Author Topic: B12 tourney  (Read 16136 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline the KHAN!

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1574
  • The Prince of Darkness and Sorrow
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #25 on: February 20, 2011, 01:37:26 PM »
We'll see come saturday.

If I'm wrong, I'll admit it.

If you're wrong, you can suck my balls.
The Scheme Doctor
Up the Banana Wall

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85385
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #26 on: February 20, 2011, 01:37:34 PM »
We won't lose to NU.  Mizzou....not so sure.

opposite

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19436
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #27 on: February 20, 2011, 01:50:02 PM »
3 more wins and we are in.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #28 on: February 20, 2011, 01:54:51 PM »
10-6  :emawkid:

Offline CatsFan_58

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 667
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #29 on: February 20, 2011, 03:10:35 PM »
We could lose @ NU and still get a bye by the skin of our teeth. KenPom has Nubb going 8-8, which would likely entail splitting the MU and @ISU games. If NU beats MU in Lincoln (52% win prob.) and loses to ISU in Ames (51% win prob.), and KenPom's other projections hold, we get the bye. Here's the bracket generator output:

1. Texas (15 - 1)
2. Kansas (14 - 2)
3. Texas A&M (10 - 6)
4. Kansas State (8 - 8) With Missouri, defeated Nebraska based on North Division record. Defeated Missouri based on record against #1 North Division teams.
5. Missouri (8 - 8) With Kansas State, defeated Nebraska based on North Division record. Lost to Kansas State based on record against #1 North Division teams. Defeated Nebraska based on North Division record.
6. Nebraska (8 - 8) Lost to Kansas State and Missouri based on North Division record. Lost to Missouri based on North Division record.
7. Baylor (7 - 9) Defeated Colorado based on head-to-head record.
8. Colorado (7 - 9) Lost to Baylor based on head-to-head record.
9. Oklahoma State (6 - 10)
10. Texas Tech (5 - 11) Defeated Oklahoma based on record against #2 North Division teams.
11. Oklahoma (5 - 11) Lost to Texas Tech based on record against #2 North Division teams.
12. Iowa State (3 - 13)
I think that there is a very good possibility that this happens. I am as optimistic as ever... WE WILL GET THAT 4 SEED!!!! :emawkid:

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17608
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #30 on: February 20, 2011, 03:53:15 PM »
Mizzou has been crap on the road

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40540
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #31 on: February 20, 2011, 04:16:58 PM »
Mizzou has been crap on the road

1 conf road win.  same as nu & ksu.  baylor has two.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline KSU_foo

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 213
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #32 on: February 20, 2011, 04:57:46 PM »
We'll see come saturday.

If I'm wrong, I'll admit it.

If you're wrong, you can suck my balls.

Yep

Offline Vanro03

  • Corn Hole'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #33 on: February 20, 2011, 05:46:49 PM »
Seems like bubble teams with a little star power have an edge, remember the Beasley year, this year the beard carries us through even at 8-8.


I would rather mu not be a must win.  and even with wins against mu, isu we still need to win our first tourney game or we aren't guaranteed cac. 

If we beat NU and MU I guarantee our NCAA spot. 
Big words from a Runza employee..

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1966
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #34 on: February 20, 2011, 05:50:44 PM »
Mizzou has been crap on the road

1 conf road win.  same as nu & ksu.  baylor has two.

Never forget the Cats have 30 seconds of a second road win.

Offline skycat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1143
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #35 on: February 21, 2011, 03:39:25 PM »
We could lose @ NU and still get a bye by the skin of our teeth. KenPom has Nubb going 8-8, which would likely entail splitting the MU and @ISU games. If NU beats MU in Lincoln (52% win prob.) and loses to ISU in Ames (51% win prob.), and KenPom's other projections hold, we get the bye. Here's the bracket generator output:

1. Texas (15 - 1)
2. Kansas (14 - 2)
3. Texas A&M (10 - 6)
4. Kansas State (8 - 8) With Missouri, defeated Nebraska based on North Division record. Defeated Missouri based on record against #1 North Division teams.
5. Missouri (8 - 8) With Kansas State, defeated Nebraska based on North Division record. Lost to Kansas State based on record against #1 North Division teams. Defeated Nebraska based on North Division record.
6. Nebraska (8 - 8) Lost to Kansas State and Missouri based on North Division record. Lost to Missouri based on North Division record.
7. Baylor (7 - 9) Defeated Colorado based on head-to-head record.
8. Colorado (7 - 9) Lost to Baylor based on head-to-head record.
9. Oklahoma State (6 - 10)
10. Texas Tech (5 - 11) Defeated Oklahoma based on record against #2 North Division teams.
11. Oklahoma (5 - 11) Lost to Texas Tech based on record against #2 North Division teams.
12. Iowa State (3 - 13)
I think that there is a very good possibility that this happens. I am as optimistic as ever... WE WILL GET THAT 4 SEED!!!! :emawkid:

It's the most likely scenario:

http://www.bringonthecats.com/2011/2/21/2004474/big-12-outlook-02-21-11#storyjump

However, everything would still have to go just right. Much better to beat NU and get a little breathing room.

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9492
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #36 on: February 21, 2011, 03:45:55 PM »
No Wednesday!

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37130
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #37 on: February 21, 2011, 10:48:27 PM »
I don't think we will lose again until we get to the Big 12 Tournament.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #38 on: February 21, 2011, 10:50:35 PM »
I don't think we will lose again until we get to the Big 12 Tournament.

If that happens...we go 3-1 in Big Monday games. One of the biggest shocks, after the team face-planted, of the season. (for me)

Offline AppleJack

  • AppleJack
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6337
  • How are you doing today?
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #39 on: February 23, 2011, 10:42:52 PM »
Looks like us vs Miz for the 4. Smell ya later Baylor and Nub  :lol:
When one person, for whatever reason, has a chance to lead an exceptional life, he has no right to keep it to himself.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #40 on: February 23, 2011, 11:30:59 PM »
wierd.  if i do the bracket projector as

KSU: MU(W), @UT(L), ISU(W)
MU: @KSU(L), @NU(L), KU(W) =>
Quote
4. Missouri (9 - 7) Defeated Kansas State based on record against #4 North Division teams.

but if i switch to
MU: @KSU(L), @NU(W), KU(L) =>
Quote
4. Kansas State (9 - 7) Defeated Missouri based on record against #1 North Division teams.

neither teams North records change.  but swapping out the results for Missouri against KU and NU flips the seedings.


Online MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44912
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #41 on: February 24, 2011, 01:36:29 AM »
wierd.  if i do the bracket projector as

KSU: MU(W), @UT(L), ISU(W)
MU: @KSU(L), @NU(L), KU(W) =>
Quote
4. Missouri (9 - 7) Defeated Kansas State based on record against #4 North Division teams.

but if i switch to
MU: @KSU(L), @NU(W), KU(L) =>
Quote
4. Kansas State (9 - 7) Defeated Missouri based on record against #1 North Division teams.

neither teams North records change.  but swapping out the results for Missouri against KU and NU flips the seedings.



Yeah because if they beat KU the tie breaker of record against the #1 team in the division would be the same 1-1 versus KU.  Mizzou and KSU would finish 2nd & 3rd in this scenario so then you go to the record against the #4 team.  In whatever you generated Nebraska finished behind Colorado for 4th.  KSU was 0-2 versus CU and Mizzou was 1-1.  Therefore the third to last tiebreaker would go to Mizzou.  It is not very likely that the standings will finish with Colorado finishing 4th and KSU and Mizzou would have to use that tie breaker.  As a matter of fact KSU, Mizzou, NU, and CU would have to win/lose an exact combination of games for this to play out.  I'm no mathematician but I'm pretty sure there are still around 100 win combination possibilities for these four teams.

Also worth noting that Colorado and Nebraska are still very much alive for the 4 seed.  Colorado will likely be eliminated on Saturday, Nebraska will need to win in Ames.

Offline the KHAN!

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1574
  • The Prince of Darkness and Sorrow
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #42 on: February 24, 2011, 11:05:52 AM »
We'll see come saturday.

If I'm wrong, I'll admit it.

If you're wrong, you can suck my balls.


Okay now, looks like someone owes me a ball sucking...
The Scheme Doctor
Up the Banana Wall

Offline Dirty Sanchez

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1749
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #43 on: February 26, 2011, 04:34:12 PM »
Update

This week has really sorted things out.  As mentioned above, its us and mizzou for #4.  Looking at the schedules and tiebreakers, here's the breakdown:

KSU: @texas, iowa st.---despite our history with texas, I'm going conservative and say 1-1
mu: @nebraska, uk--I'd say at best 1-1.  nebraska could be a trap game on the road, preparing for uk, and nebraska being a little angry at the iowa st loss.

Obviously, if we go 1-1 (or 2-0) and mizzou  goes 0-2, we get the 4.

Now if we lose to texas and beat iowa st and mizzou beats nebraska and loses to uk. The tiebreakers go 1)head2head-split 2)division record-tied @6-4. 3)record against the top team in the division (uk)--Advantage KSU.

If we lose texas and win iowa st and mizzou loses to nebraska and beats uk, the same tiebreakers go until 3, when, if I'm reading it right, would go to common record against other division teams.  uk/KSU/mu-tie.  Then it would fall to colorado--Advantage mizzou.

The texas game is inconsequential if mizzou loses either game (I think they will lose either or both), because its a non-divisional game.  Outside of NCAA resume's, the iowa st game is more important to us.  Might be more to lose by losing to them than there is to gain beating texas.

Tiebreaker list:

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=10410&ATCLID=1520897

Offline CatMission

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 510
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #44 on: February 26, 2011, 05:48:46 PM »
Be careful, fracking Colorado could blow us up.  They have an opportunity to also finish 9-7 (@ISU, NU) and we could fall as low as #6 if we finish in a three-way tie with CU and MU.

 :eek:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40540
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #45 on: February 26, 2011, 06:02:01 PM »
so it seems like a three way tie would go cu 4.  then kstate 5 if mu beats nu, kstate 6 if mu beats ku.



worth pointing out that a three way tie is highly unlikely, even though each individual game needed for the tie might appear fairly likely.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #46 on: February 26, 2011, 06:03:08 PM »
Be careful, fracking Colorado could blow us up.  They have an opportunity to also finish 9-7 (@ISU, NU) and we could fall as low as #6 if we finish in a three-way tie with CU and MU.

 :eek:
scary
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40540
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #47 on: February 26, 2011, 06:03:58 PM »
dream scenario, obviously, is kstate gets the no-wed by 10-6ing, to play five seed cu.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline TheMadCatter

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 635
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #48 on: February 26, 2011, 06:12:37 PM »
dream scenario, obviously, is kstate gets the no-wed by 10-6ing, to play five seed cu.

That would be amazing.

Online MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44912
    • View Profile
Re: B12 tourney
« Reply #49 on: February 26, 2011, 06:50:43 PM »
Update

This week has really sorted things out.  As mentioned above, its us and mizzou for #4.  Looking at the schedules and tiebreakers, here's the breakdown:

KSU: @texas, iowa st.---despite our history with texas, I'm going conservative and say 1-1
mu: @nebraska, uk--I'd say at best 1-1.  nebraska could be a trap game on the road, preparing for uk, and nebraska being a little angry at the iowa st loss.

Obviously, if we go 1-1 (or 2-0) and mizzou  goes 0-2, we get the 4.

Now if we lose to texas and beat iowa st and mizzou beats nebraska and loses to uk. The tiebreakers go 1)head2head-split 2)division record-tied @6-4. 3)record against the top team in the division (uk)--Advantage KSU.

If we lose texas and win iowa st and mizzou loses to nebraska and beats uk, the same tiebreakers go until 3, when, if I'm reading it right, would go to common record against other division teams.  uk/KSU/mu-tie.  Then it would fall to colorado--Advantage mizzou.

The texas game is inconsequential if mizzou loses either game (I think they will lose either or both), because its a non-divisional game.  Outside of NCAA resume's, the iowa st game is more important to us.  Might be more to lose by losing to them than there is to gain beating texas.

Tiebreaker list:

http://www.big12sports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=10410&ATCLID=1520897

This week cleared nothing up, Nebraska eliminated themselves, that's it.  The CU win was a worst case scenario.  Hell A&M could easily finish 6th and they've been third all season.  This race is fun to watch, there are 13 games left and 11 of them have direct impact on the top 7 seeds.  OU plays in both meaningless games.  People who disparage basketballs regular season are idiots.