Date: 22/08/25 - 04:33 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: so we were too good for austin panter?  (Read 786 times)

December 03, 2006, 04:08:16 PM
Read 786 times

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
so we were too good for austin panter?
v
Logged
December 03, 2006, 04:09:09 PM
Reply #1

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame
  • Offline
  • *******
  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
Don't like this one bit.

not even "yourmyboybuhl" can spin it.

http://netbuffs.com/message_board/football/2006/December/1/427702.php
Logged
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.
December 03, 2006, 04:12:10 PM
Reply #2

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
he really really really wanted to go to ksu.

if he tanked at lb, we could have tried him at de.
Logged
December 03, 2006, 04:12:23 PM
Reply #3

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • *
  • 2643
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
One look at that dudes picture and you can tell why we didn't offer.
Logged
December 03, 2006, 04:13:49 PM
Reply #4

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
Quote from: PoetWarrior on December 03, 2006, 04:12:23 PM
One look at that dudes picture and you can tell why we didn't offer.

cause he's white?
Logged
December 03, 2006, 04:15:28 PM
Reply #5

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
at this point in time, you could not convince me that houlik, perry, mcghee (SUCKS) or rosel are better linebackers than him
Logged
December 03, 2006, 04:17:51 PM
Reply #6

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • *
  • 2643
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?


This guy will fit right in, in the Big 10.

But not as our MLB

Diles is an athletic dynamo compared to this dude.
Logged
December 03, 2006, 04:18:41 PM
Reply #7

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame
  • Offline
  • *******
  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
Michigan wanted him.
Logged
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.
December 03, 2006, 04:22:59 PM
Reply #8

pwrcatjd49

  • Cub
  • Offline
  • 671
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
Next AJ Hawk?
Logged
December 03, 2006, 04:26:03 PM
Reply #9

mjrod

  • Second String Wildcat
  • Offline
  • ****
  • 11246
    • MJROD Consulting Services, Inc
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
Not sure he'd fit into Raheem's defense.
Logged
December 03, 2006, 06:11:02 PM
Reply #10

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
Quote from: mjrod on December 03, 2006, 04:26:03 PM
Not sure he'd fit into Raheem's defense.

too tall/big/fast?
Logged
December 03, 2006, 06:22:37 PM
Reply #11

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub
  • Offline
  • *
  • 2643
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
Logged
December 03, 2006, 07:47:10 PM
Reply #12

ds43fan

  • Guest
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
he's not gonna be that good  :bitchslap: :bitchslap: :bitchslap: :bitchslap: :bitchslap: :bitchslap: :bitchslap: :bitchslap: :bitchslap:
Logged
December 03, 2006, 09:41:02 PM
Reply #13

opcat

  • Scout Team Wildcat
  • Offline
  • **
  • 5189
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
I would love to be in on those coaches discussions on him.

Maybe one of you calls or 'emails' Princes show about him.
Logged
December 03, 2006, 11:03:57 PM
Reply #14

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
Re: so we were too good for austin panter?
i'm not saying i know better than prince, i'm just saying that michigan probably knows better than prince.

&@#%
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »