goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: AbeFroman on November 20, 2011, 07:21:11 PM

Title: 11
Post by: AbeFroman on November 20, 2011, 07:21:11 PM
 :lynchmob:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: TheHamburglar on November 20, 2011, 07:21:42 PM
ESPN blowing #15 Michigan right now...
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Stevesie60 on November 20, 2011, 07:22:27 PM
Will take.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: wetwillie on November 20, 2011, 07:24:00 PM
The animal is licking his rough ridin' chops for what he can do with a top ten cats team.  If we take care of biznass against flood u and OU beats OSU we can't be denied.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: AbeFroman on November 20, 2011, 07:24:35 PM
Could still use some help, Houston losing to Tulsa or in the ConUSA Champ game, anyone else in the 5-10 range losing again, but BCS is very real.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: kslim on November 20, 2011, 07:32:54 PM
Could still use some help, Houston losing to Tulsa or in the ConUSA Champ game, anyone else in the 5-10 range losing again, but BCS is very real.

#1 plays #6
#4 plays #9
houston plays tulsa
bama plays auburn

we will be #7 and not even have to play next week

ftb go cats  :lynchmob:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: kstater on November 20, 2011, 07:34:22 PM
Computers absolutely in love with the Cats.  Avg of 5th.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: AbeFroman on November 20, 2011, 07:44:02 PM
Computers absolutely in love with the Cats.  Avg of 5th.

Computers love the Big 12 in general. The machines know.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Panjandrum on November 20, 2011, 07:54:29 PM
Could still use some help, Houston losing to Tulsa or in the ConUSA Champ game, anyone else in the 5-10 range losing again, but BCS is very real.

#1 plays #6
#4 plays #9
houston plays tulsa
bama plays auburn

we will be #7 and not even have to play next week

ftb go cats  :lynchmob:


Houston plays at Tulsa and they will face Southern Miss in the C-USA title game.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Coley on November 20, 2011, 08:00:41 PM
Fowler said we were in firm position for a BCS bowl game.  :dunno:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: bigwilliestyle1407 on November 20, 2011, 08:03:13 PM
Would be all sorts of  :love: to finish the season in the top 10 with a bcs bowl win....... :excited:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Bookcat on November 20, 2011, 10:01:49 PM
So what is the rule for auto at-larges invites? Ranked in the BCS Top 5?
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 20, 2011, 10:07:06 PM
So what is the rule for auto at-larges invites? Ranked in the BCS Top 5?

Win your conference and be ranked in the top 16.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: The Minister on November 20, 2011, 10:29:42 PM
So what is the rule for auto at-larges invites? Ranked in the BCS Top 5?

Automatic qualification
1.   The top two teams in the final BCS Standings shall play in the National Championship Game.

2.   The champions of the Atlantic Coast, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, and Southeastern conferences will have automatic berths in one of the participating bowls through the 2013 regular season.

3.   The champion of Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, or the Western Athletic Conference will earn an automatic berth in a BCS bowl game if either:

  A.   Such team is ranked in the top 12 of the final BCS Standings, or,
  B. Such team is ranked in the top 16 of the final BCS Standings and its ranking in the final BCS Standings is higher than that of a champion of a conference that has an annual automatic berth in one of the BCS bowls.

No more than one such team from Conference USA, the Mid-American Conference, the Mountain West Conference, the Sun Belt Conference, and the Western Athletic Conference shall earn an automatic berth in any year. (Note: a second team may be eligible for at-large eligibility as noted below.) If two or more teams from those conferences satisfy the provisions for an automatic berth, then the team with the highest finish in the final BCS Standings will receive the automatic berth, and the remaining team or teams will be considered for at-large selection if it meets the criteria.

4.   Notre Dame will have an automatic berth if it is in the top eight of the final BCS Standings.

5.   If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 4, and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 3 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier, provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.

6.   If any of the 10 slots remain open after application of provisions 1 through 5, and if no team qualifies under paragraph No. 5 and an at-large team from a conference with an annual automatic berth for its champion is ranked No. 4 in the final BCS Standings, that team will become an automatic qualifier provided that no at-large team from the same conference qualifies for the national championship game.


At-large eligibility
If there are fewer than 10 automatic qualifiers, then the bowls will select at-large participants to fill the remaining berths. An at-large team is any Football Bowl Subdivision team that is bowl-eligible and meets the following requirements:

  A.   Has won at least nine regular-season games, and
  B.   Is among the top 14 teams in the final BCS Standings.

No more than two teams from a conference may be selected, regardless of whether they are automatic qualifiers or at-large selections, unless two non-champions from the same conference are ranked No. 1 and No. 2 in the final BCS Standings.

If fewer than 10 teams are eligible for selection, then the Bowls can select as an at-large team any Football Bowl Subdivision team that is bowl-eligible, has won at least nine regular-season games and is among the top 18 teams in the final BCS Standings subject to the two-team limit noted above and also subject to the following: (1) if any conference has two or more teams in the top 14, then two of those teams must be selected and (2) from the teams ranked 15-18, a bowl can select only a team from a conference that has fewer than two teams in the top 14.

If expansion of the pool to 18 teams does not result in 10 teams eligible for selection, then the pool shall be expanded by blocks of 4 teams until 10 eligible teams are available subject to the two-team limit noted above and also subject to the following: (1) if any conference has two or more teams in the top 14, then two of those teams must be selected and (2) from the teams ranked 15 or lower, a bowl can select only a team from a conference that has fewer than two teams in the top 14.

Relative to the two preceding paragraphs, all teams ranked in the top 14, other than those from conferences which have already had two teams selected, must be included in the bowl selections.

Note: in order to participate in a BCS Bowl game, a team (i) must be eligible for post-season play under the rules of the NCAA and, if it not an independent, under the rules of its conference and (ii) must not have imposed sanctions upon itself prohibiting participation in a post-season game for infractions of the rules of the NCAA or the rules of its conference.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: 06wildcat on November 20, 2011, 11:02:48 PM
Anyone know what type of bonus Snyds would get for finishing in the top 10?
Title: Re: 11
Post by: DQ12 on November 20, 2011, 11:16:04 PM
We're criminally under-respected.

Us against the world, I guess.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Panjandrum on November 20, 2011, 11:31:14 PM
We're criminally under-respected.

Us against the world, I guess.

There's a lot of football left to be played for teams in the Top 15, while we only have one game left on the calendar.

There are conference championship games to be played.  Va Tech has @UVA and the ACC Champ game (if they beat UVA).  Michigan has Ohio State (It's still a rivalry game...).  LSU has Arkansas.  Bama has Auburn.  Stanford probably has to play USC again in the Pac-12 championship, and that's after a home game against Notre Dame.

I mean, there's still a chance for a lot of movement.  All we have to do is beat Iowa State after a bye week.  That's not to say we won't lose, but I mean, the odds are in our favor.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: DQ12 on November 20, 2011, 11:36:18 PM
We're criminally under-respected.

Us against the world, I guess.

There's a lot of football left to be played for teams in the Top 15, while we only have one game left on the calendar.

There are conference championship games to be played.  Va Tech has @UVA and the ACC Champ game (if they beat UVA).  Michigan has Ohio State (It's still a rivalry game...).  LSU has Arkansas.  Bama has Auburn.  Stanford probably has to play USC again in the Pac-12 championship, and that's after a home game against Notre Dame.

I mean, there's still a chance for a lot of movement.  All we have to do is beat Iowa State after a bye week.  That's not to say we won't lose, but I mean, the odds are in our favor.
I'm not disagreeing with anything you said, but at this juncture, with the schedule we've played, there's no reason we shouldn't be in everybody's top 10.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Panjandrum on November 20, 2011, 11:43:49 PM
We're criminally under-respected.

Us against the world, I guess.

There's a lot of football left to be played for teams in the Top 15, while we only have one game left on the calendar.

There are conference championship games to be played.  Va Tech has @UVA and the ACC Champ game (if they beat UVA).  Michigan has Ohio State (It's still a rivalry game...).  LSU has Arkansas.  Bama has Auburn.  Stanford probably has to play USC again in the Pac-12 championship, and that's after a home game against Notre Dame.

I mean, there's still a chance for a lot of movement.  All we have to do is beat Iowa State after a bye week.  That's not to say we won't lose, but I mean, the odds are in our favor.
I'm not disagreeing with anything you said, but at this juncture, with the schedule we've played, there's no reason we shouldn't be in everybody's top 10.

Eh, maybe.  But there's a very, very good chance we'll end up in the BCS Top Ten by the end of the next two weeks should we beat ISU.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Perry on November 21, 2011, 12:16:53 AM
We're criminally under-respected.

Us against the world, I guess.

There's a lot of football left to be played for teams in the Top 15, while we only have one game left on the calendar.

There are conference championship games to be played.  Va Tech has @UVA and the ACC Champ game (if they beat UVA).  Michigan has Ohio State (It's still a rivalry game...).  LSU has Arkansas.  Bama has Auburn.  Stanford probably has to play USC again in the Pac-12 championship, and that's after a home game against Notre Dame.

I mean, there's still a chance for a lot of movement.  All we have to do is beat Iowa State after a bye week.  That's not to say we won't lose, but I mean, the odds are in our favor.

I believe the CCG is included in USC's postseason ban
Title: Re: 11
Post by: felix rex on November 21, 2011, 12:20:48 AM
All we have to do is beat Iowa State after a bye week.  That's not to say we won't lose, but I mean, the odds are in our favor.

Oh man I am so nervous about this. Gonna be VERY jumpy during this game. Lots of "they didn't convert but only b/c they dropped an open pass we're gonna lose if we don't adjust" type stuff.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Shacks on November 21, 2011, 03:14:27 AM
We're criminally under-respected.

Us against the world, I guess.

There's a lot of football left to be played for teams in the Top 15, while we only have one game left on the calendar.

There are conference championship games to be played.  Va Tech has @UVA and the ACC Champ game (if they beat UVA).  Michigan has Ohio State (It's still a rivalry game...).  LSU has Arkansas.  Bama has Auburn.  Stanford probably has to play USC again in the Pac-12 championship, and that's after a home game against Notre Dame.

I mean, there's still a chance for a lot of movement.  All we have to do is beat Iowa State after a bye week.  That's not to say we won't lose, but I mean, the odds are in our favor.

I believe the CCG is included in USC's postseason ban

You are correct.  The Pac 12 North Champion will be Oregon if they beat Oregon State this weekend.  If the Beavers shock the Ducks, Stanford wins the North.  There are all sorts of crazy tiebreakers to determine what also-ran from the South will play in the Pac 12 CCG due to USC being ineligible.  ASU, UCLA and Utah are all in it, but I can't remember what scenarios lead to what teams winning the South.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 21, 2011, 09:12:48 AM
Eh, maybe.  But there's a very, very good chance we'll end up in the BCS Top Ten by the end of the next two weeks should we beat ISU.

I agree there's a very good chance we finish in the Top 10. Unfortunately, whether we finish 9, 10, or 11 is pretty irrelevant to our chances of a BCS invite. KSU needs to win, OU needs to lose, and I think one of the following also has to happen: Michigan loses at home to Ohio State, Oregon loses at home to Oregon State, or Houston loses at Tulsa and loses its championship game to Southern Miss.

But everybody I'm hearing on the radio seems to think the Cotton Bowl is all over our nuts as long as we beat ISU. Would take.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on November 21, 2011, 09:22:55 AM
Anybody have thoughts on who we would play in a BCS bowl that would not humiliate us on national TV? We need a winnable bowl game. Do not care if it is BCS.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: ArchE_Cat on November 21, 2011, 09:28:17 AM
Seems like climbing higher in the BCS then getting the shaft, going to the Cotton Bowl and winning is the best for us in the long run. Need to play the underdog for respect thing as long as possible

EDIT: forgot to mention that this is best bet to win a computer national championship..."K-State, the virtual national champion." in the space age, nothing is impossible
Title: Re: 11
Post by: kso_FAN on November 21, 2011, 09:33:21 AM
Seems like climbing higher in the BCS then getting the shaft, going to the Cotton Bowl and winning is the best for us in the long run. Need to play the underdog for respect thing as long as possible

EDIT: forgot to mention that this is best bet to win a computer national championship..."K-State, the virtual national champion"

Big 12 Title.

I just want to hear "Here comes your co-Big 12 Champion Kansas State Wildcats taking the field here at the _______ Bowl. This should be a dandy of a ballgame."

Boomer.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: CNS on November 21, 2011, 09:36:20 AM
810 swearing up and down this morning that we cannot get a share of title due to secondary tie breaks  :dubious:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 21, 2011, 09:42:19 AM
810 swearing up and down this morning that we cannot get a share of title due to secondary tie breaks  :dubious:

Well, that's not surprising.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 21, 2011, 09:45:40 AM
Anybody have thoughts on who we would play in a BCS bowl that would not humiliate us on national TV? We need a winnable bowl game. Do not care if it is BCS.

Whatever shitty team that comes out of the Big East would be the easiest. Other than that, Virginia Tech or the Big 10 champ should be pretty winnable. The worst case scenario would be Oregon.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: bigwillie20 on November 21, 2011, 09:46:21 AM
Effective June 2011

The following procedure will determine the Big 12 Conference representative to the Bowl Championship Series in the event of a first-place tie:

If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

If three or more teams are tied, steps 1 through 4 will be followed until a determination is made. Once a team has been eliminated from a multi-team comparison, it is dropped from further comparisons. If only two teams remain tied after any step, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

1.  The records of the three teams will be compared against each other
2.  The records of the three teams will be compared against the next highest placed teams in the conference
3.  The highest ranked team in the first Bowl Championship Series Poll following the completion of Big 12 regular season conference play shall be the representative, unless the two highest ranked tied teams are ranked within one spot of the other in the BCS poll. In this case, the head-to-head results of the top two highest ranked tied teams shall determine the representative in the Bowl Championship Series.
4.  The representative will be chosen by draw
Title: Re: 11
Post by: CNS on November 21, 2011, 09:49:56 AM
Effective June 2011

The following procedure will determine the Big 12 Conference representative to the Bowl Championship Series in the event of a first-place tie:

If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

If three or more teams are tied, steps 1 through 4 will be followed until a determination is made. Once a team has been eliminated from a multi-team comparison, it is dropped from further comparisons. If only two teams remain tied after any step, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

1.  The records of the three teams will be compared against each other
2.  The records of the three teams will be compared against the next highest placed teams in the conference
3.  The highest ranked team in the first Bowl Championship Series Poll following the completion of Big 12 regular season conference play shall be the representative, unless the two highest ranked tied teams are ranked within one spot of the other in the BCS poll. In this case, the head-to-head results of the top two highest ranked tied teams shall determine the representative in the Bowl Championship Series.
4.  The representative will be chosen by draw

I am probably Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) here, but wouldn't #2 in the above scenario make us sole champs if OU beats OSU and we beat ISU? 
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 21, 2011, 10:03:01 AM
Effective June 2011

The following procedure will determine the Big 12 Conference representative to the Bowl Championship Series in the event of a first-place tie:

If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

If three or more teams are tied, steps 1 through 4 will be followed until a determination is made. Once a team has been eliminated from a multi-team comparison, it is dropped from further comparisons. If only two teams remain tied after any step, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

1.  The records of the three teams will be compared against each other
2.  The records of the three teams will be compared against the next highest placed teams in the conference
3.  The highest ranked team in the first Bowl Championship Series Poll following the completion of Big 12 regular season conference play shall be the representative, unless the two highest ranked tied teams are ranked within one spot of the other in the BCS poll. In this case, the head-to-head results of the top two highest ranked tied teams shall determine the representative in the Bowl Championship Series.
4.  The representative will be chosen by draw

I am probably Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) here, but wouldn't #2 in the above scenario make us sole champs if OU beats OSU and we beat ISU? 

No, because our 0-2 record against OU and OSU would eliminate us at #1. I made the key phrase in that bold, though. There is no tiebreaker for Big 12 Champs. If we tie, we are champs.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Cire on November 21, 2011, 10:05:00 AM
STAND UP!

BOOMER SOONER!
Title: Re: 11
Post by: kso_FAN on November 21, 2011, 10:13:16 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffourhorsementattoo.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2008%2F08%2Fboomer-sooner.jpg&hash=00b5de7fd1f5b89c1687ed14c422811d495addf9)

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: 8manpick on November 21, 2011, 10:20:42 AM
Effective June 2011

The following procedure will determine the Big 12 Conference representative to the Bowl Championship Series in the event of a first-place tie:

If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

If three or more teams are tied, steps 1 through 4 will be followed until a determination is made. Once a team has been eliminated from a multi-team comparison, it is dropped from further comparisons. If only two teams remain tied after any step, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

1.  The records of the three teams will be compared against each other
2.  The records of the three teams will be compared against the next highest placed teams in the conference
3.  The highest ranked team in the first Bowl Championship Series Poll following the completion of Big 12 regular season conference play shall be the representative, unless the two highest ranked tied teams are ranked within one spot of the other in the BCS poll. In this case, the head-to-head results of the top two highest ranked tied teams shall determine the representative in the Bowl Championship Series.
4.  The representative will be chosen by draw

I am probably Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) here, but wouldn't #2 in the above scenario make us sole champs if OU beats OSU and we beat ISU? 

No, because our 0-2 record against OU and OSU would eliminate us at #1. I made the key phrase in that bold, though. There is no tiebreaker for Big 12 Champs. If we tie, we are champs.
Pretty sure that step one would not eliminate us. It says "The records of the three teams will be compared against each other" (7-2, 7-2, 7-2), not "the records of the three teams against each other would be compared against each other (2-0, 1-1, 0-2).  Still doesn't seem to have anything to do with sole big 12 champs, but could mean automatic Fiesta maybe?  Not really sure how #2 would be applied.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: cvmcat on November 21, 2011, 10:35:41 AM
Effective June 2011

The following procedure will determine the Big 12 Conference representative to the Bowl Championship Series in the event of a first-place tie:

If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

If three or more teams are tied, steps 1 through 4 will be followed until a determination is made. Once a team has been eliminated from a multi-team comparison, it is dropped from further comparisons. If only two teams remain tied after any step, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

1.  The records of the three teams will be compared against each other
2.  The records of the three teams will be compared against the next highest placed teams in the conference
3.  The highest ranked team in the first Bowl Championship Series Poll following the completion of Big 12 regular season conference play shall be the representative, unless the two highest ranked tied teams are ranked within one spot of the other in the BCS poll. In this case, the head-to-head results of the top two highest ranked tied teams shall determine the representative in the Bowl Championship Series.
4.  The representative will be chosen by draw

I am probably Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) here, but wouldn't #2 in the above scenario make us sole champs if OU beats OSU and we beat ISU?  

No, because our 0-2 record against OU and OSU would eliminate us at #1. I made the key phrase in that bold, though. There is no tiebreaker for Big 12 Champs. If we tie, we are champs.
Pretty sure that step one would not eliminate us. It says "The records of the three teams will be compared against each other" (7-2, 7-2, 7-2), not "the records of the three teams against each other would be compared against each other (2-0, 1-1, 0-2).  Still doesn't seem to have anything to do with sole big 12 champs, but could mean automatic Fiesta maybe?  Not really sure how #2 would be applied.
Your arguement is redundant.  It would be a tie BECAUSE we would all be 7-2 in conference.  However, if your interpretation is to compare OVERALL records, that's an arguement that can be made.  We'd still all be 10-2 and we'd move on to step #2.  Still don't think this has any bearing on who gets a trophy, only who gets the automatic bid to the BCS.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: EMAW SP8 on November 21, 2011, 10:50:08 AM
Effective June 2011

The following procedure will determine the Big 12 Conference representative to the Bowl Championship Series in the event of a first-place tie:

If two teams are tied, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

If three or more teams are tied, steps 1 through 4 will be followed until a determination is made. Once a team has been eliminated from a multi-team comparison, it is dropped from further comparisons. If only two teams remain tied after any step, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the representative.

1.  The records of the three teams will be compared against each other
2.  The records of the three teams will be compared against the next highest placed teams in the conference
3.  The highest ranked team in the first Bowl Championship Series Poll following the completion of Big 12 regular season conference play shall be the representative, unless the two highest ranked tied teams are ranked within one spot of the other in the BCS poll. In this case, the head-to-head results of the top two highest ranked tied teams shall determine the representative in the Bowl Championship Series.
4.  The representative will be chosen by draw

I am probably Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) here, but wouldn't #2 in the above scenario make us sole champs if OU beats OSU and we beat ISU?  

No, because our 0-2 record against OU and OSU would eliminate us at #1. I made the key phrase in that bold, though. There is no tiebreaker for Big 12 Champs. If we tie, we are champs.
Pretty sure that step one would not eliminate us. It says "The records of the three teams will be compared against each other" (7-2, 7-2, 7-2), not "the records of the three teams against each other would be compared against each other (2-0, 1-1, 0-2).  Still doesn't seem to have anything to do with sole big 12 champs, but could mean automatic Fiesta maybe?  Not really sure how #2 would be applied.
Your arguement is redundant.  It would be a tie BECAUSE we would all be 7-2 in conference.  However, if your interpretation is to compare OVERALL records, that's an arguement that can be made.  We'd still all be 10-2 and we'd move on to step #2.  Still don't think this has any bearing on who gets a trophy, only who gets the automatic bid to the BCS.

 :blindfold: He is saying that the records against the other tied teams (ou, and osu) would be the deciding factor, it wouldnt be our overall record in this situation, sort of along the same lines as the tie breaker for when tech, texas, and ou all tied to win the south (tech beat texas, texas beat ou, and ou beat tech) then it went to the highest ranked in the BCS. Except theirs was to get into the championship game, dont know if that makes a difference :dunno:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: OK_Cat on November 21, 2011, 11:27:50 AM
hey dumbasses,

that tiebreaker has nothing to do with crowning a champ.  it says so it big letters, it's for bcs purposes.

if all 3 teams finish 10-2, then tiebreaker #2 will decide.  As of right now, that means that the next highest placed team in the conference is Baylor.  OSU and KSU both beat Baylor, so OU is out.  That means it's OSU head to head against KSU, so they get the conference's BCS spot.


Really not that hard, dumbasses.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 21, 2011, 11:32:09 AM
Right, but what's the rule that says we're co-Big 12 champs just because we finish with the same record? The only thing I've been able to cite so far is www.goEMAW.com.

If we get a trophy, great, but until I hear somebody with authority actually confirm this, I'm not buying it.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2011, 11:35:50 AM
Right, but what's the rule that says we're co-Big 12 champs just because we finish with the same record? The only thing I've been able to cite so far is www.goEMAW.com.

If we get a trophy, great, but until I hear somebody with authority actually confirm this, I'm not buying it.

saying "goEMAW isn't somebody with authority" is like saying "I'm a stupid dumbass and I want to get smashed in the face"
Title: Re: 11
Post by: wes mantooth on November 21, 2011, 11:38:33 AM
Right, but what's the rule that says we're co-Big 12 champs just because we finish with the same record? The only thing I've been able to cite so far is www.goEMAW.com.

If we get a trophy, great, but until I hear somebody with authority actually confirm this, I'm not buying it.

continue being a stupid dipcrap then
Title: Re: 11
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 21, 2011, 11:39:43 AM
Right, but what's the rule that says we're co-Big 12 champs just because we finish with the same record? The only thing I've been able to cite so far is www.goEMAW.com.

If we get a trophy, great, but until I hear somebody with authority actually confirm this, I'm not buying it.

saying "goEMAW isn't somebody with authority" is like saying "I'm a stupid dumbass and I want to get smashed in the face"

Fair point, fair point. But if we don't get a trophy, are we going to start a collection to buy one?
Title: Re: 11
Post by: kso_FAN on November 21, 2011, 11:52:22 AM
Fair point, fair point. But if we don't get a trophy, are we going to start a collection to buy one?

Did you read this above?

Quote
The following procedure will determine the Big 12 Conference representative to the Bowl Championship Series in the event of a first-place tie:



That is directly from the Big 12 website. And all you have to do to confirm is look at Big 12 history; KU's trophies in 05 and 08 in basketball even though they were the 2 seed in the tournament. K-State's four Big 12 North titles even though we only played in 2 championship games. This is not hard.

So our only choice is to root for OU and do this: (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)
Title: Re: 11
Post by: DQ12 on November 21, 2011, 11:54:50 AM
Oh my.  Why hello there, little fella!

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)

Title: Re: 11
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on November 21, 2011, 11:55:07 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)

 :lol:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: kslim on November 21, 2011, 11:55:58 AM
that is fantastic
Title: Re: 11
Post by: steve dave on November 21, 2011, 11:59:38 AM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)

 :horrorsurprise: :emawkid:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: SkinnyBenny on November 21, 2011, 12:05:18 PM
Oh goodness.


 :katpak: :katpak: :katpak: :katpak: :katpak:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: mocat on November 21, 2011, 12:07:05 PM
never in the history of the world has there been anyone better at calming the waters than _FAN
Title: Re: 11
Post by: kstater on November 21, 2011, 12:08:13 PM
Holy crap.  :emawkid:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Rams on November 21, 2011, 12:11:07 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)

 :surprised:

_FAN just won the internetz.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on November 21, 2011, 12:14:30 PM
Oh my.  Why hello there, little fella!

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)



I give you props my friend.   That is much nicer than my  :kugoalposts: :kugoalposts:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: wetwillie on November 21, 2011, 12:30:39 PM
never in the history of the world has there been anyone better at calming the waters than _FAN
Quote from:  William Snyder
:dubious:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: K-S-U-Wildcats! on November 21, 2011, 12:34:39 PM
Thanks _fan, I'm on board.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Pittcat on November 21, 2011, 12:41:31 PM
Bravo, _Fan.  Bravo.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Trim on November 21, 2011, 01:06:41 PM
:thumbs:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Deez Nutz on November 25, 2011, 12:20:12 PM
Fair point, fair point. But if we don't get a trophy, are we going to start a collection to buy one?

Did you read this above?

Quote
The following procedure will determine the Big 12 Conference representative to the Bowl Championship Series in the event of a first-place tie:



That is directly from the Big 12 website. And all you have to do to confirm is look at Big 12 history; KU's trophies in 05 and 08 in basketball even though they were the 2 seed in the tournament. K-State's four Big 12 North titles even though we only played in 2 championship games. This is not hard.

So our only choice is to root for OU and do this: (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2FgoEMAW.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F11%2Fwhomovedmybig12title.gif&hash=c07c9d60eca789084d2dd430bd27461bcf49cda0)

Funny I could have sworn we played in three championship games.

1998
2000
2003

 :tongue:
Title: Re: 11
Post by: theKSU on November 25, 2011, 01:14:07 PM
Let's go Clones.  Back it up with a sweep of Oklahoma. 
Title: Re: 11
Post by: kso_FAN on November 25, 2011, 01:24:51 PM
Funny I could have sworn we played in three championship games.

1998
2000
2003

 :tongue:

Correction noted. Didn't even notice my typo.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 25, 2011, 02:12:10 PM
Anyone know what type of bonus Snyds would get for finishing in the top 10?

Sean to HCIW and Tate to starter.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: SabiNation on November 25, 2011, 02:19:37 PM
Low BCS IQ here...what kind of impact does the outcome of this Arkansas/LSU game have on the cats? Does either outcome help/hurt us more? TIA
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 25, 2011, 02:21:23 PM
Low BCS IQ here...what kind of impact does the outcome of this Arkansas/LSU game have on the cats? Does either outcome help/hurt us more? TIA

I assume we want LSU to keep rolling and knock off Ark.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Bookcat on November 25, 2011, 02:21:37 PM
Low BCS IQ here...what kind of impact does the outcome of this Arkansas/LSU game have on the cats? Does either outcome help/hurt us more? TIA

not alot...the Ohio State vs. Michigan game as ALOT more bearing. Gooooo Buckeyes!
Title: Re: 11
Post by: SabiNation on November 25, 2011, 02:24:16 PM
Low BCS IQ here...what kind of impact does the outcome of this Arkansas/LSU game have on the cats? Does either outcome help/hurt us more? TIA

not alot...the Ohio State vs. Michigan game as ALOT more bearing. Gooooo Buckeyes!

What I figured
Title: Re: 11
Post by: Dugout DickStone on November 25, 2011, 02:25:57 PM
I think Ark winning would damage KK's fantastic talking point about them sucking since they went to SEC.
Title: Re: 11
Post by: felix rex on November 25, 2011, 10:25:54 PM
Let's go Clones.  Back it up with a sweep of Oklahoma.

Oklahoma state champs