Date: 23/08/25 - 08:12 AM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: Bennett, Colon vs. Wooly's big men.  (Read 1391 times)

November 22, 2006, 03:28:57 PM
Reply #30

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Sorry if this  has already been brought up but all wooly's best post guys were jucos. 

this is an unfair comparison until bennett and colon are juniors.  they will be much much better.

No, it's not, because you don't get two below-average to mediocre years from quality juco's.

We don't have the 5-8 rule anymore.  It doesn't hurt you much to take impact Juco's over non-impact freshman.

November 22, 2006, 05:38:04 PM
Reply #31

pwrcatjd49

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 671
im gonna ask a dumb question..and its only cause i cant remember or didnt care when i heard it...
but what happened to hayden?
Didn't he get pistol whipped and started having migraines all the time?

November 24, 2006, 08:50:27 PM
Reply #32

BarryMcCockner

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 586
Speaking of brain cramps, did Colon really forget to put on his jersey Sat. night?

It was the night that Bennett started, whenever that was....Colon was supposed to start, but when he got ready to take off his warmup...   :banghead:

February 08, 2007, 11:31:59 AM
Reply #33

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
Colon and Bennett are 4 year guys.  Massey comes really close, but I'd have a hard time not taking the two extra years and potential for growth than two-years of Massey.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

February 08, 2007, 12:20:34 PM
Reply #34

sys

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 10936
  • Personal Text
    gmafb
Colon and Bennett are 4 year guys.  Massey comes really close, but I'd have a hard time not taking the two extra years and potential for growth than two-years of Massey.

that is 2 years of dead weight with the 4 year players.  2 successive good jucos is far better than a 4 year player that takes 2 years to contribute.
"these are no longer “games” in the commonly accepted sense of the term. these are free throw shooting contests leavened by the occasional sprint to the other end of the floor."

February 08, 2007, 01:04:39 PM
Reply #35

Kat Kid

  • Administrator
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 8821
  • Personal Text
    warm up the EMAW
Colon and Bennett are 4 year guys.  Massey comes really close, but I'd have a hard time not taking the two extra years and potential for growth than two-years of Massey.

that is 2 years of dead weight with the 4 year players.  2 successive good jucos is far better than a 4 year player that takes 2 years to contribute.

Imagine what Massey could've been with 4 years at D1.  I can't be sure, but I think he would've been better than he was his senior year here.  That is the difference.  You have two possibly unproductive years that pay bigger dividends in the last two.  It is not a sure thing, but it is a feeling I have about Bennett in particular.  Part of Wooly's problems stemmed from his inability to keep anyone here 4 years, so I could be overreacting to that but I think there is something to be said for continuity.
ksufanscopycat my friends.

February 08, 2007, 01:09:24 PM
Reply #36

fatty fat fat

  • Premium Member
  • Hall of Fame

  • Offline
  • *******

  • 29013
  • Personal Text
    The very best.

Imagine what Massey could've been with 4 years at D1.  I can't be sure, but I think he would've been better than he was his senior year here. 

That's a scary thought.
It is a tragedy because now, we have at least an extra month without Cat football until next year. I hate wasting my life away but I can hardly wait until next year.

February 08, 2007, 01:13:55 PM
Reply #37

michigancat

  • All American

  • Offline
  • ******

  • 23713
  • Personal Text
    You can't be racist and like basketball.
Part of Wooly's problems stemmed from his inability to keep anyone here 4 years, so I could be overreacting to that but I think there is something to be said for continuity.

See:  Travis Canby, Quentin Buchanan*

*The two guys he spent the most time with.


Wooly's problem was he couldn't get any GOOD players to stay.  Also, Juco's hurt a ton more when the 5-8 rule existed.


If we're worried about continuity, we shouldn't go after the Beasleys and Walkers of the world.

February 08, 2007, 01:52:21 PM
Reply #38

ksu_FAN

  • Second String Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 11401
Part of Wooly's problems stemmed from his inability to keep anyone here 4 years, so I could be overreacting to that but I think there is something to be said for continuity.

See:  Travis Canby, Quentin Buchanan*

*The two guys he spent the most time with.


Wooly's problem was he couldn't get any GOOD players to stay.  Also, Juco's hurt a ton more when the 5-8 rule existed.


If we're worried about continuity, we shouldn't go after the Beasleys and Walkers of the world.

There goes a Woolite blaming the 5-8 rule again.  :rolleyes: