Date: 26/08/25 - 17:39 PM   48060 Topics and 694399 Posts

Author Topic: decade #1 of new millineum complete and no NU conf. title...  (Read 3806 times)

December 06, 2009, 11:32:01 AM
Read 3806 times

The Manhatter

  • Senior Cub

  • Offline
  • *

  • 2572

December 06, 2009, 11:41:09 AM
Reply #1

ksudrew

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 471
embarrassing.

 :lol:

and pellini bros as the face of the program - even more embarassing

 :lol: :lol:

December 06, 2009, 12:45:58 PM
Reply #2

Gimmered

  • Guest
Dip crap the decade runs from 1-10. One more year.

December 06, 2009, 12:48:42 PM
Reply #3

The42Yardstick

  • Argyle Square
  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 1474
  • Personal Text
    *A GREAT RUMBLING OF BASS AND MUCH SHAKING*
Dip crap the decade runs from 1-10. One more year.

Uh......no.

2000-2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009

2010 starts the next decade. Don't be a tard.
(Thanks to cyclist for the avatar)

Tired of all the angry? Come to me for your daily dose of "meh."

December 06, 2009, 12:52:43 PM
Reply #4

Dick Knewheizel

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 638
Didn't they play in the NC Game in 2001?  Did they not win the conf that year?  What a joke

December 06, 2009, 01:03:21 PM
Reply #5

Gimmered

  • Guest
Dip crap the decade runs from 1-10. One more year.

Uh......no.

2000-2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009

2010 starts the next decade. Don't be a tard.

Have you ever heard of the year 0 AD?

The decade actually runs 2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009-2010

Can't rewrite facts just because you're a wildcat.

December 06, 2009, 01:08:28 PM
Reply #6

LimestoneOutcropping

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6938
  • Personal Text
    Skate on Sister School
Dip crap the decade runs from 1-10. One more year.

Uh......no.

2000-2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009

2010 starts the next decade. Don't be a tard.

Have you ever heard of the year 0 AD?

The decade actually runs 2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009-2010

Can't rewrite facts just because you're a wildcat.


Don't really want to get into a big argument about this because it is lamesville but doesn't that mean 2000 was the last year of the 90s?

December 06, 2009, 01:10:13 PM
Reply #7

Gimmered

  • Guest
Dip crap the decade runs from 1-10. One more year.

Uh......no.

2000-2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009

2010 starts the next decade. Don't be a tard.

Have you ever heard of the year 0 AD?

The decade actually runs 2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009-2010

Can't rewrite facts just because you're a wildcat.


Don't really want to get into a big argument about this because it is lamesville but doesn't that mean 2000 was the last year of the 90s?

Yes it does.

I was born in the 50's In the year 1960. Is it clear now?

December 06, 2009, 01:14:06 PM
Reply #8

LimestoneOutcropping

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6938
  • Personal Text
    Skate on Sister School
Dip crap the decade runs from 1-10. One more year.

Uh......no.

2000-2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009

2010 starts the next decade. Don't be a tard.

Have you ever heard of the year 0 AD?

The decade actually runs 2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009-2010

Can't rewrite facts just because you're a wildcat.


Don't really want to get into a big argument about this because it is lamesville but doesn't that mean 2000 was the last year of the 90s?

Yes it does.

I was born in the 50's In the year 1960. Is it clear now?

It was clear before.  Just sounds extremely off.

Holy christ you are incredibly old to be on a KSU bbs.  I think you are like my parents age. 

December 06, 2009, 01:18:20 PM
Reply #9

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
I was born in the 50's In the year 1960.

Was the invention of the horseless carriage a big event for you gramps?
<---------Click the ball

December 06, 2009, 01:18:45 PM
Reply #10

faultlessfreshcat

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 124
Dip crap the decade runs from 1-10. One more year.

Uh......no.

2000-2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009

2010 starts the next decade. Don't be a tard.

Have you ever heard of the year 0 AD?

The decade actually runs 2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009-2010

Can't rewrite facts just because you're a wildcat.


Don't really want to get into a big argument about this because it is lamesville but doesn't that mean 2000 was the last year of the 90s?

Yes it does.

I was born in the 50's In the year 1960. Is it clear now?


You are a mother fracking retard old man

0 AD
1 AD
2 AD
3 AD
4 AD
5 AD
6 AD
7 AD
8 AD
9 AD

That = 10 years so the next decade strated like this

10 AD
11 AD
12 AD
13 AD
14 AD
15 AD
16 AD
17 AD
18 AD
19 AD

Well lookie there another 10 years
« Last Edit: December 06, 2009, 01:24:53 PM by faultlessfreshcat »

December 06, 2009, 01:29:06 PM
Reply #11

Pett

  • Premium Member
  • Junior Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8319
  • Personal Text
    Hey, basketball!!!
Yeah Gimmered, you are a complete dumb ass. Stop making NU look even worse then they are. And LOL @ Pelini trying to Dec. 6, 2003 the Horns. :rofl:

December 06, 2009, 01:42:21 PM
Reply #12

Gimmered

  • Guest
I was born in the 50's In the year 1960.

Was the invention of the horseless carriage a big event for you gramps?

Gramps is right. I have 2 and one on the way.

I also have a daughter 5 weeks younger then my oldest grandson.  :fatty:

December 06, 2009, 01:45:07 PM
Reply #13

Gimmered

  • Guest
Dip crap the decade runs from 1-10. One more year.

Uh......no.

2000-2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009

2010 starts the next decade. Don't be a tard.

Have you ever heard of the year 0 AD?

The decade actually runs 2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009-2010

Can't rewrite facts just because you're a wildcat.


Don't really want to get into a big argument about this because it is lamesville but doesn't that mean 2000 was the last year of the 90s?

Yes it does.

I was born in the 50's In the year 1960. Is it clear now?

It was clear before.  Just sounds extremely off.

Holy christ you are incredibly old to be on a KSU bbs.  I think you are like my parents age. 

I'm sure I have kids the same age.

I only come here because no one else like it when I make fun of dead people.

December 06, 2009, 01:47:13 PM
Reply #14

cireksu

  • Classless Cat
  • Cub

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2498
they'd probably be embarrassed if they knew how dumb you are.

December 06, 2009, 01:48:34 PM
Reply #15

Gimmered

  • Guest
Dip crap the decade runs from 1-10. One more year.

Uh......no.

2000-2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009

2010 starts the next decade. Don't be a tard.

Have you ever heard of the year 0 AD?

The decade actually runs 2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009-2010

Can't rewrite facts just because you're a wildcat.


Don't really want to get into a big argument about this because it is lamesville but doesn't that mean 2000 was the last year of the 90s?

Yes it does.

I was born in the 50's In the year 1960. Is it clear now?


You are a mother fracking retard old man

0 AD
1 AD
2 AD
3 AD
4 AD
5 AD
6 AD
7 AD
8 AD
9 AD

That = 10 years so the next decade strated like this

10 AD
11 AD
12 AD
13 AD
14 AD
15 AD
16 AD
17 AD
18 AD
19 AD

Well lookie there another 10 years

I may be an old retard but you are wrong. There never was an 00 AD.

God if I' a retard what does that make you? :eek:

December 06, 2009, 01:50:57 PM
Reply #16

LimestoneOutcropping

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 6938
  • Personal Text
    Skate on Sister School
Lonely old people make me sad.  Especially this time of year.

December 06, 2009, 01:51:32 PM
Reply #17

Rick Daris

  • Administrator
  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 5014
claiming that 1960 is part of the 50's just might be the dumbest thing that i've ever seen written on this website. congrats. also, your daughter sounds like a slut. no offense.

December 06, 2009, 01:56:17 PM
Reply #18

steve dave

  • Administrator
  • All American

  • Offline
  • ********

  • 23600
  • Personal Text
    Romantic Fist Attachment
<---------Click the ball

December 06, 2009, 01:59:01 PM
Reply #19

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
My god NU fans are dumb.  Also, 42Yarit is a ku fan, not an EMAW.
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."



December 06, 2009, 02:13:11 PM
Reply #22

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

December 06, 2009, 02:14:22 PM
Reply #23

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
« Last Edit: December 06, 2009, 02:20:53 PM by hemmy »
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

December 06, 2009, 02:15:05 PM
Reply #24

Gimmered

  • Guest
claiming that 1960 is part of the 50's just might be the dumbest thing that i've ever seen written on this website. congrats. also, your daughter sounds like a slut. no offense.

You are calling my 4 year old a slut? How david Letterman of you.


No offense was the problem this year. 
« Last Edit: December 06, 2009, 02:17:44 PM by Gimmered »




December 06, 2009, 02:32:03 PM
Reply #28

Boakai

  • Cub

  • Offline

  • 29
I may be an old retard but you are wrong. There never was an 00 AD.

God if I' a retard what does that make you? :eek:

You are correct that there is no year 0, but the first "decade" if you want to call it that...only lasts 9 years.
Inversely, there is no complete 10 year decade to finish the B.C. era.

December 06, 2009, 02:32:34 PM
Reply #29

hemmy

  • Scout Team Wildcat

  • Offline
  • **

  • 6020
  • Personal Text
    Anti-government
Problem is BC years went 9-1, and after that went 1-9.

Its all arbitrary, but only a complete dumb f*ck would think 1960 was in the 50s
"Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."