goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2012, 11:39:50 AM

Title: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2012, 11:39:50 AM: I repeat, this is NOT an unknown blog guy citing a "friend" who "works in the TV industry".

So keep that in mind, it's ONLY the Wall Street Journal.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203462304577138611484143588.html#project%3DCOUNT010520120105
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2012, 11:43:58 AM: You sir, are no unnammed "tv insider" . . . Ryan Brewer, an assistant professor of finance at Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: bws on February 09, 2012, 11:44:45 AM: Surprised KU is up so high, figured they would be around 100.

Nice to see Louisville up there.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: SdK on February 09, 2012, 11:44:48 AM: 110 millon dollar disparity?

Also: I feel like we've played every team on the third page under Snyder.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 09, 2012, 11:48:19 AM: 5th in the Big 12. Hopefully we can pass Tech after our stadium expansion.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: Panjandrum on February 09, 2012, 11:51:39 AM: Quote from: Nuts Kicked on February 09, 2012, 11:48:19 AM
5th in the Big 12. Hopefully we can pass Tech after our stadium expansion.

Yeah, my thoughts, too.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wabash909 on February 09, 2012, 11:54:07 AM: Surprised Missouri was as low as they were, in all honesty. That's an interesting list.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on February 09, 2012, 12:05:23 PM: Minnesota is pretty high for being one of the worst programs in college football right now.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2012, 12:12:50 PM: Well, I feel as though I must remind each of you that this was published in the Wall Street Journal, so please have your salt shakers at the ready. That is no obscure blog citing unnamed "tv insiders" by any stretch.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2012, 12:28:44 PM: :love:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: yachtbroker on February 09, 2012, 12:49:05 PM: Quote from: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2012, 12:12:50 PM
Well, I feel as though I must remind each of you that this was published in the Wall Street Journal, so please have your salt shakers at the ready. That is no obscure blog citing unnamed "tv insiders" by any stretch.

Ryan M. Brewer, Ph.D.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iupuc.edu%2Fbusiness%2Fimages%2Fbrewerweb.jpg&hash=1bea00fffdd8b12935cad7bbf0ea31b31d88453d)

:love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wabash909 on February 09, 2012, 12:50:54 PM: :kstategrad:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: LickNeckey on February 09, 2012, 12:56:18 PM: Ryan Brewer, an assistant professor of finance at Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus, calculated the intrinsic valuations for 115 of the 120 teams in the Football Bowl Subdivision (excluding Air Force, Navy, Tulane, Tulsa and Wake Forest).

Thank You OB :kstategrad:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wes mantooth on February 09, 2012, 12:56:46 PM: These threads are what i love most about Dax :love:

:love:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: MadCat on February 09, 2012, 01:00:17 PM: New Big 12:
1 Texas $805.1
10 Oklahoma $470.2
25 Oklahoma State $206.9
28 Texas Tech $160.9
31 Kansas State $153.4
36 West Virginia $132.7
47 Iowa State $112.8
60 Texas Christian $67.4
67 Baylor $51.7
74 Kansas $40.0
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: CatsNShocks on February 09, 2012, 01:27:03 PM: Ouch at KU being the lowest of any AQ conference school.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: CatsNShocks on February 09, 2012, 01:36:25 PM: Quote
CopterHawk
Frosh
Rating: 3.6/5 this site
1330 posts this site
Posted: Today 12:32 PM
RE: WSJ: Football program valuations
Clearly he is valuing the programs solely on the basis of recent earnings and not taking into account potential earnings. There are a bunch of BCS programs that have way less earning potential than KU.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: Panjandrum on February 09, 2012, 01:48:21 PM: Quote from: CatsNShocks on February 09, 2012, 01:36:25 PM
Quote
CopterHawk
Frosh
Rating: 3.6/5 this site
1330 posts this site
Posted: Today 12:32 PM
RE: WSJ: Football program valuations
Clearly he is valuing the programs solely on the basis of recent earnings and not taking into account potential earnings. There are a bunch of BCS programs that have way less earning potential than KU.

Clearly.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wes mantooth on February 09, 2012, 01:53:45 PM: Quote from: CatsNShocks on February 09, 2012, 01:36:25 PM
Quote
CopterHawk
Frosh
Rating: 3.6/5 this site
1330 posts this site
Posted: Today 12:32 PM
RE: WSJ: Football program valuations
Clearly he is valuing the programs solely on the basis of recent earnings and not taking into account potential earnings. There are a bunch of BCS programs that have way less earning potential than KU.

WE HAVE POTENTIAL!
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 09, 2012, 01:53:56 PM: Is Indiana really 3 times more valuable than KU?
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wes mantooth on February 09, 2012, 01:57:04 PM: Quote from: Nuts Kicked on February 09, 2012, 01:53:56 PM
Is Indiana really 3 times more valuable than KU?

Maybe factors in stadiums? KU's stadium can't be worth more than 80k?
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: AbeFroman on February 09, 2012, 02:14:31 PM: Quote from: CatsNShocks on February 09, 2012, 01:36:25 PM
Quote
CopterHawk
Frosh
Rating: 3.6/5 this site
1330 posts this site
Posted: Today 12:32 PM
RE: WSJ: Football program valuations
Clearly he is valuing the programs solely on the basis of recent earnings and not taking into account potential earnings. There are a bunch of BCS programs that have way less earning potential than KU.

Just amazing. :D
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: MadCat on February 09, 2012, 02:16:42 PM: Earning potential banner :kugoalposts:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2012, 03:01:07 PM: I like how, with the exception of 9 SEC schools, KSU is more valuable than every single SEC school.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wes mantooth on February 09, 2012, 03:19:03 PM: Quote from: CNS Casey on February 09, 2012, 03:01:07 PM
I like how, with the exception of 9 SEC schools, KSU is more valuable than every single SEC school.

:gocho:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2012, 03:38:42 PM: Quote from: CNS Casey on February 09, 2012, 03:01:07 PM
I like how, with the exception of 9 SEC schools, KSU is more valuable than every single SEC school.

It's fantastic isn't it?

Dang :kstategrad:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wazucat on February 09, 2012, 03:40:29 PM: Iowa State ? 2 x more than KU :dunno:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wazucat on February 09, 2012, 03:50:33 PM: Kentucky football, must be the SEC neighborhood raising the property values.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2012, 03:53:45 PM: Quote from: wazucat on February 09, 2012, 03:50:33 PM
Kentucky football, must be the SEC neighborhood raising the property values.

Kentucky pretty much fills up their 60,000 plus seat stadium. Not a surprising number at all.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wes mantooth on February 09, 2012, 03:54:02 PM: This thread has quickly become my 2nd favorite thread after the BSFS expansion/renderings thread (which hasn't been updated in forever :embarrassed:).
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2012, 03:59:02 PM: I am ashamed for the PAC12.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wes mantooth on February 09, 2012, 04:04:41 PM: Quote from: CNS Casey on February 09, 2012, 03:59:02 PM
I am ashamed for the PAC12.

you shouldn't be, they are just awful. maybe the pac 12 plane to lawrence was real :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: ben_dover919 on February 09, 2012, 04:26:03 PM: Just think when we sell our ownership stake of Texas. :kstategrad:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: bigwilliestyle1407 on February 09, 2012, 04:45:01 PM: Kinda feel like buy Arky St, just for the Scottie Pippin name rights...... that and it's cheap..... :kstategrad:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: Dave Wooderson on February 10, 2012, 02:03:05 PM: Major Conference Worth after re-alignment in Billions:

SEC = $4,717.9
Big 10 = $3,474.6
Big 12 = $2,201.1
Pac 12 = $1,769.5
ACC = $1,529.4
Big East = $658.3

Not worried about a stable conference after looking at those numbers. I love Texas! :emawkid:
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: wabash909 on February 10, 2012, 02:42:24 PM: Quote from: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2012, 03:53:45 PM
Quote from: wazucat on February 09, 2012, 03:50:33 PM
Kentucky football, must be the SEC neighborhood raising the property values.

Kentucky pretty much fills up their 60,000 plus seat stadium. Not a surprising number at all.

Kentucky is a great indicator of just how irrelevant Missouri football is about to become.
Title: Re: Disclaimer: This is only the Wall Street Journal . . . this is not . . .
Post by: Deez Nutz on February 10, 2012, 04:52:25 PM: Quote from: Dave Wooderson on February 10, 2012, 02:03:05 PM
Major Conference Worth after re-alignment in Billions:

SEC = $4,717.9
Big 10 = $3,474.6
Big 12 = $2,201.1
Pac 12 = $1,769.5
ACC = $1,529.4
Big East = $658.3

Not worried about a stable conference after looking at those numbers. I love Texas! :emawkid:

Umm, I think you mean in millions. If that is in billions, then you are saying the SEC football teams are worth $4.7 trillion. If those numbers were in billions, you could add up the value of every AQ school and still not be as high as our $15 trillion national debt. :frown: