decade #1 of new millineum complete and no NU conf. title...

[Gimmered]

I may be an old retard but you are wrong. There never was an 00 AD.

God if I' a retard what does that make you?

You are correct that there is no year 0, but the first "decade" if you want to call it that...only lasts 9 years.
Inversely, there is no complete 10 year decade to finish the B.C. era.

No the first decade lasted 10 years from 1 AD through 10 AD. A decade can also be from 1905 through 1915 I'm not sure when the DoD was. When did it start and how long did it last?

It has been a decade since Nebraska won the Big XII. But we do have a shot to win it in the first decade of this Millennium. That would be next year.

[Catfanatic]

glimmer is correct, we went though this in 2000 but most everyone ignored it anyway and everyone decided to celebrate the new millenium on January 1, 2000. Which was not correct. Oh well sometimes arguing with people who have already made up their mind on a subject is pointless anyway. (I find that happens often on this site)

Question to everyone. When you begin counting to 100 what number do you start with? I was always taught from kindergarden on though my formal education (BS KSU) that it is..... 1,2,3,4.......100. Not 0,1,2,3....100. So, therefore 1 is the first number of the decade, century or millenia. Thus nu has one more year before they are skunked for the first decade of the new millenia

BTW glimmer I was also born in 1960.

[Rick Daris]

glimmer is correct, we went though this in 2000 but most everyone ignored it anyway and everyone decided to celebrate the new millenium on January 1, 2000. Which was not correct. Oh well sometimes arguing with people who have already made up their mind on a subject is pointless anyway. (I find that happens often on this site)

Question to everyone. When you begin counting to 100 what number do you start with? I was always taught from kindergarden on though my formal education (BS KSU) that it is..... 1,2,3,4.......100. Not 0,1,2,3....100. So, therefore 1 is the first number of the decade, century or millenia. Thus nu has one more year before they are skunked for the first decade of the new millenia

BTW glimmer I was also born in 1960.

christ. just how many people on this site were born in the 50's? we've go two just in this thread.

also catfanatic, your incredibly flawed logic on why 1 is the first number of the new millenia was fascinating. absolutely fascinating. retardedly stupid, but fascinating none the less.

[The42Yardstick]

your incredibly flawed logic on why 1 is the first number of the new millenia was fascinating. absolutely fascinating. retardedly stupid, but fascinating none the less.

 

[Gimmered]

glimmer is correct, we went though this in 2000 but most everyone ignored it anyway and everyone decided to celebrate the new millenium on January 1, 2000. Which was not correct. Oh well sometimes arguing with people who have already made up their mind on a subject is pointless anyway. (I find that happens often on this site)

Question to everyone. When you begin counting to 100 what number do you start with? I was always taught from kindergarden on though my formal education (BS KSU) that it is..... 1,2,3,4.......100. Not 0,1,2,3....100. So, therefore 1 is the first number of the decade, century or millenia. Thus nu has one more year before they are skunked for the first decade of the new millenia

BTW glimmer I was also born in 1960.

NO! NO! NO! I just want to argue. MUST FIGHT WILDCATS!  

[Gimmered]

glimmer is correct, we went though this in 2000 but most everyone ignored it anyway and everyone decided to celebrate the new millenium on January 1, 2000. Which was not correct. Oh well sometimes arguing with people who have already made up their mind on a subject is pointless anyway. (I find that happens often on this site)

Question to everyone. When you begin counting to 100 what number do you start with? I was always taught from kindergarden on though my formal education (BS KSU) that it is..... 1,2,3,4.......100. Not 0,1,2,3....100. So, therefore 1 is the first number of the decade, century or millenia. Thus nu has one more year before they are skunked for the first decade of the new millenia

BTW glimmer I was also born in 1960.

christ. just how many people on this site were born in the 50's? we've go two just in this thread.

also catfanatic, your incredibly flawed logic on why 1 is the first number of the new millenia was fascinating. absolutely fascinating. retardedly stupid, but fascinating none the less.

For god sakes there was a baby boom! Don't you kids learn anything?

[Catfanatic]

Dude look it up before you call someone a retard. That is beyond retarded to be wrong and keep arguing. Decades, centuries & millenia begin with 1. This site is great example of public education at it's best

Wow I am done with this topic. Yep you name callers on this site are right again the millenia truely began on January 1, 2000. ROTFLMAO  

[Rick Daris]

Dude look it up before you call someone a retard. That is beyond retarded to be wrong and keep arguing. Decades, centuries & millenia begin with 1. This site is great example of public education at it's best

Wow I am done with this topic. Yep you name callers on this site are right again the millenia truely began on January 1, 2000. ROTFLMAO  

where did i say that the millenia began on jan 1, 2000? where did i call you a retard? because i surely didn't do either. you seem to have poor reading comprehension and problem solving skills which is sadly all too characterstic of your generation.

i simply (or maybe not so simply in your case) stated that your logic on why, which included counting to one hundred and starting with the number one was flawed. flawed and retarded. this is fact. see if you can figure out why. doubt you can. old people... gmafb.

[Catfanatic]

http://hypercreations.com/david/2001.html

You can go to numerous sites if one cares to take the time, it explains the reasons for confusion on this matter. I saw several and this is just one link I decided to post on this matter. Like I said I am not going to argue endlessly over a dumb topic anyway. If you use the gregorian calendar (which is what most of the western civilizations uses) then the dates begin with the number 1

[WillieWannabe]

this has to be the dumbest thread i ever read in my life....

[hemmy]

I am software engineer, and almost everything in computers is 0-indexed

So more often than not, I do count starting at 0.

[LimestoneOutcropping]

claiming that 1960 is part of the 50's just might be the dumbest thing that i've ever seen written on this website. congrats. also, your daughter sounds like a slut. no offense.

You are calling my 4 year old a slut? How david Letterman of you.


No offense was the problem this year. 

I thought he was talking about the easy one who got knocked up and created the grand kid.  Either that or your son only scores with sluts.

And baby boomers were close to 10 years old when you were born dipstick.

You desparately need to go back to school.

[Catfanatic]

I could not agree more willieW and I regret ever posting on this matter

[trumanorme]

Actually, if you really think about it, everything would have started on day 1, year 0. There would have to be a full year before you would get to year 1.

That should clear everything up.

[Gimmered]

claiming that 1960 is part of the 50's just might be the dumbest thing that i've ever seen written on this website. congrats. also, your daughter sounds like a slut. no offense.

You are calling my 4 year old a slut? How david Letterman of you.


No offense was the problem this year. 

I thought he was talking about the easy one who got knocked up and created the grand kid.  Either that or your son only scores with sluts.

And baby boomers were close to 10 years old when you were born dipstick.

You desparately need to go back to school.

Taught my sons that sex wasn't dirty unless it is done right. What did your dad teach you? Its best alone?

Mom took care or the talks with the girls.

Oldest daughter is still 15. Can't date until 16 house rule for everyone.

[LimestoneOutcropping]

claiming that 1960 is part of the 50's just might be the dumbest thing that i've ever seen written on this website. congrats. also, your daughter sounds like a slut. no offense.

You are calling my 4 year old a slut? How david Letterman of you.


No offense was the problem this year. 

I thought he was talking about the easy one who got knocked up and created the grand kid.  Either that or your son only scores with sluts.

And baby boomers were close to 10 years old when you were born dipstick.

You desparately need to go back to school.

Taught my sons that sex wasn't dirty unless it is done right. What did your dad teach you? Its best alone?

Mom took care or the talks with the girls.

Oldest daughter is still 15. Can't date until 16 house rule for everyone.

So it's dirty when it's done right?  You sound like a fine teacher, no wonder your son knocked up the town slut.

[Gimmered]

I could not agree more willieW and I regret ever posting on this matter

I've got to admit I don't think I've ever taken one down this far before. I should be shot.

[faultlessfreshcat]

glimmer is correct, we went though this in 2000 but most everyone ignored it anyway and everyone decided to celebrate the new millenium on January 1, 2000. Which was not correct. Oh well sometimes arguing with people who have already made up their mind on a subject is pointless anyway. (I find that happens often on this site)

Question to everyone. When you begin counting to 100 what number do you start with? I was always taught from kindergarden on though my formal education (BS KSU) that it is..... 1,2,3,4.......100. Not 0,1,2,3....100. So, therefore 1 is the first number of the decade, century or millenia. Thus nu has one more year before they are skunked for the first decade of the new millenia

BTW glimmer I was also born in 1960.

Well ill be your mother fracking retarted as well

[smurfinator6]

claiming that 1960 is part of the 50's just might be the dumbest thing that i've ever seen written on this website. congrats. also, your daughter sounds like a slut. no offense.

You are calling my 4 year old a slut? How david Letterman of you.


No offense was the problem this year. 

I thought he was talking about the easy one who got knocked up and created the grand kid.  Either that or your son only scores with sluts.

And baby boomers were close to 10 years old when you were born dipstick.

You desparately need to go back to school.

The baby boom was from 1946-1964, so he is, indeed, a baby boomer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boom

[LimestoneOutcropping]

claiming that 1960 is part of the 50's just might be the dumbest thing that i've ever seen written on this website. congrats. also, your daughter sounds like a slut. no offense.

You are calling my 4 year old a slut? How david Letterman of you.


No offense was the problem this year. 

I thought he was talking about the easy one who got knocked up and created the grand kid.  Either that or your son only scores with sluts.

And baby boomers were close to 10 years old when you were born dipstick.

You desparately need to go back to school.

The baby boom was from 1946-1964, so he is, indeed, a baby boomer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boom

But his son still knocked up the town bicycle.

[Tulsa Cat]

I don't think I have ever seen calender smack before.. I hope I never do again.  This must mean football season is over. 

FWIW I was really born in the fifties, 1959.  I married a younger  woman, my girls cant date yet. 

All you youngsters can suck it

 

[Oklahoma_Cat]

JFC, can we have a separate area for the old ballz?

Anyone born between 1900-19(75? That's probably a decent #) GTFO.  No wonder it smells like death around here.

[Shank Pushpi]

For the husker dumbass:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/decade_s_end_climate

[vanro031]

See Man-Crapper still has Husker Envy on the brain. 
Enjoy your bowl game Jr.