goemaw.com
TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Basketball is hard => Topic started by: steve dave on January 24, 2011, 10:25:16 AM
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
-
:eek:
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
No, do not want. Austin Freeman will murder us.
On second thought, that shows us making the tournament...
:cheese: <----insert bracket
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
No, do not want. Austin Freeman will murder us.
On second thought, that shows us making the tournament... :cheese: <----insert bracket
Which at this point is the best we can realistically hope for.
-
"The #12 seed
nobody everybody wants to play!" :ksu:
-
WOULD TAKE
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology
-
WOULD TAKE
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology
HOLY crap! :emawkid:
-
To everyone who says we won't make the tournament, sports writers have made it pretty clear that they want us in it even if we lose every game remaining on our schedule. We're so money, and we don't even know it.
-
WOULD TAKE
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology
HOLY cac! :emawkid:
guys, osu second round. they have looked amazing so far.
-
Pett, shut the eff up Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
-
Pett, shut the eff up Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
says the loser who is posting from his phone. :jerk:
-
WOULD TAKE
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology
HOLY cac! :emawkid:
guys, osu second round. they have looked amazing so far.
exactly. :party:
go cats.
-
You mean the loser posting from his phone that is about to get on an elite AA flight to DFW, riding first class BBS'ing the whole way there?
Yes. Yes I am.
-
Pett, shut the eff up Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
says the loser who is posting from his phone. :jerk:
nice burn pett
-
people don't realize that with CU is really our only "bad loss" in the eyes of the committee, and CU could still end up being a tourney team. Losses to top 50 rpi teams really don't hurt you that much, as long as you can pick up a couple top 50 wins and avoid bad losses.
-
people don't realize that with CU is really our only "bad loss" in the eyes of the committee, and CU could still end up being a tourney team. Losses to top 50 rpi teams really don't hurt you that much, as long as you can pick up a couple top 50 wins and avoid bad losses.
So you're just staring at that bracket and letting it sit there while not running at all?
-
people don't realize that with CU is really our only "bad loss" in the eyes of the committee, and CU could still end up being a tourney team. Losses to top 50 rpi teams really don't hurt you that much, as long as you can pick up a couple top 50 wins and avoid bad losses.
So you're just staring at that bracket and letting it sit there while not running at all?
I have my hands full of a list containing the names of oscar Pearl, Billy Clyde Gillispie, and Kelvin Sampson. :dunno:
-
people don't realize that with CU is really our only "bad loss" in the eyes of the committee, and CU could still end up being a tourney team. Losses to top 50 rpi teams really don't hurt you that much, as long as you can pick up a couple top 50 wins and avoid bad losses.
the committees have always erred in favor of high variability teams with shitty records and a few high-profile wins. that has usually not been something i've liked. however, i could like the crap out of it this year, if that's what's needed.
-
also, i'd like to take all of last year's anti 96 team tourney tards and run to a cliff with them (i'd throw them off upon arrival).
-
people don't realize that with CU is really our only "bad loss" in the eyes of the committee, and CU could still end up being a tourney team. Losses to top 50 rpi teams really don't hurt you that much, as long as you can pick up a couple top 50 wins and avoid bad losses.
the committees have always erred in favor of high variability teams with shitty records and a few high-profile wins. that has usually not been something i've liked. however, i could like the crap out of it this year, if that's what's needed.
Agreed. I especially remember OSU getting in back in 08-09, pretty much because they lost to better teams than KSU.
http://kenpom.com/team.php?team=Oklahoma%20St.&y=2009 (http://kenpom.com/team.php?team=Oklahoma%20St.&y=2009)
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
SDSU 1 seed :surprised:
-
people don't realize that with CU is really our only "bad loss" in the eyes of the committee, and CU could still end up being a tourney team. Losses to top 50 rpi teams really don't hurt you that much, as long as you can pick up a couple top 50 wins and avoid bad losses.
the committees have always erred in favor of high variability teams with cacty records and a few high-profile wins. that has usually not been something i've liked. however, i could like the cac out of it this year, if that's what's needed.
We've got to get some quality wins, I'd say 3-4 Top 50 wins minimum.
We could sort of erase the CU loss if we win out there, especially now that we have Kelly. If we are legitimately on the bubble the committee will throw out the UNLV loss b/c we didn't have Pullen or Kelly. I really don't think CU or OSU are tournament teams, so our hope is that the committee gives us a pass b/c we didn't have Kelly.
The problem is only 4 games left on our schedule are against top 50 RPI teams (After playing 3 in our first 5 games). The good thing is that if we play reasonably well we should be able to get wins, we just won't have a ton of quality wins. So then we have to hope for VT, Gonzaga, and WSU to finish well and hopefully 1 or 2 of those can finish as Top 50 RPI teams. Plus some of the other teams we play (like Baylor) in the league hopefully will play well to finish the year and finish in the Top 50.
-
prolly have to get 1 of 3 from ut, ku & ku. plus the remaining mu.
-
prolly have to get 1 of 3 from ut, ku & ku. plus the remaining mu.
True.
-
prolly have to get 1 of 3 from ut, ku & ku. plus the remaining mu.
FYP
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
SDSU 1 seed :surprised:
They are good.
-
people don't realize that with CU is really our only "bad loss" in the eyes of the committee, and CU could still end up being a tourney team. Losses to top 50 rpi teams really don't hurt you that much, as long as you can pick up a couple top 50 wins and avoid bad losses.
So you're just staring at that bracket and letting it sit there while not running at all?
:)
-
To everyone who says we won't make the tournament, sports writers have made it pretty clear that they want us in it even if we lose every game remaining on our schedule. We're so money, and we don't even know it.
Remember the Huggins year when we were a bubble team and went to the NIT and a bunch of shitty teams got in?
Yeah, this year is the exact opposite.
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
SDSU 1 seed :surprised:
They are good.
Not THAT good. But we'll see tonight.
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
SDSU 1 seed :surprised:
They are good.
Not THAT good. But we'll see tonight.
Who is carrying this game?
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
SDSU 1 seed :surprised:
They are good.
Not THAT good. But we'll see tonight.
Who is carrying this game?
CBS College Sports.
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
SDSU 1 seed :surprised:
They are good.
:lol:
-
http://thehoopsreport.com/bracket.aspx
SDSU 1 seed :surprised:
They are good.
:lol:
They were playing jimmmer, give em a break. :frown: