1
Kansas State Football / Re: BITB Today
« on: October 22, 2012, 02:21:30 PM »
rough ridin' bad person, brought up 98'
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Shows that have you by the balls, or vag...
« on: July 02, 2012, 09:12:30 PM »
Okay, so the bachelorette has my wife by the vag. Anyways, this Sean dude has a kstate picture in his room. It was like the sproles one where he jumps up to the offensive lineman and puts one finger in the air, but it was two other players. Dude used to be a football player, anyone know if he played for us?
The picture was shown for literally 1 second, but I spotted it and paused it. For sure EMAW.
The picture was shown for literally 1 second, but I spotted it and paused it. For sure EMAW.
3
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Holy War
« on: December 14, 2011, 01:07:13 PM »
I don't see Religion going anywhere anytime soon.. Belief and consciousness is an evolving process. As we humans shed our old and worn out belief systems (i.e. fundamentalism; Islamic, Hindu, and Christian to name a few) there is going to be a change in the collective consciousness, and some resistance to the acknowledgement of a Higher Power or being part of a religious body, mainly due to having felt cheated by out-dated and ridiculous sounding dogmas.
This resistance and reluctance to admit religious affiliation can in some cases be based on how crazy certain religious people are, and the desire not to be "one of them." It is natural to try to separate from ignorant people.
Also, another take on it is that now more people have access to the internet and can investigate any religion they want, so you find people with very eclectic viewpoints. These people might not have a religious affiliation, but are believers in God.
However, you do have some points noticing a trend, but making the huge jump to "Religion is done-for" is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Pew Research has some good stuff on this topic..
http://www.pewforum.org/Topics/Beliefs-and-Practices/Importance-of-Religion/
http://www.pewforum.org/Age/Religion-Among-the-Millennials.aspx
Just like when Francis Bacon stated: "A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion," humankind will pass through this phase, the shedding of old beliefs, and to a greater understanding of Reality.
This resistance and reluctance to admit religious affiliation can in some cases be based on how crazy certain religious people are, and the desire not to be "one of them." It is natural to try to separate from ignorant people.
Also, another take on it is that now more people have access to the internet and can investigate any religion they want, so you find people with very eclectic viewpoints. These people might not have a religious affiliation, but are believers in God.
However, you do have some points noticing a trend, but making the huge jump to "Religion is done-for" is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).
Pew Research has some good stuff on this topic..
http://www.pewforum.org/Topics/Beliefs-and-Practices/Importance-of-Religion/
http://www.pewforum.org/Age/Religion-Among-the-Millennials.aspx
Just like when Francis Bacon stated: "A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion," humankind will pass through this phase, the shedding of old beliefs, and to a greater understanding of Reality.
5
Kansas State Football / Re: The Wabash Cannonball
« on: December 06, 2011, 04:02:41 PM »
Just imagine this dude, his fat wife/sister/mother and his spawn doing it.. Really captures its tardness...
And here is a video of this same gentlemen disappointed Jesus didn't come back riding the comet Elenin...
And here is a video of this same gentlemen disappointed Jesus didn't come back riding the comet Elenin...
6
Kansas State Football / Re: The Wabash Cannonball
« on: December 06, 2011, 03:46:18 PM »
Wtf is up with this....
I was at a Chiefs Raiders game a few years back, and after McFadden scored a touchdown, four inbred hill people stood up in front of me and did this.. Its really weird and totally annoying.. The whole section thought they were with First Downs for Down's Syndrome or something.
And I would say the cheer that mostly consists of twinkling your fingers like Richard Simmons and "squeal like a pig" is way more gay.
I was at a Chiefs Raiders game a few years back, and after McFadden scored a touchdown, four inbred hill people stood up in front of me and did this.. Its really weird and totally annoying.. The whole section thought they were with First Downs for Down's Syndrome or something.
And I would say the cheer that mostly consists of twinkling your fingers like Richard Simmons and "squeal like a pig" is way more gay.
7
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Holy War
« on: August 04, 2011, 02:53:37 PM »
I still love you though Poet...
8
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Holy War
« on: July 29, 2011, 02:32:35 PM »Quote from: some dumb bitch's facebookHeard a new song yesterday by Casting Crowns called "Already There". It talks about how my future is God's memory and he is standing at the end looking back at my life knowing exactly how it played out. I love knowing that even though I am not sure exactly what the future holds, God's already been there and done that. So thankful for that comfort!
This is crazy talk. I mean seriously, how can anyone believe this?
gives them validation for horrible decisions. "part of god's plan"
God is completely outside of, therefore not dependent on, and transcends our space/time domain and three dimensional reality.. See, God can not only "see" our future, but He can also "see" an almost infinite number of hypothetical futures based on how we utilize our free will. Theoretical physicists might label these realms, which are as real as the one we currently live in, "parallel universes."
God also does not "see" in the sense that we see with our eyes either. Again, He is not an old man with a beard, nor is He a "He." God completely Transcends all anthropomorphic qualities attributed to Him.
"Part of God's Plan" is a trite platitude, but when looking at everything with reincarnation in mind, perhaps those things WERE meant to happen. Sure, some dude in a white robe didn't do it to them, but maybe their karma, and past lives, dictated that certain events needed to take place to create a karmic balance.
The whole predestination vs. free will argument has been something people have grappled with for centuries. But the answer lies in the fact that they are both true to a certain extent. Before the soul manifests itself on our planet or others, a karmic pattern based on a variety of circumstances (individual karma, astrological alignments, past lives, etc.) is set forth and has a magnetic-like pull, outlining a general direction for the soul during the incarnation. However, it is ultimately up to the individual, through utilizing his or her free will, on whether or not they will experience soul growth during this incarnation.
Sadly to say, some lives have this "general karmic pattern" set up so strongly, that it is practically impossible for them to experience soul growth for a particular incarnation. However, since free will is involved, sometimes they do, and overcome the odds.
To avoid vagueness, "soul growth," in the broad sense is: The learning of spiritual lessons, though a series of lives on earth, which enables the soul to become liberated from threefold suffering: physical disease (understanding the impermanence and illusion of everything on this earth plane, including our own lives), balancing and overcoming mental inharmonies, and the dispelling of spiritual ignorance. Through the application of spiritual principles (Love, Faith, Charity, Honesty, Virtue, etc. etc.), and personal attunement with the God, an individual can bring this growth about. He or she will go through several realms, astral, causal, and physical (like earth), until the soul has reached a sufficient enough vibratory level to merge back in to the Infinate, and then.. Eternal Bliss.
Oh, eff it, kinda hard to explain.. What I'm saying is... Life is like this:
9
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: fox news origination
« on: July 01, 2011, 11:05:11 AM »government controlled anti-government media
Fox News tell us how great America is/was...
as long as a Republican is President.
10
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Holy War
« on: June 30, 2011, 01:37:55 PM »Today I saw this girl's facebook status. A friend of hers commented on it and eventually it came up that the father of her friend passed away and she is going to the funeral. The girl she was talking to replied with "my prayers are with you". Why would someone say something so stupid? It wasn't her dad, it wasn't even her relative, and yet people are "praying" and "sending prayers" to her?
Why is religion (and praying) so egotistical?
Most people who "my prayers are with you" don't actually end up praying for those people at all.
Some of the time. I happen to regard the positive statement and the sentiments behind (even if feigned) "my prayers are with you" as having its own vibration, and being a "prayer" in itself.
Also, in the instance above with the girl, she was probably just being polite. But who knows, maybe she confided in the other girl how much she hates going to funerals and that it reminds her of a loss in her family etc. Who knows why she said that? Maybe she is just a brainless skank, who really cares? So why get all butthurt?
Because it is your own ego that is involved...
To judge, or to claim to know why someone says something helpful to another person, and then deem their positive statements and actions as egotistical, is, in reality, the real egotism here.
11
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Kansas City
« on: June 14, 2011, 02:37:04 PM »
Hey we got that one guy who does all the epic voice over crap 
Now we know we have made it big time 
Now we know we have made it big time
12
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Israel
« on: May 26, 2011, 02:26:23 PM »QuoteFight a half dozen wars against terrorism, while simultaneously calling for a sovereign state for terrorist group and US enemy Hamas.
painting a pretty broad brush to say all Palestinians want violence or that a terrorist group like Hamas will always be their leadership. I would say that the extremists are the only ones heard and are given leadership roles because they hold corrupt elections (see Abbas).
A Jewish state and a Palestinian state can co-exist. That's Obama stance. What's more clear than that?
:Epic Fail:
Palestinian Gaza is run by Hamas, check
Obama says Palestine and Israel can co-exist, so it must be true.:naivete on roids:
If this is the closest we're going to get to someone actually articulating how this foreign policy decision is coherent, I guess it's safe to say it's not.
The media has the public tricked on the whole situation, which is a pretty crapty situation on both sides.
Israel is just as guilty of causing violence in that region as Palestine is.
Israel could stop the violence if they wanted to, but they would rather take more land away from the people that were there first.
And I'm sure I'll see some neo-con response to this including quotes from the Bible, but the media has you tricked into hating Arabs too
Wow Pike.. I really hope a lot of the crap you say on here is "trying to hard to be edgy," because if you actually believe this crap
Wrong Fake Sugar Dick... THIS is naivete on roids
14
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Things conservatives say/do that are silly
« on: May 23, 2011, 01:03:22 PM »"If your political position is in disagreement with my own you must hate america/be butthurt"
i.e. (mods: rename this "the butthurt thread")
kudos to Dirty for exemplifying this particular brand of conservative silliness
I agree with this post LickNeckey.. but the Gay Marriage thing is a talking point enmeshed with major butthurtness, as it shows up on several threads of wide ranging topics.
Also, complaining about "National Defense" huh? Well, just because you constantly use the word "paradigm" doesn't mean you have a grasp on our nation's complex foreign policies. Basically, the world is a shithole, and we need a strong military so we can kill muslim babies and torture people and get oil from them while we convert them to Christianity. DUH!
Anyways, I am a conservative so I'll really quickly comment on a few of the things Pike brought up.
Against legalizing drugs- (Weed, legalize. Others don't)
Against Muslims practicing their religion (Not this conservative)
Against bringing troops home (Here is the deal... They are already there, whether or not they should be there in the first place is another argument. However, we can't just say "Peace out bitches" and leave abruptly like the Ron Paul Neo-Isolationist retards want to)
pro Israel (You probably have no understanding of our history with Israel or its founding, so I'm not going to even attempt to try explaining this one. I will say that it is better than Pro "Palestine" )
Anti abortion (Oh noooo, "women's health"
. FYI, There is a difference between a medical abortion, and the millions of elective abortions performed in our country. Any objective observer can see that life begins at conception. If it does not, someone is designating an arbitrary point where the "fetus" becomes "human." For example, So 1 second before it is born it is not a human, but once it passes 6 inches down the birth canal it is? What about its location changes "what" it is.. I mean, does the fact that I move to New York or LA change who I am? The only difference between you and a "fetus" is your size, your level of human development, your environment, and your degree of dependency on your mother... which judging by the liberals' posts, most of them probably live with them)Gay Marriage should be a Church and State issue. If churches want to marry gay people, the state should recognize it like they recognize other marriages performed by clergy. Problem solved.
15
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Hangovers
« on: May 09, 2011, 09:56:37 AM »
Vodka and Sprite + 2 ativan = Cured and winning
16
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: FDR Truthers
« on: May 03, 2011, 03:15:22 PM »
Seriously... It just auto corrected R E T A R D E D ? and changed it to respected? 
17
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: FDR Truthers
« on: May 03, 2011, 03:14:30 PM »
Read this book because of its religious themes (i.e. Evolution and Marxism is out to destroy Christianity), but this might give you your fix. It is actually coherent. Extremely (censored apparently), but coherent.
http://www.amazon.com/Unseen-Hand-Ralph-Epperson/dp/0961413506
http://www.amazon.com/Unseen-Hand-Ralph-Epperson/dp/0961413506
19
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Bin Laden now partying with Brook Berringer and Sunshine Meier.
« on: May 02, 2011, 09:55:45 AM »
Trying too hard to be edgy...
20
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: What would Jesus take?
« on: April 29, 2011, 11:00:46 AM »
Ummm... I don't see a lot of "owning" here.. Just a pretentious, condescending, liberal prick waxing philosophical. Kinda sad really...
Lawrence O'Donnell? Seriously?
FWIW, I think this clip actually proves the point Rush was making...
Lawrence O'Donnell? Seriously?
FWIW, I think this clip actually proves the point Rush was making...
21
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Holy War
« on: April 22, 2011, 11:28:39 AM »
I still love you though Chingon
22
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Religion,Bible,Church, Etc. Thread
« on: April 22, 2011, 09:57:52 AM »Quote
I included the quotes to show that some of the most prominent leaders in Christianity, people who'd spent much of their lives thinking about the Scriptures, were anti-women.
To be fair, at the time when the quotes were made, the entire world could be described into the broad generalization of being "anti-women." An argument can be made that Eastern Civilization was just as, or more, "anti-women" than the newly developing Christian West.
Quote
The Southern Baptist Convention in recent years said that wives should submit to their husbands.
Yes, they are speaking about St. Paul's instructions in Ephesians for a Christian household from Ephesians Chapter 5:
21 Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. (He is speaking of the spiritual principle of reciprocity in a relationship, not oppression. He goes on to clearly describe it.)
22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. (As you do to the Lord, implies that free will is still involved) 23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.
25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church....
In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 After all, no one ever hated their own body, but they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church— 30 for we are members of his body.
31 “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.”[c] 32 This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. 33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband. (The last verse he he sums it up in the consensual, mutual, spiritual, reciprocal dedication to God and the marriage)
Earlier in the epistle he gives this instruction:
"Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love. Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace." Ephesians 4:1-3
Hardly the "just go beat the bitch" slant you are trying to portray it as.
Quote
If the Bible is such a great moral guide, why has it been so easy through the centuries to use it to justify the most horrible atrocities and suffering?
Human nature my friend, is why atrocities and suffering occur, not "justification" from the Bible. The Bible has also been used to justify, motivate, and inspire a great amount of good in this world as well.
Finally,
Quote
Christians abuse women at a higher rate than non-believers.
Data? or just a platitude?
I have access to an assload of academic databases due to my work, I would be happy to email you the full text of these studies/articles.
D. B. Sugerman and S. L. Frankel, "Patriarchal Ideology and Wife-Assault: A Meta-Analytic Review," Journal of Family Violence 11 (1996)
"Conservative Protestant Ideology and Wife Abuse: Reflections on the Discrepancy between Theory and Data," Journal of Religion and Abuse 2 (2001)
“Patriarchy and Wife Assault: The Ecological Fallacy,’’ in Violence and Victims Vol. 9, No. 2 (1994)
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3817/is_200709/ai_n29491710/pg_4/
23
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Religion,Bible,Church, Etc. Thread
« on: April 20, 2011, 03:49:19 PM »
BTW, lots of gay sex and incest in Genesis by people who are said to probably be in heaven.
Lot effs his daughters in a gang bang, also, Noah gets pak'd and gets effed by his son.
Somehow I don't think this kid is going to have a cutout of that though....
Lot effs his daughters in a gang bang, also, Noah gets pak'd and gets effed by his son.
Somehow I don't think this kid is going to have a cutout of that though....
24
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Religion,Bible,Church, Etc. Thread
« on: April 20, 2011, 12:04:48 PM »
<---- Wonders why Athiesm vs. Theism always ends up with the "butt effing" discussion. It always comes back to gayness, and people not accepting said gayness.... Jesus, who really cares?
For the atheist, who cares if religious people don't accept gays? What does it matter? Must everyone agree with you?
There are plenty of religions/denominations that do. Some groups not accepting the queerz is not a basis for wholesale condemnation.
For the atheist, who cares if religious people don't accept gays? What does it matter? Must everyone agree with you?
There are plenty of religions/denominations that do. Some groups not accepting the queerz is not a basis for wholesale condemnation.
25
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Religion,Bible,Church, Etc. Thread
« on: April 11, 2011, 02:00:38 PM »
First off, The "watchmaker" argument ----> Okay, anyways...
It is easy to be critical about religion keeping people ignorant, committing atrocities, propagating superstition, and manipulating the masses. Every single one of these things has happened.
However, that says nothing about whether or whether not God exists. Religion is an entirely human creation, acting as an intermediary between Deity and man. Subjective experiences with God can lead to all sorts of crazy interpretations, philosophies, dogmas, and actions.
But deep down in the human heart, there is a Desire to commune with the Infinite. It is innate, whether or whether or not you think it is. How can it be innate? There are tons of people who don't believe. Even the atheist and the agnostic have at least asked themselves these important questions about God and Life, and have come to their own conclusion.
Some forms of religion promote ignorance. However, others including even Catholicism, ask their practitioners to go deeper in to Reality and experience it on a non-materialistic, an intuitive, inner, supernatural level.
Religion has been around since man first made cave drawings or tried to worship the sky, stars, animals or plants. We are the only primates, and animals on the planet, capable of thinking abstractly. Why hold in condemnation another's abstraction, or their Reality as they see it? Don't you have one yourself which you cling to?
The Catholic Church has accumulated some huge karmic challenges over its storied and controversial history, but I have confidence these things will work themselves out. From my personal experience, I have worked with Catholic Charities on the front lines of homelessness, drug and alcohol addiction, crime, and prostitution infested areas. To describe the work they do as commendable, inspirational, and unselfishly Loving would not do justice to these wonderful souls.
If taking shots at them makes you feel better, go ahead, they can take it.
But I must ask.. What are you doing for your fellow man, righteously indignant secular humanist?
As much as you want to intellectualize your patchwork materialistic morality, as a whole, you fall incredibly short of the religious.
Sure, you can claim religion "has done more harm," but if you want to blind yourself to its good, then perhaps you are the one steeped in "ignorance."
Okay, anyways...Quote
religious nuts from 1000 years ago would want to lock this thread.Religion is not debateable, keep the knowledge from the people, promote ignorance.
Quote
Yeah, well 1000 years ago, Catholicism was very similar to radical Islam.
It is easy to be critical about religion keeping people ignorant, committing atrocities, propagating superstition, and manipulating the masses. Every single one of these things has happened.
However, that says nothing about whether or whether not God exists. Religion is an entirely human creation, acting as an intermediary between Deity and man. Subjective experiences with God can lead to all sorts of crazy interpretations, philosophies, dogmas, and actions.
But deep down in the human heart, there is a Desire to commune with the Infinite. It is innate, whether or whether or not you think it is. How can it be innate? There are tons of people who don't believe. Even the atheist and the agnostic have at least asked themselves these important questions about God and Life, and have come to their own conclusion.
Some forms of religion promote ignorance. However, others including even Catholicism, ask their practitioners to go deeper in to Reality and experience it on a non-materialistic, an intuitive, inner, supernatural level.
Religion has been around since man first made cave drawings or tried to worship the sky, stars, animals or plants. We are the only primates, and animals on the planet, capable of thinking abstractly. Why hold in condemnation another's abstraction, or their Reality as they see it? Don't you have one yourself which you cling to?
The Catholic Church has accumulated some huge karmic challenges over its storied and controversial history, but I have confidence these things will work themselves out. From my personal experience, I have worked with Catholic Charities on the front lines of homelessness, drug and alcohol addiction, crime, and prostitution infested areas. To describe the work they do as commendable, inspirational, and unselfishly Loving would not do justice to these wonderful souls.
If taking shots at them makes you feel better, go ahead, they can take it.
But I must ask.. What are you doing for your fellow man, righteously indignant secular humanist?
As much as you want to intellectualize your patchwork materialistic morality, as a whole, you fall incredibly short of the religious.
Sure, you can claim religion "has done more harm," but if you want to blind yourself to its good, then perhaps you are the one steeped in "ignorance."