Author Topic: Game of Thrones SHOW thread for people who are confused by the book thread (Read 370497 times)

Tobias · « **Reply #2475 on:** May 31, 2016, 09:30:27 AM »

Quote from: pmshead on May 31, 2016, 07:12:54 AM

i want more of your commentary.

i'll review the dossier and let you guys know what i find

sys · « **Reply #2476 on:** May 31, 2016, 09:31:13 AM »

Quote from: michigancat on May 31, 2016, 09:25:07 AM

Good point, but I'd still assume that wouldn't happen to the son of a lord.

it gives his father, who hates him, an excuse to kill/exile/rebuff him. he's supposedly smart, although almost everything his does is stupid, so he presumably could have come up with a better plan.

OK_Cat · « **Reply #2477 on:** May 31, 2016, 09:31:59 AM »

According to like German TV guide or something, episode 9 is titled 'Battle of the Bastards' so we'll see Ramsay again soon

TCUHornedFrog · « **Reply #2478 on:** May 31, 2016, 09:32:49 AM »

Quote from: OK_Cat on May 31, 2016, 09:31:59 AM

According to like German TV guide or something, episode 9 is titled 'Battle of the Bastards' so we'll see Ramsay again soon

OK_Cat · « **Reply #2479 on:** May 31, 2016, 09:38:50 AM »

Epi 7 is 'The Broken Man' epi 8 is 'No One' epi 9 is 'Battle of the Bastards' and epi 10 is 'The Winds of Winter'

star seed 7 · « **Reply #2480 on:** May 31, 2016, 10:02:58 AM »

Quote from: sys on May 31, 2016, 09:20:13 AM

Quote from: michigancat on May 31, 2016, 08:26:35 AM
All the lords had bastards and raised them in their castles, of course Sam's mom and sister didn't get pissed at him. They were probably convinced he was going to die a virgin and were happy to have something new in the most gigantic random castle ever. And obviously Sam's dad wasn't exactly cool with the whole sitch.

the whole story opened with father stark beheading a man for breaking his nightwatcher oath. it was given to us to understand that it was sort of a big deal.

And since then they have shown that desertion is about the only oath they take seriously. They didn't care that Jon was tapping ygritte because like everyone else was tapping molestown hoo-ars

Mrs. Gooch · « **Reply #2481 on:** May 31, 2016, 10:06:30 AM »

Yeah I think Ned had to kill that guy because he abandoned the Night's Watch. Sleeping with girls isn't really a big deal.

sys · « **Reply #2482 on:** May 31, 2016, 10:06:53 AM »

tapping randos doesn't interfere with watching the night. huddling with a gilly and rearing her child does.

michigancat · « **Reply #2483 on:** May 31, 2016, 10:14:42 AM »

Quote from: sys on May 31, 2016, 10:06:53 AM

tapping randos doesn't interfere with watching the night. huddling with a gilly and rearing her child does.

He was on his way to train to be a maester for the watch. He never deserted.

sys · « **Reply #2484 on:** May 31, 2016, 10:18:09 AM »

Quote from: michigancat on May 31, 2016, 10:14:42 AM

He was on his way to train to be a maester for the watch. He never deserted.

i didn't say he deserted.

Asteriskhead · « **Reply #2485 on:** May 31, 2016, 10:23:04 AM »

@asava save us with a meme.

asava · « **Reply #2486 on:** May 31, 2016, 10:25:33 AM »

not enough time to look at memes yet. soon.

to tide you over, this is oddly entrancing.

catastrophe · « **Reply #2487 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:00:32 AM »

This ep was alright, although I could use less emphasis on Sam and Gilly. Something tells me they are doomed, but you're supposed to get attached to them so that when they're killed it feels like a bigger deal than it is.

Also, kind of weird to have that emotional scene with Dany at the end when they're like 2 years away from being able to actually get to Westeros with an army. Kind of cool though that her speech was almost a mirror of what Khal Drogo gave way back.

Also still very interested to see what happens to Arya, although I'm bummed she never finished her training.

michigancat · « **Reply #2488 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:02:33 AM »

Guys, they made a big deal out of Dany's speech because she got her dragon back.

michigancat · « **Reply #2489 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:02:55 AM »

Did you folks see the rough ridin' dragon?

star seed 7 · « **Reply #2490 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:15:51 AM »

And she was controlling it this time instead of just being along for the ride

Tobias · « **Reply #2491 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:19:09 AM »

seems like those things should've been 'borted

catastrophe · « **Reply #2492 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:26:25 AM »

Yea, but also have we ever discussed how she named it Drogon? What kind of a name is that for a dragon? That's like naming a Beagle "Bogal."

Asteriskhead · « **Reply #2493 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:28:23 AM »

Quote from: catastrophe on May 31, 2016, 11:26:25 AM

Yea, but also have we ever discussed how she named it Drogon? What kind of a name is that for a dragon? That's like naming a Beagle "Bogal."

it's named after her dead husband, dumbass.

Mrs. Gooch · « **Reply #2494 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:34:26 AM »

OK, it was kind of funny how Dany was like "Hold on for a second while I go around this corner......"

star seed 7 · « **Reply #2495 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:38:50 AM »

catastrophe · « **Reply #2496 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:47:05 AM »

Quote from: pmshead on May 31, 2016, 11:28:23 AM

Quote from: catastrophe on May 31, 2016, 11:26:25 AM
Yea, but also have we ever discussed how she named it Drogon? What kind of a name is that for a dragon? That's like naming a Beagle "Bogal."

it's named after her dead husband, dumbass.

Could've just called it Drogo if that were the case. Would be much less confusing.

catastrophe · « **Reply #2497 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:47:34 AM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on May 31, 2016, 11:38:50 AM

This is good. I didn't put that together.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #2498 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:55:59 AM »

Quote from: catastrophe on May 31, 2016, 11:47:05 AM

Quote from: pmshead on May 31, 2016, 11:28:23 AM
Quote from: catastrophe on May 31, 2016, 11:26:25 AM
Yea, but also have we ever discussed how she named it Drogon? What kind of a name is that for a dragon? That's like naming a Beagle "Bogal."

it's named after her dead husband, dumbass.

Could've just called it Drogo if that were the case. Would be much less confusing.

treysolid · « **Reply #2499 on:** May 31, 2016, 11:59:24 AM »

yes, multiple things with the same name is never confusing