Date: 27/08/25 - 08:30 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Ohio State, Kansas struggle to graduate players  (Read 536 times)

March 12, 2007, 04:55:40 PM
Read 536 times

catsfan20012002

  • Guest

March 12, 2007, 05:08:00 PM
Reply #1

pufizzle

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1015
  • Personal Text
    I miss him ^^
http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=9513.0

Sorry, the OFFICIAL Ohio State, ku article thread was posted a long time ago.  Please leave all discussion in that thread.  Thank you. :tongue:

March 12, 2007, 05:10:20 PM
Reply #2

catsfan20012002

  • Guest
Well maybe if you'd put your threads under titles that make sense.....

March 12, 2007, 05:11:06 PM
Reply #3

Trim

  • Administrator
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 2193
  • Personal Text
    "Tacky" -Kietz
Well maybe if you'd put your threads under titles that make sense.....

You are retarded.

March 12, 2007, 05:20:52 PM
Reply #4

SkiLift62

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 24
Maybe they struggle to graduate players because they consistently play into late March each year, well at least mid March.  I would also trade being on that list instead of hosting a game tomorrow night.

March 12, 2007, 05:27:54 PM
Reply #5

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest

March 12, 2007, 05:29:23 PM
Reply #6

coitus

  • Guest
a topic so nice it got posted twice.





 :-[

March 12, 2007, 10:10:55 PM
Reply #7

Racquetball_Ninja

  • Guest
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=2795525

Doesn't give any numbers for ku though

Ummm... yea... so I'm gonna have to ask you to take it easy with threads like this.  If Huggins stays here for any amount of time we're not going to have a very strong graduation rate either.  They will however, have great jobs which is why they came college in the first place.  Wait... don't say it, I took this paraphrased quote from Huggins himself.  I don't want any of you watchdogs thinking that I'm trying to pan off his brilliance as my own.   :D

March 12, 2007, 09:17:44 PM
Reply #8

HawkLegend

  • Guest
That article is sketchy at best.  They are using numbers from '96-'99.  I have no idea what ku's actual GSR is, but I'd bet that it's pretty respectable for a major program.

March 12, 2007, 10:34:05 PM
Reply #9

kst8cat

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 872
That article is sketchy at best.  They are using numbers from '96-'99.  I have no idea what ku's actual GSR is, but I'd bet that it's pretty respectable for a major program.

It said incoming freshman class of '96-'99, so the data is actually more recent than that by 4 years or so depending on when the cutoff dates are.

March 12, 2007, 11:48:26 PM
Reply #10

coitus

  • Guest
That article is sketchy at best.  They are using numbers from '96-'99.  I have no idea what ku's actual GSR is, but I'd bet that it's pretty respectable for a major program.

ku's actual gsr for that period was 45%.

that's craptier than mangino after a double serving of frijoles at don chilitos.