Date: 22/08/25 - 17:22 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: BU loses top football recruiter to K-State  (Read 1903 times)

January 09, 2007, 04:03:09 PM
Reply #30

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
Where are the academic admission standards for Baylor?

I'm just wanting to compare Dax's link to the Texas A&M link he provided.

Also, can someone tell me where it says academic admissions standards are included in this explanation for ranking the schools from the (only) link provided by the Aggy Gay dude?

Thanks.

January 09, 2007, 04:06:23 PM
Reply #31

BWisavag

  • Guest
from the link you just gave, simply look at the row called "STUDENT SELECTIVITY"


January 09, 2007, 04:06:53 PM
Reply #32

BWisavag

  • Guest

January 09, 2007, 04:09:02 PM
Reply #33

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
from the link you just gave, simply look at the row called "STUDENT SELECTIVITY"

Did you even read how they factor the score?

No?  Cool.



January 09, 2007, 04:20:15 PM
Reply #34

BWisavag

  • Guest
cant dig outta this hole champ

January 09, 2007, 04:22:55 PM
Reply #35

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
And student selectivity on the genearl student basis has NOTHING to do with athletics as I have clearly demonstrated.   Sexually confused sock tried to make an argument using unrelated items from 3rd party sources that had nothing to do with athletics, nor institutional policy.

With the "owned" part we can now start narrowing down where Sexually Conflicted Sock is really from.

http://www.baylor.edu/admissions/

January 09, 2007, 04:25:08 PM
Reply #36

BWisavag

  • Guest
again, your post is inept in proving your point

you post a URL that does not prove your point


January 09, 2007, 04:28:47 PM
Reply #37

BWisavag

  • Guest
since you dont understand i will continue to post this until you show proof otherwise...

what you have said, even if backed up by url is inept in proving the point you are attempting to make...

if you found said URL it would prove one thing, there is more of a bearacracy at baylor than at a&m... its that simple, i know that may be hard for someone from a school ranked so low to figure it out, so i will continue to post this so you can reread it.

 :popcorn:

January 09, 2007, 04:33:54 PM
Reply #38

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
At schools that only require the NCAA minumum, like 10 schools in the Big 12, there is in place a seperate admissions processs only for freshman student athletes.  At Baylor all incoming Freshman go through the same process.

The NCAA Clearinghouse allows for a high enough GPA to circumvent a non-qualifying standardized test score, at Baylor, ALL FRESHMAN must have a qualifying GPA and a qualifying test score.  

. Baylor should, because admissions standards need to be tied to the university's unique academic demands, maintain its current standards of a minimum SAT of 820 (or ACT of 68) and a qualifying core GPA, despite the fact that NCAA initial eligibility legislation now features an index with no minimum score required on the SAT/ACT as long as the core high school GPA is high enough.

http://www.baylor.edu/pr/news.php?action=story&story=8145

Plus for the last time, your URL's have NOTHING to do with athletics, NOTHING.  They are from 3rd parties, and are not based on any official documentation whatsoever . . . shame on me for continuing this.

The rest of your bilge is nothing but personal opinion backed up by nothing.







« Last Edit: January 09, 2007, 04:38:53 PM by sonofdaxjones »

January 09, 2007, 04:38:15 PM
Reply #39

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc

January 09, 2007, 04:40:02 PM
Reply #40

BWisavag

  • Guest
""The task force produced conclusions that indicate a wide range of participation and broad-based commitment, especially the use of the athletic department as a resource and the head coaches for all sports who were invited to participate in the formulation of the final recommendations," Sloan said. "I look forward to the implementation of their work.""

IT HASNT BEEN IMPLEMENTED YET IDIOT!!! i was waiting for you to post this!!! its okay, you were perfectly baited, most would have fallen into the trap... Baylor made the recommendations and never implemented them...

for this you are an idiot...

God hates you

people like you make baby Jesus cry

January 09, 2007, 04:41:21 PM
Reply #41

BWisavag

  • Guest
again, you are an idiot... they made the recommendation 2 and a half years ago and never followed through because Guymo told them it would hurt recruiting...  :ustupid:

January 09, 2007, 04:45:06 PM
Reply #42

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
I guess the word MAINTAIN is completely lost on a dumbass such as yourself. 

Baylor should, because admissions standards need to be tied to the university's unique academic demands, maintain its current standards of a minimum SAT of 820 (or ACT of 68) and a qualifying core GPA, despite the fact that NCAA initial eligibility legislation now features an index with no minimum score required on the SAT/ACT as long as the core high school GPA is high enough.

January 09, 2007, 05:31:23 PM
Reply #43

BWisavag

  • Guest
tell me, what is the range of scores one may recieve on the ACT?

there ya go... didnt think this one through did you???

January 09, 2007, 05:34:49 PM
Reply #44

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
Sure . . . and the NCAA minimum standards, which 10 of 12 Big 12 Schools use to determine the admittance of Freshman Athletes allows for an freshman athlete with a high enough GPA to by-pass the standardized test score issue all together.

No charge dumbass.

Now . . . continue to use 3rd party sources that have nothing to do with athletics to try and "back up" your "argument".

You never think do you??




January 09, 2007, 05:39:53 PM
Reply #45

BWisavag

  • Guest
tell me, what is the range of scores one may recieve on the ACT?

and then look at the Baylor statement...

just look

January 09, 2007, 05:44:33 PM
Reply #46

BWisavag

  • Guest

January 09, 2007, 05:47:23 PM
Reply #47

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
400 to 1010 on SAT or 37 to 86 on the ACT (Source-NCAA. Org) if you have a 3.55 GPA or above you can score a 400 on the SAT or a 37 on the ACT (akin to doing nothing  more then signing your name) you can get through the clearinghouse.

With Grade Inflation particularly for athletes, it makes the NCAA Clearinghouse minimum requirements even a bigger joke.  Props to Baylor.




January 09, 2007, 05:54:53 PM
Reply #48

BWisavag

  • Guest
what is the highest score you can get on the ACT?

just answer the question then review previous posts

January 09, 2007, 06:00:34 PM
Reply #49

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644
The Highest score you can get is a 36 which is a 99 on all sections.   So using ACT's scale, if you score a 68 (Baylor's minimum) on the composite that's compareable to getting a 22.5-23 overall as far as I can tell.

The NCAA Minimum Clearinghouse Requirement would allow someone to score a 17-18 overall, and IF they have a 3.55 GPA or above, they can get through.   

Props to Baylor for having higher requirements then the NCAA minimum like all other Big 12 Schools have for Freshman Athletes except CU.





« Last Edit: January 09, 2007, 06:03:09 PM by sonofdaxjones »

January 09, 2007, 06:03:32 PM
Reply #50

BWisavag

  • Guest
you have to be the biggest idiot i have ever seen post on any forum, to tell you plain and simple exactly where you are wrong and you still are too stupid to see it... please go off and die somewhere... you are rediculously stupid its no use even showing how retarded you are because you are too stupid to understand it...


"The world needs ditchdiggers too!"
this pretty much sums up why you were allowed to live

January 09, 2007, 06:06:42 PM
Reply #51

sonofdaxjones

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 15644

January 09, 2007, 11:10:40 PM
Reply #52

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
since you dont understand i will continue to post this until you show proof otherwise...

what you have said, even if backed up by url is inept in proving the point you are attempting to make...

if you found said URL it would prove one thing, there is more of a bearacracy at baylor than at a&m... its that simple, i know that may be hard for someone from a school ranked so low to figure it out, so i will continue to post this so you can reread it.

 :popcorn:

What does "bearacracy" mean?
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

January 12, 2007, 10:52:54 AM
Reply #53

catsfan20012002

  • Guest
Now I get it!!!!! Coach McGriff's main responsibility will be to recruit the state of Texas.