goemaw.com

General Discussion => The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit => Topic started by: steve dave on March 01, 2012, 11:09:26 AM

Title: flow chart
Post by: steve dave on March 01, 2012, 11:09:26 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.gawkerassets.com%2Fimg%2F17expuso98r3ejpg%2Foriginal.jpg&hash=1b0777d79594394edbc24f457f859fa8f85df821)
Title: flow chart
Post by: puniraptor on March 01, 2012, 12:31:28 PM
I love flow charts
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 01, 2012, 12:51:34 PM
I liked the part about "regional environmental groups and community activists spending their limited operating budgets." AGW is a massive industry.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: Saulbadguy on March 01, 2012, 01:12:15 PM
I liked the part about "regional environmental groups and community activists spending their limited operating budgets." AGW is a massive industry.
link?
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 01, 2012, 01:23:22 PM
I enjoyed the "90% of the worlds scientist" agree that there is global warming. woof   :lol:
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 01, 2012, 01:31:56 PM
I liked the part about "regional environmental groups and community activists spending their limited operating budgets." AGW is a massive industry.
link?

Google Al Gore (https://www.google.com/search?q=how+much+does+al+gore+make%3F&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a)
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: Dave Wooderson on March 01, 2012, 01:37:42 PM
Some people can be so obtuse and anyone who believes the left side of this flowchart fits into this category.  This completely leaves out the flow chart where huge governments, with way more money than "Big Energy", which are seeking more power, spend billions in grants to scientists.  These grants are also awarded in a manner, through reoccurance, to influence an outcome that will increase power and control to the governments over the people and the economy.

But these obtuse people keep cheering, clueless that this will impact their economic and social freedom in a negative way.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: jmlynch1 on March 01, 2012, 02:22:09 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fboingboing.net%2Fimages%2Fpanflute-toothpaste-08.jpg&hash=6e61f18837727bbb7f53e33207175f570360312c)
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 01, 2012, 02:58:01 PM
I liked the part about "regional environmental groups and community activists spending their limited operating budgets." AGW is a massive industry.
link?

Sure, start here (https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=please+use+some+common+sense%2C+you+deluded+liberal&pbx=1&oq=please+use+some+common+sense%2C+you+deluded+liberal&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=3&gs_upl=3161l5419l6l5762l16l11l1l0l0l3l151l1212l3.8l12l0&gs_l=hp.3...3161l5419l6l5762l16l11l1l0l0l3l151l1212l3j8l12l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=5930fa7aacd757c2&biw=1600&bih=809).

Then read this (http://www.examiner.com/seminole-county-environmental-news-in-orlando/peddling-global-warming-fears-puts-big-money-pockets-of-climate-researchers).

Then finish up with a nice cup of this (http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/52141).

Quote
Global warmers $600 million, skeptics $4.4 million
February 27, 2012 by Don Surber

Among the many, many myths of the crackpot global warming theory is that there is this huge cartel of carbon companies which is financing studies that debunk global warming, reminiscent of tobacco company-funded research in the 1950s. The truth is, global warming is where the money is. Not only are governments pouring millions into grants to “prove” global warming — after all, higher taxes is the only “solution” ever offered — but liberal organizations are pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into this.

The folks at EU Referendum did the math. The Heartland Institute has an annual budget of $4.4 million. Recently Peter Gleick, a global warming hero, cyber-attacked Heartland in an attempt to discredit Heartland. What they cannot prove with science, they make up for in attacks and bullying. But Heartland’s budget is puny.

From EU Referendum:

The Climate Works Foundation, though, is of special interest as it was in 2008, awarded $460,800,000 from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, a grant-making organization with assets of $7.2 billion, which disbursed $353,400,000 in grants in 2011. It has made another grant to Climate Works only last week of $100 million -– bringing the total grants to this organization to just short of $600 million.

Where such huge funding is devoted to global warming advocacy, and policy development, there must indeed be a distortion of the democratic process, especially where politicians are also being paid. These organizations must come clean about the sources of their money, and provide exact details of how much is paid to which organizations, for what purposes.

Skeptics are overwhelmed by proponents. Skeptics have only science to offer — not fairy tales about Big Carbon being the new Big Tobacco.

From Richard Siegmund Lindzen, 72, an atmospheric physicist at MIT:

Our recent work on the early faint sun may prove particularly important. 2.5 billion years ago, when the sun was 20% less bright (compared to the 2% change in the radiative budget associated with doubling CO2), evidence suggests that the oceans were unfrozen and the temperature was not very different from today’s. No greenhouse gas solution has worked, but a negative cloud feedback does. You now have some idea of why I think that there won’t be much warming due to CO2, and without significant global warming, it is impossible to tie catastrophes to such warming. Even with significant warming it would have been extremely difficult to make this connection.

Perhaps we should stop accepting the term, ‘skeptic.’ Skepticism implies doubts about a plausible proposition. Current global warming alarm hardly represents a plausible proposition. Twenty years of repetition and escalation of claims does not make it more plausible. Quite the contrary, the failure to improve the case over 20 years makes the case even less plausible as does the evidence from climategate and other instances of overt cheating. In the meantime, while I avoid making forecasts for tenths of a degree change in globally averaged temperature anomaly, I am quite willing to state that unprecedented climate catastrophes are not on the horizon though in several thousand years we may return to an ice age

The bad guys always seem to outnumber us — at the beginning.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 01, 2012, 04:06:44 PM
I enjoyed the "90% of the worlds scientist" agree that there is global warming. woof   :lol:

is it really 99%??   :dunno:
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 01, 2012, 06:25:28 PM
UH OH, looks like we are headed for another mini ice age like in the '70s.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.drroyspencer.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FUAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2012.png&hash=40e67331a9ab39881f218da5523c2a938fce5e03)
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: steve dave on March 01, 2012, 07:28:12 PM
I'm not 100% certain you are aware of this but it's hot as hell right now and we are having tornados like a mother rough rider. 
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: p1k3 on March 01, 2012, 08:37:49 PM
I agree oil companies are completely out of control and have too much influence, but all the global warming stuff is a farce for "green" technology which isnt economically feasible and no one wants. Dumb world we live in.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 01, 2012, 08:52:30 PM
I'm not 100% certain you are aware of this but it's hot as hell right now and we are having tornados like a mother rough rider.

Case closed, folks. It's well known that the weather of the continental US is perfectly representative of global climate. Case. Closed.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: OK_Cat on March 01, 2012, 10:35:27 PM
I'm not 100% certain you are aware of this but it's hot as hell right now and we are having tornados like a mother rough rider.

Case closed, folks. It's well known that the weather of the continental US is perfectly representative of global climate. Case. Closed.

how many times did it snow outside my house this winter?  Zero.  Normally at least 5 solid storms.

Oh yeah, it was rough ridin' 80 today.

score one for the good guys.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 01, 2012, 11:03:11 PM
Yes, I really think you're on to something. You should be a scientist.

Or you could just read this article (http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan/27/science/la-sci-hot-weather-20120128), or any number like it that are easily Googled, explaining the effect of La Nina this year. So, so stupid.

Also, this article (http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/01/11/this-winters-weirdly-warm-weather-explained/) provides a clearer explanation, but its from Fox News, so I know you won't trust it.
Title: flow chart
Post by: felix rex on March 01, 2012, 11:31:25 PM
Stevedave, I liked your chart.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 02, 2012, 10:10:47 AM
I'm not 100% certain you are aware of this but it's hot as hell right now and we are having tornados like a mother rough rider.

Case closed, folks. It's well known that the weather of the continental US is perfectly representative of global climate. Case. Closed.

how many times did it snow outside my house this winter?  Zero.  Normally at least 5 solid storms.

Oh yeah, it was rough ridin' 80 today.

score one for the good guys.

It's snowing now. I guess this disproved global warming? The liberal thought process is too funny.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: OK_Cat on March 02, 2012, 10:15:25 AM
I'm not 100% certain you are aware of this but it's hot as hell right now and we are having tornados like a mother rough rider.

Case closed, folks. It's well known that the weather of the continental US is perfectly representative of global climate. Case. Closed.

how many times did it snow outside my house this winter?  Zero.  Normally at least 5 solid storms.

Oh yeah, it was rough ridin' 80 today.

score one for the good guys.

It's snowing now. I guess this disproved global warming? The liberal thought process is too funny.

it's not snowing where i am.  in fact, it's like 60 something right now.  so my point still stands.

me - 1

dumbass hick - 0
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2012, 10:16:59 AM
it's not snowing in Omaha and we usually have, like, 75 feet of snow on the ground now.  I bet the ocean is a huge warm bath of dead polar bears right now. 
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: OK_Cat on March 02, 2012, 10:19:36 AM
dumbass hicks -

ever see happy feet?

the little guy isn't happy anymore.  not even close.  not even close.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: Brock Landers on March 02, 2012, 10:22:01 AM
Still amazed at people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate.  This goes for people on both sides of this issue BTW.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 02, 2012, 10:23:58 AM
Ok, you guys got me. I should have known you were joking. Nobody, not even a lib, could possibly be stupid enough to believe our current warm winter is proof of AGW. Good one!
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: OK_Cat on March 02, 2012, 10:27:53 AM
Ok, you guys got me. I should have known you were joking. Nobody, not even a lib, could possibly be stupid enough to believe our current warm winter is proof of AGW. Good one!

it's jesus
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 02, 2012, 11:04:43 AM
Ok, you guys got me. I should have known you were joking. Nobody, not even a lib, could possibly be stupid enough to believe our current warm winter is proof of AGW. Good one!

it's jesus

Please capitalize the name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. That kind of disrespect is liable to get you killed by some crazy Christian extremist.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: bubbles4ksu on March 02, 2012, 11:12:30 AM
Ok, you guys got me. I should have known you were joking. Nobody, not even a lib, could possibly be stupid enough to believe our current warm winter is proof of AGW. Good one!

it's jesus

Please capitalize the name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. That kind of disrespect is liable to get you killed by some crazy Christian extremist.

 :users:
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: LickNeckey on March 02, 2012, 11:39:50 AM
Ok, you guys got me. I should have known you were joking. Nobody, not even a lib, could possibly be stupid enough to believe our current warm winter is proof of AGW. Good one!

it's jesus

Please capitalize the name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. That kind of disrespect is liable to get you killed by some crazy Christian extremist.

 :users:

Poet Warrior doesn't seem to read the Dome so he should be safe.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 02, 2012, 01:43:03 PM
Still amazed at people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate.  This goes for people on both sides of this issue BTW.

I found shark's teeth by Scott City. I bet the climate was really different when sharks were in Kansas. I wonder who changed it?
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: p1k3 on March 02, 2012, 02:51:05 PM
Still amazed at people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate.  This goes for people on both sides of this issue BTW.

I found shark's teeth by Scott City. I bet the climate was really different when sharks were in Kansas. I wonder who changed it?

Greedy corporations changed it
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2012, 02:52:59 PM
Still amazed at people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate.  This goes for people on both sides of this issue BTW.

I found shark's teeth by Scott City. I bet the climate was really different when sharks were in Kansas. I wonder who changed it?

noah and the flood that covered the earth, like, 7 thousand years ago
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 02, 2012, 03:02:49 PM
Still amazed at people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate.  This goes for people on both sides of this issue BTW.

I found shark's teeth by Scott City. I bet the climate was really different when sharks were in Kansas. I wonder who changed it?

noah and the flood that covered the earth, like, 7 thousand years ago

But who was responsible for changing the climate and how did they fix it???!?!?!?  :runaway:
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2012, 03:04:35 PM
Still amazed at people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate.  This goes for people on both sides of this issue BTW.

I found shark's teeth by Scott City. I bet the climate was really different when sharks were in Kansas. I wonder who changed it?

noah and the flood that covered the earth, like, 7 thousand years ago

But who was responsible for changing the climate and how did they fix it???!?!?!?  :runaway:

read the bible dickhole, the climate has always been the same.

also, global warming is whipping ass across the south again today  :sdeek:
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: ben ji on March 02, 2012, 03:05:11 PM
Last time I checked people loved the crap out of summer. I would gladly sacrifice the maldives if it meant an extra 1-2 months of lake houses, float trips, grilling, girls in bikini's, and everything else mentioned in the stuff white midwesterners like.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: Brock Landers on March 02, 2012, 03:06:41 PM
Still amazed at people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate.  This goes for people on both sides of this issue BTW.

I found shark's teeth by Scott City. I bet the climate was really different when sharks were in Kansas. I wonder who changed it?

noah and the flood that covered the earth, like, 7 thousand years ago

But who was responsible for changing the climate and how did they fix it???!?!?!?  :runaway:


How do you know it wasn't land sharks?  Like dinosaur versions of a mudskipper? 
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on March 02, 2012, 03:39:57 PM
Still amazed at people who don't understand the difference between weather and climate.  This goes for people on both sides of this issue BTW.

I found shark's teeth by Scott City. I bet the climate was really different when sharks were in Kansas. I wonder who changed it?

noah and the flood that covered the earth, like, 7 thousand years ago

But who was responsible for changing the climate and how did they fix it???!?!?!?  :runaway:

read the bible dickhole, the climate has always been the same.

also, global warming is whipping ass across the south again today  :sdeek:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncdc.noaa.gov%2Fimg%2Fclimate%2Fresearch%2Ftornado%2Ftornadotrend.jpg&hash=bcb438eee436114172b3569984ed11668d060e6f)
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: Dugout DickStone on March 02, 2012, 03:49:01 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46594944/ns/us_news-environment/#.T1FEGHnCaSo
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 02, 2012, 03:49:45 PM
Pffft, facts. AGW is real, damnit. It was warm todayyesterday.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: star seed 7 on March 02, 2012, 04:56:36 PM
Pffft, facts. AGW is real, damnit. It was warm todayyesterday.

Im sure you were ranting last winter when it snowed at lot and the major republican talking point was that snow disproved global warming.  Those had to be some all-time great rants...  right?
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on March 02, 2012, 05:58:18 PM
Pffft, facts. AGW is real, damnit. It was warm todayyesterday.

Im sure you were ranting last winter when it snowed at lot and the major republican talking point was that snow disproved global warming.  Those had to be some all-time great rants...  right?

Nope. I'm not stupid enough to believe that, because I'm not a lib. It's just fun to mock the libs when it's super cold because they claim global warming anytime it is warm.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2012, 06:02:59 PM
good grief you guys
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: steve dave on March 02, 2012, 10:24:56 PM
You dolts

who specifically are you referring to here dax....
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: sonofdaxjones on March 02, 2012, 10:26:11 PM
It's a term of endearment.
Title: Re: flow chart
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on March 03, 2012, 12:20:43 PM
Big Energy controls "green energy" patents, sits on loads of cash to buy up "green energy" technology . . . they even control all matter of patents on "green energy" trading systems.   They stand to make huge profits both coming and going. 

So, one school of thought is that at least one side of Big Oil/Big Energy is all for AGP . . . because they know as the pace increases to wean us off oil, oil production will be limited, but it will still be needed, and the price will skyrocket.   Then they're all set up and ready to go on the backside.

You dolts act like there's a bunch of derp-derps running those companies just waiting on the last gusher and for the government to come turn out the lights.

It's hilarious that they don't see this.  Such puppets.

Nice use of dolt, one of my favs.