why settle for second when first is availabe?
Quote from: OX56 on November 06, 2006, 08:35:07 PMwhy settle for second when first is availabe?one problem ox, first isn't available..
NU won't lose to CU this year.
Three things have to happen for us to be big XII North champsin order from most likely to least likely1. Mizzou has to lose to either ku or ISU2. We have to beat Texas3. Nebraska has to lose to CU in Lincoln2003 has nothing to do with this MJ, we had control over that. We don't have control of the Mizzou and NU scenario.
The longest shot among the things that need to happen is KSU beating .
Quote from: Ċzİa on November 07, 2006, 12:56:40 PMThe longest shot among the things that need to happen is KSU beating .They are all pretty big long shots. FBWillie, I was already assuming that NU loses to TAMU..
Quote from: waks on November 07, 2006, 11:54:41 AMThree things have to happen for us to be big XII North champsin order from most likely to least likely1. Mizzou has to lose to either ku or ISU2. We have to beat Texas3. Nebraska has to lose to CU in Lincoln2003 has nothing to do with this MJ, we had control over that. We don't have control of the Mizzou and NU scenario.Then I guess we should just give nubb the Big XII title and cancel the rest of the games until the Big XII Championship.