is gross looking.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
after last year's game tubbs basically called snyder a simple-minded respect and his football team a bunch of JV'ers.
"They don't do anything special," he said. "They took advantage of their opportunities and we didn't take advantage of ours. We had too many missed opportunities."
Evidence Tubbs is a simple-minded respect. Also if we play the entire game like the 2nd half in Lubbock we are going to Ass Fart their faces off.
-
I think there should be a thread dedicated to what we're going to do to their faces. I'm enjoying this.
-
Tech does some nice things and has a solid defense. But I think turnovers and special teams could really hurt them in Manhattan. Unless the Cats suddenly decide to turn the ball over, I think we'll be fine.
1 key turnover could be the difference in this game, imo. i think they score at least 28 24 points.
edit: changed point prediction
So as long as we don't score 20 points less than our average we should be fine, IYO?
WGAF how many points we average. We only scored 26 points against isu who has a worse defense than tech's. We scored 17 offensive points against OU. those are the only decent defenses we have faced this year.
-
predictScore["TexasTech", "KansasSt.", week]
{24, 54}
:dunno:
-
is there a worse poster on this site than kim carnes? :flush:
-
predictScore["TexasTech", "KansasSt.", week]
{24, 54}
:dunno:
:emawkid:
-
is there a worse poster on this site than kim carnes? :flush:
yes kougar24, for one
-
is there a worse poster on this site than kim carnes? :flush:
there are many
-
is there a worse poster on this site than kim carnes? :flush:
there are many
ok, you're right.
-
is there a worse poster on this site than kim carnes? :flush:
kim carnes has been an elite poster since Frank left.
-
is there a worse poster on this site than kim carnes? :flush:
kim carnes has been an elite poster since Frank left.
Win win.
-
Tech might pull a KU and slow us down...but we pull away in the second half. Daygee can scramble but he'd rather dump it...so force an early throw.
Calling for a pretty chilly day, btw. high of 50.
-
Texas Tech sucks and the only team that they have played that is even close to our level kicked the crap out of them in their house. Not worried.
Two words . . . Collin Klein . . . not worried. Dude is a winner.
-
is there a worse poster on this site than kim carnes? :flush:
yes kougar24, for one
You talking about exiled KStateFans Mod, Kougar24? :D
-
Texas Tech sucks and the only team that they have played that is even close to our level kicked the crap out of them in their house. Not worried.
Two words . . . Collin Klein . . . not worried. Dude is a winner.
:thumbs:
-
The only thing I'm worried about for Saturday is how many burpees I'm going to have to add to the end of my already elite workout to account for all of the mike & ikes and hot tamales I'll be pounding down. :emawkid:
-
Have we played at 230 yet this year? Can't remember
-
K-State is gonna roll. TTech is good, but not great. K-State is great and playing for its championship life. Figure it out, dudes.
-
we are gonna sack their qb all doe long
I love this.
-
Birth-pitt Tubberville keeps games close and losses them. When LHCBS gets in a close game, he wins.
-
predictScore["TexasTech", "KansasSt.", week]
{24, 54}
:dunno:
Hmm..Seems like my mind and your computers have a pretty similar opinion of the game.
-
Shut up with the "they allowed TCU to score 53!" talking point. Points in OT should not count.
-
we are gonna sack their qb all doe long
Aldo Raine?
-
Shut up with the "they allowed TCU to score 53!" talking point. Points in OT should not count.
They still gave up 36 in regulation. Plus they blew a 10 point lead in the 4th.
-
Shut up with the "they allowed TCU to score 53!" talking point. Points in OT should not count.
OK- They allowed TCU 36 points. How many points better is the Cats offense than the TCU offense. Thanks, i'll listen off air.
-
we are gonna sack their qb all doe long
oh man, this is good
-
Shut up with the "they allowed TCU to score 53!" talking point. Points in OT should not count.
They still gave up 36 in regulation. Plus they blew a 10 point lead in the 4th.
TCU did everything they could to lose this game and still had a chance to win it.
Threw 2 picks. (Tech had 0 TOs)
Gave up an onside kick.
Drove inside the Tech 30 four times and settled for FGs.
TCU ran for 184 yards and threw for 332 while outgaining Tech by 127 yards. Plus TCU had 111 return yards compared to 26 for Tech.
I will give Tech credit because they found a way to win, similar to what we did last year multiple times.
However, K-State does not seem like the type of team to lose these types of games. TCU showed that you can exploit Tech's defense, and with a RS FR QB at that. I simply don't see K-State making the high number of mistakes that TCU made to lose this game. I just don't see this Wildcat team doing that. So while I respect Tech and know tha they are a solid team, I do not fear them and I will say with confidence that K-State should win this game by 10-14 points.
-
we are gonna sack their qb all doe long
oh man, this is good
Agree. Good post.
No woe we lose this goeme.
-
Shut up with the "they allowed TCU to score 53!" talking point. Points in OT should not count.
They still gave up 36 in regulation. Plus they blew a 10 point lead in the 4th.
TCU did everything they could to lose this game and still had a chance to win it.
Threw 2 picks. (Tech had 0 TOs)
Gave up an onside kick.
Drove inside the Tech 30 four times and settled for FGs.
TCU ran for 184 yards and threw for 332 while outgaining Tech by 127 yards. Plus TCU had 111 return yards compared to 26 for Tech.
I will give Tech credit because they found a way to win, similar to what we did last year multiple times.
However, K-State does not seem like the type of team to lose these types of games. TCU showed that you can exploit Tech's defense, and with a RS FR QB at that. I simply don't see K-State making the high number of mistakes that TCU made to lose this game. I just don't see this Wildcat team doing that. So while I respect Tech and know tha they are a solid team, I do not fear them and I will say with confidence that K-State should win this game by 10-14 points.
:thumbs:
Tech already ripped my heart out once this season. I'll hate them so, so hard if they do it again.
-
we are gonna sack their qb all doe long
oh man, this is good
Agree. Good post.
No woe we lose this goeme.
:thumbs:
-
This game is going to be about like their game against OU. :zzz:
-
i'm more concerned with how we play than i am with how tech plays.
lot of attention this week, hope they are "in the zone" or whatevs
-
i'm more concerned with how we play than i am with how tech plays.
lot of attention this week, hope they are "in the zone" or whatevs
Autozone?
-
Shut up with the "they allowed TCU to score 53!" talking point. Points in OT should not count.
They still gave up 36 in regulation. Plus they blew a 10 point lead in the 4th.
TCU did everything they could to lose this game and still had a chance to win it.
Threw 2 picks. (Tech had 0 TOs)
Gave up an onside kick.
Drove inside the Tech 30 four times and settled for FGs.
TCU ran for 184 yards and threw for 332 while outgaining Tech by 127 yards. Plus TCU had 111 return yards compared to 26 for Tech.
I will give Tech credit because they found a way to win, similar to what we did last year multiple times.
However, K-State does not seem like the type of team to lose these types of games. TCU showed that you can exploit Tech's defense, and with a RS FR QB at that. I simply don't see K-State making the high number of mistakes that TCU made to lose this game. I just don't see this Wildcat team doing that. So while I respect Tech and know tha they are a solid team, I do not fear them and I will say with confidence that K-State should win this game by 10-14 points.
Good grief. Now, I am worried that TCU is our toughest game left. Ugh.
-
Good grief. Now, I am worried that TCU is our toughest game left. Ugh.
I'm inclined to agree with you. Tech is the best team, but TCU is probably the toughest game.
-
Good grief. Now, I am worried that TCU is our toughest game left. Ugh.
I'm inclined to agree with you. Tech is the best team, but TCU is probably the toughest game.
No way. I'll be at the TCU game. The Cats haven't lost a game I was in attendance since 1988.
-
Pro tip: Should we stay undefeated, each game will be the toughest game. TT is tough because they are the best team. OSU is tough because it’s sandwiched between TT and @ TCU. Baylor is tough because it’s a roadie and they have a fantastic offense. And Texas will be tough because if we are undefeated then, the amount of pressure will be so ridiculously immeasurable.
Sometimes I wonder if you people understand how hard it is to go undefeated.
-
baylor is a shittier wvu. lol at being scared of them.
-
Sometimes I wonder if you people understand how hard it is to go undefeated.
zacker, we already are undefeated. it was super easy.
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
At least we have last year's loss of the game (and conference title) to remember in that one. But yeah, I'm nervous about that game, primarily because Gundy's had Snyder's number ever since he came back.
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
At least we have last year's loss of the game (and conference title) to remember in that one. But yeah, I'm nervous about that game, primarily because Gundy's had Snyder's number ever since he came back.
yeah its almost like every time Snyder has faced him he has had some combo of a top 10 WR or starting NFL qb.....
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
depending on Lundt's status, they'll be playing with their 3rd string qb (and friend of OK_Cat). He's a chode, we win easily.
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
depending on Lundt's status, they'll be playing with their 3rd string qb (and friend of OK_Cat). He's a chode, we win easily.
The fact that you're friends with chodes doesn't surprise me in the least.
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
depending on Lundt's status, they'll be playing with their 3rd string qb (and friend of OK_Cat). He's a chode, we win easily.
The fact that you're friends with chodes doesn't surprise me in the least.
my chode friends = D1 football players
your chode friends = (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fphillyimprov.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fjuggalos.jpg&hash=294d41361f362f27898aebef9cd6d18906d42276)
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
At least we have last year's loss of the game (and conference title) to remember in that one. But yeah, I'm nervous about that game, primarily because Gundy's had Snyder's number ever since he came back.
yeah its almost like every time Snyder has faced him he has had some combo of a top 10 WR or starting NFL qb.....
tbh I have an irrational fear about every game we have left besides baylor because briles is a garbage x's and o's coach
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
depending on Lundt's status, they'll be playing with their 3rd string qb (and friend of OK_Cat). He's a chode, we win easily.
The fact that you're friends with chodes doesn't surprise me in the least.
my chode friends = D1 football players
your chode friends = (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fphillyimprov.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F07%2Fjuggalos.jpg&hash=294d41361f362f27898aebef9cd6d18906d42276)
Sad thing is, I don't actually know a single juggalo and never have. On the other hand, you feel the need to drop the name of a thrid string college qb who actually is a choad. :comeatme:
-
hmmmmm
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5556.0 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5556.0)
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5789.0 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5789.0)
-
Ok cat and osu need to get a room, good grief
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
depending on Lundt's status, they'll be playing with their 3rd string qb (and friend of OK_Cat). He's a chode, we win easily.
Talking about Chelf, right?
-
hmmmmm
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5556.0 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5556.0)
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5789.0 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5789.0)
Yep, that's where the jokes started from. Thanks for taking time out of your day to find that, I guess?
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
depending on Lundt's status, they'll be playing with their 3rd string qb (and friend of OK_Cat). He's a chode, we win easily.
Talking about Chelf, right?
yep. word is that lundt isn't anywhere near where he needs to be health-wise, but Gundy might pull the trigger regardless. but if not, clint is their starter. good dude, but not a great qb.
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
depending on Lundt's status, they'll be playing with their 3rd string qb (and friend of OK_Cat). He's a chode, we win easily.
Talking about Chelf, right?
yep. word is that lundt isn't anywhere near where he needs to be health-wise, but Gundy might pull the trigger regardless. but if not, clint is their starter. good dude, but not a great qb.
It would really hurt the image of our program to have to play against a coach who blatantly disregards the health and well-being of his players because of his win at all costs attitude
-
"We're playing at a high level right now, and we have an opportunity to continue that and be very successful and kind of shock the world a little bit."
I almost keep forgetting that we are everyones superbowl every single week.
-
OSU scares me the most. They aren't that great because they are incredibly inconsistent, but if they put together a nice game against us, they are going to be tough to beat.
depending on Lundt's status, they'll be playing with their 3rd string qb (and friend of OK_Cat). He's a chode, we win easily.
Talking about Chelf, right?
yep. word is that lundt isn't anywhere near where he needs to be health-wise, but Gundy might pull the trigger regardless. but if not, clint is their starter. good dude, but not a great qb.
It would really hurt the image of our program to have to play against a coach who blatantly disregards the health and well-being of his players because of his win at all costs attitude
walsh played 3 quarters with a broken leg last saturday. :horrorsurprise:
-
hmmmmm
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5556.0 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5556.0)
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5789.0 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=5789.0)
Yep, that's where the jokes started from. Thanks for taking time out of your day to find that, I guess?
No problem. It really didn't take that long to go to the combo-fanning board and type "juggalo" in the search box.
-
I think there should be a thread dedicated to what we're going to do to their faces. I'm enjoying this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=C8toZgypLrA#t=192s
-
I think there should be a thread dedicated to what we're going to do to their faces. I'm enjoying this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=C8toZgypLrA#t=192s
Their coach was a naked gym person. :surprised:
-
I think there should be a thread dedicated to what we're going to do to their faces. I'm enjoying this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=C8toZgypLrA#t=192s
Fact: 12 year old _33 had an extremely up close view of that play. Was standing at the railing at the bottom of the steps in between section 13 and 14.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7zMek00-wA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIUHeNV8KHI&feature=related
-
I love the TT band because they make every song sounds like it belongs in a western movie.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7zMek00-wA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIUHeNV8KHI&feature=related
God those are terrible, especially the first one.
:barf:
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7zMek00-wA
I got half way through that and suddenly realized it wasn't a Chevy truck commercial.
-
Speaking of things that concern you about Tech’s offense, I’m worried about their shotgun, RB offset, w/ four WR sets (3WR to one side, 1 WR to another). This usually pulls AB away from the LOS and leaves a gaping hole for the RB. All the guard and center have to do is handle the DT and it’s wide open, our ends are usually up the field.
-
Speaking of things that concern you about Tech’s offense, I’m worried about their shotgun, RB offset, w/ four WR sets (3WR to one side, 1 WR to another). This usually pulls AB away from the LOS and leaves a gaping hole for the RB. All the guard and center have to do is handle the DT and it’s wide open, our ends are usually up the field.
Valid concern, but I think we'll be prepared for the run.
First, Tech is a pretty balanced team, running the ball 43% of the time (WVU was the same) and we tend to adjust well. We will be ready to stop their run game. With spread teams and 4 wide sets you are going to have gaps on the snap, but if defenders read their keys well you generally can get people to the football. Plus, while balanced, Tech still is going to throw it more than they run it; I highly doubt they'd be willing to sustain an entire drive from the formation you suggest and just run the ball. They simply don't do that. Plus, we've made some adjustments in coverage to keep AB closer to the box, like moving TZ out on the #2 receiver in a trips formation.
Second, we adjust well. Tech's a solid running team at 4.7 YPC, but WVU was as well at 4.6. WVU had a 13 yard run on their first carry, but then didn't get another run more than 3 yards until they were behind 45-7. They finished the game at 3.3 YPC. OU has the best YPC in the league at 5.9 and we held them to 3.4 and their best rush was 13 yards. We haven't allowed an opponent more than 3.6 YPC for the game all season. Plus in 3 of their 4 Big 12 games Tech hasn't even reached 3.0 YPC.
We'll have to contain it, but I'm not fearful of Tech's running game. Getting them off rhythm with their quick passing game will be the key on defense and hopefully forcing 2-3 TOs.
-
What about Tubby being 6-2 against top 5 teams? :ohno:
-
Speaking of things that concern you about Tech’s offense, I’m worried about their shotgun, RB offset, w/ four WR sets (3WR to one side, 1 WR to another). This usually pulls AB away from the LOS and leaves a gaping hole for the RB. All the guard and center have to do is handle the DT and it’s wide open, our ends are usually up the field.
Valid concern, but I think we'll be prepared for the run.
First, Tech is a pretty balanced team, running the ball 43% of the time (WVU was the same) and we tend to adjust well. We will be ready to stop their run game. With spread teams and 4 wide sets you are going to have gaps on the snap, but if defenders read their keys well you generally can get people to the football. Plus, while balanced, Tech still is going to throw it more than they run it; I highly doubt they'd be willing to sustain an entire drive from the formation you suggest and just run the ball. They simply don't do that. Plus, we've made some adjustments in coverage to keep AB closer to the box, like moving TZ out on the #2 receiver in a trips formation.Second, we adjust well. Tech's a solid running team at 4.7 YPC, but WVU was as well at 4.6. WVU had a 13 yard run on their first carry, but then didn't get another run more than 3 yards until they were behind 45-7. They finished the game at 3.3 YPC. OU has the best YPC in the league at 5.9 and we held them to 3.4 and their best rush was 13 yards. We haven't allowed an opponent more than 3.6 YPC for the game all season. Plus in 3 of their 4 Big 12 games Tech hasn't even reached 3.0 YPC.
We'll have to contain it, but I'm not fearful of Tech's running game. Getting them off rhythm with their quick passing game will be the key on defense and hopefully forcing 2-3 TOs.
i've noticed that as well in the wvu game. what coverage are we in when ty lines up like that? Is it like cover 3 or somethng?
-
Techs run game got absolutely stonewalled against TCU outside of one 47 yard TD run.
-
Good grief. Now, I am worried that TCU is our toughest game left. Ugh.
I'm inclined to agree with you. Tech is the best team, but TCU is probably the toughest game.
No way. I'll be at the TCU game. The Cats haven't lost a game I was in attendance since 1988.
Why don't you attend more games then? You selfish bitch.
-
i've noticed that as well in the wvu game. what coverage are we in when ty lines up like that? Is it like cover 3 or somethng?
Most the time in man I think, but I'll have to go back and look. I'd guess we'll see it some against Tech. I think Tech has a better scheme in the passing game, but WVU had more dangerous receivers.
-
Hopefully jace amaro doesn't play
-
i've noticed that as well in the wvu game. what coverage are we in when ty lines up like that? Is it like cover 3 or somethng?
Most the time in man I think, but I'll have to go back and look. I'd guess we'll see it some against Tech. I think Tech has a better scheme in the passing game, but WVU had more dangerous receivers.
i saw it also.........it's man, with 1 safety covering the middle of the field.
-
Anyone with insider sources at Tech feel free to post whether or not Amaro will be able to play this weekend.
-
this seems to bode well for us
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGFIvgSoOjg&feature=player_detailpage#t=534s
-
OU seems to do more defensively than we do. Which was surprising because they didn’t do much against us (in terms of blitzing).
-
bad things happen when we try to do things on defense. (see: ISU)
-
Watched this game. It would have been close without the 3 INT's.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
-
predictScore["TexasTech", "KansasSt.", week]
{24, 54}
:dunno:
:dunno:
-
predictScore["TexasTech", "KansasSt.", week]
{24, 54}
:dunno:
:dunno:
You have transcended science into an art form
-
predictScore["TexasTech", "KansasSt.", week]
{24, 54}
:dunno:
:dunno:
fantastic. i need okie state numbers if you dont mind. betting the house
-
predictScore["TexasTech", "KansasSt.", week]
{24, 54}
:dunno:
:dunno:
:surprised: :surprised: :surprised:
-
Damn. I am basing all outcomes solely on the ORCHID from now on.
-
Sun, Dog's ass, etc.
-
What do you think 'zacker's investment portfolio looks like?
-
What do you think 'zacker's investment portfolio looks like?
bitcoin