Date: 27/08/25 - 18:14 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Can anyone listening give a Kietz monologue rundown?  (Read 1369 times)

March 12, 2007, 01:53:24 PM
Read 1369 times

cireksu

  • Guest
 :hope:

Or at least does he meltdown Rose style?

March 12, 2007, 02:09:58 PM
Reply #1

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
No real meltdown yet, says his problem is with the league.
Weiser will be on BTL @ 5pm.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

March 12, 2007, 02:16:08 PM
Reply #2

cireksu

  • Guest
Thank you,

anything specific, did he call out weiberg?

March 12, 2007, 02:16:35 PM
Reply #3

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
He's talking about the NIT selection process.

In other words: WGAF so far.

March 12, 2007, 02:22:00 PM
Reply #4

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
Questioning the validity of the league tourney.  Only bad things can come from it.  Suggested moving it up to December.
Sick of the Big XII being a step child. 

Most of the people on the committee believe the MVC to be stronger than the B12.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

March 12, 2007, 02:23:06 PM
Reply #5

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Questioning the validity of the league tourney.  Only bad things can come from it.  Suggested moving it up to December.

I like this idea.  I'll start a new thread.

March 12, 2007, 02:26:09 PM
Reply #6

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
Ah, the rant has begun. B!tching out everyone affiliated with the Big XII front office, on promoting the conference and its crapty TV deal.

March 12, 2007, 02:27:56 PM
Reply #7

pissclams

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 16026
  • Personal Text
    (worst non-premium poster at ksufans.com)
LOL @ Danny clowning Whataburger Big XII sponsorship


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

March 12, 2007, 02:29:48 PM
Reply #8

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers

March 12, 2007, 02:32:03 PM
Reply #9

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
The real rant has commenced, re: K-State knowing ahead of time that they were out.

March 12, 2007, 02:41:34 PM
Reply #10

cireksu

  • Guest

March 12, 2007, 02:49:07 PM
Reply #11

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
The real rant has commenced, re: K-State knowing ahead of time that they were out.

and....
ksufanscopycat my friends.

March 12, 2007, 03:08:53 PM
Reply #12

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers

March 12, 2007, 03:27:44 PM
Reply #13

DrunkoMcGee

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 243
Wow.  Now Kevin is saying that the Big 12 was openly trying to hold KSU down. 

March 12, 2007, 03:29:10 PM
Reply #14

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Wow.  Now Kevin is saying that the Big 12 was openly trying to hold KSU down. 

You really need to work on your posting style.

March 12, 2007, 03:38:55 PM
Reply #15

DrunkoMcGee

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 243
Wow.  Now Kevin is saying that the Big 12 was openly trying to hold KSU down. 

You really need to work on your posting style.

Who would actually spend time trying to work on a posting style?  You seem to respond to me a lot, I guess my style is doing something to attract you.

March 12, 2007, 03:51:28 PM
Reply #16

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
Wow.  Now Kevin is saying that the Big 12 was openly trying to hold KSU down. 

You really need to work on your posting style.

Who would actually spend time trying to work on a posting style?  You seem to respond to me a lot, I guess my style is doing something to attract you.

You apparently give a sh1t enough to post 110 times.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

March 12, 2007, 04:12:21 PM
Reply #17

FHSU92

  • Premium Member
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2625
I caught the end of someone supporting the committee's decision to leave out KSU, but felt KSt8 was the better team.  KK repeated that the committee was supposed to put the best teams in the tourney.  Mentioned that based on marquee wins, OSU should have gone instead of Tek as Tek didn't have any big noncon wins.

Also, mentioned that the Big12 should penalize soft noncon schedules.  Klink said it wouldn't work cuz ukan and UT would raise a stink because if they lost, it would jeopardize a 1 seed.

Just played Huggins 'making history' statement.

Making a statement that swapping the Cal/XU away games with 150-250 rpi teams at home would've gotten them in (24 wins), but Huggs took a chance to face tougher teams.

March 12, 2007, 04:17:46 PM
Reply #18

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
Leaks and Leaks and Leaks and Lunardi and Weiberg and Weiberg's a failure and Vegas is laughing at Tech
ksufanscopycat my friends.

March 12, 2007, 04:18:16 PM
Reply #19

BMWJhawk

  • Guest
I'm laughing at Illinois.   Look at their resume compared to K-State.  It's an absolute joke.

March 12, 2007, 04:24:43 PM
Reply #20

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
He's really making huge assumptions regarding what Weiberg said to the committee.

Heck, he's making a huge assumption saying that the committee asked for his input.

March 12, 2007, 04:26:25 PM
Reply #21

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
He's really making huge assumptions regarding what Weiberg said to the committee.

Heck, he's making a huge assumption saying that the committee asked for his input.

Agreed.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

March 12, 2007, 04:40:28 PM
Reply #22

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Love his idea of lobbying for Fox to broadcast Big XII sports.  National football and basketball games on Saturdays would be a bigger deal than Big Monday.

http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=2701.0

March 12, 2007, 04:44:28 PM
Reply #23

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
I'm laughing at Illinois.   Look at their resume compared to K-State.  It's an absolute joke.

What do you think of the snub?  Coolhawks seems to be enjoying himself.

March 12, 2007, 04:46:20 PM
Reply #24

catzacker

  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8304
  • Personal Text
    Fear the Brick
Love his idea of lobbying for Fox to broadcast Big XII sports.  National football and basketball games on Saturdays would be a bigger deal than Big Monday.

http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=2701.0

Now that is something tangible the Big 12 Commissioner could do that would affect the conference positively. 

March 12, 2007, 04:48:59 PM
Reply #25

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
I'm laughing at Illinois.   Look at their resume compared to K-State.  It's an absolute joke.

Just looked at their schedule.  They have 4 road victories, 3 over 10-20ish teams, and 1 over Bradley (NIT team).  Not very impressive.

March 12, 2007, 05:17:37 PM
Reply #26

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers

March 12, 2007, 05:18:51 PM
Reply #27

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
Weiser thinks team names should be removed from the selection committee's databases and discussion, and use codes for each team instead, to ensure that conference affiliations and personal biases are truly removed from the equation.

March 12, 2007, 05:30:00 PM
Reply #28

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Weiser thinks team names should be removed from the selection committee's databases and discussion, and use codes for each team instead, to ensure that conference affiliations and personal biases are truly removed from the equation.

That would be impossible, since they would see the schedules and have a good idea who they are.

March 12, 2007, 05:32:22 PM
Reply #29

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
Weiser thinks team names should be removed from the selection committee's databases and discussion, and use codes for each team instead, to ensure that conference affiliations and personal biases are truly removed from the equation.

That would be impossible, since they would see the schedules and have a good idea who they are.

To some extent, but remember, team names would be removed from the schedules as well. You would only see RPI numbers (or whatever other ranking system they might create). So unless the committee members memorized a ton of RPIs, they wouldn't know who they were looking at.