BU loses top football recruiter to K-State

[catsfan20012002]

http://www.wacotrib.com/sports/content/sports/college/2007/01/08/01082007wacmcgriff.html

[catsfan20012002]

Baylor recruiting coordinator Wesley McGriff will coach running backs for Ron Prince at Kansas State after working with the Baylor cornerbacks for the last four seasons. He is reportedly leaving to replace first-year running backs coach Tim Horton, who is returning to the Air Force Academy.

[FBWillie]

no offense... but do you actually read any threads before you post new ones?

[greasd up deaf guy]

no offense... but do you actually read any threads before you post new ones?

http://www.ksufans.com/forums/index.php?topic=5887.0
That's not '01-02's only problem.

[BWisavag]

yeah baylor has a lot of talent 

[sonofdaxjones]

Baylor has higher academic standards then everybody else in the Big 12 except CU.   Therefore it's more difficult to recruit there . . . it would seem an AgSquawk would know this.

[BWisavag]

are you kidding me???

OU's academic standards are crap

Baylor's academic standards are as following; You have money, Check, ok, you get admitted

A&M and Texas are the two hardest schools to get into academically each year, they are the hardest schools to get into in the south... look at the average SAT numbers and class ranking for the following schools,

Texas A&M
Texas
Baylor
OU

OU will be 3rd in the list behind Texas then Texas A&M

you are an idiot

[BWisavag]

National school rankings are as follows

47. Texas
60. Texas A&M
81. Baylor
112. Oklahoma
124. Kansas State

sorry i was wrong, baylor is ahead of oklahoma

you are an idiot

[BWisavag]

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/college/rankings/brief/t1natudoc_brief.php

[sonofdaxjones]

No Big 12 School outside of Baylor and CU requires more then the NCAA minimum requirements for freshmen athletes.

Academic rankings and such have NOTHING to do with entrance requirements for Freshman athletes at all Big 12 schools . . . NOTHING.

You're a total dumbass . . . but by all means, keep posting.

[BWisavag]

i backed mine up, you didnt, lets see it

idiot

[sonofdaxjones]

The only thing you backed up was academic rankings, that had nothing to do with athletics.   

Lets read the Ags Self-Study for Athletic Admission . . . here is what qualifies as "Non-Admitted":


Non-Admission
The admission process ends with the student-athlete not being admitted when any of the following conditions apply:

1. NCAA core-curriculum or cumulative core course GPA requirement(s) is not met at the time of graduation as certified by the NCAA Initial Eligibility Clearinghouse. [NOTE: According to NCAA guidelines, learning disabled students may meet the core curriculum and/or GPA requirements by taking core courses in the summer immediately following their regularly scheduled date for high school graduation.]

2. SAT/ACT score not met after final test period as certified by the NCAA Initial Eligibility Clearinghouse.

3. The student-athlete fails to graduate from high school.

Translation-If you don't meet the NCAA minimum requirements, you don't get to be an Ag Athlete.

Nothing more, Nothing less.

http://www.aggieathletics.com/nonsports/FOOT/self-study/academic.htm

The document also discusses the differences between Ag Freshman athletes and regular student body Freshman . . . and again, (if you're smart enough to read the document) it clearly shows that all that's required is the NCAA minimum.

[BWisavag]

you have not backed anything up

[sonofdaxjones]

I backed everything up . . . it's the offiical admission process of Texas A&M athletics.

Again, nothing more then the NCAA minimum requirements for incoming scholarship freshman athletes.

Apparently you're not capable of reading the document.

You're a total dumbass.

[BWisavag]

you gave A&M's

not gaylors

man it seems KSU has pretty weak admissions

[BWisavag]

to back up your statement you need to provide both and compare them...

this would be like this situation;

KSUck fan :"Yeah man we did great against Father Kansas yesterday, we scored 82 points"
Father Kansas: "Too bad we scored 124"

yeah 82 points tells half the story

i award you no points,
may God have mercy on your soul

[sonofdaxjones]

LOL!!

You just went on and on about how tough it was to get into A&M (which is true for non-athletes) painting with a broad brush.  You "backed  up" your weak smack with general student body related academic rankings . . . which don't have anything to do with athletic admissions.

But now you've been proven wrong even about your own school and you still want to be a dumbass.

Sad . . .

[BWisavag]

what school is my school again...

and by the way... you have no backed up any argument

[sonofdaxjones]

Okay . . . and the only argument you've  backed up is that some Big 12 schools are rated high in academic ranking rags.  You've done NOTHING to disprove my original statement . . . NOTHING.   It's not me who is questioning anything, it's you who is questioning my statement about Baylor and CU.   You PROVE me wrong.

What school are you from Sock??

[BWisavag]

it seems you have given up on trying to find baylor's standards...

the burden of proof is on the originator of the statement...

[sonofdaxjones]

Baylor's admission for athletes who do not meet Baylor's standard requirements is as follows:


Admission By Individual Approval
In addition, applicants who possess special or unique talents or abilities in music, the visual or performing arts, athletics, or other extenuating circumstances who wish to pursue a degree but who do not qualify for admission may be offered admission at the discretion of the Admissions Committee upon the request of the dean, department chair, or athletic coach. Such admission may require attendance in summer school and/or entrance with special requirements.

What's your school again Sock??

[BWisavag]

1st post URL

2nd there is nothing noting that you need anything more then minimum NCAA requirements..

it basically says, "Get Guymo to talk to the dean and you are in"

[sonofdaxjones]

Difference . . . all incoming freshman at Baylor are required to through the same admissions process.

Texas A&M Freshman Athletes . . . just get through the NCAA Clearinghouse, standards far below the institutions standards for non student athletes, and the most basic admissions process that exists.

[BWisavag]

this is speculation, please back it up with proof

[sonofdaxjones]

I've already proved it.

You only get moved to the individual admission process at Baylor if you don't meet the standard entrance requirements.

At A&M . . . just get through the Clearinghouse if you're an athlete.

Game . . . set . . . match.

Now what school are you at Sock??

Tell us again how academic rankings predicate admissions standards for athletes.

[BWisavag]

again, if trying to prove something URL must be given

second, it just says that you gotta get Guymo to write you a letter and then the dean to sign it... its clearinghouse as well... i have a friend that went to baylor on a ftball and he is literally retarded

[Ameroogie]

again, if trying to prove something URL must be given

second, it just says that you gotta get Guymo to write you a letter and then the dean to sign it... its clearinghouse as well... i have a friend seat partner on the short bus we rode to school that went to baylor on a ftball and he is literally retarded. Given he was the valedictorian of our class, my only hope was to spread my gayness on message boards.

Appropriate edits made...

[sonofdaxjones]

again, if trying to prove something URL must be given

second, it just says that you gotta get Guymo to write you a letter and then the dean to sign it... its clearinghouse as well... i have a friend that went to baylor on a ftball and he is literally retarded

Oh okay, so you're incapable of finding Baylor's entrance requirements.  

You're second sentence is unmitigated speculation.  

Lets review . . . you attempted to:  1.  Back up your claim that Aggie (or whatever school you're for) and UT had tougher entrance requirements for athletes by rolling out 3rd party general student body/institutional academic rankings.  2.  You then attempt to refute my statement by saying things that are nothing but hearsay, innuendo and speculation.  Yet I am the one that has to provide all the URL's and cut and pastes from the official (Not 3rd Party Sources) websites??

Good gawd you are Aggie/Sock dumb.

[BWisavag]

you have to be the dumbest poster ever...

you realize liars go to hell right?

[BWisavag]

also, even if you were able to put forth the url, (which you seem scared to because you are making it up) that statement still proves nothing, it proves there is a different admissions process, not a harder... it just says there is more beuracracy, and at all schools once you are in you must be admitted to a college within the school, and through that admission you must mean minimum college requirements

honestly, give up, God hates you