goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: Johnny Wichita on September 11, 2011, 08:20:46 PM

Title: -15.5
Post by: Johnny Wichita on September 11, 2011, 08:20:46 PM
nm
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: catzacker on September 11, 2011, 08:26:15 PM
Last time we are favored all year until isu (dec 3rd)?
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on September 11, 2011, 08:29:07 PM
Last time we are favored all year until isu (dec 3rd)?
and even then, I don't think we are favored  :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Stevesie60 on September 11, 2011, 08:33:00 PM
Last time we are favored all year until isu (dec 3rd)?
and even then, I don't think we are favored  :goodbyecruelworld:

Agreed, Luke-KSU.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: DQ12 on September 11, 2011, 08:39:20 PM
Last time we are favored all year until isu (dec 3rd)?
Reserving my judgment on whether or not I agree with this statement until after the KSU KSU game.

But there's a very good chance you're correct.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 11, 2011, 08:45:18 PM
Well, I can't speak for all you Squawks but I'm not sold on KU myself. I think we end up being favored in that game.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 11, 2011, 08:47:36 PM
Well, I can't speak for all you Squawks but I'm not sold on KU myself. I think we end up being favored in that game.

Yeah, I think we will be 4 or 5 point favorites. A lot of farms will be lost on that one.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: nicname on September 11, 2011, 08:52:46 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0. 
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: 0.42 on September 11, 2011, 09:01:48 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0. 

 :dubious:
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: ksu101 on September 11, 2011, 09:03:09 PM
meh, not bad.  Wasn't Bama a 28 point favorite?
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: DQ12 on September 11, 2011, 09:11:04 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0. 
Agree with absolutely everything in this post. 

Go Wildcats ftb
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on September 11, 2011, 09:21:21 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0. 
I see us losing more than that, I predict a 4-3 start.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 11, 2011, 09:32:34 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0. 
I see us losing more than that, I predict a 4-3 start.

Luke you are probably the biggest negative nancy on this board. Why do you hate K-State football?
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: kim carnes on September 11, 2011, 09:35:35 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0. 

+1  go cats!
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on September 11, 2011, 09:48:06 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0. 
I see us losing more than that, I predict a 4-3 start.

Luke you are probably the biggest negative nancy on this board. Why do you hate K-State football?
here i'll be positive... i agree with the 6-1 start with the only loss to OU  :grin:
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Panjandrum on September 11, 2011, 10:05:24 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0.  

 :dubious:

I still think we win at least seven games.

People are too doom and gloom over one game.  This is just how Snyder's teams operate.  We'll go out there and beat Kent like 49-7, everyone will be all EMAW about it, and then we'll go down to Miami and be pretty competitive.

We beat UMass 21-17 a couple of years ago, lost to UL-L, and we ended up one game from winning the North in 2009.  This is just how it goes.

You turn the ball over five times, and what we saw last week is what's going to happen.  I mean, even though it was EKU, they still only gave up 0.37 yards a rush.  That's reason for optimism.  If you take away a couple of really nice/lucky grabs by EKU on offense, they would have had around 80 total yards with about 1.5 yards a play.  That's pretty solid no matter who you're playing.

After watching the game, KSU's main problem was the offensive line.  Klein was fine.  The receivers are really good.  The running backs are good.  All of the skill positions are fine.  The OL just needs to get stuff straightened out, and we'll be fine.  No matter what you or I may think about him, there's no way a  LHC Bill Snyder offense will look that bad for an entire year.  It's just not possible.

If anything, I'm probably more optimistic about the defense after the first game than I am down about the offense.  I was not expecting that at all.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Panjandrum on September 11, 2011, 10:08:02 PM
Alright, who forces a "LHC" in front of the string when you type in LHC Bill Snyder?

 :dubious:
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: nicname on September 11, 2011, 10:14:15 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0. 
I see us losing more than that, I predict a 4-3 start.

Luke you are probably the biggest negative nancy on this board. Why do you hate K-State football?
here i'll be positive... i agree with the 6-1 start with the only loss to OU  :grin:

Luke, OU is game number 8.  It will take a herculean effort to beat the Sooners.  It should be a great match-up though.  Both teams prob in the top 10, and most likely gameday will be in town.  You know how Gameday likes those KSU vs. OU match-ups.  I'm not a sunshine pumper just a realist who see this years Cats as being a very good team. 

Low estimate 5-2 for first 7, and 3-2 for final 5 for 8-4. 
High Estimate is 7-0 and of course 5-0 for 12-0 and Natty title game. 

Realistically we should be happy with something in the 10 win range.  I don't see how anyone could see otherwise.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: kim carnes on September 11, 2011, 10:15:56 PM
Alright, who forces a "LHC" in front of the string when you type in LHC LHC Bill Snyder?

 :dubious:

Pretty sure it is programmed into all windows operating systems.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on September 11, 2011, 10:20:45 PM
You dorks.  After we dismantle Kent, and then beat Miami to a pulp.  We will probably be favored over Ken Starr's suing Bears.  After that win we might not be favored over Mizzou, but the next two will be cakewalk favoritism.  OU is the first game we def. won't be favored ('cept maybe Miami, which we will win).

Cats start out 5-2 at worst.  Prob 6-1 or 7-0.  

 :dubious:

I still think we win at least seven games.

People are too doom and gloom over one game.  This is just how Snyder's teams operate.  We'll go out there and beat Kent like 49-7, everyone will be all EMAW about it, and then we'll go down to Miami and be pretty competitive.

We beat UMass 21-17 a couple of years ago, lost to UL-L, and we ended up one game from winning the North in 2009.  This is just how it goes.

You turn the ball over five times, and what we saw last week is what's going to happen.  I mean, even though it was EKU, they still only gave up 0.37 yards a rush.  That's reason for optimism.  If you take away a couple of really nice/lucky grabs by EKU on offense, they would have had around 80 total yards with about 1.5 yards a play.  That's pretty solid no matter who you're playing.

After watching the game, KSU's main problem was the offensive line.  Klein was fine.  The receivers are really good.  The running backs are good.  All of the skill positions are fine.  The OL just needs to get stuff straightened out, and we'll be fine.  No matter what you or I may think about him, there's no way a  LHC LHC Bill Snyder offense will look that bad for an entire year.  It's just not possible.

If anything, I'm probably more optimistic about the defense after the first game than I am down about the offense.  I was not expecting that at all.
Everything in this post is so true.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: pike on September 11, 2011, 10:22:01 PM
13 wins
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: wetwillie on September 11, 2011, 10:23:08 PM
We are going to lay 40+ on Kent State. Can't wait for the defense sucks crowd to get back on track
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 11, 2011, 10:46:33 PM
Panjandrum you are just so effing full of K-State optimism it literally springs forth from every post you make!  :love:
And Nic I don't see how anyone could possibly disagree with anything you posted. So much truth it simply blows me away. You are truly EMAW!  :thumbs:
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Andy on September 12, 2011, 04:01:06 AM
would be wary laying that number.  have a feeling snyder is gonna try to vanilla it again with miami on deck, even despite everything that happened last week.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: bigwillie20 on September 12, 2011, 08:36:02 AM
Gonna be a pretty tall task to score at least 16 points to cover  :flush:
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: yoga-like_abana on September 12, 2011, 08:40:40 AM
Is there such a thing as a slth fan because Panjandrums post summed one up perfectly.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: mcmwcat on September 12, 2011, 08:50:11 AM
i agree with panj - people are too doom and gloom over one game.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Bookcat on September 12, 2011, 09:10:23 AM
i can't believe they think we'll score more than 1 TD. suckas
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: mcmwcat on September 12, 2011, 10:09:38 AM
i think we'll score more than a TD.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Johnny Wichita on September 12, 2011, 10:23:29 AM
I'm anticipating a huge resurgence in our special teams department this week.   Probably cover the spread by themselves.  :pbj:
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Winters on September 12, 2011, 11:15:27 AM
I think if we open up the playbook this is possible.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: jtksu on September 12, 2011, 12:50:34 PM
Those lines don't really mean anything.  It's not like the people who set them actually know anything or have anything at stake.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Pete on September 12, 2011, 12:52:44 PM
I'm anticipating a huge resurgence in our special teams department this week.   Probably cover the spread by themselves.  :pbj:

No unit is working harder, you can count on that.
Title: Re: -15.5
Post by: Lucas Scoopsalot on September 12, 2011, 01:08:39 PM
Those lines don't really mean anything.  It's not like the people who set them actually know anything or have anything at stake.
agreed jt