I don't understand how we'll probably be one of the last four in, and you guys say we are getting a 12 seed?
Quote from: lynchmb1029 on March 10, 2007, 03:54:30 PMQuote from: catfan28 on March 10, 2007, 03:52:07 PMQuote from: Trim Reaper on March 10, 2007, 03:47:46 PMOk, setting aside that you're declaring Today (a day where we lost to ku when winning would've LOCKED UP a NCAA berth) as FINE and DANDY, you'd rather play a #5 or #6 seed in the 1st round than a #8 or #9 seed? If it means having to play a #2 or #3 seed in the second roundinstead of a #1 seed....then HELL YES.The fact that you are worrying more about who we would face in the second round before locking up a for sure NCAA bid......well it just speaks volumes.I was going to reply with something along those lines, but you beat me to it.Catfan28... let me know when there's hot video of good-looking wbb players doing something dirty... leave the real basketball talk to us.
Quote from: catfan28 on March 10, 2007, 03:52:07 PMQuote from: Trim Reaper on March 10, 2007, 03:47:46 PMOk, setting aside that you're declaring Today (a day where we lost to ku when winning would've LOCKED UP a NCAA berth) as FINE and DANDY, you'd rather play a #5 or #6 seed in the 1st round than a #8 or #9 seed? If it means having to play a #2 or #3 seed in the second roundinstead of a #1 seed....then HELL YES.The fact that you are worrying more about who we would face in the second round before locking up a for sure NCAA bid......well it just speaks volumes.
Quote from: Trim Reaper on March 10, 2007, 03:47:46 PMOk, setting aside that you're declaring Today (a day where we lost to ku when winning would've LOCKED UP a NCAA berth) as FINE and DANDY, you'd rather play a #5 or #6 seed in the 1st round than a #8 or #9 seed? If it means having to play a #2 or #3 seed in the second roundinstead of a #1 seed....then HELL YES.
Ok, setting aside that you're declaring Today (a day where we lost to ku when winning would've LOCKED UP a NCAA berth) as FINE and DANDY, you'd rather play a #5 or #6 seed in the 1st round than a #8 or #9 seed?
I don't like Currie.
props to Trim for sniffing out losers
Quote from: Trim Reaper on March 10, 2007, 03:57:33 PMQuote from: lynchmb1029 on March 10, 2007, 03:54:30 PMQuote from: catfan28 on March 10, 2007, 03:52:07 PMQuote from: Trim Reaper on March 10, 2007, 03:47:46 PMOk, setting aside that you're declaring Today (a day where we lost to ku when winning would've LOCKED UP a NCAA berth) as FINE and DANDY, you'd rather play a #5 or #6 seed in the 1st round than a #8 or #9 seed? If it means having to play a #2 or #3 seed in the second roundinstead of a #1 seed....then HELL YES.The fact that you are worrying more about who we would face in the second round before locking up a for sure NCAA bid......well it just speaks volumes.I was going to reply with something along those lines, but you beat me to it.Catfan28... let me know when there's hot video of good-looking wbb players doing something dirty... leave the real basketball talk to us. LOL.....this topic has nothing to do with women's basketball.And yet...you are supposed to have more knowledge than me Please son......
Bob Huggins on radio show 45 seconds ago:I'd like to compete against people like catfan28.
Quote from: Trim Reaper on March 10, 2007, 04:04:42 PMBob Huggins on radio show 45 seconds ago:I'd like to compete against people like catfan28.I'll take you on in a 3 point shootout Trim.....
Quote from: catfan28 on March 10, 2007, 04:07:00 PMQuote from: Trim Reaper on March 10, 2007, 04:04:42 PMBob Huggins on radio show 45 seconds ago:I'd like to compete against people like catfan28.I'll take you on in a 3 point shootout Trim..... Read better. And go listen to the post-game.
Quote from: Skycat on March 10, 2007, 03:26:11 PMNormally you're one of the most rational posters on this board, but this post just doesn't make any sense in the context of this thread.winning better than losing. not rational?
Normally you're one of the most rational posters on this board, but this post just doesn't make any sense in the context of this thread.
Quote from: Trim Reaper on March 10, 2007, 04:14:05 PMQuote from: catfan28 on March 10, 2007, 04:07:00 PMQuote from: Trim Reaper on March 10, 2007, 04:04:42 PMBob Huggins on radio show 45 seconds ago:I'd like to compete against people like catfan28.I'll take you on in a 3 point shootout Trim..... Read better. And go listen to the post-game.Giggle....total unadulterated pwnership. Nice work trim.
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2007, 03:28:00 PMwinning better than losing. not rational?Did anyone argue that?
winning better than losing. not rational?
Today worked out just FINE and DANDY
As much as I would like to beat ku......Today's results will work in our favor. We stayed with the#2 team on a neutral court and lost by only 6 points.We are gonna be a #12 or #11 seed, and that worksin our corner because it would put us against a 5 or 6seed and then a #2 or #3 seed.If we had beat ku today, we would have been a #9 or #8seed and then been on the same side of the bracketas the #1 seeds.
Yeah, I guess he did.I need to read better I guess.
Quote from: Skycat on March 10, 2007, 04:51:53 PMYeah, I guess he did.I need to read better I guess.if you were the first to laugh at the irony in the 3 amigos thread you would completely redeem yourself.
what time, what channel is the selection show on?
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2007, 04:55:32 PMQuote from: Skycat on March 10, 2007, 04:51:53 PMYeah, I guess he did.I need to read better I guess.if you were the first to laugh at the irony in the 3 amigos thread you would completely redeem yourself.that was amazing. you got there before i asked you to.
i like that he likes nph. sets he apart from the crowd.
Quote from: sys on February 12, 2007, 04:14:42 AMi like that he likes nph. sets he apart from the crowd.
