Date: 22/08/25 - 02:25 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Cat-Tracker updates  (Read 2021 times)

November 28, 2006, 10:55:20 AM
Read 2021 times

chum1

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6944
Quote
Orr remains in critical condition at Kansas University Hospital...Lawrence police say Simonsson did not comply with restrictions on his driver's license at the time of the accident.
http://www.kbsd6.com/Global/story.asp?S=5738504

Let's keep these idiots in our prayers.

November 28, 2006, 11:05:50 AM
Reply #1

PoetWarrior

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2643
Quote
Orr remains in critical condition at Kansas University Hospital...Lawrence police say Simonsson did not comply with restrictions on his driver's license at the time of the accident.
http://www.kbsd6.com/Global/story.asp?S=5738504

Let's keep these idiots in our prayers.

That sums it up.

November 28, 2006, 11:34:26 AM
Reply #2

jeffy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 7000
  • Personal Text
    ku Swallows
I had originally hoped that the driver didn't get any charges pressed against him, but that was before knowing that he was on restricted license with multiple DUIs.  Now I don't really care if they throw the book at him.

As far as Chris goes, hang in there buddy!  AHS c/90 rulz!

November 28, 2006, 11:38:26 AM
Reply #3

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
Why is it possible for someone to get 3 DUI's.  In some countries you lose your liscense for life after 1.
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

November 28, 2006, 11:51:58 AM
Reply #4

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.
The dude is going to die.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

November 28, 2006, 02:08:52 PM
Reply #5

rlatta

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 141
Is the driver the owner of the bus? if not where was the owner?

November 28, 2006, 02:18:51 PM
Reply #6

kougar24

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6966
  • Personal Text
    shame on you, non-believers
Is the driver the owner of the bus? if not where was the owner?

No. The owner is a lawyer from Salina, if I recall correctly.

November 28, 2006, 02:21:49 PM
Reply #7

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
The bus was auctioned off that weekend for a charity event.  Nothing out of the ordinary.
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

November 28, 2006, 02:31:55 PM
Reply #8

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Is the driver the owner of the bus? if not where was the owner?

No. The owner is a lawyer from Salina, if I recall correctly.

No, the original owner was a Manhattan lawyer who had a sloppy LLC set up and basically is &@#%ed.

November 28, 2006, 03:13:42 PM
Reply #9

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
Is the driver the owner of the bus? if not where was the owner?

No. The owner is a lawyer from Salina, if I recall correctly.

No, the original owner was a Manhattan lawyer who had a sloppy LLC set up and basically is &*$@!ed.
So is this the last we will ever see of the cat tracker?
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

November 28, 2006, 04:43:19 PM
Reply #10

KSt8er

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1550
  • Personal Text
    AAAAAHHHHH AAAAHHH
I'd bet it never rolls under those colors again, at the least.

As for the 3 DUI dude, lets not get too uppity, I'd guess that he was driving because he was the only one not drinking.  He otherwise will pay for his past mistakes, but I truly doubt that he was in any manner to blame for what happened.
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." -- Sir Winston Churchill

November 28, 2006, 04:46:01 PM
Reply #11

rlatta

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 141
Having three DUI's in the first place should have made him "the only one who couldn't drive"

November 28, 2006, 04:56:00 PM
Reply #12

KSt8er

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1550
  • Personal Text
    AAAAAHHHHH AAAAHHH
I don't know the particulars, or if they are even out yet, but it might well depend on the timeline of when they were received.  If it was over a 20 year period who knows if he was legally behind the wheel.  A restricted license can be given for many reasons, not necessarily does his come from the DUIs.
"He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire." -- Sir Winston Churchill

November 28, 2006, 04:57:44 PM
Reply #13

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
There are probably several people you could blame for this incident.  The owner for not putting some sort of lock on rear door while it is in motion; The driver for not making sure no one was on top of the vehicle while in motion; the 6 other people on top of the bus that didn't yell duck; But ultimately the real fault lies in the 8 people that made the decision to ride on top of a bus going 40 mph down a busy street.   I personally don't feel the driver nor the owner should shoulder any blame for the incident.  Sure they could have stepped up and said they weren't moving until everyone was inside, but people are going to make their own decisions in life.  

You could compare this to the seatbelt laws in Kansas - If your front passenger isn't wearing a seatbelt, THEY get the ticket... correct?
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

November 28, 2006, 05:00:34 PM
Reply #14

FBWillie

  • Classless Cat
  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3541
I don't know the particulars, or if they are even out yet, but it might well depend on the timeline of when they were received.  If it was over a 20 year period who knows if he was legally behind the wheel.  A restricted license can be given for many reasons, not necessarily does his come from the DUIs.

the above linked article says he received his DUI's in 1994, 1996 and in 2000.

It seems like a non issue in my mind.  A person with a clear liscense still would have had people riding on top of the bus.  A nun could have been driving and this still would have happened if people had made the decision to ride up there.  If he get's charged with anything, it should be held seperately from this incidental death issue. Fine for driving under a restricted license or whatever.
The comments posted above do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of FBWillie

November 28, 2006, 06:46:53 PM
Reply #15

ksuno1stunner

  • Guest
i know his daughter, she was pretty tight.  they won a lawsuit worth a couple million dollars.  her mom told her the good news by calling her at school and saying "how does it feel to not have to worry about money ever again"

November 28, 2006, 08:39:00 PM
Reply #16

Gimmered

  • Guest
Why is it possible for someone to get 3 DUI's.  In some countries you lose your liscense for life after 1.
1 DUI shame one you and pay the Judge. 2 DUIs you lose a limb. Pretty soon it will be hard to drive drunk.

November 29, 2006, 05:54:49 PM
Reply #17

PowercatPosse

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 808
Bob Potroff is the owner of the Cat Tracker. 

November 29, 2006, 07:24:40 PM
Reply #18

SWKCat

  • Guest
I can't believe you people are so quick to bash the driver.  What the hell did he do wrong????????????????????  He drove the bus!!!!!!!!!!!   He didn't have a commercial license.  Unfortuante that the accident happened but not the drivers fault

November 29, 2006, 07:30:53 PM
Reply #19

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
I can't believe you people are so quick to bash the driver.  What the hell did he do wrong????????????????????  He drove the bus!!!!!!!!!!!   He didn't have a commercial license.  Unfortuante that the accident happened but not the drivers fault

Not only did he not have a commercial license, he wasn't supposed to be driving a vehicle not equipped with a device that gives him a breathalyzer before allowing the engine to start.

He totally &@#%ed up....not necessarily "his fault", but he was a freaking idiot to be driving at all and probably deserves a lot of whatever crap is heading his way.

November 29, 2006, 08:02:22 PM
Reply #20

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
he doesn't deserve the manslaughter charges and the hundred thousand dollar law suit that will be coming his way. He deserves like maybe thirty days in jail. that's it.

November 29, 2006, 08:14:48 PM
Reply #21

rlatta

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 141
Thirty days? man, you are harsh.
 

November 29, 2006, 08:23:00 PM
Reply #22

ednksu

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1935
a guy with this kind of proven track record of responsibility needs to be in office!

Quote
You could compare this to the seatbelt laws in Kansas - If your front passenger isn't wearing a seatbelt, THEY get the ticket... correct? 
 
driver and passenger get a ticket, im assuming both are of age to be driving.  I think an unlicensed 6 year old without a belt gets a pass, little bitches.
Be a winner today

November 29, 2006, 08:24:43 PM
Reply #23

waks

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10290
  • Personal Text
    KSU Super Fan
Thirty days? man, you are harsh.
 
That was the penalty that the last person I knew of that got caught driving illegally on a restricted licence when he had three previous DUIs and that is why he had a restricted license.

November 30, 2006, 01:16:29 AM
Reply #24

Racquetball_Ninja

  • Guest
he doesn't deserve the manslaughter charges and the hundred thousand dollar law suit that will be coming his way. He deserves like maybe thirty days in jail. that's it.

Hey dipsh*t, have you ever seen what a fatality on the other end of a drunk driving accident looks like?  I watched a drunk slam into the back of a car wrapping the innocent driver around a steel pole while his pregnant wife watched from another vehicle.  I was the first person to get to the mangled car and I will never forget what that driver looked like nor will I forget his wife screaming as the car caught on fire. 

30 days... f*ck that, if you take a life because you're drunk and you kill somebody I say its at least 10 years with community service and parole for life.

If you're wondering the guy that was hit by the drunk driver ended up dying and his wife, child, and yet-to-be-born baby were left husband and fatherless. 

November 30, 2006, 01:34:27 AM
Reply #25

rlatta

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 141
Thirty days? man, you are harsh.
 
That was the penalty that the last person I knew of that got caught driving illegally on a restricted licence when he had three previous DUIs and that is why he had a restricted license.

Was there also someone who was killed as a result?  The driver might not be totally resposible for that persons death, but he has not and will not learn his lesson if he recieves yet another slap on the wrist.  Thirty days? you can't actually think thats all he deserves.

November 30, 2006, 04:09:06 PM
Reply #26

greasd up deaf guy

  • Guest
You can get infinite DUI's granted you can stay out of prison somehow. A guy that was selling a house that a client of mine wrote an offer on was in prison with 8 or 9. You can get your license suspended and still get behind the wheel. Then it's driving on a suspended license AND DUI.

November 30, 2006, 04:10:32 PM
Reply #27

greasd up deaf guy

  • Guest
he doesn't deserve the manslaughter charges and the hundred thousand dollar law suit that will be coming his way. He deserves like maybe thirty days in jail. that's it.

Hey dipsh*t, have you ever seen what a fatality on the other end of a drunk driving accident looks like?  I watched a drunk slam into the back of a car wrapping the innocent driver around a steel pole while his pregnant wife watched from another vehicle.  I was the first person to get to the mangled car and I will never forget what that driver looked like nor will I forget his wife screaming as the car caught on fire. 

30 days... f*ck that, if you take a life because you're drunk and you kill somebody I say its at least 10 years with community service and parole for life.

If you're wondering the guy that was hit by the drunk driver ended up dying and his wife, child, and yet-to-be-born baby were left husband and fatherless. 
I couldn't have said it better myself.

November 30, 2006, 05:00:06 PM
Reply #28

Houstoncat93

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 687
  • Personal Text
    It's good to be good again!
he doesn't deserve the manslaughter charges and the hundred thousand dollar law suit that will be coming his way. He deserves like maybe thirty days in jail. that's it.

Hey dipsh*t, have you ever seen what a fatality on the other end of a drunk driving accident looks like?  I watched a drunk slam into the back of a car wrapping the innocent driver around a steel pole while his pregnant wife watched from another vehicle.  I was the first person to get to the mangled car and I will never forget what that driver looked like nor will I forget his wife screaming as the car caught on fire. 

30 days... f*ck that, if you take a life because you're drunk and you kill somebody I say its at least 10 years with community service and parole for life.

If you're wondering the guy that was hit by the drunk driver ended up dying and his wife, child, and yet-to-be-born baby were left husband and fatherless. 

I may be wrong but I haven't seen anywhere that the driver of the bus was drunk.  I think the 30-day comment was what waks thinks should be the punishment for this particular offence.